Well, Jow Forums?

Please dont put any effort into troll threads

Right, so evolution then.

Because that stupid picture has ruined it for retards like you. We didn't come from monkeys, we share a common ancestor. The thing on the very left that looks like a modern monkey isn't and they are all in fact dead. You'd know this if you didn't drop out of high school to breed with your niece Cletus.

Attached: 1549221361355.webm (198x360, 2.93M)

fpbp

Well I am the Son of God, how about you other anons?

evolution breaks the second law of thermodynamics.
chaos come from order, but chaos don't create order : physically impossible

Ok so the real deal is that higher entities or spirits guide our evolution, they create bodies over time through natural processes so that lower souls/spirits have flesh bodies to inhabit and can live life and eventually ascend to a higher spiritual plain after several reincarnations.

Watch, someones gonna say thats just a tard but this fucking video gets deleted everywhere its posted. Nothing is happening thats inherently wrong in the clip. It's just a happy looking pre evolved denisovan or some shit. why is it bad? why are they keeping this vid from us?

Attached: 1543023282689.png (320x320, 100K)

You're assuming order is a singular state.
Which is more ordered, the atoms of a crystalline structure, or a fluid?

micro evolution.

No proof that evolution produces new kinds of animals.

There aren't any of the first "these" that's a common ancestor long gone, but you know that.

Attached: Creationism.webm (198x360, 1.75M)

Where do you draw the line as far as "new kinds of animals?"

some die out. Its survival of the fiftest. The money has skill of movement while the humans have intelligence. The ones in the middle died because they didnt possess enough of those or nature just wasnt kind to them. The conditions on earth change all the time.

Wiped out by imperialistic British bastards

> when your theory is so full of holes

Attached: 1493604261053.jpg (1024x971, 75K)

>Why do I need history and biology, I'll never use it in life

Attached: GetALoadOfThisFaggot.jpg (500x377, 82K)

>he thinks we evolved directly from the chimpanzee
kek, you're retarded m8

I'm just saying that you can't have photosynthesis without having the system that allows the cell to convert energy, they bove need to exist at the same time, otherwise it won't work, therefore life could not appear by the atoms colliding

Right here

In case you didn't notice. Time moves forward for all things, including niggers.

Attached: i606zp.png (573x556, 390K)

Apes didn't go extinct because they still suit their environment and don't have major competition. Pre-humans had some big competition :)

In Africa, Turkey, Brazil and Oceania

Humans didn't evolve from Chimps you moron. We share a common ancestor.

This is White in America

These?

Attached: Neanderthal-DNA_0.jpg (927x630, 44K)

How about these?

Attached: les-pygmees-du-congo-appele-mbuti-et-leurs-les-rites-sur-les-jumeaux-03.jpg (280x335, 57K)

Or perhaps just these

Attached: images (4).jpg (259x194, 14K)

Attached: 1553193934059m.jpg (752x1024, 111K)

There is only one race: the mammalian race

Attached: e41788fe0ca4cb6da3e33fcfc5d623c5.jpg (600x806, 50K)

I'm boutta drop the fatest redpill you niggas have eva seen

Attached: 20190320_020229.jpg (1434x1434, 702K)

The Problem Of the Formation of Cells and Proteins

“Evolutionary theoryclaims that life started with acellthat formed bychance.According to this scenario, four billion years ago variouslifeless chemical compoundsunderwent areactionin the primordial atmosphere on the earth in which the effects of thunderbolts and atmospheric pressure led to the formation of the first living cell.The first thing that must be said is that the claim that inanimate materials can come together to form life is anunscientificone that has not been verified by any experiment or observation.Life is only generated from life.Each living cell is formed by the replication of another cell.No one in the world has ever succeeded in forming a living cell by bringing inanimate materials together, not even in the most advanced laboratories.The theory of evolution faces no greater crisis than on the point of explaining the emergence of life.The reason is thatorganic moleculesare so complex that theirformationcannot possibly be explained as beingcoincidentaland it is manifestly impossible for an organic cell to have been formed by chance.”-Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit”

How could all the inter-connected andcompartmentalized components, the cell wall, the cell membrane, the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, RNA, ribosomes, lysosomes, cytoplasm, vacuoles, nucleus and other cell parts magically come together and create conscious intelligent life from unconscious dead matter?Just making one average-sized protein molecule is already composed of 288 amino acids of 12 varying types which can be combined 10300power different ways!Of all those possibilities, only one forms the desired protein molecule and there are over 600 types of proteins combined in the smallest bacterias ever discovered.

