Who are Jow Forums's favorite political theorist and economist?

Who are Jow Forums's favorite political theorist and economist?

>Adam Smith
>Milton Friedman

Attached: Milton Friedman.jpg (474x688, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dQiBD-crrvA
youtube.com/watch?v=B3B5qt6gsxY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

'Nuff said

Attached: 1496262563972.jpg (343x450, 33K)

>economist
Andrew Jackson

Attached: Baste Jackson.jpg (591x475, 51K)

care to explain why?

Attached: 1529300403979.jpg (850x400, 89K)

Attached: Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.jpg (300x167, 8K)

Karl Marx

Attached: marx.jpg (937x1024, 250K)

This book changes lives:
youtube.com/watch?v=dQiBD-crrvA

Attached: Basic Economics 5th Edition.jpg (225x225, 8K)

great man

Engels is way better, Marx is just a pussy

A fellow Sowell disciple. My man.

Fucking love knowing you guys are out there lurking.

We should create Basic Economics bumper stickers or some shit.

Attached: Jack.jpg (220x353, 22K)

Literally changed my life

Add Mises and Tom Woods to pic related.

Attached: D0F7A381-6C03-4802-BB63-5CF35A875880.jpg (750x741, 96K)

Hans Herman Hoppe

Jesus and Jesus

Attached: 1545700964379.jpg (125x108, 2K)

Same.

Attached: Leonardo-Dicaprio-Cheers.jpg (600x400, 26K)

Attached: 1545700973456.jpg (125x115, 2K)

>Karl marx

Attached: Karl marx.jpg (1656x1060, 238K)

You only had to stop caring what niggers think.

Attached: 1545700982481.jpg (125x94, 2K)

>is for faggots

You nibbas are on the right path but you need to upgrade

Attached: file.png (850x400, 234K)

>adolf
>the hitler

Aristotle is best to contemplate tradition. Gottfried Feder is best to contemplate modernity.

>this thread

Attached: 3DAEDA91-8D36-4317-B461-759FDC4AB008.jpg (347x509, 35K)

Alfred Marshall is to Thomas Sowell what John the Baptist was to Jesus.

Are Alfred Marshall and Thomas Sowell holy? Not by any means.

But still... Alfred Marshall doesn't get enough credit - despite the fact he tightened up Adam Smith's definition of VALUE. Which was absolutely critical to avoiding the mistakes that Karl Marx made (the dumb fuck).

Attached: Alfred Marshall.jpg (220x310, 13K)

The fuck?

Attached: don2.png (480x320, 164K)

Attached: 1553719375451.jpg (720x720, 398K)

Fredrich Hayek and Friedman supported Pinochet

Gengis Kahn

Attached: 2CF86C95-5BCA-478D-859C-B8931A63AA49.png (700x525, 680K)

I think he didn't get the credit in a public view unlike sowell who was able to go on television and make others learn about him.

Milton Friedman was the man. My introduction to economics. Thomas Sowell really brought it home though.

Attached: Thomas Sowell 3.jpg_large.jpg (2048x1024, 361K)

proof?

Very true. Thomas Sowell does go out of his way in Basic Economics to credit him though. So at least there is that.

Attached: Alfred Marshall 2.jpg_large.jpg (2048x727, 226K)

Mencius Moldbug and Hans Herman Hoppe

Dont you love how this thread is probably the only one to talk about politics but all the reddit lurkers and new fags rather shit post than talk about their political ideology.

Could not have said it better myself.

Attached: drinking.jpg (480x360, 14K)

fpbp

20:42
youtube.com/watch?v=B3B5qt6gsxY

whoever or whatever created Bitcoin

Attached: henry-hazlitt.jpg (640x948, 167K)

heaty kek, this can't be real but i'll look into rothbard.

Attached: 12345678753.png (898x496, 672K)

its almost like these faggots are just like the left, no independent thought. no logical reason to back just spewing more shit that they havent looked up their-selves. repeating what they hear on jewtube from some faggot who gets their fame by spewing more "facts" at unintelligent college kids and people.

Attached: 1548009328952.png (602x282, 164K)

Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard. Name a better duo, I'll wait.

