Woman should stay homes and raise kids

Another Liberal DESTROYED

Attached: nothing personnel kid.png (493x454, 396K)

The first

Kys
Choose one

come home working man and woman
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_People's_Welfare

>The Nazis provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft, which promoted the collectivity of a people's community where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated 8,000 day-nurseries by 1939 and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families and was involved with a wide variety of other facilities.[5]

>The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes and interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941.[6] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible "for travellers' aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; 'support' for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics".[7] The Office of Youth Relief, which had 30,000 branch offices by 1941, took the job of supervising "social workers, corrective training, mediation assistance" and dealing with judicial authorities to prevent juvenile delinquency.[8]

Do you have mommy issues?

Attached: William-Adolphe Bouguereau, Temptation (1880).png (1280x962, 1.93M)

Serious answer: the only reason why women are employed anywhere is due to government. If it was up to the free market, nobody in their right mind would employ women. Why would you employ somebody who at any moment could be incapacitated for 9 months and disrupt the entire workplace? Why would you employ somebody who constantly whines, has lower productivity, and ruins the atmosphere of the office? Government subsidies and regulations. Imagine what would happen if maternity leave wasn't subsidized, for example. Women would be finished.

Attached: women.jpg (1131x652, 393K)

what wipes out job is not open borders. its automation. the result being that many workers compete for few working places, making labor effectively (if no always legally) cheap

But the government should intervene in the economy, user.

Attached: Friedrich_List.jpg (368x450, 45K)

It's both actually but you are a retarded lefty so it's not like I expect you to actually comprehend that.

>what wipes out job is not open borders. its automation
People actually believe this. I can't believe these 8 IQ amoebas actually get to vote. What a travesty.

We're not married to the free market here at Jow Forums. We just hate scum like yourselves guts.

Attached: 1550854068777.jpg (1024x576, 76K)

This not either/or.

no its actually true. Mexicans dont work in factories. they work in hotels and agriculture. those are works that people usually wont dooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

I to suck on big tiddies

These have nothing to do with each other.

All of them, if women didn't work. That's how the US was before women entered the workforce.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-03-28 at 3.54.00 PM.png (1530x590, 124K)

It's actually really easy to tell why female employment hasn't increased productivity and wealth. That's because that employment has to be subsized by other productive employees, which are the males. Who is the one paying for all those maternity leaves? The guys. Instead of spending that money on their families and wives, they spend it supporting "career women" who aren't having children and destroy the business. It's the most retarded arranged anybody has ever come up with.