Here is the new print ad for L'Oréal Paris.
>The sad truth about gender equality in Germany: Men dominate the management and executive boards - with 91.4%.
Do you think they'd be happy with a 50-50 ratio of men and women in management roles? What about teachers, 87% of whom are women in Germany. Shouldn't we also work on decreasing the gender imbalance there, and start hiring more men, even if they're less qualified than their female counterparts?
Other urls found in this thread:
fundacjaliderekbiznesu.pl
twitter.com
>the revenue goes up because the female leaders are paid less
GUYS WHAT IF WE JUST HIRED PEOPLE BASED ON HOW QUALIFIED THEY ARE FOR THE JOB AND NOT THEIR GENDER/KIN/SKIN COLOUR/ATTACK HELICOPTER TYPE
LIKE YEAH THERE ARE 0% POMERANIANS HIRED AS POLICE DOGS BUT I DON'T THINK FIRING HALF OF THE GERMAN SHEPHERDS AND REPLACING THEM WITH THESE LITTLE FLUFFY BOIS IS A GOOD IDEA
the ad is very misleading. profitability is what matters not gross revenue.
>revenue goes up
That's it, I'm too old to be here. Fuck all of you.
Business owner here. This ad and no retarded ad campaign would ever make me hire women for the sake of it. I only hire the best people for the job, and it just so happens that the majority of people who work for me are white males. Suck shit.
NO its perfect! we can send them in as bomb diffusional squads!
The poster says revenue, I was using the same word as the poster faggot.
Male teachers are less qualified in what way? Indoctrinating kids?
All my male teachers have been good if not better than the female.
Less salary expense doesn't mean more revenues you stupid burger FUCK
Ive only ever hired the AH-64 Apache gunship to work in my business.
Look at the ad, these idiots can’t even keep from conflating revenue and profitability. Absolute amateur tier.
You're getting mad at a joke boomer faggot.
hey Tone, da math don't add up:
100 men = $100 revenue
100 men (70%) + 42 women (30%) = $115 revenue
Women in leadership roles are poison.
Given Amy sort of authority they weild it ruthlessly.
Huge penis shaped chips on their shoulder and extremely sack happy.
they're making fun of men who want to be women these days
>Profitability goes up
>Can pay them less while making more profit
If this were actually the case, WHY WOULD A COMPANY EVER HIRE A MAN?
No. You should be sammiches, not ads.
I like the idea. [spoiler]HONK[/spoiler]
Why are men the ones that have to hire women in leadership roles? Sounds pretty sexist to me loreal
No thanks. It's bad enough with too many overly emotional men being in leadership roles without adding more women, who tend to be more emotional on average, to the fire.
I thought those were bullets. I love bullets!
then start a firm, its easy to prop up profits with new blood, but women almost never start companies that make it big
Ah, conflating cause and effect again. It's like saying white countries are wealthy because women have equal rights - when actually, we rose to the point where we could afford such a luxury. Actually, it's costing us, our wealth and influence and even our future as a society.
>never see any ads saying we need more female garbage collectors, lineworkers, pipeline workers, oil rig workers, roofers, ironworkers, construction site laborers, underwater welders, etc
>we only need more females in corporate figurehead positions
k
>An ad for trannys?
Wait...a print ad?
So, actually an ad no one will see because next to no one reads magazines.
fundacjaliderekbiznesu.pl
Go read it and poke holes in it.
It has a nice sample but 1/3 of the companies have 0 female board members and 0 female executives, maybe that should be taken into account.
same
>females in workplace
Purge.
Correct. Next to the fact that these numbers are bs anyway and very likely are only based on some bs study done by a gender studies intern and/or only focus on an event study of a couple of months of hiring a new ceo.
because the truth of how men would be hired more often on average would be revealed to the goyim and we can't have that
Lmao what the fuck, how much deeper can the west sink
I gave a link to the study. Judge for yourself and don't make ASSumptions
It's junk economics. If economics was a science I'd call that junk science.
They have not introduced any lagged variable. So is it that women cause excess margins, or that they are attracted to succesful companies, or that companies that are already doing well are more inclined to get women in leadership?
When do you intend to shoot up a mosque?
You guys do realize the lipstick represents a penis, right?
This, basically
I head a department of a highly specialized technical function for a business in finance. People in my department typically have math degrees and continue their formal education and training up to a decade after completing their bachelors degree. We are highly paid and sought after by employers. We also interact frequently with Senior leadership and often get opportunities to become a senior leader at a much greater rate than other functions and much earlier in our careers.
Whenever I have an opening for a new hire I get a lot of candidates. 40-50 is pretty common. Of those normally only about 2 will be women and they are normally immigrants.