>le HITLER & HITLER xDDDD
>implying a raging Austrian manlet who led his country to political and economic collapse knows anything about either sciences

Attached: 1517307486761.jpg (850x400, 84K)

Attached: 1508418531673.png (1500x1000, 677K)

God damn boy you sure do love that leather huh?
tongue shinin them walkers like your life depended on it..... shiiiiit moist those thing little man make them shine like disco balls

Attached: boot-licker-1-752690.jpg (400x295, 27K)

Attached: basedhoppe.jpg (275x183, 10K)

Attached: 1508415321273.png (900x500, 209K)

Attached: 1508417498614.jpg (960x322, 107K)

Attached: serveimage (3).jpg (1100x619, 115K)

explain?

eric clanton

Attached: cc0.jpg (591x379, 22K)

Attached: serveimage (1).jpg (1100x619, 117K)

Hitler and Hitler

Attached: 7698679.png (700x788, 21K)

how you gonna love Milton Friedman? you're the most boomier millennial out there... Milton Friedman is the Jesus Christ of the boomers.

Attached: 769768976.jpg (3840x2160, 2M)

This thread gives me hope, didn't know Jow Forums was so redpilled on economics, all these austrians and chicago(ans?)
If you can get past the fact that he's jewish (most of Jow Forums fails this test), Rothbard is just a goldmine of quotes

Attached: roth.png (1393x774, 208K)

>Who are Jow Forums's favorite political theorist and economist?

Attached: Al_Capone.jpg (233x216, 7K)

Attached: 54756756.png (700x788, 43K)

you should really watch this some time. its all about Milton

youtube.com/watch?v=B3B5qt6gsxY

i agree with his solution to education, welfare, and his prevention of monopolies.

your'e a dumb motherfucker then

Hilaire Belloc

"With others (G. K. Chesterton, Cecil Chesterton, Arthur Penty) Belloc had envisioned the socioeconomic system of distributism. In The Servile State, written after his party-political career had come to an end, and other works, he criticised the modern economic order and parliamentary system, advocating distributism in opposition to both capitalism and socialism. Belloc made the historical argument that distributism was not a fresh perspective or program of economics but rather a proposed return to the economics that prevailed in Europe for the thousand years when it was Catholic. He called for the dissolution of Parliament and its replacement with committees of representatives for the various sectors of society, an idea that was also popular among Fascists, under the name of corporatism."

Attached: new-york-amish-farmer.jpg (540x416, 142K)

I mean you are a total faggot, but I'll watch your vid

Damn.

Attached: picard reaction.jpg (825x464, 31K)

>This thread gives me hope, didn't know Jow Forums was so redpilled on economics, all these austrians and chicago(ans?)
Most of Jow Forums was supporting Ron Paul back in the past elections. Austrian Economics is the future but it has to be protected from leftist subversion like Hoppe states. A hybrid of fascism and Austrian Economics is the best theoretical political and economic system.

Attached: 1495226445782.png (1080x720, 134K)

Back to lefty/pol/ communist baboon

Attached: 1544427628090.jpg (723x723, 94K)

Damn straight.

Attached: Don Draper 2.jpg (310x411, 23K)

ill definitely will give it a look, like i said here i like his solutions to those problem, never called him a god or profit, im not blindly following everything that he says. i agree with what i want and that i think will make my country better. i take from all minds not just one.

care to explain or are you just gonna name call and go post on reddit how you owned some capitalist?

Hoppean Libertarianism Fascism is the best possible future we can have.

The hell?

Attached: oh shit no.jpg (624x464, 21K)

i've always thought that a hard core capitalist economy/no gibs/no fiat currency economy would genocide the fuck out of niggers and sneaky kikes. am i wrong? it always seemed like de-niggerification and de-kiking was always a byproduct of pursuing economic freedom and objective moral integrity.
sometimes i wonder, if there was ever the possibility of a third party election, what would an explicitly all-races advocate party that mostly benefited whites look like? i can't think of anything else other than straight, hardcore, old school, grit and merit based economics.

Attached: 167468487.png (960x880, 357K)

The grammar on that image.

Attached: Dear God.png (836x512, 508K)

have any more of that? its what i believe but i never had a name for it, just came from deep though.
i want a libertarian society but with closed borders, i mean 100% anyone who wishes to come in to the state(not nation) but be voted by the people and essentially on a probation period until proven they can be apart of that state (ie contributing to community or the economic growth of the state) if anyone (immigrants) wish to move before the probation period they must go to the desired states board for election to live into that state.

little bit of thought, any anons care to contribute or rebuttable?

>If you can get past the fact that he's jewish (most of Jow Forums fails this test), Rothbard is just a goldmine of quotes

I could not care less if someone is Jewish. I just do not care. It's such a dumb meme for the 98 IQ crowd.

