European culture or American culture ™?

"National-Anarchism" is an oxymoron. Nationalism is a category of capital-accumulation. there were no Nations before capitalism and there will be non after it.

Anarchism is the absence of government.

Capitalism is government

youtube.com/watch?v=VwcKwGS7OSQ

Wow, you're really convincing! Kys shitskin commie.

I didn't ask "prove to me that National Anarchism isn't real anarchism," I said, "Prove to me that Rojava and Neo-Zapatismo aren't just National-Anarchism."

>there were no Nations before capitalism and there will be non after it.
lel

you can go there and be one of them.

>there were no nations before capitalism
this is some really solid high IQ bait well done.

Attached: 1506712662108.jpg (500x385, 31K)

its absolutely true. "France" is a creature of modernity.

>Seen through the lenses of nationalist historians, the initial colonizers as well as their later imitators look like nations: Spain, Holland, England, France. But seen from a vantage point in the past, the colonizing powers are Hapsburgs, Tudors, Stuarts, Bourbons, Oranges — namely dynasties identical to the dynastic families that had been feuding for wealth and power ever since the fall of the western Roman empire. The invaders can be seen from both vantage points because a transition was taking place. The entities were no longer mere feudal estates, but they were not yet full-fledged nations; they already possessed some, but not yet all, the attributes of a nation-state. The most notable missing element was the national army. Tudors and Bourbons already manipulated the Englishness or Frenchness of their subjects, especially during wars against another monarch’s subjects. But neither Scots and Irishmen, nor Corsicans and Provencals, were recruited to fight and die for “the love of their country.”

But if too many outsiders moved there, their local cultures and ethnicities would be destroyed, which would be settler-colonialism.

if you think Nation always existed and are somehow a creation of nature and not of history then, well, you're mistaken

Attached: germany-1789-700x390-at-map-of-german-unification.jpg (700x390, 96K)

Tribes and races are a creation of nature, though. Globalism is certainly a creation of history though.

>Nationalism is a category of capital-accumulation. there were no Nations before capitalism
lol

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (474x362, 38K)

>culture
>America

pick one.

>if you think Nation always existed and are somehow a creation of nature
"human society isn't natural goy!"

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (474x355, 31K)

>America never existed goy!

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (432x648, 39K)

The nation has been in existence in one form or another since the literal dawn of time. From the city-state of Sumeria, to dreams of a pan-hellanic union, to roaming bands of nomads on the North American continent, nation and nationalism, blood and soil, were issues not on the periphery or mere abstraction, but often the one and only focus of the self-conceptualization of whatever peoples you'd prefer to use. You are a fucking moron.

no, "settler-colonialism" is a category of capitalism. "settler-colonialism" is what happens when people from abroad come to another country to make money on the backs of ,historically, people who dont live under capitalism.

if "too many" (who's to say how many are "too many"?) outsiders move there they will bring their own cultures and something new, a new culture will emerge. just like new music emerges when people come to possess different musical instrument.

This is american culture. You are thinking of jewish produced pop culture.
youtube.com/watch?v=q_x4jbe76Tc

>"settler-colonialism" is a category of capitalism
lel, explain the sacking of Ur and the replacement of their Gods and Idols with Marduk. Commies are the dumbest fuckers on the planet.

Race is a creation of modernity, prior to modernity Race did not exist. it made no sense to speak of Race as we understand the concept now.

prior to modernity "Jews" ,for example, was a religious category and not a "race"

Amish people make great neighbors. A bunch live in my dad’s village in upstate New York. Before meeting them I thought they were uptight, but most seem to have a good sense of humor.

>no, "settler-colonialism" is a category of capitalism.
lmfao, only if you consider the PRC to be capitalist; what they are doing to Tibet is settler-colonialism.

>a new culture will emerge
Cute way of saying that the old culture is destroyed and their resources are taken by outsiders.

Race is a modern word that is used to describe something that exists in nature, analogous to how taxonomy is a modern field that describes and categorizes things that exist in nature.

>European culture or American culture ™?

...is there a difference?

