The further related you are to your partner the better

Quick reminder that humans went through a genetic bottleneck and two people from different continents share mote genes than two gorillas from the same pack.
Yes this effect exists, but its terribly minor in humans, and intermixing would benefit the genepool after a few generations because positive traits of several populations will converge and survive.
But as I reiterate on every issue like this:
Stop thinking about genes! The largest differences between races come from culture and nothing else

Depth of gene pool is indeed an issue in small communities but nothing that would justify cross breeding with different species of humans
>I'm so cool and pro-science
>wtf don't call niggers a different species even though in literally every biological model they would be considered a different species

>wtf wtf

>Produces fertile offspring when intermixed
>Different species
You are new to science huh?

and culture is entirely influenced, created, and produced by genes you absolute fucking mong

I dont know. My wife is a mix of German, Portuguese, Japanese and Italian. She is healthy.

you are new to subspecies, huh?

Inbreeding is a meme. Humans are evolved to live in small tribes and it's only harmful if it's your first cousin or closer.

Kraut, how would you classify asexual organisms, like bacteria, into different species? Is it the case that they have no species or are the same species because your
>muh fertile offspring
rule does not apply here? Or maybe consider the homo sapiens who made fertile offspring with neanderthals. Don't call people new to science if your only education in the topic is high school at best.

it's most beneficial to breed with people from your nation because of adaptations to your specific part of the world.

true for society, but could be true or false from couple to couple

>married a quadrimutt
You Krauts voluntarily wants to go extinct from this planet.

guy dating his scone cousin here
her and i have been together over 7 years now and its great
ama

>europeans and africans don't even have the same ancestors
>europeans have neanderthal ancestry
>we're close
KYS germroach

Two subspecies of one species are the fucking same species. Read up the definition of species, it literally is being able to breed together. Negroes are surely another subspecies, but that wasnt the point here

It depends if you are genetically gifted or not.
If not, then its advantageous to select outside your own group.
If you are, then it's better to select within your own group.

Using American blacks as an example, they have been put In a socially and genetically disadvantaged position. They would be better off finding partners outside their own group.

There are multiple extinct species of humans that were capable of interbreeding and in the case of neanderthals it's even stone cold hard solid fact that they interbred

It's a simple fact that we're not further away from neanderthals than we are to niggers genetically, yet neanderthals are a different species or subspecies depending on who you ask, while niggers are "just black humans"

Attached: 1553190246436.jpg (566x1024, 107K)

>Don't have the same ancestors
We are both Homo Sapiens, direct descendant of Homo Erectus
Yes europeans have Neanderthal genes mixed in, but
A: only a little, and
B: those are also descendants of Homo Erectus

Yes, my wife is from Brazil. As long as no Niggers, Abos or Arabs are involved I dont care. I like fellow Europeans and I am neutral on East Asians. You are purity-spiraling If you look down on intermixed Europeans. My own father is half-north Italian and my mom is part Danish. There are lots of people who are inter-European mix in my area. And frankly its us who are having the children not the "full-blooded Germans". Their women are child-haters

>"A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring"

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species

Then they are the same species by definition

False, but if you want to assert otherwise enjoy your outbreeding depression.

>often defined

By who? It clearly isn't a very widespread definition if neanderthals are considered a seperate species by large

Caucasians and Negroids are some of the most genetically distant human populations, you're full of shit.

>"A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring"
>often defined
>often
>not considering that taxonomy is just labelling of pre-existing biological reality and, therefore, not indicative of any biological principles
Here you contradict by stating that europeans even can have neanderthal DNA mixed into their genome, given that neanderthals are a different species to us and, by your own logic, should not be able to produce fertile offspring.

Attached: mother fucking nigger.jpg (210x237, 16K)

Semantics doesn't negate the fact that racial mixing is dysgenic

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
archive.is/hbpsV
>Mixed-race adolescents showed higher risk when compared with single-race adolescents on general health questions, school experience, smoking and drinking, and other risk variables.

Conclusions
>Adolescents who self-identify as more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks. The findings are compatible with interpreting the elevated risk of mixed race as associated with stress.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/
archive.is/gyKM6
>The analysis included approximately 1.6 million live births and 1749 stillbirths. In the unadjusted model, compared with two white parents, black/black and black/white couples had a significantly higher risk of fetal death. When all demographic, social, biological, genetic, congenital, and procedural risk factors except gestational age and birth weight were included, the odds ratios (OR) were all still significant. Black/black couples had the highest level of risk (OR 2.11, CI 1.77-2.51), followed by black mother/white father couples (OR 2.01, CI 1.16-3.48), and white mother/black father couples (OR 1.84, CI 1.33-2.54). Virtually all of the higher risk of fetal death was explainable by higher rates of low birth weight and prematurity.

Conclusions
>Mixed race black and white couples face higher odds of prematurity and low birth weight, which appear to contribute to the substantially higher demonstrated risk for stillbirth. There are likely additional unmeasured factors that influence birth outcomes for mixed race couples.

sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080817223530.htm
archive.is/nKEF0
>Biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to have been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, UC Davis researchers report.

False. Horses and Donkeys are so distantly related that they are considered separate species, yet a mule is not some kind of 'Equus'. Indeed the overwhelming majority are sterile. generic failures.
While you want diversity within your gene pool, you don't actually need that much. Don't marry your cousins, but you don't need to go looking for people of vastly different races to reproduce safely.