The problem isn’t employers hiring practices. The problem is the professions women pursue.
Fantasy land
phosphorus mmmmmm
>Hinter jeden Regenbogenfahne...
Exactly my thoughts. I don't think you can use a simple OLS for this based on just a snapshot (even though the author literally states an OLS in this case is sufficient but that the snapshots should be interpreted with care). Normally, you would use an event analysis for this or at least something that takes the necessary time-variable into consideration. NEXT TO the obvious reverse causality fact that is righly expressing.
I remember having extensive classes on event analysis and the addition of female/minority board members leading to lower overal short term return and long term return or neutral long term return.
>has to tell you this is an ad for men
The marketing department has completely failed here lmao
I bet this poster was conceptualised and creating by women marketers and graphic designers. This thing would not catch my attention for a second. Advertising by women is just fucking awful. 90% of TV ads are made by women these days, and it shows. Also half the super bowl ads are made by women - again, it's why they are shit
>hire a woman
>suddenly have to deal with "sexual harassment" horseshit nonstop
Yeah, no thanks. Men are worth that extra wage gap.
Exactly. They premise of what they believe isn't grounded in facts, as a result their victimhood never changes. Women are preferred in many fields, but they'll never be happy until they dominate men in all fields because deep down they know they are worse in STEM and management positions.
>'Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.' -Industrial Society and its Future
Lost
Yes, this is the problem and you'll notice in Hollywood there is a huge push to get women into STEM so that they get the same amount of respect (in practice without the same amount of work). Hollywood actresses are speaking to major Tech companies and saying you had better hire more women. Hollywood and the Porn Industry like Porn Hub are setting up scholarships for women in STEM, it's kind of pathetic, but since everyone buys into it, they will get their way. It ties into this Ted quote
>I was only pretending to be retarded hahah roflmaohahahahhhBbh
>Oi guvna. You have a shittin loicense?
There are so few male teachers in Germany because women think all men are pedos.
Dont forget theranos.
>Germany: Men dominate the management and executive boards - with 91.4%
Good
This is what created the imbalance in hiring ratios between genders in the first place.
Men are just better than women at everything worth a salary.
How could you turn down 15% more profits though?
>BIG MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION VIRTUE SIGNALS IN AN ADVERTISEMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO SEEM COOL
>"HOW DO YOU DO FELLOW KIDS"
>wtf feminism
I thought it was dog penis. Only reason i clicked.
I must be a part leaf because all I see on that ad is dog dick.
So you’re saying we need more lobsters on boards?
Ew no those jobs are icky lmao
lmao
>work at semi truck factory
>developing new hydrogen powerd truck
>pretty cool
>first fully functional truck rolled out
>a marvel of engineering
>next day
>it's been plasted with a special paint/color design
>"Diversity" and leftist saying stenciled on
>truck is now perminarty displayed on the factory floor, next to the classic old model
Literally not true, I had a female in a high position in my company and she couldn't close one deal in two months... it took a guy five minutes talking to the same customer
Lol pages 19 and 20. Lmfao quotas don’t seem to work at all
>the problem is the professions women pursue
This is of course blamed on the male-established order of societies (patriarchy). Anytime bad thing happen=male, patriarchy
Good thing happen by/to woman= she fought against the patriarchy to get it OR she was forced into it in the first place by the patriarchy.
They are unable to take responsibility for anything. Got a black hanged because you were flirting with him and said it was the other way around to avoid responsibility? Patriarchy is at fault for creating the situation and implying violent threats. Man are violent patriarchy an women would have done everything better if only brute men weren't in charge from the beginning, which they only were due to raping women and beating/subjugating/murdering anyone who opposed them.
Intelligent leaders are only women, whereas men are only PERCEIVED as intelligent because patriarchy even though all men are brutal rapists.
Not a good picture, makes us look like incels. I am redpilled and dosed with the best of them, but we can do better then post these memes.
tell that to yahoo
>us
You're not fooling anyone
>incels
Wew lad pls stop
Back to CNN/Fox with you
I wish yahoo never bought geocities... I could get back that id I created in 2001 ‘sending_marshmallows_to_newyork’
A corporation is an uncaring and unfeeling monster. It knows that men are better in management than women will ever be, which is why it picks men to run it. That's how it should always be.
There is no "us" here, you tranny. You don't belong. Now go.
Except all the companies with diversity hires always go under.
You are a fucking brainlet. This is am ad for women, not men. By attacking men they are appealing to women you stupid fuck. I bet you run your business like shit if you can't even solve a simple fucking ad.
If you ever come to Canada you can suck my dogs penis with me user. I'll hook you up.