He claims science and humanities are controlled by liberals in a lot of interviews.
I believe it but is there ANY SOLID proof for it? Data? I Googled and found nothing. That would explain so much and also why race isn't studied more profoundly.
>race has nothing to do with intelligence >oh ashkenazi jews are a waaaay smarter race than white people
William Clark
The best way to figure it out would be to look okay the most influential papers and names that have been born of the humanities over the last 20-30 years. Figure out what points they're making, who is making them, and the root of it all.
The general consensus is that universities are extremely liberal locations, so it's not at all silly to suggest that the humanities are affected in the same way. Dig deep enough, you might even realize it's the humanities that are the driving force behind the unhinged liberalism at universities.
>Why isn't race studied more profoundly Well race is definitely studied, but not by any fair metric. Muh racism generally stems back to people who study and preach ethics. Any data that even suggests that races are different outside of appearance is complete blasphemy in their realm.
Adrian Turner
Have you set foot on a western university campus in the last 20 years?
Jeremiah Bell
Good proof is that he's a leftist and prominent in said circles in Canada.
He's correct because there's a correlation between being a liberal and intelligence. I think Jow Forums is right a lot of the time but they aren't right because of logic, they're right because they just want to be edgy automatically negate anything extreme libtards say
Carter Brown
A study that put originators of said scientifical studies and humanities to scrutiny based on political affiliation, or a survey at least. Anything really.
Is there nothing? Then why would he risk his image and keep saying it?
He doesn't say race has nothing to do with intelligence. Find a single place he has said this. He just knows that it is meaningless in regard to how you should treat individuals.