Why the fuck would anyone become a scientist or believe any science...

Just like with every profession, there are people who are not very good at their job. These people are a small minority, and there are structures in place to address this. Take the "vaccines cause autism" paper as an example. It's shit, and it has been thoroughly discredited as a result.

it has nothing to do with how good they are at their job, that's what the scientific model was for. it's just that money sways research findings, some official consensuses are outright bullshit because of this.

>there are people who are not very good at their job.

I have not met a plumber claiming "all pipes are the same", i do see many people in genetics claim all people are the same...

> what are ethics
> what is peer-review
> what are replication studies
Do you think that the gubbirment or "Big ___" are paying off everyone involved? With no dissenters? If something like this was going on some disgruntled grad student would've spilled the beans long ago or the Chinese would've exposed this to de-stabilize the West or whatever.
And you should listen to the geneticist when he's talking about genetics, just like you would listen to a plumber when he's talking about plumbing.

Those are Jewish tricks, smoke screens. And you're a shill.

I wish I was getting paid for this desu. If you believe that Westerners are being deceived by Jews-controlled science, then why aren't Russian or Chinese scientists disputing these claims? It would be incredibly distablising wouldn't it? Did the Jews get to them too? How come there aren't any grad students who have worked as R.As in these bogus experiments in the past who would report on these things? Surely they have access to documents and such, and they'd make a killing off of selling evidence of tampering to some Right-wing news outlet. There are bound to be plenty of weird fucks out there who would jump at the opportunity to be the kind of whistleblower that would make Snowden look like a nobody. Why isn't anyone doing this? Wouldn't any of the researchers do something like this too? Or just coming clean because they're on their deathbeds and have a guilty conscience or something. And don't forget that there are plenty of rich right-wing type. Wouldn't Lachlan Murdoch (Fox news owner) jump at the opportunity to fund some this research? "(((LIBERAL UNIVERSITIES))) COLLUDE TO HIDE THE TRUTH ABOUT RACE" would be among the biggest headlines in world history. Why aren't they doing it?

>Did the Jews get to them too?
Yes you fucking retard. Sorry for accusing you of being a shill, it appears you're just dumb as hell.
>How come there aren't any grad students who have worked as R.As in these bogus experiments in the past who would report on these things?
There are.

Not reading the rest of your post, you are gay.

Different lefty here. Jews got control of China? Please explain.

I hope you grow out of this once you graduate high-school and hopefully get forced to go to a college by your parents. Talk to your profs and you'll see that they're normal and well-meaning people, and not Jewish devils.

>an alliance between the 100IQ proles and the 150 IQ uberneets
The Third Reich in a nutshell.

>communism
Read what Rockafeller said about Mao's genocide.

People who are indoctinated by the nearly perfect Jewish retard production facilities may be good in their heart but their deeds and minds are not. They've been bred and raised as goys. You sound like someone who justifies circumcision, willfully ignores the economy being so fucked, happily pays ever increasing rates for oil, doesn't care that we haven't explored every inch of the planet and know all of our history, and tries to downplay autism rates sky rocketing thinking nothing can be done about any of these things and it's all scientifically sound.

A shill or, sorry, a retard.

What bogus experiments? Every experiment proves that race is real and matters, but you won't hear of them outside weird internet forums, because no public figure including Murdoch wants his name associated with the RACIST label.
There isn't anything worse in this society than being racist. Your worth as a person is measured first by how non-racist you are.
The science is on our side, but the media is our enemy and when the science doesn't get published in the media, it might as well not exist.
And why don't the scientists speak out? 1) Because they're afraid of being called racist and losing their career. 2) Because no media will give them a platform.
If Fox News really came out with such a headline, it would be the end of Fox News. All the brainwashed normies who only ever hear about how race is a myth in the media would boycott them and force all their advertisers to drop them.
If Russia or China started pushing back on the race issue hard, it would lead to political trouble for them - and that is ignoring the fact that they have their own anti-racist activists. China in particular still upholds a Communist image, so they could never make such a statement without dismantling the basis of their power.

