Can someone logically explain why marrying extra women is forbidden in the west?

Because the rich guy would end up with all the women and 50% of the men would grow up knowing that they would literally never have a wife and children. This would necessitate wars in order to keep the male pop in check and create a system where men would be very willing to inflict violence to procure/protect a harem. But you already know this, shill.

Attached: 8654865987.jpg (2124x1413, 878K)

Judaism allows multiple wives. All Patriarchs had multiple wives. David, Solomon, anyway, read the Torah. An Ashkenazi rabbi said at one point no more polygamy because the Jews were afraid Christians would view the custom as sin and have additional reasons to persecute.

It's not. There's even a retarded TV show about a guy with 4 wives on TLC. You gotta move to Utah though to find any large communities.

Yeah, never got this. I think it is some vestige of Christianity, even though we are supposed to have separation of church and state and freedom from religion.
In my home country you can marry as many as you want. You just have to provide each one with a house and some land.
I think you also have to spend some minimum amount of time with each, but I might be misremembering that.

not having incels/rape since there 50% male 50 % female, it avoids having psycos in the streets

>1 million plus 1

Christianity. "A deacon should be the husband of one wife". Also, monogamy was a thing in Rome, so the two reinforced each other.

with the shrinking population of men who are actually capable of providing, polygamous arrangements are going to become alot more palatable for alot of people. this goes back to the idea of the top 20% of men getting the bulk of women or whatever, i know this to be true. alot of chicks are already sharing a man, whether they acknowledge it or not

Attached: tumblr_pay760qa2u1wp71epo1_250.gif (169x249, 906K)

>Can someone logically explain why marrying extra women is forbidden in the west?
According to JP it was done so incels wouldn't fuck up society with their rage.

Vikings had a polygamous society. So men would have to go other countries to get wealth and sometime even wives. Their weren't exactly diplomatic about this enterprise.

Vikings stop doing this with the introduction of a monogamous religion.

Not Mormons

Why did you guys cuck out. Father Abraham would laugh at you degenerate slobs and regret creating the tribes of Israel.

The amount of angry incl in this thread. Having more then one wife is how things should be the weakest shouldn't breed. if your offended its because you know your not in the top 50. And if you are incapable of loving more then one person you shouldn't have kids

A lot is tied to the idea of democracy and equality - every man gets one wife and one vote

there is no problom marrying multiple wives in judaism but it's not socially accepted

Honk honk
Let the clownworld honk

But if you have a wife, you have two votes ;)

Also fuck your fake equality, some losers don't deserve to breed

Fucking burger education system.

Primary sources about vikings being heathens and sexual degenerates were all written by Christian conquerors. These types of sources literally never depict the conquered people honestly, they always exaggerate their 'uncivilised' behaviours. Read the Poetic Edda. Pagan sources described loyal monogamous relationships.

Modern 'paganism' has promoted these historical lies so that whores can make their being a whore seem special by calling themselves 'pagans.'

Harems produce exponentially more social and economic problems than they solve.

Attached: warren-jeffs-wives.jpg (700x398, 41K)

Look at these shitty responses.
1. It destablizes society. Human birthrates are 50/50 Male/Female, so for every male that has two wives, another male goes without. Those males get angry and murderous or spend their lives rolling the dice trying to get rich and famous instead of contributing their labour productively.
2. It reduces the genetic diversity of the population. This makes the population more susceptible to disease, particularly genetic diseases.

In your case, Roach, your people added inbreeding to the unholy mix and that's the reason the Middle East went from being the Cradle of Civilization, and then to the engine-room of the Greek and Roman empires, to the utter disaster of subhuman infighting and chaos it is today. Every incestuous, polygamous marriage has a detrimental effect on the health and IQ of the following generation.

