Give me your best arguments against Accelerationism, GO

not only baiting. notice word "fishing" and "angling" is synonymous? So i don't give a shit about (you) grand theft auto. No soup for you - you rainbow scum

Attached: cia_lgbt.png (1056x816, 234K)

The good answer of this thread.

For what purpose? So your shill ass can formulate stock responses against all of them for future use kek? Whatever, I'll play along.

Disorder and chaos only pay when you're already winning. Soros probably loves accelerationism because it allows him to implement his vile, insidious little plans at a more expeditious rate. The average person, on the other hand, is not apt to benefit from accelerationism in any capacity at all. Proponents of accelerationism argue that its implementation will magically result in revolution and liberation through the overloading and eventual collapse of systems that supposedly keep people in a state of complacence.

This is retarded asf for several reasons.

First of all, accelerationists have no understanding of human nature. People are not kept in a state of complacence by external systems; you could burn the whole fucking world down and destroy everything, and it would not change hardly anyone or make them more revolutionary. You could drive the government to act in the manner of an overt fucking police state, and most people will still just take it. People act like obedient, mindless NPCs because they are fucking NPCs, and there is nothing you can do to change that. Second of all, accelerationism is blindly, retardedly idealistic and accelerationists are stupidass utopians. Going back to what I wrote above, accelerationism only makes sense if you and your associates are already in a state of relative power and you have one or more viable alternatives to the established systems of control you are seeking to overthrow. As it is, the general plan of most self-proclaimed accelerationists on this shithole seems to be:
>1. Encourage governments and other systems of control to act in ever more repressive, restrictive, heavyhanded ways
>2. Blindly assume that the NPC retard masses will spontaneously embrace Jow Forums-approved politics as a result
>3. ???
>4. PROFIT
It's all just half-baked pseudo-nihilistic nonsense.

The Nick Land accelerationism in your pic is not always the same as Jow Forums accelerationism.

Nick Land's style accelerationism is something like this:
>Accelerationists argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified – either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself.

>Accelerationism, therefore, goes against conservatism, traditional socialism, social democracy, environmentalism, protectionism, populism, nationalism, localism and all the other ideologies that have sought to moderate or reverse the already hugely disruptive, seemingly runaway pace of change in the modern world.

But when Jow Forums talks about accelerationism, for the most part it's basically about accelerating what many see as the inevitable societal collapse due to an unsustainable global economy based on what seems to be some kind of grand but shaky Ponzi scheme, which would usher in a race war and white racial consciousness.

Attached: 1552056777749.jpg (600x334, 52K)

it's inefficient and will lower your gas mileage. a slow and steady acceleration towards a cruising speed of about 100km/hr is ideal.

This

I'm pretty sure it's a leftist tactic to try and convince people to give up, since supporting accelerationism means essentially becoming a progressive or communist.

It's also a Marxist idea that exists within the concept of class warfare and the inevitability of communism.

Just a reminder, your hereditary monarchy consists of two princes that are near inbred, leftwing nut jobs, one of which will raise a genderfluid child.

We once fought a whole war to ensure we didn't have a hereditary monarchy controlling things, it worked out pretty well, at least for a while.

Attached: sdfgqw34q3.png (712x475, 782K)

tarbaby hoaxfaggotry fuck you op you nigger
youtu.be/XES-AydpIoc
fuck attorneys, all jurisprudence dur dur deserves the rope

Because the left in the us is heavily damaged and we may get 6 more years of trump and economic growth that benefits the average Joe. Inb4 MIGA.

It is probably more useful to shatter the fragile minds of those that oppose 'us' than to tear everything down, at least in the short term as we watch how previous events play out.

Always shoot a traitor first.

>lets all cut our dicks off. That will show them.