Just show me where in the Second Amendment it says anything at all about "AR-15s" or assault rifles. You can't. Because it's not there. Instead it says "well regulated".
And yet, we are all supposed to believe that the founding fathers wanted you to be allowed to own assault rifles when they clearly gave the government the ability to regulate guns. I mean, it's right there in the Second Amendment.
All assault rifles should be confiscated and those who resist should be promptly arrested and sent in for mental evaluations. Gun control won't be easy but it MUST be done. Gun owners are in the minority in this country and it's time we put them in their place.
>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed >the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed >shall not be infringed
Lincoln Thomas
Yeah and you show me what we're supposed to do with matchlock rifles in the current year dipshit.
Oliver Mitchell
AR-15s are not assault rifles you fucking retarded mudkike
Hunter Sullivan
>SHALL >NOT >BE >INFRINGED
learn2read dumbass
Austin Wilson
to be fair, where does it say in the constitution that the government is allowed assault rifles either
Samuel Ward
Does the first amendment only apply to the printing press? The constitution was written in a way that it can apply to all periods of time and any level of technology.
Asher Adams
If this is not bait, you are the stupidest, most poorly educated piece of shit in the world. Let's eliminate the 1st amendment too, because it assumed free speech on paper, (There was no mass media or internet) and in small venues by direct word of mouth to anyone close enough to hear you.(no voice amplification, no media to broadcast more than those within earshot)
Dumb Fuck.
Asher Edwards
Meanwhile in real life, states are passing noncompliance resolutions with federal gun laws, rural counties are refusing to enforce gun laws passed by big city constituencies, and judges are overturning unconstitutional bans.
You're losing.
Ethan Diaz
Why would people infringe bear arms?
Henry Russell
Shall not be infringed tho
Eli Hill
whats your beef with the bill of rights?
Leo Price
You can print weapons you know. No matter what laws they try to pass in the future...You can't stop people from owning guns. youtube.com/watch?v=sPAmPjKaKDw
>guns Absolutely bluepilled. The second amendment refers primarily to artillery such as ships canons. Guns are the very least of the rights protected bt it. All non-military groups should not have free and easy access to mobile artillery, prodivded they can afford to do so. There is no reason why a private citizen should not be allowed to own a ground-to-air battery to protect the sanctity of their own airspace from corporate merchantile pirates who seek to expolit it for profit.
Adrian Johnson
Definitely SAAAAGEEEEEEE worthy you stupid like nigger faggot cunt spic piece of fucking human shit. I hope you get tarrant’ed So I can watch your stupid Nigger brain spray of a wall. Sage
Julian Gray
>shall not be infringed
Joseph Garcia
>Just show me where in the Second Amendment it says anything at all about "AR-15s" or assault rifles. Show me anywhere where it says anything about any type of weaponry >You can't. Because it's not there. Instead it says "well regulated". exactly >Gun owners are in the minority in this country and it's time we put them in their place. Sic semper tyrannis
tbqh I know this is bait but I hate gun grabers almost as much as I hate commies
Well regulated refers to the functionality of the militia itself, meaning we need to retain the most cutting edge technology so as not to become obsolete in the face of oppressive forces.
William Price
SHALL
Cameron Lee
>
Cameron Wilson
Where does it say in the constitution that you can write a tweet and blast it out to a gorillion people? 1A clearly doesn't cover such a massive and instantaneous manner.
Modern automatic weapons fire at a far more regular rate than 18th century guns, so full auto should be mandatory.
Parker Brooks
where in the constitution does it say that its ok to allow kikes to live in the US?
Evan Morales
(you) aren't really this stupid >right of the people to keep and bear arms >arms arms =/= firearms, it means any tool of warfare offensive or defensive. The founding fathers chose their words explicitly so they don't get misconstrued yet here (((you))) are
Landon Jones
this image is great. looks like a token "food analogy" on the surface but actually highlights the semantics which inform our supreme court's understanding of the issue
Juan Bailey
the second amendment protects me from people like you and I do thank the founding fathers for their wisdom
Asher Murphy
well regulated means well trained dummy
>The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected
Freedom of the press should apply only to the printed word, since online environments did not exist in the days of the Constitution It's fine to ban multiple-words-per-minute publications, no-one needs assault literature
Noah Long
If there's a fire in a crowded blah blah, you'd damn well better yell fire, retard.