Attached: 1541097885326.jpg (500x378, 51K)

you're conception of history is borrowed from The Flintstones

you cant dispute the fact that France didnt existed before modernity

youtube.com/watch?v=MODP4BTVq6M

>you cant dispute the fact that France didnt existed before modernity
True; however, the Franks and the Gauls, as a people, did.

Also, I would say that Jews are more of an ethnicity than a race.

well that's just a bunch of horseshit

people with white skin existed but that dos't equate with "White Race"

>Race is a creation of modernity
>prior to modernity "Jews" ,for example, was a religious category and not a "race"
imagine being this fucking retarded
>you're conception of history is borrowed from The Flintstones

Sure thing boss. Keep up the PROFIT IS THEFT!! thing, maybe it'll make people forget you're a borderline retarded loser.

>people didn't literally say "THE WHITE RACE" so it doesn't exist
>checkmate liberals

By your own retarded commie logic, Capitalism didn't exist before Marx wrote Das Kapital
Checkmate commies

Good! but "Franks" and "Gauls" does not constitute a Nation any more then being with white skin complexion constitutes as "White Race"

all of those are historical movements

It depends on what you mean by the "White Race." When I use the term "White Race," I'm referring to a group of people whose ancestors come from Europe, and are primarily descended from 4 ancestral populations: Early European Farmers, Ancient North Eurasians, West European Hunter Gatherers, and Neanderthals. If there was no word for this group in antiquity, that doesn't mean we can't categorize and talk about this group in a meaningful way today.

the tribe is bigger now.
you are boring.

Attached: 1551827365924.jpg (724x522, 42K)

show us your schoolbooks please

>Good! but "Franks" and "Gauls" does not constitute a Nation
No, they quite literally constituted the Ghalic nation. A nation is rooted in shared genetic lineage and custom.

youtu.be/CpmDAu_47OE

but that didnt mean shit before modernity. "black people" didnt existed as a separate category of people more then "redhead people" constitute it now.

21:27
youtube.com/watch?v=GcrcflTCu4Q

youtube.com/watch?v=MODP4BTVq6M

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/fredy-perlman-the-continuing-appeal-of-nationalism

I suppose it depends on what you mean by the word "nation." I agree that white skin does not make someone racially European (white), as is evidenced by albinos.

youtu.be/hasNHeQQXnI

just listen to this sometime. its a real eye opener.

The greek word is ethnos. It's a very old word that is over 2000 years old. It means ethnicity and it means the same as race essentially. A group of people with a high degree of relatedness or genetic affinity who also share relatively similar physical traits such as craniofacial metrics and skin color etc.
>word-forming element meaning "race, culture," from Greek ethnos "people, nation, class, caste, tribe; a number of people accustomed to live together" (see ethnic). Used to form modern compounds in the social sciences.

...

youtu.be/y3oNfYCh5Vg

I'm not sure why you keep bringing up modernity. Through modern technology, the world has expanded, we are aware of more types of people, and we can do anthropology and genetics. It makes sense that we would come up with new ways of categorizing people in a more systematic fashion.
>"black people" didnt existed as a separate category of people more then "redhead people" constitute it now.
Two blonde Irish people can give birth to a redhead; however, they cannot give birth to a Black Bantu Africa. Hence, why we would categorize "black people" in a different way than we would categorize "redheads."

*Black Bantu African

youtu.be/paiQRSpg4Aw

So-called Nationalism is like a weapon; why unilaterally disarm yourself when those who would take advantage of you aren't going to do the same?

youtube.com/watch?v=vQhqikWnQCU

youtube.com/watch?v=k9O9_P7G4vw

Here from where I grew up, used to walk with these midsummer celebrations as a kid
youtu.be/TOOA-33Frwc

based japanese bavarian. he left his country for yodeling

youtube.com/watch?v=oBUmwumvM3g

youtube.com/watch?v=-ukhZgsC4vc

Dey got walmart dere?

m.youtube.com/watch?v=R0WZbgJKgeY

Attached: amerimutt.png (1124x598, 202K)

Very nice

Yes, they are good natured

>European culture or American culture ™?
Adults vs children

Are you new friend?