Astronomer Fred Hoyle compared the odds that all the multi-faceted and multi-functional parts of a cell could coincidentally come together and create life analogous to “a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard and assembling a Boeing 747 from the materials therein!”

“Thelikelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 zeros after it … It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution.The beginnings of life were not random; they must have been the product of purposeful intelligence.From my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind of deliberate creation.That notion has had to be painfully shed.At the moment, I can’t find any rational argument to knock down the view which argues for conversion to God.We used to have an open mind; now we realize that the only logical answer to life is creation – and not accidental random shuffling.”-Astrobiologist Chandra Wickramasinghe

Dr. Leslie Orgel, an associate of Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA wrote, “It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time.Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other.And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means.”Or as Turkish Evolutionist Professor Ali Demirsoy stated “the probability of the coincidental formation of cythochrome-C, just one of the essential proteins for life, is as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes …Some metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have acted in its formation.”

“Let us suppose that millions of years ago a cell was formed which had acquired everything necessary for life, and that it duly ‘came to life.’The theory of evolution again collapses at this point.For even if this cell had existed for a while, it would eventually have died and after its death, nothing would have remained, and everything would have reverted to where it had started.This is becausethis first living cell, lacking any genetic information, would not have been able to reproduce and start a new generation.Life would have ended with its death.”-Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170)

The Problem Of Specialized Organs

Many facets of nature are far too complex, specialized, and perfect to ever have arisen simply due to blind chance changes over time.For example, the eye with its various parts and mechanisms all working together with the brain producing the sharpest, clearest 3-D color images imaginable.Even the most advanced cameras and plasma screens ever produced by humans cannot provide an image as perfect in detail and clarity as our own eyes.Charles Darwin, the originator of the theory of evolution himself admitted that “the thought of the eye made him cold all over!” as he knew what an impassable obstacle the eye presented for his theory.And it is the same with ears and audio equipment.For over a century many thousands of researchers, scientists and engineers have been working in factories across the world trying to produce sharper, clearer audio/video playing and recording devices, never coming close to the capabilities and perfection of the ear and eye.

The Problem Of Transitional Species

Charles Darwin, in his “Origin of Species,” the veritable Bible of atheist-materialists, stated that, “If my theory be true,numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of the same group together must assuredly have existed … Consequently evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains.”Darwin himself knew no such “transitional forms” had been discovered and hoped that they would be found in the future.He even admitted in his “Difficulties on Theory” chapter that these missing intermediate forms were the biggest stumbling-block for his theory.He called it “the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.”

Harun Yahya:“For instance, there should have lived in the past some half-fish/half-reptile creatures which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had.Or there should have existed some reptile/bird creatures, which had acquired some avian traits in addition to the reptilian traits, they already possessed.Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past as, ‘transitional forms.’If such animals had really existed, there would have been millions, even billions, of them.More importantly, the remains of these creatures should be present in the fossil record.”

Darwin hoped that transitional forms of animal species gradually evolving into different species would eventually be discovered at some future time in the fossil record.To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been found anywhere in the world.Darwin’s observations regarding natural selection and adaptation were certainly correct.So-called “micro-evolution” of various traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and widely exists, but “macro-evolution,” the supposed transformation from one species into a completely different species has never been observed, and no evidence of such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record.Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist for the British Museum of Natural History and an ardent evolutionist, even he admits that Darwinists must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve: “No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection.”

most of them were killed off by Africans and Asians. European whites are the only race that has not committed complete genocide of a sub-species of humans.