Father Abraham is so proud from his sky orbital seats watching you degenerates

He’s probably rooting for the goat fuckers shooting missiles at you now

gynocracy

The real question is, what are you going to do to stop me? Nothing
You can do nothing
and you will do nothing
kek

>Marrying 2 black women

Attached: MV5BN2ViMmU4NDAtOTZmZi00ZGZkLWJlMjMtZGNiMWY0NjE1ZTVmL2ltYWdlL2ltYWdlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjkxMjM5Nzc@._V1 (814x500, 59K)

Cuckstianity. The Jewish faith imposed on the West does everything to limit imagination, limit agency, limit our war-fighting abilities, and to tie our hands, force us to serve Jews, and not breed.

economist.com/the-economist-explains/2018/03/19/why-polygamy-breeds-civil-war

Do these women have names or are they just numbered?

We already have stopped you, legally.
I dont care if you want to have a bunch of cult followers or groupies or whatever literally sucking away on your success. But you will never have us give you legal recognition of the fact.

Attached: Eurobondage.jpg (678x1177, 228K)

>legally
oh you mean how you stop people from doing drugs illegally? Or guns? Or anything prohibited? kek

Ayyy boi 2 votes hahaahaha

I think your original point was pretty solid. But then again, I personally think you can only love 1 woman. She will occupy you so as there not being a possibility to love another

this

I don't have to do shit kek, the system is self-regulating. Most men are incapable of fully providing for fucking one female, let alone a bigass harem of them. What are your chances of getting cucked and divorce raped in a normal, monogamous relationship? Multiply that probability by however many females you want to hypothetically marry and logically explain to me why you think polygamy is a viable practice.

The Stench of feminized cuckboy.

>Getting scared of getting cucked and divorce raped
I guess this explains why you're arguing for state enforced distribution of pussy
kek

Because it destabilizes the society you faggot.

Is..is that a gay porn? Source please!

It creates an excess of single males in society because 80% of the roasties will go to 20% of the Chads.
Societies with an excess of forever-alone males tend to be violent and implode or else are constantly at war in order to get rid of the extra men.

Look around you, society is already teetering on degenerate. Look at all the lgbt fucks, all the coal burning, all the incels. Its already degenerate buddy, me marrying 3 girls is the least degenerate thing on the scale of degeneracy.

Attached: DXjmrFCW0AUdKnX.jpg (1024x768, 86K)

Dumb question.
Better question is; would the children of different wives be better or worse off?

he's right tho, sleeping around without scouting for prospects who will carry your child to term and be a good mother is peak degeneracy. Modern roastie women wouldn't be they way they are if men didnt excuse or encourage thot behavior. You'll understand when you get older

Are you muslim?

concept is wee bit different friend...
Legal recognition of the marriage, along with associated benefits would be what your trying to get.

Like I said, you basically just a guy with a bunch of sheeple parasites without the legal recognition.

Plus: don't think for a second there aren't hundreds of thousands of guys like this in america. Your just another.

Sorry that I do not believe that it is in the best interests of a healthy society for a minority of men to be allowed to monopolize the resource that is pussy.

Attached: DeficientOblongAfricanwilddog-size_restricted.gif (335x251, 3.38M)

Because we actually have ethics and believe in God in this country still you filthy sand nigger. At least some of us do. Keep your niggerdom to yourself.

Attached: 1511555486492.jpg (600x555, 78K)

E.g. every filthy Semite sandnigger society ever.

I believe its in societies and the white races interest to ensure that high quality males that are able to socialise and dominate to the point they breed should be able to breed women that would otherwise become spinsters. Don't kid yourself, not everyone is going to breed and its not because of polygamist attitudes, its because they don't have what it takes to actually get to that point.
The Waffen SS actually told their soldiers to go out and breed as much as possible, more white people is never a bad idea, unless you're suggesting that genetics don't matter nearly as much as culture does. womp womp

Those hairstyles are horrible, and those homemade uniforms are unbecoming and awkward. Several of those women would be attractive with a stylist. Others can't be helped. A few look underaged.

The incest vibes are off the charts. He's an old man, there's no way he's giving each the attention they need. Secret cuckolding has to be a thing.

Monogamy is a pillar of the west and considered moral. You can have polygamy in your dump. Stay there, please.

A lot of good breeding future crazy cat ladies will do you when, by the very virtue of them being the sort of garbage-tier females likely to become spinsters, you're probably just going to get divorce raped and be forcibly separated from your children by the state, leaving them to be raised in a single mother household. Jesus fuck you Australians are retarded.

