Just explain why anyone would even need an assault rifle in the first place. And don't give me that tyrannical government tinfoil hat nonsense. Because from where I'm standing I see no good arguments for the government to start being tyrannical.
I mean, when the founding fathers wrote the Second Amendment they did not say anything about assault rifles. If they really wanted people to be allowed to own assault rifles then they would have mentioned AR-15s but they did not. The founding fathers even the same people who enslaved African Americans and resisted women's suffrage. So they are hardly role models anyway.
Fuck you, I need a gun to put holes in niggers like you. Soon enough it'll be open season on shitheads like you and people like me are chomping at the bit to smoke fags like you. Fuck you stupid cunt.
Wyatt Green
>inb4 200+ replies and 1 post by ID
Levi Watson
I'll give up my modern guns the day the press stops using modern electronic transmissions and returns to the manually operated printing press.
It's not even bait at this point.
Elijah Jones
SHALL
Jose Hughes
NOT
Jayden Price
INFRINGE
Camden Hill
I agree, electronics are evil and we need to get rid of them. You start.
Parker Moore
Situation like yellow vests.
Jaxson Ortiz
This. OP is just baiting and doesn't give a shit about this. They can come back once they've looked into the issue and want to have a serious discussion on some aspect of gun control.
David Sanchez
Because I can't trust you. /thread
Ethan Hall
>Because from where I'm standing I see no good arguments for the government to start being tyrannical. Where exactly are you standing, memeflag?
>Just explain why anyone would even need an assault rifle in the first place. >And don't give me the exact stated reason for the creation of the 2nd amendment. Gr8 b8 m8
Christopher Ortiz
fuck you
Jayden Edwards
One post by this homo, sage and ignore.
Alexander Young
Just shot my M4 I bought 2 days ago. Shit's cash as fuck.
It's mind boggling that western civilization has tolerated you creatures this long.
Cameron Gutierrez
SUBSCRIBE TO TIM POOL NORMIES
Mason Campbell
Hitler took the guns, Stalin took the guns, Fidel Castro took the guns, Hugo Chavez took guns. And im here to tell you 1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms. You go through backrounds checks. Did you know that Prozac is the number one reason bla bla bla bla OH GOTTA CUT THAT OFF DONT YOU.
Guns are needed to protect people from the number 1 killer in history - Governments. Democide - google it folks.
Jaxson Perry
Through government is tyrannical. People are just too scared to rise up against it. Which totally proves my point
Nolan Fisher
Easy
Wartren v Washington D.C.: >appeals court ruled that police DO NOT have an obligation to protect individuals, their duty is owed to the public at large. According to the U.S. government, the ONLY person responsible for your safety, is YOU.
Are you a peasant or a free man? Do you think that the wealthy are better than you? Why should they be able to defend their homes with heavily armed private security if you can't? Simply because you can't afford that privilege?
>left wing constantly pushing for more government control over your life >open talk of socialism >"I see no good arguments for the government to start being tyrannical" Hang yourself
Michael Reed
>1 post by this ID This is why gun grabbers will fail, they are lazy and don’t believe their own agitprop.
Saged.
Jack Rodriguez
Obviously globalists want to invest into the African continent which will net them 20 trillion GDP to keep the ponzi going for ZOG.
Caleb Bailey
I am neither, I am a Sigma male, I am the free spirit, people are afraid of me so I don't need guns. And I earn like 60k a year so I am pretty rich enough to employ my own private security. So fuck the poor.
The government on the most part is pretty good and somewhat trustworthy. Honestly I rather let them handle my business like the good slaves they are. I am the law.
>I mean, when the founding fathers wrote the Second Amendment they did not say anything about assault rifles. They didn't mention firearms specifically either. They wrote the amendment concerning ARMS, as in ALL WEAPONS OF EVERY TYPE. Go back and read it you dumb faggot. >but muh modern standards Ignores the principle of the article as written as well as the context in which it was written. But this is all beside the point. I don't have to convince you of anything. You however have to convince either the majority of the state you live in to get the state laws changed, or you need to convince 3/4ths the states in the union to support your position. Something you are not going to bother doing and something decades long trends show will continue to be immensely difficult for you to do.
David Smith
>60k >rich You're middle class. You aren't living in any wealthy areas. You won't be able to defend yourself from a gang of thugs who want your possessions without a weapon. "It won't happen to me" mentality is fine until you find yourself drowning in your own blood. Its better to have the weapon and not need it than to need it and not have it
Tyler Edwards
Buddy, I don't think you can understand that the government can protect me from those 'thugs' And btw, I own a 550 square feet apartment, so yes, I am rich. Oh and I have my government healthcare plan so I am rich enough for that too.