Facts don't matter. Narratives matter.

lots of them are jewish devils tbqh
t. grad student

Caucasians and asians are the only humans prove me wrong

>I'm incredulous, I tell you. Incredulous!
>that's it. that's my argument

cool story bro

Anyway, it's not about big interests paying off labbies to keep their mouths shut.
Any given scientific community has been a culture unto itself. It has always been understood that you didn't breach the status quo, question certain axioms, and tow the line to keep the laymen in check. People would like you would be more than willing to accept this if we were talking about Galileo or Aristotle even.
But in this particular, contemporary, Western culture it is not popular to voice opinions questioning the consensus on race, among other things.
If you do fall out of favor, you're not just losing your funding for whatever bullshit project you were working on, you're going to be shunned by the community as a whole, leaving you with only the options to 1, find a different career path or, 2, funny you should mention it, go work for wealthy backers outside the Western Scientific Community.

The Chinese have, in fact, been making strides and breakthroughs in areas we're too limited by red tape to investigate properly, or too cucked to even talk about. Genetics is, in particular, one of those fields, though a lot of it has to do with their utter lack of enforcing ethics guidelines.
I would imagine that hoarding all the wealth of knowledge they are gaining is more valuable to them than a fleeting "fuck you," because it would be just that, not an actual destabilizing act.

Attached: 2OEmwvY.gif (499x223, 909K)

>be graduate student
>doing post graduate studies
>working on semiconductor physics with a professor
>research is funded by some faggot feminazi group
>Be researching P-N junctions
>they got mad when they realized that we weren;t looking into a p-p or n-n junction
>said p-n junctions are too heterosexual, and we should focus our research on p-p or n-n junctions
>we are like f that
>one day the feminazi shows up to our lab
>we kick her out
>she opens the door
>drop on the floor
>everybody walk the dinosaur

the jews have such a huge grasping kvetch on the world where they have basically manipulated any semblance of education to be perfectly Jewish,
they made it so that jew socialist professors with psychology degrees are the ones getting hired. going to college is basically just expensive cultural enrichment programs. anywhere you go in the world you need to empty your fucking pockets to a jew. Say some completely innocuous "anti Semitic" truth on the internet?, you gotta pay the brave jewish woman whose PTSD she inherited from her 29x great grandparents who were under slavery by the Egyptians or some shit, the truth is they have a finger in every pie on the continent and every step you take benefits the eternal jew in some way
i cannot fucking wait until they all get All Tomorrowed

Attached: 1553533484639.jpg (500x631, 45K)

Science is just a tool. Someone using it incorrectly to support an agenda doesnt make it any less useful

Lets be the generation that ends racism and starts calling people our for being the worthless pieces of crap they are.

Why do you believe this stuff? You keep saying this shit and yet all you have to back this up are a bunch of charts you found on this website and a couple of blogs at best. Have you ever actually stepped foot in a university?
> willfully ignores the economy being so fucked, happily pays ever increasing rates for oil
Academia is notoriously left-leaning. There are plenty of academics who despise the Neoliberal world order.
> we haven't explored every inch of the planet and know all of our history
The ocean is being explored. It's not profitable so it's fairly slow. What exactly do you think the Jews are hiding? Aliens? Atlantis?
> muh autism
We got better at diagnosing it. And what good would it do to make slightly more people autistic anyway. The majority of people are still mentally sound.
t. lazy grad student.
You knew what you signed up for. You're your advisor's bitch for now.