Attached: 1464235578026.jpg (306x306, 68K)

The only reason I don't have a Harem is Jews. Also they feminized me and brainwashed me to be afraid of everything... I should be a Navy Seal, but I'm not BECAUSE OF JEWS!

...

Chad already has de facto polygyny, nobody is stopping you from moving in with 20 nubile Aryan princesses except yourself... The government won't give you a little paper saying you're married, but if you want I can write you a letter saying Odin approves and you can print it up and frame it.

Attached: 71m2HTRAAHL._SX342_.jpg (342x326, 25K)

Because with gay marriage laws if a man can marry multiple women, a woman can marry multiple men and those women and men within those marriages can each marry several women or men , a man can have 2 husbands and 2 wives etc. this is tribal and within our court system spouses cannot testify against each other.

FPBP. Underrated response. The legal nightmare attched to a polygamous marriage is the only reason pedophilia will be legalized before polygamy.

If one man has 50 wives, what's to stop each wife from having 50 husbands of her on? It would be a violation of human rights to demand that women must be monogamous to their polygamous husband.

Tax time, welfare benefits, alimony and criminal law would create a whole new breed of lawyer.

One man with four wives means three men will have no wives. Societies that have large numbers of men who do not have the investment of a family or means to gain one end up with massive instability and war. You are not Chad: the likelihood of you being the man banging multiple women are just as high as they are now. Wives and their children are very expensive. Even if you had enough money to support your wives and all the children, you will not have enough time to guide and raise them all, resulting in a pseudo-single mother effect on the children. Most women hate each other and having more than one in the household competing for higher status will destroy the family's stability as they attempt to destroy each other in jealousy and spite. Horrible, horrible idea.

Lmao. Polygamy would destroy alimony, because it is in the interest of the non divorced wife to secure your resources from the one that you divorced.

>Chad already has de facto polygyny
No he doesn't. Chad is a mere fucktoy who gets passed around by females whose whorish hedonistic desires are legitimized and facilitated by technology. You're insinuating that Chad is the one in control of females, when it is actually the opposite: pussy calls the shots, and Chad is ultimately just another clown in this stupid fucking clown world.

Why should I care about other men?
What kind of cuck shit is this, you are practically going socialist on me over "comm-unitizing pussy"

>Why should I care about other men?
Because we live in a society, dipshit. What stops you from going around and killing anybody who looks at you funny?

They don't even have numbers.

They're each getting welfare benefits, Uncle Sugar is their real Daddy. Mormons are running the same polygamous welfare scam as Hasidic Jews.

Honestly it probably has to do with Christianity being the US primary religion starting out as for why Europeans I haven't a clue.

absolutely based response my dude, legit

Muslim flag, your opinion is invalid.

>non divorced wife
Hahahahah, I chuckled, you're forgetting the domino effect.

EET IS LURVE YEW EEDIOT

Lmao think about this.

You marry 10 women. Do you think when 1 divorces you, the other 9 are going to allow her to take 50% of your stuff, or even let you pay her child support and alimony to the level that allow her to keep her prior quality of life? Having 10 women entitled to your resources protects you in a democracy where women vote.

Alot of these posters are triggered women.

Attached: MV5BMjQ1MjA5OTIzNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDg2NTc5NTM@._V1_.jpg (1000x1500, 288K)

One man, one woman. All else is degeneracy.

Wrong bucko. Populations grow much faster when society allow more than 1 wife. See muslumland vs the west

because unwed young men would raise hell on earth... just look at the Muslim world where polygamy is rampant

They become spinsters because they fall between the cracks, they don't start off crazy cat ladies m8
If they are so worthless, why are you asspained that others want to take them off your non existent hands?
>divorce rape
Fucking kek the absolute state of Jow Forums larping as Jow Forums

Remember anons polygamy is degenerate. Polygany is wholesome. There is a big difference between the two.

Nigga why would someone have multiple wives if he is not going to service them at the same time?

