Who are Jow Forums's favourite political thinker and/or economist?

For me it is Hans Herman Hoppe.

Others I enjoy are Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Henry Hazlitt and of course Frédéric Bastiat.

Attached: tripleh.png (208x242, 71K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/channel/UCxDEhf6zZmDjWdRF_Nt-VKg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butter_mountain
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Hans Herman Hoppe
I agree

Attached: 1508418531673.png (1500x1000, 677K)

Attached: 1481556534387.jpg (412x257, 28K)

Lauren Southern is saving the white race one youtube video at a time.

Attached: 1483370559355.jpg (477x641, 85K)

Attached: 463456456546.jpg (850x400, 85K)

Attached: 1508417498614.jpg (960x322, 107K)

Attached: based hoppe.jpg (1024x667, 81K)

Attached: 70yf9u4Y_400x400.jpg (360x360, 17K)

You are my kind of nibba!
What books should I read if I want to get this Lauren Southerns views on politics or economics?

Attached: 43643643645.jpg (850x400, 88K)

F

are there backups somewhere?

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn is fantastic as well

Attached: 1551544838432.jpg (729x828, 124K)

Yeah, the free market did so much good for the west in the last 50 years. I mean look how good it is! Anarcho capitalism is inherently international capitalism and would require the abolition of borders to even try to work.

Ayn Rand

Attached: 63922837-094F-49A0-A1C5-973F701B011E.jpg (480x480, 61K)

Attached: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn .jpg (735x387, 147K)

Read Hoppe fag

The only book you really need to read is the bible.

tariq nasheed
but you racists wont understand, hes to hi abouve you

That is a lie. Free trade means just that, trading free of government interference. Borders has nothing to do with that, mate. You can have an ethnostate, if you wish, and still practice austrian economics.

Yuri Bezmenov is great as well

Attached: 1517259200111.jpg (640x274, 58K)

His only good perspectives are his anti democratic views and critique of communism. "Democracy: The god that failed" is worth a read though. Otherwise anarcho capitalism is inherently internationalistic

Attached: 1517245347906.jpg (697x462, 56K)

Hoppe is amazing and unironically one of the brightest political thinkers alive.

Sounds like you didn't read any Hoppe. Keep regurgitating your memes.

Attached: DSC_0560.jpg (1228x1280, 298K)

(((Ayn Rand)))

While I do agree that one should read the bible. I do feel that it lacks in the economics department. Wouldn't you agree?

Laissez-faire economics and neo liberalism are the thing that inherently ruined the west post WW2. Feel free to disprove me

He has a new channel
youtube.com/channel/UCxDEhf6zZmDjWdRF_Nt-VKg

Francis Parker Yockey

Attached: 76B2361A-FD75-4EC0-AE9D-90983CD8B3AC.jpg (262x320, 27K)

I was just saying that Anarcho Capitalism is anti borders and internationalistic.

Hate to say it, but (((Hannah Arendt)))

>Laissez-faire economics
Why do we all have central banks then?

Attached: Central Banking.jpg (850x400, 55K)

D.ubs confirms

Gottfried Feder

Now that sounds like something an atheist would say.

I lost so much respect for Heidegger after I found out that he banged her

Attached: 7BAA7E19-F8A7-4B1E-A4F4-C2C813E52AD1.png (599x396, 347K)

I feel that It is not I that should disprove you, I feel that it is you that should prove your statement.
I am very spiritual.

>I feel that it is you that should prove your statement.
Well, has there been any other system that existed in the west? One that doesn't have a free market?

Private property is a border and freedom of association is anti-globalist. These two worked well in the USA for most of it's existence, until the left established a central banking cartel and subverted the education system.

We don't have a free market you retard.

I don't know of any modern market that has been free of regulations for any serious amount of time, at least not in the west.

>Private property is a border
Yeah, it's no border of a state or land of any kind. For Anarcho Capitalism to exist, states would have to be abolished and for a government to be a government it needs a piece of land to govern, and since there would be no governments there would be no borders. And how would you convince the whole population to care about private property so much as to an anarcho capitalist society being able to exist?

If we had a free market, we wouldn't have hundreds of thousands of pages of regulation centrally planning the economy and a central banking cartel centrally planning the money supply (that we are legally not allowed to stop using)

So private property is not a border in your country? Trespassing is not a crime?

>And how would you convince the whole population to care about private property so much as to an anarcho capitalist society being able to exist?
They already do here in the USA for the most part.

There is nothing in the school of Austrian economics that prohibits any number of people to band together and form their own "government". And we don't need to convince anyone, what we do need is physically remove anyone not adhering to the non-aggression principle.

Yeah you're right. But a free market would allow any sort of degeneracy to flourish because as long as there would be people to consume and would continue ad infinitum. So I don't really find that as the best solution to save the west.

Someone would own the land on which said degenerace takes place and would have the right to forcefully remove any unwanted person or activities from said land.

Consumption is fueled by central banking and low interest rates. None of this was a problem in the USA pre-1914. Look, I don't think we are just going to magically adopt Anarcho-Capitalism or even that Anarcho-Capitalism is possible right now. I just think the Hoppe will be proven correct in the future.

Yeah see this is exactly why an anarcho capitalist will never come into fruition. People would never willingly do or commit to something like this. That's exactly why one has never existed thus far.

Yup, a Russian soap bubble. With a damn good philosophy. Anti-kike mind virus.