Darwinists claimfish (creatures living only under water)turned intoamphibians (creatures living on both land and water)and then amphibians evolved intoreptiles (creatures living only on land).Then they propose some reptiles evolved wings and becamebirdswhile other reptiles evolved and becamemammals.None of these transitional forms have ever been found, however, nor could they realistically exist either.For example amphibianeggsdevelop only in water whereasamniotic eggsdevelop only on land, so some sort of gradual step-by-step evolution scenario is impossible since without perfect, complete eggs a species cannot survive.Reptiles allegedly evolving into mammals is another example of evolutionist wishful-thinking.Reptilesare cold-blooded, lay eggs, do not suckle their young, have one middle-ear bone, three mandible bones and bodies covered in scales, whereasmammalsare warm-blooded, have live births, suckle their young, have three middle-ear bones, one mandible, and are covered in fur or hair – far too many distinct differences for “gradual evolution.”Reptiles evolving wings is another sheer impossibility, as the structure ofland-dwelling reptilesandair-dwelling birdsare far too different.Engin Korur, a Turkish evolutionist admits the problem wings present to Darwin’s theory, “The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only function if they are fully developed.In other words a half-way developed eye cannot see; a bird with half-formed wings cannot fly.How these organs came into being has remained one of the mysteriesof nature that needs to be enlightened.”

Correct. Just look at iq. Most of Africa is in the 60s. Maybe 70s. Average white man is 100. And any decent man with good genetics is 120+. They are clearly a sub species of humans. Wish we could realize this.

those are swedens

Freemasonic recordsstate that Charles Darwin’s grandfatherErasmus Darwinwas a philosopher, scientist and physician who advanced ideas on evolution back in the 18th century.Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Darwin had been made a Mason and also maintained close connections to theJacobin Masonsin France andAdam Weishaupt’s Illuminati.Sir Francis Darwin and Reginald Darwin, two of his sons, were also made Masons in Tyrian Lodge No. 253 at Derby.Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is most likely that he, like his Grandfather, his Sons and his “Bulldog”T.H. Huxley, was aMason.

“Masons, thinking that Darwinism could serve their goals, played a great role in its dissemination among the masses.As soon as Darwin’s theory was published, a group of volunteer propagandists formed around it, the most famous of whom was Thomas Huxley who was called Darwin’s ‘bulldog.’Huxley ‘whose ardent advocacy of Darwinism was the single factor most responsible for its rapid acceptance’ brought the world’s attention to the theory of evolution in the Debate at the Oxford University Museum in which he entered into on June 30th, 1860 with the bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce.Huxley’s great dedication to spreading the idea of evolution, together with his establishment connections, is brought into further light according to the following fact: Huxley was a member of the Royal Society, one of England’s most prestigious scientific institutions and, like nearly all the other members of this institution, was a senior Mason.Other members of the Royal Society lent Darwin significant support …In short, Darwin wasn’t acting alone; from the moment his theory was proposed, he received the support that came from the social classes and groups whose nucleus was made up of Masons.”-Harun Yahya, “The Theory of Evolution Revisited”

“An important example which proves the fact that Darwinism is one of the biggest deceptions ofatheistic freemasonryis a resolution carried in a mason meeting.The 33rd degree Supreme Council of Mizraim Freemasonry at Paris, reveals in its minutes its promotion of evolution as science, while they themselves scoffed at the theory.The minutes read as follows: ‘It is with this object in view [the scientific theory of evolution] that we are constantly by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories.The intellectuals will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words:think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.’Atheistic freemasonry in the United States has picked up the resolution of Mizraim before long.New Age magazine in its March 1922 issue stated that the kingdom of atheistic freemasonry will be established by evolution and the development of man himself.As seen above, the false scientific image of evolution is a deception set in the 33rd degree atheist Masonic lodges.Atheist masons openly admit that they will use the scientists and media which are under their control to present this deception as scientific, which even they find funny.”-Harun Yahya, “The Fundamental Philosophy of Atheistic Freemasonry