>pussy is a great motivator for men

Original idea was 1 man 1 women. When this rule is not enforced top 20% of male population get all the girls. Bottom 80% of men (majority) are not motivated anymore. They work for bare minimum or below that or simply give up all together, leech of the system instead of contributing. When majority of men don't want to work anymore society starts to crumble.

Attached: 1545465524857.jpg (828x979, 409K)

Polygamy has been so strongly associated with child rape and child abandonment it needs to be illegal here. Thank you Mormons.

Because those 3 wifeless men will kill you, your 4 wives, and all your children. That is why you should care. Their feelings don't matter really, but the actions they take as results of feeling do. Idle, frustrated men are dangerous when they have nothing to lose. Especially in large numbers.
It is not a matter of pussy distribution but longterm investment in one's society and individual livelihood.

That's bullshit and you know it. Or you are a teenage girl.

You are absolutely right about that.

>divorce raped
Divorce rape is not really a thing outside the US. Thank your oh-so-conservative politicians for this.

Hypergamy is bad for society. Men without skin in the game become depressed, alcoholic, stop working, turn to crime and violence. Religions promote monogamy because it's what kept the society functioning.

Western civilization is starting to collapse for a variety of reasons - most of them started with giving women the vote - but one of the biggest reasons is the destruction of the family.

We have it too, your wife takes half your shit and most likely the kids, and prenups don't even work unless your lawyer is an expensive gigakike.
I think the aforementioned stuff is more or less the same in most of Europe, with some countries even more cucked - for example frogs have to pay alimony for children that are not genetically theirs

It creates instability in the society.
archive.is/xtXhY
>Polygamy nearly always means rich men taking multiple wives. And if the top 10% of men marry four women each, then the bottom 30% cannot marry at all. This often leaves them not only sexually frustrated but also socially marginalised.
>Young bachelors who cannot afford to marry also make easy recruits for rebel armies. If they fight, they can loot, and with loot, they can wed. In a paper published last year, Valerie Hudson of Texas A&M University and Hilary Matfess of Yale found that a high brideprice is a “critical” factor “predisposing young men to become involved in organised group violence for political purposes”. Jihadist groups exploit this, too. One member of Pakistan’s Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the attack on Mumbai in 2008 that killed 166 people, said he joined the organisation because it promised to pay for his siblings to get married.

Attached: polygamy.png (658x607, 553K)

based and absolutely true

>frogs have to pay alimony for children that are not genetically theirs
Holy fuck, no one can be THIS much of a cuck.

Attached: 1551154788920.gif (400x225, 513K)

Matthew VI:24:
No man can serve tvvo masters. For either he vvil hate the one, and loue the other: or he vvill sustayne the one, and contemne the other. You cannot serue God and Mammon.

Attached: Christ-the-Pantocrator.jpg (599x814, 79K)

Allow it, for both genders. I want to see thots followed by a flock of basedboys.

Who's gonna stop me if I don't advocate state sanctioned marriage?

Polygamy is illegal, yet we still have sexually frustrated incels that join fringe political movements as a way to literally COPE.

Since we have a birthrate problem, we may as well just legalize polygamy.

Attached: 1411869006978.gif (384x216, 1.98M)

How does loving women equate loving money?

Vote against you.
And guess what, we already won that fight.

Wasn't/isn't it only really Islamic royalty and really wealthy men who do/could marry multiple women? Your average man can neither afford it nor manage the household with four women

Read it again, only instead of focusing on the single example at the end, use your critical thinking skills to understand where else a man may serve two masters.

Attached: dog-autism.jpg (574x382, 44K)

for once I agree with Muslim OP. Western countries are supposedly a liberal democracies. If two women consent to marrying the same man and he is consenting as well, it should be their liberty to do so. fuck hypocrite liberals who preach for gay sex but muh polygamy, muh no true love, muh civilization

>if you're able to "love" two women, you clearly have no clue what love actually is
pussy. keep gargling on that σoy, you fucking faggot.

Quads of truth
/thread

Attached: 46CF6BAD-F12F-4F64-A66E-0C2AC28B169C.jpg (640x1972, 184K)