Unfortunately Mark Zuckerberg is not the appropriate individual to dictate the rules for the internet since his own network fails to meet the legal requirements for engagement with minors, and over a decade of harmful content solicited by him and Akamai does not advance his authority in this regard.
These are decisions to made by the appointed government administration in every territory, not the most popular scammer.
1. It is illegal to obtain consent from minors without appropriate solicitation 2. Aggressive and abusive material must be abolished 3. Protections for children must be in place such as 'proof of age' requirements for entry to adult sites, and family sites that cannot guarantee the restriction of adult content. 4. CDNs should not profit from content deemed illegal. Please refer to human rights and the rights of the child for guidelines. 5. Networks enabling and profiting from the radicalisation of children need to come under review and be held accountable for their violations thus far.
These key areas need to be discussed and agreed upon by each territory, administered by government in partnership with the corresponding web authorities in each territory, and these discussions need to occur between civil adults qualified in the respective areas, and urgently.
Public debate wherein the response is uninformed should not be included in the assessment of general concensus.
It should also be noted that Mark Zuckerberg is responsible for the current state, the psychological assault of minors, the manipulation and exploitation of minors, and the normalisation of illegally engaging with minors through unsolicited consent.
Henry Scott
no. if content is not appropriate for children it means it's not appropriate for anyone. That is huge red flag that humans are not native to this planet, but raised as cattle here on earth.
Samuel Butler
How about this. All these American tech companies are under criminal investigation. They'll face trillion dollar fines and the execution of their executives. After that constitutional law is going to be applied to these platforms and other countries will just have to deal with the constitution and the god given rights we have to speak freely.
Jackson Rogers
That is illogical, children are restricted from seing a lot of content, which adults are not. You are just a pedophile that wants to view children as having the same agency as adults, so you can suggest you have consent when you molest them.
OP is right, zuckerberg and facebook are not in any position to be stating what the wider internet should look like.
Tyler Scott
no. what i'm saying that entire so called 'civilization' is pedophile civilization. It's CIA lemon party gestapo.
Easton Richardson
No u
Dominic Thomas
no. i'm not from tar budgets. so of course i'm speaking out of my ass. I'm one of the "children"
Aiden Garcia
>criminal investigation >constitutional law is going to be applied
Noted.
See: >human rights and the rights of the child for guidelines.
Nathan Bennett
Dont toy with my heart like that user
Ian Sanchez
>content is not appropriate for children >huge red flag >to view children as having the same agency as adults >zuckerberg and facebook are not in any position to be stating what the wider internet should look like >CIA >toy
Quick insight.
Carson Butler
t. satan
Dominic Myers
>Quick insight. >satan
Current state.
Nicholas Myers
>if content is not appropriate for children it means it's not appropriate for anyone
M15+, R18+
Nicholas Young
you're saying it as if you're better than children. such ratings are like walls and stonewalls for rioting. for some reason children are kept in the dark where they have to "grow" out of this closet. Once they grow big they will get to enjoy all those forbidden fruits. Everything is wrong about this system paved with good intentions. Starting with security - keepers of this crypt. You know FBI should be considered as NAMBLA
Jose White
>Once they grow big they will get to enjoy all those forbidden fruits
with the discernment acquired by adulthood.
Aaron Moore
Sodomy (corrupt sexuality) is destroying us It is a weapon wielded by the jew to that effect
no. such lawfare structures imply that children are not humans until they acquire human rights provided to them by this authority: right to vote, right to buy alcohol, cigarettes, gambling, right to buy real estate, right to invest, etc.. In other words the protection and security has grown so big it became protection racket. And that is only if we are looking at it through the good intentional prism of rosy colored glasses.
Brody Baker
>lawfare structures imply that
children are to be protected, from pedophiles, and many other harms.
Thomas Mitchell
by pedophiles who understand that they are dangerous? it's like fox who gets her shit together ands starts productive and meaningful activity of farming chicken coop so it could be shared with other foxes.
Zachary Nelson
>pedophiles
Robert Anderson
>and many other harms. cont' - rapists - murderers - drug dealers - sex traffickers - grooming - prostitution - exploitation - trauma - disturbing content - graphic content - adult content
Connor Brown
>Sodomy
In my understanding this is the nature of the methods these sites employ to mine the data of minors: backdooring.
There have also been many years spent already, indoctrinating children in anal sex.
These are serious violations punishable by law in criminal courts.
Adam Gutierrez
>Public debate wherein the response is uninformed should not be included in the assessment of general concensus. Fuck you, tyrant.
Cooper Gray
>These key areas need to be discussed and agreed upon by each territory, administered by government in partnership with the corresponding web authorities in each territory, and these discussions need to occur between civil adults qualified in the respective areas
Jackson Torres
Incoming: WHY IS NOTHING BEING DONE ABOUT THIS
Isaiah Bell
Profiting from the defilement of an entire generation, Noted, USA.