Hoaxes and Frauds Used As “Evidence” of Evolution

One of the first frauds in the history of Darwinism, known as “recapitulation theory,” and heralded as undeniable “proof of evolution,” was an idea proposed and propagated by aracist eugenicistProfessor namedErnst Haeckelin the late 19th century.A contemporary and friend of Charles Darwin and Thomas “Bulldog” Huxley,Haeckel postulated that human (and other animal) embryos experience a miniature form of the entire evolutionary impulse during their development in the womb, displaying first characteristics of fish, then reptile, and lastly mammalian or human.It has long been eliminated from scientific literature, but many people and popular sources still unknowingly quote and believe in Haeckel’s fraudulent work.Several popular magazines and school textbooks as recently as the 1990s, over a century after being exposed, were still publishing Haeckel’s hoaxed pictures and recapitulation theory as science fact!

Attached: embriyoing.jpg (450x356, 40K)

Searching for the missing link in Human Evolution

For the past 150 years, evolutionist scientists have been working diligently to propagandize the public into believing thatmodern humans are descended from ancient apes.The final and most difficult theoretical leap for the theory of evolution is this supposed million-year transition from ape to human.The utter impossibility of “evolving” abilities like bipedality, erect spinal columns, and complex linguistic skills has been debated since the theory was first presented, but such obstacles will never stop die-hard evolutionists set on discovering (or inventing!) a believable monkey-man transitional species.

The first of these convenient evolutionary “discoveries” was the “Neanderthal Man” found in theNeander Valley of Germanyin 1856,just in time for the release of Darwin’s Origin of Species.To this day, reconstructed drawings of hairy ape-like “Neanderthal” men are depicted in scholarly journals and school textbooks and claimed to be a missing evolutionary link.The fact is, however, that all so-called Neanderthal remains have never been shown to be any more different from modern humans than an Asian from a Caucasian, or an Inuit from an Aborigine.Also the skull size shows its brain was actually 13% larger than the average brain of modern man, making it impossible to be an intermediary between man and ape.Even Time magazine in 1971 proclaimed the primitiveness of Neanderthal to be unwarranted, that he could walk the street today unrecognized.

Proponents pushingNeanderthal Manas an authentic species nowadays is Reiner Protsch, a German professor who dated the fossils at 36,000 years old allowing them to fit perfectly in the evolutionist’s timeline.In 2005, however, Protsch was forced to retire in disgrace by a panel of Frankfurt University heads who determined he had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues over the past 30 years.”The once-renowned “carbon-dating expert” has presently been completely ostracized from the scientific community.It has since been determined that all Neanderthal skeletal remains are no more than a few thousand years old, some only a few hundred!They have also found modern human DNA in the bones, that their brain capacity was 13% larger than the modern average, their height 5’9” comparable to our average, and they had advanced tools, buried their dead and enjoyed art!

In 1891-92, the next ape-man “discovery” was found in Java, Indonesia by Eugene Dubois, who “coincidentally” happened to be a student and apprentice of evolutionist hoaxster Ernst Haeckel!Dubois found a skullcap, a leg bone, a jaw fragment and three teeth, from which was reconstructed the ape-like “Java Man.”Within 10 years of its discovery, Java Man was the main subject of over 80 evolution books and articles.It was given the “scientific name,” of “Anthropopithecus erectus,” and later changed to “Pithecanthropus erectus” and finally “Homo erectus” undoubtedly for super-official pseudo-scientific reasons.

