1. Australoids- These are the Abbos, the aboriginal people who inhabited South Asia before other Human groups came and mixed with them. These people are the foundation of ALL South Asians,and they are genetically very close to the aboriginals in south-east asia and Australia(to the point of negligible variation).
2. The second major migration was of the Dravidians, these were people whose origins are not well understood at all, but probably somewhere in the near East. These were more sophisticated, more anatomically modern Humans who migrated into the Indian sub-continent and created the first complex societies in the region. They heavily mixed with the Aboriginal population as well.
3. The Indo-Europeans/ Aryans- These were nomadic warrior tribes originally from the Eurasian steppe who had a very patriarchal social structure and were extremely aggressive and expansionist. These people conquered the Dravidian natives as well as the Abos and created the Caste system, or more correctly in its true form, the Varna system. In the Varna system the Aryans established themselves at the top of the Caste hierarchy and kept the native below them. Of course, that is not to say that Indian Upper Castes are purely descended from the original Aryas because first of all, when the Aryas initially began invading, the bulk of the tribe that came into India was male, so many of them took native consorts/wives (basically raped the Dravidian wimmins). Consequently, almost all Indian Upper Castes have Dravidian (and even abo admixture) genetic heritage, primarily through their maternal mitochondrial DNA.
Mitochondrial DNA evidence supports northeast Indian origin of the aboriginal Andamanese in the Late Palaeolithic ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477783
the Indian population is attributed to incessant, historical waves of migrations into India, the earliest, by the Australoid speakers around 70,000 years ago ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513393/
Microsatellite diversity reveals the interplay of language and geography in shaping genetic differentiation of diverse Proto-Australoid populations of west-central India. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16323197
Microsatellite diversity reveals the interplay of language and geography in shaping genetic differentiation of diverse Proto-Australoid populations of west-central India. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16323197
~50k yrs ago proto Manleets from India followed a coastal route to Australia to become the Australasian Aborigines
~5k yrs ago proto Manleets from India returned and reinforced themselves in Australia
In India btw, there still exists these bed rock peoples who speak the original australoid language related to austro-aboriginal lingua franca.
Haplogroup M2 [2] - found in South Asia Haplogroup M3 [3] - found mainly in South Asia Haplogroup M29'Q found among Papuans, Australian Aborigines Haplogroup M31 [24] - found among the Onge, in the Andaman Islands[15] Haplogroup M32 [25] - found in Andaman Islands Haplogroup M33 [26] - found in South Asia Haplogroup M33a - found in India Haplogroup M34 [27] - found in South Asia Haplogroup M40 [30] - found in South Asia[15] Haplogroup M41 - found in South Asia Haplogroup M42 [31] - found among Australian Aborigines Haplogroup M5 [5] - found in South Asia Haplogroup M6 [6] - found mainly in South Asia
Also prevalent in East asians and Native Americans with australoid origins.
So Indians/other South Asians are cross bred Aborigines. Not some sort of Asiatic Caucasian or something along those lines (although because of West Eurasian migration East, they are partially mixed with some Caucasian groups). With that out of the way, once you assess for their phenotypic traits, this assertion becomes self evident. For example take their conventional skin tone, and compare and contrast it with the other native ethnic groups in Eurasia. After you're done, what you'll see, is that they're the only race native to Euraisa with dark skin that exceeds the threshold of the conventional Eurasian tan(the darkest skin tone seen in other Eurasian groups). Not only that, but their eye sockets are also larger than what a Caucascoid should conventionally have. And their nostril shape is uniquely West African esk in appearance despite their geographical location. So what does this all mean? Well it means either they're recent African migrants(no genetic study points towards this) or are the cross bred descendants of the original Australasian population that balkanized and gave way to what we see in Australia, the Australian Aborigines. Who btw, seem to be their only unmixed descendants as India(their old homeland) was forcibly miscegenated into an old world Brazil.
Indians are subhuman, they are worse than race mixed Africans considering aboriginals are even more subhuman.
Asher Nelson
With that out of the way, once you actualize the fact that all South Asians are bleached Austrialoids, then their Goofiness starts to make sense. From their annoying way of talking, to their ass back wards customs and traditions, to their androgynous ugly appearance and street defecating tendencies. It all comes to clarity, as to why these characteristics exist within their race.
They're Abbos, something below the threshold of Kara boga approval.
Any citation for that bull shit cope? Keep in mind btw, that genetic differences can arise in a short time frame. Usually in part to isolation, so that might affect the validity of your statement , and or not refute the core assumption of my premise. Which is that South Asians primarily descend from an Australasian population.
>”poo flinging monkeys” >launch satellites in space for hundreds of other nations >explore Mars >open new areas of mathematics
>niggers >”space be oppressin us, the White man made space so he could oppress us by putting money on the moon instead of our reparations, also muh dick be bigger than da rocket tho 1+1=muh dick”
>India provided ₹15,000 (equivalent to ₹990,000 or US$14,000 in 2018) worth of medicines and clothing to Somalia in 1961, and ₹20 lakh (equivalent to ₹1.2 crore or US$160,000 in 2018) of relief supplies in 1992.[4] India donated 100,000 tonnes of wheat to Somalia, Kenya, and Djibouti) in 1985.[5]
>The Pan African e-Network project, India's flagship aid initiative in Africa, was inaugurated on 16 August 2010 in Somalia. India donated $2 million to the African Union Mission for Somalia (AMISOM) in May 2011, and an additional $1 million in March 2012. In September 2011, India provided $8 million to Somalia, Kenya and Djibouti through the WFP.[1]
>Citizens of Somalia are eligible for scholarships under the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation Programme and the Indian Council for Cultural Relations.[1]
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA sounds like you nigs needed us abbos to help your 68 IQ asses
