New Zealand Arrests Everyone except Mark Zuckerberg

What a disgusting slag of woman

You can’t censor the world

green-miled preferably

They are incentivizing the slaughter of more desert rat Muslims and Jews .

Attached: 7863465328745234.png (724x401, 173K)

Fuck, it really is a question of what's next. How do I know this won't happen to America? It seems that soon the 1A won't matter anymore.

>What a disgusting slag of woman

yeah she is but its about actually arresting kids for sharing something a fucking criminal made available to them.

they're kids. zuck is a crook.

its like booking a druggie but not the dealer.

Always kill a traitor before an enemy Jimbo.

Because if it does we get to happen.

I still don’t understand what is the danger of people posting that video.
They bung on about “protecting people from dangerous content” but how is that video dangerous?

Doesn’t it just prove he’s guilty, acted alone and disprove conspiracy theorists?

You forget that people are lethally retarded

Zuckerburg has a net worth greater than a 4th of New Zealand gdp
too put that in perspective zucks worth around 60-70 billion (at 60 now will probably go back to 70 after the data breeches and investigations blow over)
New Zealand has an operating budget of about 2.4 billion a year
That's about how much facebook spends on R&D... every quarter

by which I mean idiots in power aren't thinking anything through, but are taking unproductive, harmful actions just because.

mate the surplus was 3.1 not the budget
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_New_Zealand_budget

>idiots in power aren't thinking anything through

none of them did they were too busy taking selfies on social media.

nek minnet > kids get arrested for sharing content presented to them by fucking FACEBOOK... and us aussies are apparently only going to "fine" mark Zuckerberg

wait for the penny to drop on this one.

I agree, brutha

I didn’t forget but even a retard could see that watching a video doesn’t hurt.
Is the argument that seeing violence will cause people to become violent?
Because compare that video to half the movies in Hollywood and the Hollywood movies are just as violent.

It’s really weird how Hollywood can make videos about all kinds of violence and murder and racism and rape but if you make jokes about the same things society panics and the government attacks you. I can’t afford to make a multimillion dollar movie which will be seen by millions of people about this shit so I make jokes on the internet for like 1000 people at most. But I’m somehow the bad guy? Fuck you politicians, fuck you all.

Hollywood jews can make a movie about some elaborate plan to kill the president and blow up the White House but I’m probably on some government watch list just for mentioning those words in this sentence.

Fuuuuuuuuuuuck.

>An australian raging
OH FUCK HE'S GONNA BLOW FBI GET IN HERE!

I think we should all email links to every New Zealand government email we can get our hands on.
Come on Ameribros. We've shut down Britain's online crime reporting with claims of being held at spoonpoint.

Attached: 1553127120351.jpg (1024x682, 131K)

I don’t even agree with fining zuckerjew. Don’t get me wrong he should be thrown into an oven for being a kike but who gives a fuck what someone posts on a website, nobody is forcing you to view anything. People need to take responsibility for their own eyeballs.

>Is the argument that seeing violence will cause people to become violent? Because compare that video to half the movies in Hollywood and the Hollywood movies are just as violent.

ratings. adult content. live murder is not the same as a movie.

you blokes are not really thinking this through honestly. This is a flex by the government which holds the monopoly on power. If they appear weak and feckless the perception would lead to loss of control over their current narratives. Its better in their mind to crack down hard in order to ensure their predetermined plans will still be on track.

>and us aussies are apparently only going to "fine" mark Zuckerberg
good luck with those fines, US tech companies dont take kindly to foreign governments telling them what to do as they are sovereign entities, they could probably invoke some ridiculous treaty provision in order to force the hand but it will be symbolic and not pursued past the initial request.

Attached: 15526324105.png (724x427, 235K)

>nobody is forcing you to view anything

facebook is. hit 'like' or 'share' and what you pumped will show up in other people's feeds when they never asked to see it.

>good luck with those fines

I don't need it, they do. I want him jailed and fried in the chair.

that's much easier.

Look at that absolute unit swingin between her legs holy shit

Attached: 1552408801171.png (476x492, 491K)

That's a good idea, you should post a thread about this.

