Who would be the worse overlord: muslim or atheist

Attached: 1554407781359.jpg (1512x1045, 221K)

good redirection, rabbi

Attached: jew_votes_donors.jpg (1664x1350, 591K)

It's not my fault you can't answer a simple question, Achmed

Like a fedora fag or an Reasonable Human that is atheist? Take away the memes and Atheist has absolutely no cons.

Muslims by Muslim law must kill non-muslims and gays. So they have some heavy cons.

Attached: 1554706448398.jpg (1024x859, 130K)

I mean are they reasonable or just seem that way in a majority Christian nation?

Atheists. Muslims are incompetent and inbred. Their regime would quickly fall apart.

Like the Chinese?

Yes, state mandated atheist nations such as China are more of a threat than bumbling caliphates.

It depends, lolbert atheists/irreligious folk would probably be similar to early America and would just let whatever happen but authoritarian atheists would genocide anyone that didn’t agree with them without remorse. They’d be kebabs but more effective.

Early Americans literally had eight hour church weekly.

Muslims for sure. The main problem with atheists is that many do not apply the scientific method to man himself.

I mean in terms of government control, if your community wanted you to go to church I doubt they’d give a shit.

??? An Atheist is a person who doesn't believe in a god. An atheist has no other dictation or doctrine or law, they are just people who don't worship any God's.

Muslims have a doctrine and law that demands they violate people.

Sure, an atheist could be an unreasonable cunt, but there isn't anything that defines him as a cunt. The title atheist doesn't determine much about the person.

Buddhist are Atheist, many don't believe in any God's, they just practice Spirituality.

Thats what I'm worried about. Which group is more stupid, do you think? Osama was a pretty smart Muslim.

Another problem with atheists is that they still often view life through the lens of religion, in that they will think they must do the opposite of what religious people do. What they fail to realize is that a lot of religious morals are based on good common sense and the natural order of things.

Misleading as heck, Moshe

Well, Chinese are quite atheist and I would choose them over Muslims even if I hate Chinese a lot.

What? That's a broad and ignorant statement based on nothing.

I would support Sharia law if the Muslims were white

>Fedora memes.
Lets judge christans by those Tinder Sluts then? And judge Muslims by those Tranny gay Muslims.

Why? Sharia Law is shit with or without skin color consideration.

Attached: 77vYy7JSf.png (760x749, 494K)

Atheist

Stop shilling your shitty honeypot, CIA

Muslims would be better. Atheists support every degenerate cause. Atheist overlords would force you to give your kids sexual reassignment surgery.

Sharia law aligns with about 90% of what Jow Forumstards wish for.
Trust me. I am a Saudi.

His name was Rabbi Yeshua the Annointed Messiah. The name "Jesus" or Logos are satanic pagan-greek influences.

In the bible logos = word (Yeshau is the living word)
In Stoicism/Heraclitus LOGOS = force of reason.

God = a Germanic-Anglo-Saxon-English word for their Allfather Godin or Wod (Wotan or Odin). The father of Yeshua was EL (sometimes called YHWH), as in IsraEL, or GabriEL, or the Elohim (sons of EL)

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (474x632, 44K)

>Muslims by Muslim law must kill non-muslims
That only applies to pagans. The Quran states that people of the book doesn't have to convert, but rather pay the jizya.

>Saudi
Thought on that 'Neom' project? Is this bullshit or is KSA actually pulling itself to build a second Dubai like Abu Dhabi or Qatar has been doing?