“He found a leg bone, a skullcap, a jaw fragment and three teeth.And that’s what he concocted Java man from.Interestingly enough some of the teeth were old and some young.The bones belonged to ape, female and male.It was an interesting conglomeration and the reason that people didn’t catch on to it is because the find of Dubois was kept from scholars for about 30 years.He also withheld the discovery of modern human remains, which were found in the same stratum as Java man.Of course, that would have ruined his claims that Java man was the ancestor of modern day humans.Finally, enough pressure was placed on him that the actual bones were allowed to be examined and the discrepancies were found.And eventually, enlightened America as well as the world found out that this was a hoax.unfortunately hoaxes die hard. [Recently] Time Magazine ran a cover story entitled “How Man Became Man” and starts off ridiculing Christians and Creationists then goes on to present Java man as though it were fact.”-Hank Hanegraaff, “The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution”

Evolution is definitely flawed. There are gaps everywhere. "God of the gaps" well sure. Prove the gaps out. We're waiting.

In 1912 a doctor and paleo-anthropologist namedCharles Dawsonclaimed to have found a jawbone and cranial fragment of an ape-man transitional form in a pit in Piltdown, England.It was alleged to be 500,000 years old and was displayed as absolute proof of human evolution in museums across the world.For the next 40 years, scores of “scientific” articles, artist reconstructions, and over 500 doctoral theses were written about “Piltdown man.”Objections and criticisms were raised immediately by contemporaries like Arthur Keith but managed to be mitigated by Dawson until 1953 when tests proved conclusively that thePiltdown skullwas actuallyhumanandonly a few hundred years old, while the lower protruding jaw was from a recently deceased orangutan!

Attached: piltdown-hoax1.jpg (298x320, 42K)

In 1927 Davidson Black declared he had discovered five crushed skulls and several teeth near Beijing belonging to an ancient ape-man species now widely known as “Peking Man.”Somewhere between 1941-1945 all the original bones were mysteriously “lost,” however, leaving only a few plaster casts left to examine!At the same site where this supposed “missing link” was found, there were also found the remains of 10 fully human skeletons who quarried nearby limestone, built fires and left behind a variety of tools.Many scientists now believe the tools were used on the Peking Man rather than by them.The back of the skulls were all bashed in and in that part of the world, monkey brains are a delicacy, so it is likely that Peking Man were actually Peking apes, and they were man’s meal, not man’s ancient ancestor.

In 1974 Donald Johansson discovered “Lucy” a three-foot tall supposedly three-million year-old “Australopithicine” in Ethiopia.Widely publicized as our oldest direct human ancestor, Lucy made the usual rounds of scientific magazine journals and school textbooks.Don Johansson modestly claimed that Lucy was “the most important find made by anyone in the history of the entire human race,” and the media heralded him a hero.He was promoted from assistant professor to receiving his own Institute for Human Biology at Berkley.During all this time he never allowed scientists to examine Lucy’s bones until 1982, eight years later.Since then, and as more “Australopithecine” skeletons have been found and examined, however, many leading evolutionists agree that Lucy is simply an extinct type of ape, similar to modern pygmy chimpanzees and nothing more.They may have walked slightly more upright than most apes, but were not bipedal or erect, could not talk, spent most time in trees, and walked on all fours.

Lord Solly Zuckerman and Professor Charles Oxnard did 15 years of research on Australopithecines along with a team of five specialists coming to the conclusion that all the various specimens of Australopithecus they examined were only an ordinary ape genus and definitely not bipedal.The French Science andLife magazine ran the cover story in May 1999 “Goodbye Lucy” writing about how “Lucy” the most famous fossil of Australopithecus was not the root of the human race and needs to be removed from our supposed family tree.However, even now in 2014 a movie named “Lucy” has just been released by Masonic “Universal Pictures” where the Lucy ape-woman fraud is still treated as scientific fact throughout the entire movie.

So, when seen for what they really are, all the supposed ape-men discoveries and reconstructions are nothing but frauds and fantasies.Neanderthal Man was just an ordinary man, Java Man and Piltdown Man were composed of human and ape bones, Nebraska Man was actually a pig, Peking Man was actually a man’s meal, Lucy was just a monkey, Orce Man was a donkey, and Turkana Boy was just a boy!

