Ben Shapiro Andrew Yang debate about circumcision happening soon! If you know any pregnant women please remind them...

Ben Shapiro Andrew Yang debate about circumcision happening soon! If you know any pregnant women please remind them that circumcision is a human rights violation and is cosmetic.

Attached: bananana.jpg (728x546, 31K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-DHuRTvzMFw
youtu.be/-RKZaokpHfY?t=2007
nordic.businessinsider.com/Finland-is-killing-its-world-famous-basic-income-experiment--/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Attached: 1547093465925.jpg (480x441, 27K)

Great thread.

>human rights violation and is cosmetic
go home, pagan.

Yes, it is a human rights violation as it voids bodily integrity. Yes, it is cosmetic as it offers no health benefits. Calling me a pagan is simply an ad hominem. Considering that there is a list of logical fallacies sticked on this board, I was hoping for a more educated response.

bump

When is soon?

fake and gay

The video on the daily wire says that it will premieres in 15 hours. I can't wait! I've been waiting for two weeks when it was first announced that Yang was going to debate Ben about it.

Although Yang has weakened his stance, I'm so glad that this issue is being talked about. Hopefully more will realize how wicked this practice truly is. Here is a link to the video! youtube.com/watch?v=-DHuRTvzMFw

Guess I'll check back tomorrow. Even if this winds up being little more than a gimmick, I'd have to say that I can't think of another reason off the top of my head why I'd bother listening to either of them.

It's going to be a cuck fest, but at least people will be talking about circumcision which I doubt Jews want people doing at all.

It isn't really a debate on circumcision, Shapiro has said it's actually mainly about UBI

But what about the dicks? Won't somebody think of the dicks?

>Cutting up a dick for without a medical reason
Purely cosmetic and only being done because of extensive social engineering.

Debate about what? Yang's already "softened his stance" on circumcision.

Why do american Christians allow a Jewish ritual to be performed om their sons?

It's not cosmetic at all. Do you also disfigure animals for fun?

It's not about the dicks. Its about the infringement of human rights and the countless cosmetic operations on the helpless. Also, it's about the pleasure and the human experience. Circumcision removes the pleasure one can experience in life. Think about where those erogenous cells link to in the brain. Imagine living life without being able to see the color blue. Now imagine if you were able to see the color blue but had it removed from you at birth.

It's about what is moral and immoral.

Nobody cares about either of those two gay retards

The conversation about circumcision is predictable if you know Shapiro's position. He'll just claim that it prevents STD's/HIV and protects against penis cancer. He'll also say that all the doctors recommend it. Shapiro has said in the past he looks at what the torah says and then tries to form a logically consistent argument from it - he does this with virtually every position he takes. Normies and the 'hebrew hammers' cum guzzlers will gobble it up, they aren't going to consider who and why they fund those studies and how flawed they are.

>reminder that Shapiro really likes Yang
youtu.be/-RKZaokpHfY?t=2007
Can you really trust Yang if he's considered the goodest of goys by probably the most zealous Zionist Ben Shapiro?
You can't.

Seriously who in the world who want to watch two literal nobodies talk about dicks like for real

These people are influencers. The people they influence are the real issue as they may regurgitate faulty reasoning

>yang and shapiro are influencers
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA RETARD

Don't pretend you don't like talking about dicks, faggot.

Attached: allthepills.png (684x426, 383K)

The circumcision thing is just clickbait, they're going to be discussing much more for sure. Will be interesting to see if Ben completely ruins his UBI policy or if it's just a fluff piece to prop up people other than Trump.

surprisingly, not a lot of people know that this topic is even up for debate. It's mostly UBI people are watching for.

remember when zuckerberg promised everybody ubi and everybody thought he was a retard? it wa only 2 years ago.

>lots of Jews seem to be promoting UBI
Hmmm... and especially vile ones like Zuckerberg?

I wonder if they'll point to existing experiments with UBI, such as in Finland and Ontario.

yeah how did those go?

The funny thing about the circumcision debate, like many debates is you can't mention Jews yet it's so critical to mention Jews. It just ain't fair boys.

As far as I understand Finland concluded that it needed further study, but last I heard had not initiated any further studies. Also that it was not "universal" but rather only applicable as a replacement for those who qualified for the morass of other different kinds of government support.

In Ontario, the leafs I probled didn't seem very educated about it, but rather seemed to just have the disposition that it went so wrong it ought to be swept under the rug. Might be an interesting thing to bring up in some leaf thread or other for further comment.

I mean, if you can't get it to work in a country that is already more socialist, then I don't think the US is the right place to do the next test run.

ok good i thought you were a shill for a second. UBI is gay and only fags want it.

nordic.businessinsider.com/Finland-is-killing-its-world-famous-basic-income-experiment--/

Im Christian, no one in my family is jewish. and im circumcised. My dick works just fine. I agree its kind of archaic, but why should I hate my dick all of a sudden?

