Is there a name for this philosophy

Basically, capitalism is trash, we all know it is despite not wanting to admit it, but it's the best shit we have currently and we're going to just have to live with it. Humans are reaching advanced civilization where we're all going to be living in corporate commie utopia with autobots running everything. And every fucking thing wrong with society is the corporate infiltration in our lives. This sort of brief over view results in the following:

feminism = make women work because elites want to maximize the work force and consumer force, the sane view would have women be caregivers and have the ocassional hobby, and allow men to realize their full potential as the evolutionary and historical resource providers, but instead women are convinced they must have careers, leaving men to take jobs they wouldn't normally want, resulting in higher costs for everything. a women working to pay another woman to raise her kid is an absolutely insane and unnatural thing, for instance

transgender = commodification of identity, civilization has reached a state where anyone can almost be anything they want, and with a batch of makeup, and nice clothes, a little fag boy can convince himself he's a lovely little lady, it helps that the same commidification of identity creates insecurities that lead helpless soys to go in various insane directions to be fufilled (this also goes for redpillers, mgtow, liberals, conservatives, and so on, but transfags are the true realiztion of the commodification of identity; though a fag buying makeup isn't as big of an economic driver as a dumb hick buying a truck which eats half his fucking paycheck just because he wants it)

Attached: 007.jpg (4000x2666, 1.43M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dQiBD-crrvA
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

racism = result of the homogenization of society because its consumer friendly, and everyone gets to have some identity presented to them, if niggers are putting rims on their cars and wearing gold chains that's a net positive input to the elites and gold selling kikes, even if they're shooting themselves in the street, the whole gang culture shit was literally prompted by rappers selling that image, that shit didn't even exist before that, niggers didn't even exist, blacks made jazz and fucking contributed something, and it's taken like 3 generations for that shit to disappear

sexism = the idea that women are less than men is just a result of women being forced into cetegories where they are, objectively, less. the natural order is that women are doing desk jobs and pushing paper while men create shit and do grunt work, and that is reflected in our current workforce breakdown (most teachers, ie baby sitters, are women, for instance). mgtow/red pillers are a result of efforts to bring women in to male fields but its being used to fuck up male identity (actually wanting MORE men to be teachers is counter to evolution and the red pillers are falling for the same identity trap that drives consumer behavior).

red pill = actually a result of too many fags not having a mature, male, presence in their lives giving them useful knowledge and skills, this is different from teaching, and is itself a commodity, because it creates toxic relationships which is used by media saturation as a driving force. that fucking anti-bullying video was common sense (civilized society doesn't like bullies, who would've thought), but the drivers of the discussion were idiot red pillers "offended" that it was being said. if you looked at it carefully, from the corporate, copy-tested lens, that shit was made specifically to sell a product and nothing more. the companies that have child labor making shit do not give two fucks about the ideals they present to your visual cortex

male homosexuality = somewhat similar to transgender though fag dudes may have a genetic propetensy for fucking other dudes, normalizing their fucking dudes may or may not be a good thing (if they're dude fucking they're not spreading their fag genes so it may be short term good if we can eridicate those genes; this, if true, would require the normalization of faggotry in the bible belt so those closted fags will stop spreading their genes to good women who will eventually lose their lineage when their decendents stop breeding and go full fag)

The basic krux of the argument is that everything boils down to the commodification of identity for the full realization of corporate profit and that we're all tools in the machine. In other words, it really is the fucking Jews.

read Christoper Lasch

wanting a label for your """""""philosophy""""""" (fuck you for abusing this term) is just doing the same as you mentioned under the point of "racism"
ask yourself why you just posted that

Attached: W.jpg (4288x2848, 2.45M)

What shitty blog is this from? Long and gay like a nigger faggot dick.

Attached: 276231A5-4B27-484C-A48B-CCF3E74D6DDF.jpg (600x600, 101K)

agree that we need to do something about trucktards

Attached: idiots.jpg (634x472, 63K)

This looks good, but I was more leaning toward Guy Debord's Society of the Spectacle, because of the outright corporate influence that is the driving force here, it's completely counter intuitive to evolutionary behavior. Thanks user.

Attached: 014.jpg (2666x4000, 2.07M)

Your philosophy is called missing the point completely. HUEHUEHUEHUE.

Come and take it faggot

Tell me more Mr. Brazilian. I'm sure you have a lot to contribute to the question.

Attached: image-20161103-25339-6qtg9r.jpg.jpg (926x672, 106K)

One bump. Thanks user, Lasch is good now that I'm reading more about him. Dude was on fucking point.

Attached: 044.jpg (2666x4000, 2.08M)

I don't see the point in discussing with you anymore...

Reminder that Satan was originally a CORPORATION of 5 or so fallen angels and Lucifer was only the CEO. Translation of the original hebrew actual uses the word corporation. Why does the word corporeal mean 'relating to a person's body, especially as opposed to their spirit.'? What does that have to do with corporations like Apple and Amazon?