lol i'm not talking about mine you dumb nigger

>
> because no public figure including Murdoch wants his name associated with the RACIST
Murdoch does not give a fuck. Fox news is already known as a hub of racists. And what difference would it make if they had solid science to back this up?
> but the media is our enemy and when the science doesn't get published in the media
This is how I know you've never been to a university. Mass-media only publishes the really big stuff, and it only does it when it makes for a click-worthy headline. Science gets published in academic journals. Good ones have peer-review processes and other procedures in place to make sure that trash doesn't get published. Shitty ones don't. And you won't find this sort of nonsense even in the shitty ones. Why? Because it's not true. It really is as simple as that.
> end of Fox News
How? Why? It's a private corporation. How would it be the end of it? And besides, there are plenty of racists (and I don't say it in an accusatory way) who watch Fox. Why would they care? They would even be able to say that it's sound science.
> Russia or China started pushing back on the race issue hard, it would lead to political trouble for them
One blatantly violated international law by annexing a part of a nation, the other executes people by the thousand and put a million muslims into "re-education camps" and both got away with it. But allowing for a bunch of banned papers about race to be published will be their doom?
> and that is ignoring the fact that they have their own anti-racist activists
China is anti-racist? See my comment about them putting muslims in re-education camps. As for Russia, Putin does not give a fuck. And his opposition have much bigger fish to fry than niggers.

>Why do you believe this stuff
I'm just more informed and probably smarter than you. The world is fucked and the current stage of our civillization(protip, it's not good) is in large part due to the scientific model, or more specifically all the slanting that's been done in its wake and how people believe whatever they hear when scientists of any sort back up the claim.

You have no fucking idea how fucked the world is because of actual pseudo science or fabricated scientific reports being gobbled up by the masses.

>why would a person of above-average intelligence tongue the anuses of overpaid pseuds who lie to manipulate society on a global scale?

Attached: 25778492-6AAA-4E4B-8F50-4234825E6DD2.jpg (250x250, 9K)

>those people actually look very similar
I think you dropped these.

Attached: 3043E17C-5C33-4A98-9C9D-AB393D887892.jpg (720x350, 12K)

user... the OP pic is talking about subspecies. There's nothing in it about species. It's okay if you're dumb, you just need to read more carefully.

t. listens to right-wing Youtubers and the occasional pop-philosophy video. Bought beyond good and evil and culture of critique, but never got around to reading either.

>banned papers
What "banned papers"? There are plenty of scientific articles that implicitly prove that race is real and matters, though they won't put that in their headline. I think you don't understand the issue yet.
- Try to do a study that explicitly studies racial differences => Get denied and put your career at risk | Example: Richard Dawkins said he would never allow funding to be allocated to such a study.
- Make an analysis that extracts data from published papers to show correleation between race and other factors like IQ and publish a book => Become universally known as an evil racist and have your name smeared endlessly | Example: The Bell Curve
- Make some blog posts on the internet => Nobody reads them lol

>How? Why? It's a private corporation. How would it be the end of it? And besides, there are plenty of racists (and I don't say it in an accusatory way) who watch Fox. Why would they care? They would even be able to say that it's sound science.
How does Youtube keep getting cucked by emails to their advertisiers? They're also a private corporation and have plenty of racist users.

>them putting muslims in re-education camps
To heal them of their muslimness and make them good Chinese citizens.

I'm being incredulous because the claims you're making range from highly unlikely to absurd. What you've said thus far requires me to believe that "The jews" are a highly organised force (they're not) with world-wide influence (there isn't) that are motivated by some nefarious anti-white agenda (global capitalism is about profit, nothing else) and that they have nearly absolute control over academia (they don't). I'm supposed to believe that my professors, people who are highly intelligent and critical and whom I respect and sometimes admire, and even fellow students, are being secretly paid by the juden to keep quiet about how races are biologically distinct as part of a plot to promote multiculturalism etc. and ignore everything that I've mentioned thus far in previous comments.

Yeah, it is ridiculous. You've been here for far too long if you don't see that.

That’s not actually true. Defining species is not an exact science, and there are multiple theories about it.

For example, grizzly bears and brown bears can interbreed and produce fertile offspring.

>bachelor in strategic studies
>ongoing masters degree on international security
>have to listen from white female professors how colonization is the root of all evil
>have to write essays on how white man is evil and destroyed Africa, the Americas and most of Asia
>disturbed and I'm not even white
>latino from mostly European descend

How can people actually not see that this zeitgeist of framing European ("western") cultures as inherently evil is only given the upper hand to civilizations that are far more negligent when it comes to the so desired social justice?

I've never had to face a class where there was high criticism towards Arabian slave trade and exploitation of the Horn of Africa. I never had to endure a class on Ottoman system of slavery. All I hear about is how my ancestors were apparently were wrong in trying to civilize previously primitive societies in the Americas.