Attached: 1543775481379.jpg (657x527, 54K)

Why are mutts so obsessed with penis cutting?
Why do mutts love getting their penis snipped just like muslims they claim to hate?
Is it that they never wash themselves just like muslims?

you shouldnt hate the dick, you should hate the practice

To be honest, I find the concept of UBI interesting. I'm down for discussing new developments, especially if they're not good ones. I don't think it's a good idea to change for the sake of change alone; that's usually Luciferian and in keeping with the Trotskyite concept of endless revolution being a solution.

But the benefit of having nation-states instead of things like the EUSSR is that you can test out an idea in one place as an experiment without threatening the system as a whole.

Yes it is interesting. It is impossible to achieve by taxation though. Gaddafi had successful socialism in libya by nationalizing the oil industry, but (((they))) don't ant you to know about that. A country can't eat it's rich people and expect to survive.

yeah thank God the Great Federation of United 50 States of American Republic, dont have an UBI in any of its la-
wtf alaska i thought you arent commie

Why? All those dick buggers that shielded penises get are kind of nasty. I dont have to inspect my dick to wash it. I just hit it with a bar of soap. Seems more functional to me.

Attached: D0XoGSIW0AUlXDk.jpg (750x497, 34K)

Don't. Be amazed your dick can sustain catastrophic injury and still work. You know all the shit women can do? You probably can't have multiple orgasms, control orgasm, but you still feel pleasure. All I am saying is that women have a higher threshold than a circumcised man and greater control.

Its a way to fuck you over and make money off of you body. Don't hate your dick. Hate your stupid evangelical parents. Christians don't need to cut. It caught on cause of Jews. They make money from this. The royal family has a Jew cut the dicks of their sons. You are a gentile and circumcised. You are goy.

That's an important point. What if we nationalized the Federal Reserve so that it wasn't constantly skimming wealth out of the country? I'm not saying I like Gaddafi, but he used government control to effectively develop his country to a extent that threatened the status quo.

We could look to Norway or Alaska as other examples of leveraging natural resource wealth as a way to subsidize the people. I'm personally not much in to national socialism, but I'm willing to accept a certain balance so that things that are inherently centralized go to benefit the little guy as much as the big guy.

do you shave your head too? so you dont have to wash and comb it n shiet?

Alaska benefits itself. Our states are sovereign except for some limitations required for joining the union. I don't live in Alaska and I wouldn't expect Alaska to pay my rent.

I might expect maybe fair contribution for the upkeep up interstate roads or something of national interest like that. Rome was known for its roads.

Trust me user. wifeanon is perfectly satisfied. Three beautiful kids and 10,000 orgasms in 10 years. No complaints.
Maybe you might need to stop hating your dick?
And fuck yang and UBI

Attached: 1553724099388.png (784x778, 428K)

what will America be known for in 2000 years? i doubt it will be the roads

I agree, fuck the fed. I used to be more of a socialist until I realized that failures need to fail, not be propped up by handouts. Universal healthcare? fuck that shit, not while my country is 60% overweight. Sure as fuck not paying for fat retards to have their diabetes hoofs amputated and then paying for their mobility scooter as well.

tldr niggers ruin everything

I keep it shaved with a #1. hold over from the military. Functional.

people think the Mark of the Beast is RFID chips, when it's been circumcision all along.
jews have nothing to do with it.

Wait, so my dick makes me marked as some kind of hell spawn? Whoa. thats news to me.

If you read Genesis, what it does, according to the holy book of the Jews, is mark you as a slave.

I'm not so sure about mark of the beast like you're going to put your cock in a cock scanner to buy or sell, but to be honest I'd have to go back and read Revelation to give you an honest opinion.

>I'm not so sure about mark of the beast like you're going to put your cock in a cock scanner to buy or sell
lmfao

I already know I am a goyim. But, I think it might be a bit more nuanced than that my dude.
I'm no slave, thats for damn sure.

That was a pretty good line

It's just automation for penis inspection day.

You are literally retarded
God SPECIFICALLY told Abraham to circumcise himself and his family for it is the physical mark of a covenant between God and his people
To go against circumcision is to go against God but that doesn't matter because you're going to call me a kike for reading the Bible

You shouldn't hate it, but it's hard to live knowing that what you are feeling when you use it could be 10x better... Please don't do the same to your children.

I don't know if that was God or not, but he SPECIFICALLY said it was so that the sons of the sons of the sons would get their land back. I guess that's the ultimate landlord action.

It was revoked under Jesus, along with things like animal sacrifice. I can only assume you didn't read the bible.

it was revealed under Paul you historically illiterate inbred
People didn't want to join Christianity so Saint Paul took away the dietary requirements and well as circumcision leading to the slippery slope where modern day Christians allow trannies to roam the street and blacks to interbreed with the populace.

I don't think those are Christians. Why would you assert such a thing?

>Literally needing to DEBATE about infantile genital mutilation

the absolute state of burgeristan
you just cant resist cutting your sons penis to please your jewish overlords

Attached: 56%.png (241x263, 13K)

Because Saint Paul founded Christianity. Jesus lived, died, and was resurrected a Jew. Only after his ascension was Christianity founded by his followers. Animal sacrifice was no longer needed as the people now had a way to pray to God through Jesus Christ but circumcision being swiped to the side was a move made to merely bolster converts as most people didn't want to get their foreskin cut off with a sharp rock

uncut dicks are gross

I always thought it was called Christianity because of Jesus Christ. I don't know where the rest of your ideas come from other than some perversion by the Jews.