Attached: evilution.jpg (320x107, 16K)

Attached: 10491267_10204403422539304_2869798231091298810_n.jpg (400x400, 56K)

>Well, Jow Forums?
here you go

Attached: niggers.jpg (1280x1024, 162K)

>Conflating the mystery of the creation of the Universe with Evolution

Spaniards aren't white

youtube.com/watch?v=RzWNh9ZpOCw

Attached: primates.jpg (611x339, 93K)

Intelligence is not sexually selected for.

t. Moor

We killed them and ate them....

When a mating pair from both types can no longer produce fertile offspring.

Attached: brainlet.jpg (645x729, 57K)

cells defy chaos retard

fyi this isnt true. RNA in simplest form is literally a chain of 7 or 8 molecules.

Theres actually silicate rocks that if you submerse them in primordial goo, just happen to have the right sized formations to line up RNA molecules on the surface and create them.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20255/
>A conclusion that two (or more) genes or proteins are homologous is a conjecture, not an experimental fact. We would be able to know for a fact that genes are homologous only if we could directly explore their common ancestor and all intermediate forms. Since there is no fossil record of these extinct forms, a decision on homology between genes has to be made on the basis of the similarity between them, the only observable variable that can be expressed numerically and correlated with probability.

Reminder that there is no genetic evidence that prove evolution. It's all conjecture.

Attached: Haplogroup autism.png (1210x1219, 174K)

>Those comments

Absolutely cringe.

did you know that there is continents called africa and australia?

Attached: 1493405115825.png (720x843, 399K)

Huehuehuehuehuehuehueh

Attached: 9DACDD4B-A3BA-4B92-B8AC-ACEFDF472A4A.png (799x572, 411K)

OHHH SHIT MOLECULAR GENETICS COMES IN FOR THE KILL

....AND ITS...

SMOKING GUN EMPIRICAL PROOF THAT HUMANS ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF OLD-WORLD APES

FUUUUUCK!

Attached: 4241237b87aa7aa47ea4e0f290640035.jpg (800x727, 95K)

>displays the missing link
>continues to claim this is proof of species evolution

K

the answer isnt creationist or evolution but a combination of both
do some research into ancient history and the Sumerian tablets

we were genetically altered by aliens

la creatura...

A creator built the rules and put things into motion. It isn't coincidence DNA is similar to computer coding. This doesn't necessarily mean "God" did it either. Multi-Vac could actually be the source of the big bang, lol.

basically aliens genetically modified monkeys to turn into humans theres no way our evolution is natural and our genetics look like thieve been edited in a lab

>can't prove that humans and apes are genetically related
>uses guesswork when he has no blood samples

Attached: 1512069634037.png (1144x225, 13K)

I know you don't have the background to understand what you're looking at, my leafy friend, but let me assure you -- this kind of indisputable molecular evidence doesn't get any better.

Apes have 24 chromosome pairs, we have 23. Our HCII is the result of end-to-end fusion of two well conserved old world ape chromosomes. The same genes, in the same order. There's even the vestigial remnant of a centromere in our Chromosome II, exactly where the ape one is.

There is literally no way this makes any sense except in the light of what we know about heredity, which is that our current genetic technology is physically connected to primates who were upright, fruit-eating, literal jungle monkeys.

Now please get a grip.

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 17K)

the meme is right, there are no signs of that supposed evolution

Spain the first of mulattos

Attached: 1554502608054.jpg (660x533, 64K)

its a real humanzee?

The pic is wrong. There aren't any ape/human ancestors around.

Attached: La Chose de Grotemburg.webm (800x450, 2.85M)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcephaly

if evolution is wrong, how did we come to be?

/thread

Fish in lake washington.

They're all dead. We have their skeletons.

Why is the first post always the best post?

What the fuck is in ‘primordial goo’? Sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me. I’ve never heard of rna forming from rocks, but even if it was true, it doesn’t account for how that rna started self replicating or how it grew a protein/lipid structure to surround itself

>actually thinking this is atheism
10/10