POL BTFO

POL BTFO

Attached: 3uTeKaT.png (618x748, 372K)

B A S E D

Attached: 1552953970489.jpg (960x608, 179K)

piss poor logic

*takes your guns*

oofπŸ˜ƒ

...

Reminder that YangGang are ShareBlue shills

Attached: EF62CA0A-E81E-4683-96A2-84EC5D13EEBA.jpg (806x886, 189K)

Yang still hates white men.

MIGAtards can't compete.

Attached: funny yang.png (500x399, 157K)

...

I gotta give you credit, you shills are getting really fucking creative.

how

fuck you

>tfw I see a niggerπŸ™

Fuck you goy

Well now.

>redditors

Attached: 79e0f76f22f429dc6a79ebbe8f3b484d.jpg (306x306, 20K)

Really? You consider that to be a good argument?
Okay, i am going to explain it slowly to you. The resourses necessary for for UBI demand a source. Either:

A) Money gets printed causing huge inflacionary pressure on consumer goods, thus increasing the cost of living and mitigating most (if not all) of the impact of UBI.

Or

B) Private entities are taxed for it.

The second alternative is simply redistribution of money. Depending on how this money is taken and from who it is taken the impact will vary. This option may bring only mild inflation to consumer goods and real state.

Both alternatives mess up the labour market. UBI decreases the marginal utility of money making most individuals demand higher wages than before to compansate the marginal cost of performing labour (all measured by hour here and dealing with averages).

You are creating free loaders while the technology creates even more. The only reason to support UBI is to accelerate the world towards doom.

Attached: bowie.gif (400x303, 1.56M)

test

More like lowtest, amirite?

Your fortune: キタ━━━━━━(οΎŸβˆ€οΎŸ)━━━━━━ !!!!

Attached: 7cf.jpg (480x600, 64K)