Attached: cat nerd.png (668x668, 475K)

>and his prevention of monopolies.

Hm, I may have to look into his thoughts on that.

wow, a greek.... a guy who's country got litrally gutted by neoliberalism.... its doesn't get lower iq then that folks

when do you think America will leave its two party system and start going back to independent political ideologies?

pretty simple actually, just completely free and open market. if china is going to push the same product at a cheaper rate, the other company can either
A- make a better product
B-lower their product cost
C-go broke

>Most of Jow Forums was supporting Ron Paul back in the past elections
>Austrian Economics is the future

As long as you are not promoting the "gold standard" or discussing the "petro dollar" conspiracies, then I'm fine with you guys. Gold would just lead to deflation. And the value of the dollar is not just attached to oil - but the entire economy.

Attached: do you feel in charge.jpg (400x316, 40K)

Milton Friedman is one my favourites as well. There are some videos on youtube, where he explains very nicely what the purpose of a state is. I wouldn't support quite as minimalistic state as he would have, though, since I think a state should also try to reinforce unity, and that likely involves propaganda. Göbbels is also one of my favorites.

You know.... I'm really on board with what you wrote.

As for what I have to contribute? Perhaps Thomas Sowell. But honestly, I think we need to start organizing in rural and suburban churches if we really want to push back against the big business and big agricultural crowd that is pushing and pushing for cheap labor (and low IQ) immigration.

Attached: church.jpg (800x534, 196K)

If you don't forcefully prevent monopolies, you will get monopolies. A rich company can lower prices to drive all others out of business, and then raise prices tenfold. When new companies again pop up, it'll just rinse and repeat.

Amen to that, I wish I see such a thing happening sometime in my lifetime, it'll probably be in America, the culture and history is very conducive and there's already small examples popping up (Free State Project etc.)
I'm sure America would practically be a white ethnostate once again if such a thing were ever to be implemented, nonwhites literally live for socialism, with the ability to discriminate/no civil rights act and no welfare state they're done, very little incentive for them to stay there, especially when there's shitholes like Germany/UK etc around which basically pay money to get replaced.

if you can pass any law to prevent monopolies what would you pass? and i dont think thats the case when it comes to a global market.

Mmmm.... What happens if you have a company that made Windfall Profits for a prolonged period of time, and then decides to keep lowering the unit price so other competitors keep going out of business, and then after new competitors die out the Monopoly re-raises the price to an artificially high level?

The A, B, and C do not appear to cover that scenario - which is typical of how a Monopoly or Oligopoly operates.

Keep in mind - companies like Google (an oligopoly along with Microsoft) are no friends to conservatives.

Not trying to be a dick. I would genuinely like to know what Friedman has to say about this scenario. I'll probably research for my own sake.

Attached: question.jpg (259x194, 9K)

It's not a matter of passing laws, but a matter of the law recognizing when Monopolies or Oligopolies (via collusion) are abusing the Price mechanism of an economy.

And then going into action to break those entities up. It's not so much Prevention as it is Re-Action.

Attached: Hayek.jpg (580x800, 54K)

Why do you want your money to become less valuable? Are you retarded for real or just larping?

You said it simpler than I did. Cheers.

>Why do you want your money to become less valuable?

WHAT??????????????????????????????????????????

How are you defining "VALUE"?

Attached: dondraperwhat.jpg (340x244, 21K)

>A rich company can lower prices to drive all others out of business, and then raise prices tenfold. When new companies again pop up, it'll just rinse and repeat.

Myth. You asserted this with no evidence, so I'll just go ahead and dismiss it with no evidence. I'm just curious, who told you this nonsense? You do realize that price X at time Y isn't the sole determinant of consumer choice and market share, right? This is why several grocers, restaurants, and car dealerships can exist side-by-side in the same town, expensive but innovative products often outperform cheaper alternatives, and corporations prefer suppliers with good reputations and consistent delivery to those with the lowest price.

Such a juvenile view of the economy. It's quite easy to see that the lie, which originates among progressive activists of the 1900s attempting to justify unlimited government, was created to incite fear of liberty than provide any realistic, nuanced, and sound insight into the functions of an actual economy.

He's Polish

You said you dont want deflation and no gold standard but you want fiat based on "the economy". Did I misunderstand you?

>Gold would just lead to deflation
So responsible people who save will be reworded

>leave neoclassicals to me

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (487x487, 27K)

Sowell is The Man!