That broad has literally had a hard on since St. Tarrant removed kebab.

people keep finding fake shit in the video, and they don't want you talking about it.

Attached: uh oh.jpg (1535x2852, 986K)

Can I get a link so she can try.

because it gives them the excuse to enact hardline censorship, and acts as a precedent for future expansion. it's just another step in the eventual complete control of information

Then why not ban footage of 9/11? Heaps more people died in that. They played that shit live on the news. Nobody went retarded about fining the news for showing people dying on 9/11.

I don’t even think they give a fuck about the video or people seeing it at all, besides a few retarded feminist types who want to be the world’s mummy protecting people from scary things. The main thing seems to be they are using this shooting video to push through new legislative powers where they can delete anything they don’t like and punish rogue websites that refuse to comply.

Zucker will probably just pay the fine, whatever the number is it’s probably low as fuck with his purse, he’ll he might even just donate some cuck bucks to the mosque itself to virtue signal. He might even make a point of it by refusing to pay the fine and paying the same amount to the mosque and our Australian cuck government will just fold and praise him for it because they are total faggots.

its not because of that. either way zuck is a crook and should already be in jail, not just being warned.

he fucking rejected toxicity warnings, and has allowed live murder and rape to air on his shitshow network many times.

he profits from exploiting kids, ruining their lives, the sick, the elderly, the poor

he lets pedophiles mix with fuckign children

he is a shitstained maggot and deserves the chair.

his network has been the sole cause of murders, slaughters, retarded movements pushing for immoral shit.

just lock the cunt up please and shut that shit down.

unlawful surveillance, stalking kids through their phones, fucking filth you are mark.

Attached: 2127.jpg (315x301, 13K)

>they are using this shooting video to push through new legislative powers where they can delete anything they don’t like
there is probably some opportunism happening there, however this came out of nowhere for them obviously. I wouldnt say that it was planned or anything like that.
>and punish rogue websites that refuse to comply
within the bongosphere maybe but any country can fuck right off if they believe they have one ounce of sway with US website operators (of course some will cuck of their own free will)

Attached: 1538145441464.jpg (645x912, 73K)

Yeah and the general public is so dumb and misinformed they will cheer for it. I’m surprised they didn’t claim more people were part of tarrants white terrorist ring so they could disappear them the people would have eaten it up and all they would have to do is accuse anyone who points out it is bullshit as conspiracy theorists.

Oh yeah the governments didn’t plan it at all, but they want the censorship so bad so they will use any opportunity they get.

Part of why the NZ prime minister virtue signaled so hard is because of how the shooting proved how shit her government is at protecting people.

Took them fucking ages to respond with cops and when they did respond the cops didn’t have a fucking clue what was going on, arresting a bunch of people who had nothing to do with it, thinking there was two shooters. It’s no wonder they are terrified of the public having guns. Everyone thinks rebelling against the government is impossible because the police would own you but the New Zealand shooting exposed how shit at least the NZ government is 100 angry guys with guns could probably overthrow that whole nation.

>any country can fuck right off if they believe they have one ounce of sway with US website operators

tell that to the supreme court.

>Everyone thinks rebelling against the government is impossible because the police would own you
important point, in the video it did appear he was expecting a response. He ran out multiple times and was looking down the street.
>but the New Zealand shooting exposed how shit at least the NZ government is 100 angry guys with guns could probably overthrow that whole nation.
probably, maybe even less. The same is true for almost any country. Look at Vietnam, and Afghanistan. A few determined goats herders kicked in the shit of multiple first rate world powers all with AKs and some IEDs.

Attached: 1552872180067.png (566x800, 462K)

the point is she's arresting kids instead of crooks.

eh? yours or mine? The first amendment would be the trump card in this case. It wouldnt even make it that far if you are inferring that the court system would somehow make me take down this video from my own website. would never happen.