Colton Russell
>It's a meme that only applies to white males. so let's fix that! a much easier constitutional argument can be made to make sure all citizens have access than restricting access which never works out
Jeremiah Scott
Let's take a moment and relish the fact that califronia has recently overturned the hi capacity mags penal code on Friday
I'm sure Op is a paid shill trying to shitpost the board, but to respond appropriately... The states are legally allowed to uphold their own militias to hold back the power of the federal government. When the constitution was written, the U.S. was fighting the monarchy and the framers wanted to ensure that a centralized federal government could not override the freedoms of the state or individual. The best way to ensure that a future government could not enslave it's own people in the U.S. was to ensure that the people could protect themselves from that tyranny. In the late 1700's and early 1800's both civilians and the military used the same basic weapons. Today the landscape and technology has changed but the concept is clear. The government is explicitly prohibited from removing weapons from it's citizens. the Constitution is not a document that grants rights, it limits the power of the government over the people. These weapons are necessary if something bad were to happen at the federal level. You may not think that a "silly AR-15" can do anything against a modern army. But if you look to what the Taliban has been able to do over the past 15 years, it should be clear that one man with one rifle has the ability to hold back foreign and domestic enemies no matter how advanced the technology is. The guns you vilify so much is the exact reason that we have the freedoms we have today and also the reason you are even allowed to be shitposting currently. Show some respect for the people who protect you from your own self-harm. We are the true Americans and will continue to protect you despite your misplaced hatred.
Grayson Gutierrez
show me where in the First Amendment it mentions the internet
Gavin Allen
And what is 'assault weapon' for you, OP?
Andrew Jones
Never be less armed than your enemy. In this case it’s the police and the fbi. Fuck of you Jew shill.
Show me where the Constitution applies to anything but the original 13 colonies
Justin Sullivan
What's with the recent influx of anti-gun shills?😃
Benjamin Davis
>sage
Deprive this op
Back to CTR with you!
Robert Perez
WHO GAVE THAT SQUAT A BOLTER!?
Kayden Stewart
Classic bait. But I believe it is the militia (which is necessary to the security of a free state) that is to be well-regulated, not the arms (it also states that the right to keep and bear said arms shall not be infringed) - and forming a militia at all with a disarmed population would prove difficult.
Jordan Gray
So the purpose of the Bill of Rights was to establish the rights of the individual people that is out of the range of government interference. Also, old English is pretty hard to understand to the modern person and Thomas Jefferson was trying to be very efficient and broad with his wording, so I understand your confusion with the grammar of the second amendment.
A well regulated militia (notice how it does not say "In a well regulated militia", meaning this is a dependent clause and the primary subject of the sentence has yet to be introduced), being necessary for the security of a free State (this is an appositive, defining whatever phrase is before it, but not entirely necessary for the sentence structure and can be removed), the right of the people to keep and bear arms (here we are introduced to the main subject of the sentence), shall not be infringed (we conclude the sentence with the final bit of information needed to create a coherent thought).
Now lets take what we have, The second amendment is compartmentalized very nicely into parts by commas, making it easy to find and create a simplified version without additional context. This can be done by taking the parts of the sentence and mixing them together like so:
"A well regulated militia shall not be infringed." (good) "The rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." (good) "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State." (bad) "Being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms."(Bad) and so on and so forth.
The only combinations that create a complete sentence are "A well regulated militia shall not be infringed." and "The rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
So what we can gather from this is that we have the right to formulate a well regulated militia, and we all have the right to keep and bear arms.
Michael Allen
Shareblue stopped doing damage control for JS.
Carson Morgan
> assault rifles If you really wanted to have a persuasive opinion on this matter, you should look up what an “assault rifle” is. TLDR: it’s cosmetic features that make it look scary.
Kayden Robinson
Shareblue stopped doing damage control for Jussie Smollett
Dylan Harris
Sincerely, A guy who passed 6th grade English 10 years ago.
Alexander Evans
A citizen should have access to ALL of the weapons our military has access to. The goverment should fear the people, not the reverse.
Julian Russell
How about this: the constitution is the only authority that applies. I don't care what bullshit you make up to try to snatch my guns, I'm keeping all of them, and using them (on you) if you visit me to try and take them.
Liam White
is an AR-15 an "arm" if yes then; "Shall not be infringed"., if no then irrelevant.
Juan Thompson
5/10 bait, honestly enough bullshit to get the blood up but enough stupidity to make me laugh
Edit: Alexander Hamilton, not Thomas Jefferson, I actually barely passed history.
Gavin Evans
Serious question do automobiles also count as arms?
Christopher Sanders
The two most powerful empires on the planet (France and Spain) along with the fifth most powerful empire on the planet (Holland) joined forced to defeat the fourth most powerful empire on the planet (Great Britain).
The Spanish, Dutch and French armies numbered over 600,000 men. The British army numbered 60,000 men with over half of them kept in the home islands and most of the rest scattered around India.
The Spanish, Dutch and French navies numbered over 120 ships of the line versus the British navy which had less than 50 ships of the line.
The largest battle of the American Revolution was the siege of Gibraltar which involved literally ZERO Americans and was fought in Spain.
Yet somehow Americans always come up with stories about how George Washington intimidated the Brits into submission with his big black cock.