Attached: 50F70808-A8AE-4B71-81AA-9D05E16CBFD4.jpg (480x453, 95K)

>I just think the Hoppe will be proven correct in the future.
Well then only time will tell if you're right or not, nothing else.

I feel like you are not consistent in your arguments mate. To me it seems like you just don't like freedom and don't want anyone else to either. Why I ask?

How is this:
>this is exactly why an anarcho capitalist will never come into fruition
Consistent with what you wrote earlier:
>Yeah, the free market did so much good for the west in the last 50 years.

>People would never willingly do or commit to something like this.
Maybe not there but this isn't an uncommon idea in US history. Different cultures and different histories though. This is the main reason I think Anarcho-Capitalism would only be possible in the future if shit gets better. Culture has to change first and the nigger ideas of the left have to be eliminated by fascism before anything like Anarcho-Capitalism can work.

Hoppe isn't even in favor of an absolutely unregulated market, he's mostly against the government interfering in price signaling which never produced any good results. See
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butter_mountain

The only people better than Hoppe are the founding fathers

Attached: 1fe7689a239459a3d880e52e0.jpg (324x324, 20K)

Also, Monarchy is something Hoppe has spoken highly of as well from time to time. He's quite a bit different from most Anarcho-Capitalist

Attached: 1508415619452.png (920x1250, 1.12M)

Some people misinterpret Hoppe as saying monarchy is the best system, he simply says monarchy is 10 times better than democracy unless the monarchs inbreed

Attached: 1548009328952.png (602x282, 164K)

Hitler

>Jow Forums is one person
Go suck some more migrant dick dumb fucking swedecuck

Attached: BE5D6AAB-9B86-42D1-87E6-AF1FE56A24F4.png (320x312, 61K)

Attached: ancrap.png (838x1452, 404K)

Attached: ancuck.jpg (500x397, 23K)

Attached: ankike muttlover.png (1920x1080, 706K)

I do feel monarchy is the way to go. Or maybe something with a very strong constitution, like the USA a long time ago.
Any sytem where plants a three in which shade they will never sit in, or fruit they will never taste is better then anything we have today.
I dream of the day europe is constituted of 10.000 Lichenstiens.

Attached: ancap anti-white.png (1572x216, 25K)

THIS

Attached: 1553013717672.jpg (255x255, 13K)

Attached: ancucks.jpg (1200x565, 122K)

I get were he is coming from. The incentives to provide the public with just leadership are more prevalent in a monarchy then in a democracy. Democracy is just a popularity contest where the nigger that wins didndu nuffin when he fucks shit up because he can blame it on the bureaucratic mess running the system behind the scenes.

Hoileeeee fuk

He just asked you who your favorite philosophers are you stupid statist
lmao why are you commies so mad?

Attached: lolbergtardianism.jpg (1500x894, 612K)

Attached: lolbert.png (482x918, 448K)

Attached: lolbertarian retard.png (550x492, 651K)

Attached: (((individualism))).png (2500x1912, 2.98M)

Oh look, Erich Honecker is having a hissy fit

Attached: 821a938059441f09349032536685f2cb5780cf0ec2d6f2790b24d28f41af.jpg (255x223, 12K)

Yeah, It really is something isn't it?

Attached: 1464566475072.jpg (515x790, 111K)

Attached: 1465253769676.jpg (480x470, 31K)

Attached: 1465255334600.jpg (1024x765, 189K)

Historical data should be kept largely separated from a field like economics, at least if you wish to make economics more scientific. Us scientist don't use the Mayan calendar to create a new theory about how the earth goes through cycles, so why should the economist take Soviet data and use it to prove that shit like central planning works?

very wise, the founding fathers created a system they thought would last beyond their lifetimes, we'll see if it can be reformed at this late stage
It's very simple really, a monarch usually has an incentive to take care of their 'property', democracy is just 2 wolves and a lamb voting on whats for dinner, a soft form of communism where you can just vote to kill the rich

The sale of children is not in any way wrong. It is not unlike todays adoption. One can have issue if the then buyer mistreats that child in any way.

Don't we already do this when we adopt children?

>t. orwellzeit

Attached: a46d1.jpg (800x416, 34K)

It's in my individual self interest to live in a majority white traditional society with low crime.

u mad kraut?

Attached: 1516473671238.png (684x688, 108K)

Anyways, someone like Duterte is what we need right now more then anything.

Attached: 1519830365680.jpg (1959x2048, 465K)

Attached: serveimage (3).jpg (1100x619, 115K)

Attached: serveimage (1).jpg (1100x619, 117K)

holy shit the hero we don't deserve

While foster parent racket is most definitely flourishing market in children, it's not exactly way Rothbard envisioned it though.

Not like was the idea anything new, selling children into slavery was a time honored practice since the antiquity.

Lmao you're a faggot

anarchocapitalism doesnt wo-

Attached: ancap pizza.jpg (549x960, 51K)

Based. I could get insanely rich, Sweden is like 80% commies.

Attached: serveimage.jpg (1100x619, 126K)

Attached: 1543462048329.png (508x592, 465K)

Duterte is /ourguy/

Attached: 1543462722556.png (500x558, 139K)

Attached: 1543462586956.jpg (1014x1200, 134K)

Attached: 1529417043888.jpg (641x755, 76K)

Attached: 1543462443486.jpg (750x862, 127K)

Attached: 1543462278136.png (850x870, 684K)