Attached: 1554344730000.jpg (500x336, 36K)

We also almost cost Bruce his gold. Good times

What our government is doing isn’t much better. Australian government just past laws that say they can fine a company 10 percent of their annual income or jail individuals for 3 years if they host footage or audio of torture, terrorist acts, murder, rape and kidnapping. So they are going to punish the people hosting rather than the people posting but it still seems like this will just lead to sites banning and censoring a lot more. They made the sites liable by Australian law and if they don’t delete and report the post to the federal police they get punished. The attorney general behind the new law, Christian Porter specifically mentioned Jow Forums while presenting the law.

COPE

>fine a company 10 percent of their annual income or jail individuals for 3 years if they host footage or audio of torture, terrorist acts, murder, rape and kidnapping. So they are going to punish the people hosting rather than the people posting

huh? the providers are the drug dealers, the posters and sharers are the druggies.

and guess which option the aus gov will choose > $$

because until Zuckerberg is jailed and fuckbook is blocked from Australia, they are supporting every crime they have committed.

they are complicit and currently pathetic.

jail no bail.

The cucks in Leaf Country have been harassing BestGore for years. None of these stupid fucks will ever win something like this.

The US is rightful kiwi clay.

No no, big companies like face book and YouTube and twitter, get fined. Little guys who post shit on their personal site get the jail time. People like gookmoot will get jail time because he doesn’t have enough cash for it to be worth their while fining him, but let’s not forget this important factor, they are trying to force these companies to report Australians to the federal police if they post anything offensive.

Think about it, you post a webm of a car accident in China on Facebook, Facebook then flags you, deletes the post, reports you to the federal police, next thing you know you are arrested for insighting violence against China or some other bullshit charge. These people don’t just quit when they are winning, they keep squeezing your rights away.

so more sites will pull their Australian mirrors and our tech will be put back another 10 years, business as usual

Attached: 1532653469421.jpg (354x286, 31K)

>We've shut down Britain's online crime reporting with claims of being held at spoonpoint.

top kek I remember that

In 2015, I nearly died from laughing when I had a dream, in minecraft, that a bunch of Jow Forums yanks from here got union jack flags and manchester united t-shirts and were sending pictures of them in their rooms full of AKs and AR-15s with tons of bullets and magazines everywhere holding up the english/british flag and signs saying "pakis out" and "english and proud vote the bnp" in response to hate crime arrests. One mad lad yank had an MG-3 machine gun with a 7.62x51 bandolier across his chest and pushed it really far.

Attached: 8642864286429.png (236x224, 101K)

>The US is rightful kiwi clay.

Attached: image (1).jpg (1267x1945, 453K)

thats right. The tech is certainly there to filter images and videos but you will still have false negatives/positives and how would you distinguish between explicit audio and something like deathmetal its absurd! Also this stuff isnt free, it gets expensive at scale so the proper business decision is to pull out or drop functionality.

Attached: 1553719996522.jpg (740x960, 63K)

Attached: hurr durr.png (604x711, 459K)

Renting servers in Australia is already much more expensive than simply having one overseas and the response times aren't really a problem for web services, also the TOS of a lot of hosting sites prohibit this stuff and much more like archiving, porn and most types of automated scripts for scraping and such.

Attached: 30653736_1566720776778922_7592205730564800512_n.gif (480x360, 347K)

stupid government? or posts don't appear unless the network publishes them.

it is ALL the networks fault.

we are responsible only for what we upload, they are responsible for what other people see.

Australian man questioned over Facebook posts
liveleak.com/view?t=u7nXr_1553057198

Attached: futileborglaugh.jpg (474x279, 10K)

lol. that's how stupid they are. they don't realise what publishing companies are.

here's another good one:

>your content belongs to us once you upload it
>if its illegal content, its not ours anymore

i'm leaning back in my chair Zuckerberg and unzipping my pants

>arresting a bunch of people who had nothing to do with it
this is what terrified the government, a active shooting event happened and the people armed themselves and went to go find their loved ones. Those militias he US is so fond of actually appeared here and the government was not ready for it whatsoever. One loony with a gun is easy to explain, an actual armed populace that does shit?