REGULATION IS DIFFERENT THAN RESTRICTION the founders intended to have sensible gun laws to keep the peace, they also wished to ensure the people could overthrow a corrupt government if needed. Warfare prays on the weak. Firearms and weapons of any sort the public have is an insurance policy against tyranny of any kind, be it public, governmental or otherwise.
Don't act like governments are some kind of innocent god that means the best for you
>BTFO faggot
Benjamin Jenkins
Mid-tier bait, friendo. But for those people who unironically believe this load. >Just show me where in the Second Amendment it says anything at all about "AR-15s" or assault rifles. You can't. Because it's not there. Instead it says "well regulated". Seeing how AR-15s AND assault rifles(they are not the same thing) are arms, the 2nd clearly does mention them. But this is typical no-guns illiteracy at it's finest. > when they clearly gave the government the ability to regulate guns. Why do these people not understand the phrase shall not be infringed. >All assault rifles should be confiscated and those who resist should be promptly arrested and sent in for mental evaluations This type of mentality is pretty funny from an objective standpoint. Seeing how the 2nd clearly states shall not be infringed and people assume someone who resists unconstitutional and thus illegal confiscations is somehow mentally unstable. >Gun control won't be easy but it MUST be done. I think you mean confiscations. >Gun owners are in the minority in this country and it's time we put them in their place. Obviously not and anyone who thinks this should be sent in for mental evaluation.
There, I responded to your bait and gave you a (you). Enjoy it. Just understand that you in no way triggered and or trolled me. I just feel like typing something here that isn't total bullshit for once.
Every registered democrat in this nation needs to be hanged
Zachary Hughes
it also says "shall not be infringed" you low agency soiboi beta retard.
Hunter Torres
This guy gets it. The first test of the 2A was in 1790 when a merchant ship captain requested clarification on what arms were protected because he wanted to arm his vessel with anti-ship cannons. The president told him there were no restrictions whatsoever
Daniel Carter
Take the langanpill. Of course (((they))) want the police to point the right at us while we have only the left. Modern liberals are such good goyim...
The 2nd Amendment said we needed a well regulated militia. If that militia can't keep the federal and state governments in check, then they are useless. We actually need less gun regulation, not more. But good laws are no substitute for good habits, and society will be jacked up no matter what we do with guns; until we fix our values and societal cohesion.
It's our fucking JOB to maintain militias on parity with modern military forces. We ignored that responsibility. But it's still our right and it is violated every day.
Neck yourself traitor. Not even a conservative. Just not a total retard. Hell you're not even making a genuine argument, you're just shilling today's agenda for your boss. It gets obvious as shit after a while. Kys you deserve it desu.
Aaron Taylor
Checked, and I understand your feelings, but we need the Democrat Party to keep our children aware of how seductive the forces of tyranny are. Otherwise they might grow up believing nobody could ever take their freedom, and end up giving it away just as the baby boomers almost did.
Jaxson James
You are fucking retarded
Jordan Turner
It's only a matter of time before another white gun owner snaps and kills a bunch of people.
White people are more dangerous to other people than black people are to each other.
Luke King
My favorite image for retards that think tanks and planes can run a police state
Go ahead and carpet bomb an entire city block to kill a few rebels, see how many more insurgents you create
Most violence is black-on-black. Most terrorist violence is Muslim.
Luke James
That's the thing, white people are more calculated than any other race. Even asians. When a white person snaps planes crash into buildings and the jews get the blame.
That's just one way to destroy the best country on earth.
Carter Sanchez
Arms mean armaments, not guns specifically. Obviously the founding fathers wanted you to have militias on par with whatever ZOG feds have. That means artillery, attack drones, tanks, anti-air batteries and so on. The whole "assault weapons" discussion is a red herring. Uncuck yourselves.
>Just show me where in the Second Amendment it says anything at all about "AR-15s" or assault rifles. Right between smoothbore muskets and muzzle loading rifles.
Mason Jackson
Armalite you cheeky cunt.
Lucas Collins
God this is a low effort (You) generator
Brandon Foster
it says "arms" which is broader than any single weapon
A well balanced breakfast, being necessary for a healthy lifestyle, the right of the people to keep and eat oats shall not be infringed. Who has the right to the oats? The people or the well balanced breakfast?
Henry Ross
>muh 2nd amendment Imagine not slashing niggers with a katana like pic releated
We only need food at breakfast and I trust the government to decide what makes it well balanced.
Eli Sanders
Armalite?
Oliver Brooks
the founding fathers had privately owned cannons. They also had privately owned and operated warships. Not to mention, semi-auto weapons were already around, granted they lacked the complexity they have now, but they were not unheard of.
Jaxon Green
Militia is not the national army. It’s average people with guns.
Well-regulated, according to Madison, meant they trained or organized at least twice a year.