There is a difference between Capitalism, Monopoly, and Oligopoly.

One out of the three has a lot of competition. When that competition creates high Supply relative to steady Demand, you get low prices for the consumer (you), and stable wages for the worker (also you).

_________________________________


With that said, I am not an open borders Capitalist. We never have been and never should be. If we choose to fold Social Security into Basic Income, then closing the border will be even more important.

_________________________________


In order of importance I recommend:


1. Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell, audiobook. (This book changes lives.) Youtube link:
youtube.com/watch?v=dQiBD-crrvA


2. Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith as read by Gildart Jackson, audiobook.


3. Principals of Economics by Alfred Marshall


4. The Intelligent Investor, revised edition, by Benjamin Graham

Attached: Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.jpg (300x167, 8K)

The problems I'm illustrating in my post are due to capitalism creating a commodity out of identity. That is, who you are is something that can be sold, and what you want to be is something that can be sold. And there's a product that can bring that into fruition.
I'm saying that identity should not be a commodity. I'm all for supply and demand, but I do not think there should be a demand for HRT and the people who sell that shit to dumb internet users are immoral and unethical.

Attached: 052.jpg (2666x4000, 2.92M)

>wearehairy.com

Attached: 1530308028438.gif (280x211, 1.92M)

>read Christoper Lasch
baste
>Guy Debord's Society of the Spectacle
good book but the situationist's marxism is its undoing ultimately

Melana D's early sets are all with a bush... not a fan myself...
Yeah, I think his critique is good but he doesn't prescribe a solution to any of it, and his anti-technology views also contributed to the neo-luddites of the early 90s which ruined a lot of this thought. Anarchists these days are neo-fascist Orwellian idiots. Lasch seems to have hit most of my points or at least the root of my ideas.

Attached: sexart_vivente_milena-d_high_0066.jpg (3744x5616, 2.89M)

Life off the grid and hoard ammo.

Attached: 1440993277087.gif (200x293, 1.73M)

It all falls under the umbrella of Satanism.

You're not going to be able to convince someone who thinks any criticism of capitalism is a lack of understand of muh basic economics. It's just one step up from; any criticism of capitalism is communism, and not a far step either.

> Is there a name for this philosophy
Yeah bluepilled Hipster who can't swollow redpills like "usury".

Attached: 1930s Weimar Hipster.png (448x629, 340K)

>I do not think there should be a demand for HRT and the people who sell that shit to dumb internet users are immoral and unethical.

There are ways a Capitalist system can take on products that are highly immoral. The fastest way is to tax the product (producers, distributors, etc.) out of existence. I highly recommend this for things like online pornography - and especially the Birth Control Pill. (Pic related.)


>You're not going to be able to convince someone who thinks any criticism of capitalism is a lack of understand of muh basic economics.

I do not believe criticism of Capitalism is a lack of understanding of basic economics. There are instances of highly immoral products, employer practices toward employees, the softening of national borders and integrity, industry capture (of the government), and the lax policing prolonged windfall profits (which leads to Monopoly and Oligopoly), etc. that can be attributed to Capitalism.

Capitalism needs some regulation. I'm fine with the criticism.

Attached: Roger Sterling 4.jpg (800x600, 62K)

>Birth Control Pill.
>(Pic related.)

Edit:
I meant this pic.

Attached: Today's Birth Control.jpg (2348x1890, 2.21M)

Fuck! It's Maxmoefoe!

>I do not believe criticism of Capitalism is a lack of understanding of basic economics.
Yeah that's why you responded to him with Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.jpg and a list of assigned reading for Economics 101.

Attached: 1523161316446.jpg (750x726, 56K)

>The basic krux of the argument is that everything boils down to the commodification of identity for the full realization of corporate profit and that we're all tools in the machine. In other words, it really is the fucking Jews.

Most of what you said is a consequence of freedom and free speech.

>Yeah that's why you responded to him with Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.jpg and a list of assigned reading for Economics 101.

You wrote:

>You're not going to be able to convince someone who thinks any criticism of capitalism is a lack of understand of muh basic economics.

So I guess each point needs to be qualified.

I do not believe *any* criticism of Capitalism is a lack of understanding of basic economics.

However, the OP did specifically cite Capitalism as an underlying issue with regard to the commodification of identity. In response I cited economic 101 material as a way to prevent people from looking at systems that cause more harm than good - and to show that there are ways we can use regulated Capitalism to solve these issues.

>It's just one step up from; any criticism of capitalism is communism, and not a far step either.

Jesus, you dumbfuck. Lol.

Attached: Dear God.png (836x512, 508K)

You seem triggered. You thought you were being smart by posting Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.jpg and a list of assigned reading for Economics 101 in a thread criticizing capitalism, as if that does anyone any good, and you're trying to mental gymnastics you're way out of the fact now that i've called you out on it.