>implying social sciences are a real science

Attached: G800S15.jpg (1106x1012, 90K)

Actually pathetic post.

>How can people actually not see that this zeitgeist of framing European ("western") cultures as inherently evil is only given the upper hand to civilizations that are far more negligent when it comes to the so desired social justice?
the people pushing it do see that.

>are being secretly paid by the juden to keep quiet about how races are biologically distinct as part of a plot to promote multiculturalism etc
Are you saying that races AREN'T biologically distinct? If so, why is it that when two Khoisan parents have a baby, it's always a Khoisan, and never an Eskimo? Or when two Punjabi parents have a baby, it's never a Nahuatl?

>and most of Asia
??
Other than that it IS true, but it's not all black and white as you say. Other countries are just as bad if not worse. Greed as a whole should be snuffed out whenever possible.

>How can people actually not see that this zeitgeist of framing European ("western") cultures as inherently evil is only given the upper hand to civilizations that are far more negligent when it comes to the so desired social justice?
You're buying into their pretext there, my friend.

>All I hear about is how my ancestors were apparently were wrong in trying to civilize previously primitive societies in the Americas.
Well... your ancestors WERE wrong in trying to do that. Albeit for a totally different reason than what the Intersectionalists say. You can't just GIVE people civilization. That which is received for free has no value. Case in point, your Abos who just lie around all day in a stupor drinking and huffing petrol fumes.

What course is this?
> I've never had to face a class where there was high criticism towards Arabian slave trade and exploitation of the Horn of Africa
Take a course on the relevant topic? Why would a course that's presumably focused on the West talk about unrelated matters? And besides, the problem is that Western colonialism was far more pervasive and more importantly more recent, and it was that which created conditions that have delayed development in formerly colonised countries. But you got a really bad professor or haven't been paying attention if you think that it's about moralizing to people about how they're evil whiteys. Even in undergrad they'll teach you about various theoretical approaches to I.R and none of them are "whitey bad darkie good".

>come on goy, why didn't you just take one of the gorillions of courses about how evil Muslims were instead of the mandatory fuck whitey classes?

>You can't just GIVE people civilization.
That's simply not true. Yes, that which is given has little value compared to what was conquered. However, civilizational processes are numerous. Take China's role in creating a tributary system that culturally enhanced all of their neighbors. Take what the US and Brazil are today considering the current state of their former slaves, most are much better off then their ancestors who stayed slaved in Africa. Take most of South and Central America where native-american populations, although highly interbreed, now live in far more civilized societies the before. Conquest, when accompanied by a proper civilization process, is a enriching experience if you play your cards right.

You're mixing up race and ethnicity. Race is a broad category - like black or white - that doesn't have much biological value. Ethnicity is a term for a group of people who have social similarities and sometimes biological ones too. But even then you'd be hard-pressed to find credible science that shows that these groups have any real differences in terms of performance that stem from biology - like one ethnicity being inherently more intelligent than the other.

University courses aren't designed to cater to your white fragility. You're a Westerner, and the Western professor at your Western university has designed a course that focuses on the West. If you want to learn about colonialism by non-Western powers, take more specialised courses.

Most courses are focused on Asia for logical geographical reasons.

>the problem is that Western colonialism was far more pervasive and more importantly more recent, and it was that which created conditions that have delayed development in formerly colonised countries.

That's just plainly wrong. 'western' (the mere employment of this concept is flawed, but anyway) colonialism are far LESS pervasive then those perpetrated by the Ottomans, for example. If this sort of colonialism was so detrimental, why are their children amongst the most developed nations in the world? The US, Canada, Australia, China, Singapore, in a sort of second rank, Brazil, Chile, South Africa, Mexico etc. None of these former are even close to perfect nations, but they are, nonetheless, fully functioning civilizations on their own right who were ENRICHED by colonial experience that allowed them to configure themselves in a westphalian way capable of preserving their own interests. Where are Ottoman's or Arabian colonies today?

