He claims science and humanities are controlled by liberals in a lot of interviews

He claims science and humanities are controlled by liberals in a lot of interviews.

I believe it but is there ANY SOLID proof for it? Data? I Googled and found nothing.
That would explain so much and also why race isn't studied more profoundly.


How would you even find numbers like that?

Attached: 1552898158467.jpg (1116x1228, 33K)

Other urls found in this thread:

econjwatch.org/articles/faculty-voter-registration-in-economics-history-journalism-communications-law-and-psychology
bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-09-17/colleges-have-way-too-many-liberal-professors
youtube.com/watch?v=EOh1Gflu7Uw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>judan peterstein

go on tweeter and look at any scientist or any humanity.

Attached: hey listen.jpg (224x225, 6K)

This.

>race has nothing to do with intelligence
>oh ashkenazi jews are a waaaay smarter race than white people

The best way to figure it out would be to look okay the most influential papers and names that have been born of the humanities over the last 20-30 years. Figure out what points they're making, who is making them, and the root of it all.

The general consensus is that universities are extremely liberal locations, so it's not at all silly to suggest that the humanities are affected in the same way. Dig deep enough, you might even realize it's the humanities that are the driving force behind the unhinged liberalism at universities.

>Why isn't race studied more profoundly
Well race is definitely studied, but not by any fair metric. Muh racism generally stems back to people who study and preach ethics. Any data that even suggests that races are different outside of appearance is complete blasphemy in their realm.

Have you set foot on a western university campus in the last 20 years?

Good proof is that he's a leftist and prominent in said circles in Canada.

Attached: 5d82a28c6eef4e6bcf8612c8828de8c9.jpg (1103x893, 121K)

What sort of data would you find persuasive?

He's correct because there's a correlation between being a liberal and intelligence. I think Jow Forums is right a lot of the time but they aren't right because of logic, they're right because they just want to be edgy automatically negate anything extreme libtards say

A study that put originators of said scientifical studies and humanities to scrutiny based on political affiliation, or a survey at least. Anything really.


Is there nothing? Then why would he risk his image and keep saying it?

Attached: 1537728445356.jpg (390x433, 231K)

This guy seems to know what's up, guys. We should probably give him our money to further his fight against all those crazy libtards.

Attached: mqdefault.jpg (320x180, 12K)

Just fkn search it.

econjwatch.org/articles/faculty-voter-registration-in-economics-history-journalism-communications-law-and-psychology

Attached: IMG_1777.png (500x605, 123K)

He doesn't say race has nothing to do with intelligence. Find a single place he has said this. He just knows that it is meaningless in regard to how you should treat individuals.

actually, he's considered right-wing in canada.

Attached: 1552153233022.jpg (1000x750, 154K)

How long did it take someone to provide this answer

Fuck sake pol. Also bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-09-17/colleges-have-way-too-many-liberal-professors

he is a drug addict for decades

So which of these proves it and is the good study?

No one cares

>individuals tend not to be part of collectives
lol

Attached: wBbUssr4K.jpg (1024x968, 280K)

>Berg
I thought pol hated Jews and thought they lied?

Research the frankfurt school and the orgins of the placemetn of the huimanities in education

Attached: 1553765698150.gif (560x646, 1.84M)

Just watch this, dummy
youtube.com/watch?v=EOh1Gflu7Uw