Best articles written by liberals about President Trump thread.
I’ll start obviously:
rollingstone.com
Best articles written by liberals about President Trump thread
Joshua Cooper
Adrian King
Archive it you lazy piece of shit.
Ayden Flores
Levi Murphy
I’m not lazy I don’t know how to do that desu
Noah Butler
Also this thread is blessed
Ethan Cox
This guy sure loves to plug his books every chance he gets.
Angel Price
Can anyone besides me post an article or is this truly an echo chamber?
Jace Allen
how does one archive?
Jayden Ward
Landon Ross
Christian Harris
Xavier Turner
>or is this truly an echo chamber?
for whom?
Josiah Morgan
Here come the trannies
Daniel Mitchell
Kevin Flores
Julian Turner
Whoa, you got me. I promise not to vote for Trump, what do we win?
Charles Richardson
Cameron Wood
Cameron Moore
archive.is used to work well, but these days archive.org (AKA the wayback machine) is better. Lots of people read Jow Forums and when you post links to anti-white publications like Rolling Stone, you are helping to further their agenda by giving them clicks. Next time, post an archived link so anons can view their propaganda if they wish without financial support to our enemies.
Brandon Lopez
Christopher Miller
Matthew Thomas
Trolls and kikes.
Nicholas Moore
I get why it’s beneficial I just didn’t know how but I will from now on ty
Charles Bell
I'm here to help.
Jack Richardson
The discord trannies are out in full forxe today. The OP said post articles not dump your shitty fucking image folder you stupid worthless imbecile of a nigger
Isaac Jenkins
>I’ll start
Zachary Hernandez
Start by killing yourself
Christopher Clark
Elijah Gonzalez
Why? It’s a thread about the enemy admitting defeat. God damn you have a low iq
Jordan Morales
>archive.is ('archive.today')
>web.archive.org ('wayback machine')
Those are the two big ones. both have pros and cons:
>archive.is has no 'depth' (eg, links to images are not archived unless you archive them manually).
>archive.is is great for articles/text/basic pages, but bad for anything with rich media
>archive.is captures a screenshot and lets you DL both it and a .zip of the archived page for offline storage/viewing.
>archive.is is, in a word, 'basic' - but efficient.
>archive.is is VERY easy to automate (script), both the archiving itself and the file downloads.
>web.archive has a better interface, period.
>web.archive archives to at least a depth of 1 (it seems), so images linked on a page are archived as well.
>web.archive automatically crawls a lot of the web already, so there are simply many more pages on web than *.is
>web.archive is just -better- (as another user has also opined)
These ones can also be leveraged as a mirror (or proxy) to view pages and not give unwanted clicks etc.
(not true archiving services, but useful)
>via.hypothes.is - allows you to annotate pages too
>??? forgot the name, sorry. document.com or some shit. same idea, a mirror/proxy, not an archive. maybe another user can help.
Finally, there are desktop programs that allow you to archive entire websites (or single pages) and save locally;
I have used HTTrack personally and it's very good, but NOT user friendly. Many others i've never touched.
If you can code use archive.is IMO. Otherwise .org.