>the Western professor
Jewish*

>you’d be hard press—

Attached: 8A8DF9CB-FE45-4DA5-8050-D1BA528C774B.jpg (600x405, 26K)

>You're mixing up race and ethnicity.
"Ethnicity" is basically the pc way to say race, but muddy the concept enough that you have plausible deniablity to claim it's not race you're talking about.
>Race is a broad category - like black or white - that doesn't have much biological value.
Wrong. The way you'd construct a race categorization is by following the evolutionary lines - not skin color.
>But even then you'd be hard-pressed to find credible science that shows that these groups have any real differences in terms of performance that stem from biology - like one ethnicity being inherently more intelligent than the other.
Wrong, there's plenty of evidence.

Ignore all memeflag kikes

>white fragility
uh oh now you exposed yourself

Well, good thing I didn't say that then.
Now that I realize you're a grad student I realize that this conversation is pointless.
You're so full of enthusiasm and high ideals right now that nothing I could say would be anything you want to hear.
But, in about 5 years, you're going to come to the very core-shattering realization that I am right, that some of the things these other guys are saying are right, and you're going to feel like a fool for believing what you do now.

When that time comes, I hope you decide to see the problems you see as your problems. I hope you realize that you're not alone. I hope you decide to not give in to despair.

You seem to be a smart person and have a good heart. Even if you never agree with me, honestly, if you stay true to how you are now, the world will be that much better for it, and that's good enough for me.

>which created conditions that have delayed development in formerly colonised countries
Oh, you fucking brainwashed moron, go to Ivory Coast or Ethiopia that were never colonized by evil white people.

Either a kike or a retard.

The big brains need to convince the small brains to bash in the heads of all the midlets with rocks

>Take China's role in creating a tributary system that culturally enhanced all of their neighbors.
The neighbors WANTED it. They saw that the Chinese system conferred advantages upon the Chinese and proactively adopted aspects of that system. It was never a situation where the Chinese just went around throwing copies of The Analects at the locals and simply attempting to GIVE them culture.

>Take what the US and Brazil are today considering the current state of their former slaves, most are much better off then their ancestors who stayed slaved in Africa.
Their higher general quality of life isn't an indication in of itself that they value civilization. Most of them are better off because they live within a civilizational framework that gives them gibs, not because they themselves became civilized or have come to value civilization. One only needs to take a look at the crime statistics in both the US and Brazil and see how the majority of violent criminals are blacks (and descendants of slaves) to see that. If they valued the civilizations that they had been given, they would not behave in this manner (assuming they're genetically capable of not behaving in this manner, of course).

>Take most of South and Central America where native-american populations, although highly interbreed, now live in far more civilized societies the before.
I would say that that the high level of interbreeding between the native Mesoamericans and invading Iberians is a major factor in this case. The modern mixed-race descendants found in these areas were not given civilization so much as they culturally inherited it from their Iberian ancestors.

Because actual science shows for a damn fact that human races are different.

show your real flag you meme flaggot

Shifting the goalposts doesn't work on me. Maybe this pilpul shit works on whites because they're easily distracted but I'm Chinese and I've got that East Asian autism. Your original statement didn't talk about performance stemming from biology. You talked about races not being biologically distinct.

Address my question. If you object to the granularity I used then I can go less granular if you like. Why do Australoid parents never have a Capoid baby, or Mongoloid parents never have a Caucasoid baby?

Quite frankly, I don't know much about the subject, and you'd be better served going to your professor and asking her these questions. From the little I understand reading about it online, the ottoman empire was not a colonial power because Colonialism is sending a group of your people to settle and dominate a conquered population, and the Ottomans did not do that, presumably opting to give the people they conquered more independence. Maybe not. Like I said this isn't my thing.
> US, Canada, Australia
But user, the natives of these counties were nearly exterminated. There's nothing left but settlers. And these states never had a the type of exploitative relationship with their Colonial masters for long. You know how the brief colonial history of the U.S has ended, and the Canada-UK relationship was not really exploitative and fairly distant. Australians are not important.
Anyway, why the fuck are you asking a literal nobody on the internet about this? Ask your professor. Like I repeatedly stated ITT, you vastly overestimate how shallow these people are. As long as you're respectful and looking for honest answers they'll give them to you.

