Explain how the constitution

- is any different than a king signing a promise that all his heirs will be benevolent.

At the end of the day, its still a bunch of people taking your money to pay others with guns to tell you what to do, including taking your money.

The American experiment has finally been revealed as a failed design. There is no democracy, not even representative, once a government reaches a size "large" enough that they can do whatever they want and you dont have shit to say about it.

Whether you want to admit it or not, democracy is an artificial contrivance and found nowhere in nature. Moreover, this nation was founded on ideas by French liberals, perhaps with Haiti being the first warning of where it was headed.

It is moreover the most easily corruptible because it relies on the artifice of 'law' not common sense and deliberately has too many moving parts, which is why it is the choice of globalists.

Attached: SpongeBob....The.....jpg (720x540, 109K)

>>>/reddit/

you're revealing something. democracy is not a form of governance. it's a governance used for showing and telling something. Notice it's a "demo". Like a software feature limited demo. So if it was an "experiment" it tried to achieve some sort of objectives. Maybe it was being used as "double edged" sword for technology transfer. Maybe it was being used as framework to look for intelligent life in the planet of the apes. Nobody knows. You're the weakest link. Not america per say. It's globalized world. Je suis america.

Critical thinking. This stuns the poltard.

Attached: Either Kenya or Baltimore not sure.jpg (3072x2304, 1.18M)

Tardb8

Attached: 1553477620489.png (255x6776, 3.46M)

A minor point: "Demo" comes from a word root meaning 'the people' if Im not mistaken.

But anyways, its not that the principle is flawed in idealism. The ideal is great. But in the real world, ideals are ideals because in reality, they dont really work.

It would be nice to think that everyone who enters or inherits the position of power whereby they use men with guns to collect money on the premise that it is a socially contracted law will behave ethically if a majority of people, the governed, will continue to consent to their actions and act on their behalf.

But in reality, once this system is in place, people are flawed and will steal, cheat and oppress to keep their own livelihood once in power. The herd will suffer this to keep peace and order until there isnt any.

It doesnt matter what the system is. Its just democracy is the most open to corruption. A bad monarchy is just as awful, just not as corruptible.

The United States was founded as a Republic in which only land owning white men with a minimum of 50 acres could vote.

>founded on the idea of french liberals

Citation needed for this blatantly false fact

Well it is fixable
Reed zeege

Democracy is flawed in all instances
Representative republics work in mono-racial societies

*demos

And look what happens. Sure, I can get distracted with the arrival of the Jew, but then we need to ask how the Jew insinuates himself, and we find that all the pleasant offices and laws of our charter are a welcome mat for Jewish tactics. But what are they?

Simply, a Jew talks. And keeps talking. If he keeps you talking, you wont act, you wont decide until he has worn you down with your own language and convinced you that you dont even know what your own language means or intended. This is law, and this is how its practiced. Our freedom loving charter is ripe for just such nonsense, so that 'all men are created equal' gets argued to mean that transexual Africans are entitled to my money to raise children in classrooms who end up despising my heritage under the banner of freedom.

So you are right, but I think pol needs to understand how these things work. Theres a lot of talk about who but not how.

Attached: 1379988374645.jpg (612x587, 62K)

Because the 2A.

Well at least you didnt use an ancap memeflag. But yes, you're right. By design, the constitution left itself open for editing, which was a massive mistake. If we still only had 10 ammendments, women and niggers wouldnt be the societal cancers they are now.

It wasn't until the Civil War that income tax was first instituted, and it was considered unconstitutional until 1913 with the ratification of the 16th amendment.
The Civil War, which was provoked by certain European nobles and bankers, was the beginning of the downfall of the United States as it was founded. It would have happened much sooner if not for Andrew Jackson. Lincoln said that the major objective of the war was preservation of the union, that's because he knew that without the union that Europe would fuck everything up again, but they put him in a check mate. His choices were to either allow the south to succeed and lose the union, or expand the powers of the executive office and hope that no future president would sell us out. Thank Woodrow "Cocksucking" Wilson for that.

Obviously the founders couldn't even conceive of a world where anybody would take a transsexual african seriously. There are flaws obviously, but the bill of rights alone much better than "a king signing a promise that all his heirs will be benevolent." since it has a built in mechanism for preserving liberty, and while it hasn't preserved it as well as most would have liked, it's still better than what other countries have, although the tree only has a couple leafs left.

Well, Wilson was a piece of shit, true.

It is ideal when it works, but you can say that about a lot of failed systems and their ideals. I just dont think it lasts or ever could, and this one in the US obviously doesnt have much time left before balkanizing. Every globalist has wished for this land grab for ages now.

I don't think balkanization is going to happen. Neofeudalism on the other hand...

You're right, let's abolish government, law, and borders. You go first.

> let's abolish government, law, and borders.

Well, let's see how we are doing:

De Facto abolished-

Laws
Borders
Government

I'd say we are almost there, Pierre.

Attached: animated harper.gif (317x211, 1.83M)

The constitution either allowed the country to become what it is now, or was powerless to stop it. SCOTUS is just an institution that passes amendments at this point.

Babby's first redpill?

Anarcho-tyranny. The government tyrannizes the public through censorship, spying, and taxes, but refuses to protect it from anything. Give us 30%+ of your income and we'll cover up rape gangs.

We have the worst of both worlds.

The following 15 points are based upon factual historical evidence:

1st: In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today - what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter "Corp. U.S.") owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution's 13th Amendment. The national constitution's 13th, 14th and 15th amendments are respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th amendments in their constitution.

4th: The corporation began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system-again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. It must be noted that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

7th: Next (also 1913) Congress passed and entered the 17th amendment as ratified, even though the states had no opportunity to ratify the same. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected.

8th: In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for re-election in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only.

9th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters WWI and passes their Emergency War Powers, and Trading with the Enemies Acts.

Shall not be Infringed you goddam commie

10th: In 1918, President Wilson is re-elected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where in the new Corp. U.S., only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation. The only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government officers.

11th: In 1933, the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.

Explain how you’re not a faggot.

Faggot.

13th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. They create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and a depository account number in the Social Security General Trust Fund (GTF). They give you the Social Security card which identifies you as the single person with authority to control the entity they created (on review: you may notice that the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, the GTF is its beneficiary and you were made its Trustee.) More importantly: this capacity does not limit you or your capacity to act in your sovereign capacity in any way.

14th: In 1968, at the national governors' conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people.

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us with any evidence you find that proves or disproves these facts.

When you find there is no error, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.

I don't disagree that there are problems, but they're problems that could be solved with additional amendments such as "only whites can be americans" and term limits for all government officials, and so on. Of course, none of those will ever happen, because too many are gaslit by the media to oppose those measures, but that's a problem that any nation is going to have once you let (((them))) into your institutions, no matter the form of government.

How it should be again. At least only landowners should be allowed to vo3.

will read, ty

The constitution is nothing more than a written version of what was already there,a declaration of God given rights

knew a lot of this, but some new stuff in there.

First. Historically democracy mean that only land owning right wing white males could vote, second what's the alternative?

Modern democracy is basically a jewish invetion.

That failed too because eventually it transitioned to modern democracy