Evan Brooks
why do you want to ban guns? planning to attack us after that? hmmmmmm?
Dominic Thompson
>3rd world immigration, i don't see rape gangs here in the US yet.
Owen Garcia
> expecting U founding fathers to able to predict development of assault rifles lmao you urban rednecks (aka liberals) truly are the global laughing stock these days.
You can think about assault rifles as a market solution: it provides capabilities to hunt & defend yourself. Even a mere pistols provides this, and as most of the school shootings are conducted with mere pistols,. why don't you call for ban on pistols too? Why don't you ban kitchen knives too since you can bring them to schools to kill people. Or candle holders? Or hammers?
Caleb Campbell
Are you implying that I am some Jewish agent ready to incite a social collapse and the killing of Americans? To spill you the tea, I am not Jewish but my parents are, so still not Jewish.
Isaiah Ramirez
>not being allowed to propel a mass out a tube using contained fire
Zachary Campbell
I'm implying that you would go to war with the US given the option because you would kill millions to "protect the children" while in the process killing them too and any chance of liberty in the future.
to shoot faggots like OP of course how about its non of your fucking business why somebody needs guns including the oh so famous Assault Rifle 15 hell let people buy tanks, fighter jets and attack helicopters for all i care at least its good for the economy
"What the honk did you just honking say about me, you little honk? I'll have you know I graduated top of my honk in the Navy Honks, and I've been involved in numerous secret honks on Al-Honkuaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed henks. I am trained in gorilla honkfare and I'm the top honker in the entire US honk forces. You are nothing to me but just another honk. I will honk you the honk out with precision the likes of which has never been honked before on this Earth, mark my honking honks. You think you can get away with honking that henk to me over the Honkernet? Honk again, honkler. As we speak I am honking my secret network of honks across the USA and your IP is being honked right now so you better prepare for the storm, honklet. The storm that honks out the pathetic little thing you call your honk. You're honking honked, honklet. I can honk anywhere, anytime, and I can honk you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my honk honks. Not only am I extensively honked in unhonked combat, but I have access to the entire henks of the United States Honk Corps and I will honk it to its full extent to honk your miserable honk off the face of the honkinent, you little henk. If only you could have known what unholy honktribution your little "clever" honk was about to honk down upon you, maybe you would have held your honking horn. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the honks, you goddamn honk. I will honk honk all over you and you will go deaf from it. You're honking honked, honko."
>And don't give me that tyrannical government tinfoil hat nonsense. >Who was American War for independence literally fought against? >If the founding fathers wanted people to be allowed to own assault rifles then they would have mentioned AR-15s The fact that this thread didn’t get immediately archived shows how absolutely moronic pol has become since the election.
why does guns on people matter to you when you want to ban modern assault rifles but doesnt matter to you when it applies to the government i dont see any reason the government should have assault rifles. i mean theyre just if you know what theyre job is, is to make sure that the states continue to trade. and deal with trading. like buying slaves from africans, not freeing them here(niggers), then making everyone into slaves(usury)
If you don't like guns, then move to a place with strict gun laws. If people want to own guns, then let them. The moment something becomes illegal, then you just crest a black market.
>just look at what happened when the US banned drugs
Lucas Wright
Side note Look at the UK, they have strict gun laws, but people still find a way to kill each other. Be it with acid or with a spork.
I know the perfect country for you: Mexico. Civilians are prohibited from owning guns, so the crime rate is virtually non-existent. It's a paradise for progressive thinkers like yourself.
you NRAfags sicken me. Obviously, if you remove the guns from the law abiding population, then gun crime will be drastically reduced. Its simply common sense. No criminal in their right mind would use an illegal weapon, because that would be wrong. Just look at my beloved UK. Anything that could be considered a weapon in any capacity, be it a butter knife to a pair of scissors is illegal to carry, and were better off for it. No stabbings here boys!
>You dont need your guns Taking away our last right to self preservation is tyrannical >The government would never be tyrannical, give us your guns This is why we have our guns. Youd have to carpet bomb civilian areas to combat the current state of US civilian political affairs enough to enforce your gun grab, which ironically enough would be used to enforce your policies and dictatorial edicts upon civilians in a more passive manner who would not be armed enough to fight back, if and when you decided to idk fire on them for trying to get aid, or send assassins to their home to kill them. The average person isn't well versed in civilian tactical insurgency, or how a shadow government operates as such when it suites their needs to accomplish an agenda. His name was Seth Rich. We're keeping our fucking guns.