Oh shucks I've been exposed! What do I do Mr. Soros? I still get paid, right?

...

no you don't get paid fag

it's funny, the last few nights I was looking into this using ncbi and other sources
I also looked into the transgender thing
turns out tons of PhDs and other scientists have came to a conclusion that race doesn't exist and transgender's best treatment is to go through the transition
I'm excited to see what the outcome of all this will be in 20 years or so

Attached: amertart.jpg (500x500, 150K)

Attached: amuekafag.png (1464x772, 545K)

>Quite frankly, I don't know much about the subject, and you'd be better served going to your professor and asking her these questions
Ah, hiding behind someone else's authority, the third-to-last refuge of the intellectually dishonest.

>Anyway, why the fuck are you asking a literal nobody on the internet about this?
Because you're here, and this is a venue where literal nobodies on the internet talk to each other. You came here of your own free will to speak as an equal among equals and you don't get to slither away to hide in someone else's shadow now. Hold forth on your own beliefs on their own merits or fuck off.

he is even worse than a meme flag, he is - may Allah forgive me for saying this - a fucking leaf

Because the struggle for truth is worth it.

this is why engineers and craftsman never become leaders, becoming an expert in a non-social field retards those senses

> Why do Australoid parents never have a Capoid baby
Because the baby will not magically teleport himself to a different continent, won't be raised by his parents to speak a foreign language or coached in a foreign culture. Anyhow, the point of this whole debate is anons asserting that the Jews or whomever are hiding that race (and the language has been about race from the very beginning) is a predictor of performance (intelligence etc.) because of inherent differences between races. This is not true because races (white, black, "asian") are vague categories with little biological values. There are some biological differences between some ethnicities. However, they are still not useful when it comes to predicting performance. An Australoid is not going to have a lower IQ than the other because of his biology.

> Ah, hiding behind someone else's authority, the third-to-last refuge of the intellectually dishonest.
Not talking about things that you don't understand is what reasonable people do. A foreign concept in these parts, naturally.
> You came here of your own free will
To talk about the OP. The poster I responded to veered into a very specific issue that I'm not knowledgeable in. I gave him my three cents while acknowledging my lack of expertise in that particular area. I don't know what else to say about that.

>race doesn't exist
well it really doesn't : you classify something based on how genetically different something is from another thing
but that range is completely arbitrary and it's not applied in the same way with animals and humans
>transgender's best treatment is to go through the transition
lobotomy was the best treatment for mental disorders too, doesn't mean it's good

both statements are technically correct

Joke's on you goyim, I get paid for (You)s. Now that I've collected almost 30 (You)s he'll let me at his personal pure Aryan child slave he keeps in his basement so that I could give her non-white babies.

140 uberneet here

Its lonely at the top bros.... im poor and alone and all I do is think all the time. Everyone i talk to doesnt understand me. Its like im litterally a retard but on the opposite end.

Attached: 43A8C7AC-44D8-4B0C-81CB-F04AD62FCD6E.jpg (750x1000, 45K)

Internet IQ tests don’t count

>Because the baby will not magically teleport himself to a different continent, won't be raised by his parents to speak a foreign language or coached in a foreign culture.
So if a pair of Australoids left Australia to move to say... the Congo, and there in the Congo had sex with each other and produced a baby, which they then raised to speak Igbo, then their baby would be a Negroid?

Do you know what these terms of Australoid, Capoid, Mongoloid, Negroid, etc, even mean? They're not ethnicities. Nor are they the soft categories of white, black, asian. These are sets of anatomical features.

>There are some biological differences between some ethnicities. However, they are still not useful when it comes to predicting performance. An Australoid is not going to have a lower IQ than the other because of his biology.
And having acknowledged that biological differences do exist between different human populations (or ethnicities), on what basis do you make the claim that the biological differences between the ethnicities stop below the neck?