>>arresting a bunch of people who had nothing to do with it

for the crime of liking and sharing
which is only a crime once Zuckerberg pretends he doesn't own the content anymore.

I’ve been tweeting links of thevideo to New Zealand police forces. And New Zealand based journalists and private citizens.

Oh, I thought you were talking about all the people who got 'taken into custody' on the day of the shooting.

did you tell them it belongs to facebook

>live murder is not the same as a movie
The Simpsons is more realistic than this carry-on

Attached: Hats-Off.gif (400x222, 1.82M)

the other guy was I think. I cut in to your convo to exploit it for the purpose of making a crucial point

The only thing i can think of is that it has to do with making sure the video remains admissible as evidence for the court case.

debatable, I understand, but I think we all know the feeling of raw air.

how bout its distressing for people including new Zealanders and it isn't normal to be entertained by something like that

this, If you see the video you can point out fake shit they are covering for a sloppy mossad job.

Attached: 1553302772499.png (1289x691, 924K)

> its distressing for people
so's the human centipede doesn't mean it should be banned from the internet.

Attached: 1554348786484.gif (386x390, 3.35M)

So, we should probably plaster that manifesto and video everywhere on the internet that we can.

what is with them trying to appear powerful while walking?

do they think we dont notice them all sucking in their guts?

Attached: canadaantitrumpteamassemble!.jpg (761x800, 75K)

no, we should make it clear that the footage belongs to Facebook.

Facebook, Live.

not Tarrant, Live.

Facebook is responsible for the fact that it even exists.

you're a special kind of jew so let me just emphasize how fucking fake your jew-op is
>(((white))) man tarrant is being aided by semites with assault rifles
huh

Attached: two shooters.webm (608x892, 621K)

Attached: 1552926254899.jpg (2850x5600, 3.33M)

I think you're missing the point.

They are literally trying to censor the *ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD* through their bullshit local laws.

And their arrogance should cost them dearly.

take a look at this article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

>aye tony

Attached: 1552926051484.jpg (912x960, 552K)

colostomy bag?

...

>I think you're missing the point.

i'm actually not. the thread is about Jacinda arresting kids instead of the owner of the fucking video : facebook.

I understand what ur on about but censorship is what ratings are about:

children's content is censored of adult content, and family content is censored of disturbing content

This is happening daily.

>the thread is about Jacinda arresting kids instead of the owner of the fucking video : facebook.

That's just because she's retarded...

and I don't think anyone can make a case for owning the video, to be honest.

>I don't think anyone can make a case for owning the video

Facebook owns it. Legally, 100%.

Facebook Live. just like they strip your photos of your file name and replace it with theirs, they fucking own it.

Therefore they are responsible fully. They are also responsible for what other people see, 100%.

i'm pretty sure that's not how it works in this case.

The video is in public domain now, it belongs to the world.

Attached: sad face.png (2206x1262, 2.34M)

>i'm pretty sure that's not how it works

it is how it works. public domain? Tarrant can sue for copyright violation < that's where it gets slippery because facebooks contracts are ridiculous;

>you agree that we own this when you upload it
>ur sort of licensing it to us
>but suddenly, if its illegal content, none of it is ours
>you have the right to make a copyright claim on content that we technically have first dibs on
>we put it under our own domain name
>we fucking own it

Seriously, she has such a beheadable neck

>I'm an American, I'll fight to death for my Jewish overlords
Yeah sounds about right.

>MFW the UN is a conspiracy theorist

Attached: 1554071297431.png (684x605, 510K)

she's just another politician who doesn't understand who owns what and who is responsible for what.

if this cow came near my kid to arrest him for sharing a video that facebook fucking owns and made available, i'd sue her ass for every cent and wreck her entire career.

>Tarrant can sue for copyright violation

oh, that would be hilarious.

I hope that does happen.

I'm ok with the video being banned, although 10+ years imprisonment is far too harsh a penalty for distributing it. Porn and snuff shouldn't be covered by protections for political speech. It's an affront to the dignity of those who died. Same goes for the news showing 911 footage tbqh. OTOH his manifesto should be free to download.