"Prematurity and Low Birth Weight as Potential Mediators of Higher Stillbirth Risk in Mixed Black/White Race Couples"
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2867623/

"Risks of selected congenital malformations among offspring of mixed race-ethnicity."
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15390318/

"Health and Behavior Risks of Adolescents with Mixed-Race Identity"
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

You’re retarded thinking hybrid vigor applies to human populations

Attached: identity mutt.webm (700x700, 2.9M)

Why are you arguing his semantics? He's trying to weasel his way out of the actual science with pedantic wordplay

Attached: population distance.png (319x346, 101K)

I said Neanderthals ARE the same species by any sane Definition. Just some retards don't like being the same as "cavemen"

Source on pic: nature.com/articles/nature11128

Attached: nature11128-f4.2.jpg (926x648, 35K)

Not true, someone being too genetically different causes more health related problems, as you see with mixed race children.
That best partner is related to you as being within the same broad racial group, but not directly related enough to reinforce any defects that might be laying latent within your genes.

Look at Iceland, they have to make sure they are not cousins before they marry since there is such strong interbreeding, yet they are also some of the healthiest people in the world.

He's just baiting for attention, so it's easier to argue the semantics to let other anons reading know that he is full of shit and making constant errors and inconsistencies than it is to attack his main point, which is just wrong.
Well they aren't considered the same species as us, are they? Not by literally anyone except you.

>I said Neanderthals ARE the same species

Doesn't matter, they're completely different sub-population groups.

Can I fuck a rat because we're both mammals?

Attached: neanderthal.jpg (600x369, 40K)

Oh, fair enough.

"Race, Ethnicity and Ancestry in Unrelated Transplant Matching for the National Marrow Donor Program: A Comparison of Multiple Forms of Self-Identification with Genetics"
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545604/

"Importance of Donor Ethnicity/Race Matching in Unrelated Adult and Cord Blood Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation"
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064795/

Just marry a wife that is attractive and can produce both hot & intelligent sons and daughters. Stay away from low-IQ races. Stay away from inbreeding practitioners (example: Ashkenazi)

Done

>The largest differences between races come from culture and nothing else
This is your brain on the liberal koolaid folks

* Marry a woman

Breeding with Asians is just as dysgenic as fucking Sheboons

Breeding with full Asians is bad because women hate hapas. Her brother is well-liked by women though, but he barely looks Asian at 1/4. 1/4 Asian really isnt a deal. 1/8 even less

Not only false, but also retarded.

Extraterrestials tweaked non niggeroid genetics 15000 years ago when they visited us. Thats why we whitez wuz smart and the kangz wuznt

False. Third cousins are best as it reduces the increased risk of miscarriage caused by immunological incompatibility whilst not being so close you get too many defective genes doubling up and becoming active.

scientificamerican.com/article/when-incest-is-best-kissi/

Obviously wrong. Inbreeding comes with risks, but breeding with something barely related to you is even worse.
Many animal species purposely mate with their cousins due to evolutionary stable strategies for maximizing reproductive fitness.

>Read up the definition of species, it literally is being able to breed together.
You just advertised how ignorant you are. There can be subgroups of animals, 'A', 'B' and 'C', separated geographically, where both A and C can viably reproduce with B, but the farther separated A and C cannot reproduce viable offspring.
The term "species" doesn't even make sense when you rigorously examine it. There is no reasonable definition for species, but most faggots are too retarded to notice this.

And since you are a brainlet, to spell this out, are A, B and C all the same species? But A and C can't reproduce together. But they both cam reproduce with B. So there goes your "species are groups that can reproduce" idea, right into the oven like where your body belongs.

False, otherwise we'd all be marrying trees.

>This thread

Attached: incest.png (500x496, 271K)

that doesn't make any sense
am i supposed to fuck bacteria?

>fucking someone from your own race is the same as fucking your sister
Retard spotted.

>Quick reminder that humans went through a genetic bottleneck and two people from different continents share mote genes than two gorillas from the same pack.
wrong, there's more genetic diversity within humans than there is between the grey wolf and the coyote, and those are entirely different species
taxonomy is incredibly arbitrary and mostly based on phenotypical differences and geographic distribution, there is no genetic basis for speciation

Brilliantly done lad

Thread seems to favor "closer related is better."
But yeah, incest is a stretch. Slippery slope and all that shit though.

>Thread seems to favor "closer related is better."
saying that further related is better is a retarded statement, doesn't mean the opposite must be true
most people throughout history have fucked cousins, whether they were 3 times, 4 times or 5 times removed. It's only a real problem if you fuck someone related to one of your grandparents

True to a certain extent. There are diminishing returns and at some point you'll hit the point where the chance of having a retarded baby is the same no matter how far you go from your own family.
This point is around your second cousin

>It's only a real problem if you fuck someone related to one of your grandparents
What matters is how related you are. Ideally people should be around 1/32 directlynrelated to each other, with the rest of the genes coming from a relatively small pool. But then again, you don't even know the difference between a second cousin and cousins x-removed (one of them shares a grandparent). You fucks are so fucking retarded, no wonder this boars sucks donkey dick.

*mates should be 1/32 directly related with the rest from a small, shared population.

it's a language barrier thing, i meant to say 3rd, 4th, 5th cousin etc

true. that is why i mostly fuck spiders and fish.

Eugenics, so probably not...
But do any of those DNA/Family History sites offer anything that would help with finding an "ideal" partner?
Seems like it would be a good way to combat low birthrates by just having a shit ton of kids with ideal partners.

my man

Attached: 1553856264581.jpg (300x168, 9K)

Neanderthals and humans created fertile offspring, do you consider neanderthals to be humans just like rest of us?

Sure, memeflag goatfucker!

A study in lceland found that third cousins had the highest fertility rates amongst all couples, so hey.

scientificamerican.com/article/when-incest-is-best-kissi/
Marrying/having babbies with third/fourth-cousins is best.

Based laddy