>Not talking about things that you don't understand is what reasonable people do.
And yet you held forth on these topics at some length and with some attempts to portray yourself as an authority. Until you were confronted with factual limitations in your knowledge, at which point you tried to invoke the authority of your professors and hide behind that.

Reasonable... yes, I suppose, for someone who has not thought out their positions but instead has been fed them by their professors and taught to recite them mechanically like a puppet.

Uhm i got tested at school. They didmt know what to do with me. Because i was so smart but kids ended up beating me because I knew so much. So they put me in Gifted classes at first. Then decided because kids didnt like me to put me with special ed kids. At that point i just stopped caring. Regardless IQ tests dont matter anyway. There’s no official test. I was given one so the had an idea where to put me. But in my local theres not much in the way of programs for gifted kids. But cool

you are a total fucktard
forensic dectectives and anthropologists identify remains by RACE
and the easiest way to differentiate race is by difference in the skull.
The six phenotype are Caucasoid, Mongoloid. Negroid, American Indian, and the Melanesian/Australian.
The fact that forensic scientists can differentiate the different races through scientific methods proves that the belief that "race is a social construct" is fraudulent non-science being perpetrated by disingenuous University professors with a progressive agenda

>tfw to smart too go anywhere but special ed classes

Attached: B2CFD731-81FA-4AA3-AF03-6072FC866ACC.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Haven't found a black girl that looks like pic related

Attached: 123459484554035568.jpg (1080x720, 81K)

Well my sister was able to skip a grade because of her test scores. but the state said that it couldnt do that when i got into school, because “its not fair to the other students”. They thought i was autistic because i wasnt socializing with the other kids. Thats why

You left out Capoids! Very very different from a Negroid.

Attached: capoid.jpg (183x275, 8K)

It's okay, user. We're all autistic here.

Attached: tists.gif (530x320, 1.57M)

> with some attempts to portray yourself as an authorit
Only with regards to the original question of whether there is a conspiratorial effort to suppress sound science because of ideological reasons. That doesn't mean I'm an expert on the history of the ottoman empire. Do you really not see the difference here?

Anti-speciesm is the new antiracism. You may not like it, but if you have four limbs you're a lobe-finned fish.
I'm taking my wife and children and will live in the ocean to check our terrestrial privelege.

The categories that forensic anthropologists are (sometimes) useful only insofar as they determine a very broad ancestry. That's not the same as race because the latter is a much more vague category that includes social factors and in terms of biology is not very useful, to the point where there can be more biological variation inside the same race compared to between races. And the concept of race is being phased out of physical anthropology as well:
journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/202915

And yet you made the statement of
>the problem is that Western colonialism was far more pervasive and more importantly more recent, and it was that which created conditions that have delayed development in formerly colonised countries.

Thereby attempting to portray yourself as an authority on this topic by making a definitive statement. If you know very little about the topic then why did you make this claim to begin with?

Look, this pilpul thing where you pretend to not have said the things you said? It doesn't work so well in text form as it does in verbal speech.

Still haven't answered the question. And in our hypothetical of Australoids moving to the Congo a broad ancestry is sufficient for our needs, as the Australoids and native Congolese Negroids' common ancestors diverged at most some 70,000 years ago by the OOA model.

So, I'll restate it. So if a pair of Australoids left Australia to move to say... the Congo, and there in the Congo had sex with each other and produced a baby, which they then raised to speak Igbo, then their baby would be a Negroid?

Answer the question, faggot.

>to the point where there can be more biological variation inside the same race compared to between races
Are men taller than women or "is there more variation within than between"?
Are there black Finns?
Are there tall pygmies?

We do it because

A. Job security in academia is fucking great, even if the workload is insane.
B. Everyone we know tells us how smart they think we are despite most of us having some form of imposter syndrome.
C. Not all scientific information gets repressed, and it feels pretty good to get published.

It depends on the shape of the baby's skull. Because that's all being a "negroid" means. What's that worth to anyone?
> Are men taller than women
Some are, some aren't.
>Are there black Finns?
At this point? Probably.

>Missed the "sub" prefix.
user work on your reading comprehension and stop making us burgers look bad.

Attached: theraces.jpg (1158x1600, 355K)