If we lose we win

If we lose we win.

t. accererationists

Attached: megamaths.png (821x411, 12K)

5

Your sperm count

Accelerationists have brain damage. Just look at South Africa and see what happens when white minorities are persecuted... Nothing and no one cares

Attached: Kike ops.jpg (1000x1117, 790K)

5

No you dumb, retarded, faggot nigger, mutt, kike and nigger loving amerishit:
if you keep doing nothing (besides working on "peaceful solutions") you will CERTAINLY lose.
If you go the accelerationism route, you at least have a chance to win.

>implying the natural result of trying to forcibly take away firearms from the worlds most influential nation being America isn't a nationwide Waco-esque scenario followed by a coup to remove the infiltrated government
It's like these last years of this insane political polarization isn't also a natural result of the left gaining immense power and pushing even more absurd policies and agendas in all sectors of the government, especially education and media. This should immediately remind you of something.

Attached: 1516739582415.jpg (250x263, 11K)

And Rhodesia before that. And Haiti, way before that. I'm starting to get the distinct impression that there's no magical point where white people go Super Saiyan, activate their Devil Trigger, enter Gear Third, use Spartan Rage, and rebound by miraculously wiping out all the niggers and shitskins. I think accelerationism may in fact be retarded.

17

81?

If society collapses now then we have a chance to fight for our future. Otherwise we leave the burden to our children

Attached: ben_shapiro.png (971x640, 442K)

29

It's the Jews.

>16 / 2 * (8 - 3 (4 - 2)) + 1
>16 / 2 * (8 - 3 * 2) + 1
>16 / 2 * (8 - 6) + 1
>16 / 2 * 2 + 1
>8 * 2 + 1
>16 + 1
17

Attached: e17ee0e80e8b51d100960910bad16af0.jpg (552x470, 45K)

You're literally stupid. The shorter time frame things happen, the more people it will radicalize and the bigger the chance of winning is. Accelerationists dont make things happen, they make the inevitable things happen faster. Which is a good thing. It would happen anyways.

Of course it's only Africans getting this stupid math question right.

16/5

or

5

>ambigious notation
KYS.

Yes good goy follow the wheel and the path we have laid for you dont ever think about destroying the system

Please excuse my dear aunt sally

16 / 2[8 - 3(4 - 2)] + 1
16 / 2[8 - 3(2)] + 1
16 / 2[8 - 6] + 1
16 / 2[2] + 1
8[2] + 1
16 + 1
17

5 or 1488 guess

you cannot do that
>16 / 2[2] + 1
>8[2] + 1
>16 + 1
>17

5 if I'm not autistic

Apparently I'm autistic

Attached: IMG_20190404_104929.jpg (2736x3648, 2.04M)

>16 / 2[2] + 1
>8[2] + 1
>16 + 1
>17
Not
>16 / (2[2] + 1)
And not
>16 / (2[2]) + 1
Either

5, there is absolutely no ambiguity in this problem

the divisor symbol and multiplication have left to right precedence, however, fraction bars have higher precedence than multiplication. This is why you don't see the divisor symbol in higher math.

it's 5 you absolute guffoons

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-04-04 at 1.57.31 AM.png (322x52, 11K)

D before M if it is a fraction bar, otherwise it's whatever comes first, left to right

fuck this thread and fuck OP

Attached: Screenshot_108.jpg (586x728, 127K)

Attached: Screenshot_72.jpg (595x582, 118K)

16/2[8-3(2)]+1
simplify is different than solve

() is different from []

It's 17

It+s 5 god damnit

If you don't get 5 you're an idiot