To not be circumcised is the same as willingly cutting off your covenant with God. I just abide by the laws written down in the Old Testament

idk what Catholic "edited to appease and control the masses" version of the bible you read but I abide by the law of God and no other

Oh, ok, so now you just use a personal attack presuming I'm Roman Catholic (which is true) becuase the new argument you're making about control of the masses has no bearing on your previous arguments?

I don't think you can think straight, but all this time you could have been educating me about your law of God and no other instead of trying every different attack against somebody you've never met. I don't think that's how Jesus did it.

>willingly being Catholic
I'm not concerned with how Jesus did it. You've willingly listened to people who have brainwashed you with a massive centralized church that have been known to change parts of the bible to control the masses. Distance yourself from all organized religions and read on your own and make your own conclusions instead o listening to others.

I don't think you understand the definition of cosmetic and you're confusing it with the definition of aesthetic.

That's another personal attack instead of explaining why circumcision has anything to do with a sect that would call itself Christian. If I were to listen to no others, the idea of genital mutilation would never enter my mind. In any normal society, a mind such as yours who proposes raping children would quickly be lost in the woods without any explanation.

Tell us the difference.

>I was hoping for a more educated response
you must be new

I'm not your personal Google machine. You're completely capable of doing that yourself.

God said further to Abraham, “Now as for you,ayou shall keep My covenant, you and your1descendants after you throughout their generations.

10 “aThis is My covenant, which you shall keep, between Me and you and your1descendants after you: every male among you shall be circumcised.

11 “Andayou shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskin, and it shall be the sign of the covenant between Me and you.

And this was revoked when Jesus came around.

No it was revoked to boost conversion rates. I understand that all free thinking capabilities have been stamped out by that megalithic corrupt entity known as the Catholic Church but please use some of it.

Does it say that, too, somewhere in the Torah? We all know Jews hate Christians because they went back to the word of God rather than the Rabbi word of Man. It's unimaaginable to me that you would actually advocate for the rape of children.

It's a satanic sex magic cult. You cannot escape this.

I'm 36, don't take kindly to jews, but I'm happy I'm circumcised. Never met a girl who prefers uncut.

>new covenant is not valid because it was created by christians to make more christians!
>i will continue adhering to the old covenant created by jews for other jews. truly this is the christian thing to do and all others are heathens
get your fucking head checked out mate

It should be about the rejection of kike traditions.

I wish I could see a full grown man be circumcised with a rusty knife.

You are a mutilated kike slave who will forever be branded as property of the jew.

It’s notcosmetic, it inhibits the function of a penis. You don’t know what a consmetic surgery is either fuckwad.

I want to cut off dick skin.

The new testament is valid you retard but if you use any semblance on critical thinking you can usually separate the word of god and politics of the time. Such as why would Saint Paul remove the dietary restrictions other than to boost conversion?

Don't forget to listen to the Exodus readings during Easter if that's what you do.
>slap sacrificed animal blood all of the lintels
>eat unleavened bread with your sandals on like you're about to jailbreak
>get chased out by the Egyptian military
total lol

I'm comfortable with you thinking that. Can you honestly say you've met more women who prefer uncut to not?

why are you a slave to women lmao
fukn women bought sketchers shape ups
if 20 women say they like cut dicks chances are 100 women will say they like cut dicks even more so if the original women are 'pretty' or have clout
a womans entire life is about fitting in
so lets mutilate our sons to appease literal braindead women

Mutilated dicks make me wet.

>Literally making things up
I want direct quotes that show anything about blood during the Passover or anything to do with eating bread with your sandals

>stinky
>smegma
>looks like an anteater

I went to paris and everyones cocks smelled. It reeked. If you arent going to be circumcised at least wash your fucking dick. No one wants to smell that shit. No wonder Euro woman are choosing clean brown people over stinky white people

Attached: download (1).jpg (221x228, 6K)

Do you have direct quotes to the contrary?
It's pretty obvious what happened there.

I mean, if I wanted to escape, would I scacrifice animal blood all over and and run from the chariots and the charioteers? Not very smart.

Let me know when your IQ level exceeds three digits...

>I’m comfortable with being a branded slave because retarded, slutty women have been brainwashed into thinking the mutilation is aesthetic

I mean I've read the Bible and the Tanakh and nowhere in both of those does it mention spreading blood or eating bread with sandals. It does however say that blood should be avoided as it is filthy so I'm calling bullshit till you provide sources

They paint the blood on the lintels. That's the whole entire fucking point of passover.

The point of passover is to recognize the Israelites were passed over by god when he killed every newborn in Egypt during exodus. They eat unleavened bread and rest/read to celebrate. Nowhere does it mention blood of any kind

How brown are you?

they painted their doors with blood so god would know they were kikes