Circumcision makes me hate my body

Yes. You were mutilated, but gotta work through it

>You’re a beta virgin who think male circumcision is a big deal.

Hey, man, if you don't have any self-respect, that's fine. Some of us would rather have normal cocks, though.

Have sex.

dammmm that guy gets the best pussies on the PLANET

Chad user vs virgin op.

>unsatisfied with life because everything was "taken" from me ;_;

do you need a sucker and a binky?

Hey it's the typical faggot shit I was expecting. Thanks, guys.

Don't worry OP I feel the same. Strange how it always attracts such vicious attacks.

Never forget what was taken you. But still you can't change the past, so work to be the best you can be.

Thanks for the actually worthwhile posts, fellas.

Op stop being over dramatic.

Literally common sense advice.
you yourself could think of that OP

OP stop being a BIG DUMMY

Man you sound like a faggot.

I’m thankful I kept my penis uncircumcised I get more pleasure even from masterbating desu. All those idiots thinking being circumcised is better will never experience true sex.

>I'll be mocked for this, but I don't care, I'll say it anyway: I hate my body because I was circumcised.
having a foreskin makes jacking off easier which means more masturbation which can be debilitating for a young man.
You have an advantage over uncut men in the mental game of life.

Couldn't say it any better.

Get your priorities straight op, nobody cares that you miss your earthworm dick.

Lol, if you think a clinically accepted practice is bad, wait until you hear about the increased risks of contracting various types of STDs if uncircumcised. Oh, not to mention that pulled-back foreskin can "suffocate" the tip of the penis and lead to amedical *emergency* (paraphimosis)

Sure smells like Amerimutt in here. Hopefully one day this shit becomes outlawed and Jews and Muslims chimp out over it

>wait until you hear about the increased risks of contracting various types of STDs if uncircumcised.

Yeah, as we all know, Europe is a hotbed of STDs.

> Oh, not to mention that pulled-back foreskin can "suffocate" the tip of the penis and lead to amedical *emergency* (paraphimosis)

This is a rare thing, Shlomo.

>Hopefully one day this shit becomes outlawed and Jews and Muslims chimp out over it

The global influence of the former has kept it from being outlawed anywhere in the civilized world, unfortunately. Look up what happened in Iceland.

There's a difference between banning it as an unnecessary medical procedure, as some European countries have done, and banning it across the board, which infringes on religious freedom. Which I think they've done in Iceland.

Europe has too many Muslims for that to happen. (Hardly any in Iceland)

Intactivists are nuts. About as anti-science as anti-vaxxers.

On the upside? It may bring Muslim and Jewish communities together so in that regard I say BRING IT.

Jews have faced death and still circumcised their children. This fad of the day is nothing.

What happened there?

>which infringes on religious freedom.

Ah yes, the "freedom" of adults to carve their despicable, savage religions into their children's genitalia. Lovely.

>Intactivists are nuts. About as anti-science as anti-vaxxers.

Couldn't be further from the truth actually, it's people like you who are anti-science when you claim that men are born defective and actively ignore the functions of the foreskin or anything even remotely negative that can result from cutting the end of somebody's fucking cock off.

>Jews have faced death and still circumcised their children. This fad of the day is nothing.

Yeah, that's definitely something to be proud of. We might be killed but goddamn it we just have to torture our children.

A ban was proposed which polls found that the majority of the population and medical community in Iceland supported, and then the ADL and two politicians in the US wrote them open letters that were thinly-veiled threats saying that Iceland would be encroaching on religious freedom and empowering the far right, and somehow this is like Nazi Germany all over again, and guess what? Whole thing got dropped. It's gone. Zip, nada, zilch. Like it never even happened.

Attached: 1550506398603.jpg (817x712, 224K)

It's not possible to be Jewish or Muslim without circumcision, and defining it as barbaric (ergo "not like us"/not-western) is badly veiling your antisemitism or islamophobia. You're goysplaining Judaism to Jews.

you should discuss with mainstream accepted religious authority. Not fringe extremist groups that tell you what you want to hear and don't represent anyone but themselves.

You're advocating for the oppression of minorities and the removal of their religious freedom.

They'd do it anyway illegally, or move. Jews have done circumcision during persecution under penalty of jail or death. Several times during history.

Oppression of minorities isn't something you should advocate for.

I came from a parallel universe where all the uncircumcised men here are circumcised there and vice versa. Believe it or not, you are the same small dicked cry baby here and there. Stop obsessing about penises and blaming your parents for your own shortcomings you ungrateful cunt.

That's alright user, I'll love your dick enough for the both of us.

>It's not possible to be Jewish or Muslim without circumcision

You better go tell those Jews and Muslims who have their cocks in one piece that they don't actually exist, then.

britshalom.info/

>and defining it as barbaric (ergo "not like us"/not-western) is badly veiling your antisemitism or islamophobia.

I don't give a fuck. Sexually torturing children is savage and disgusting. Sorry you don't agree with that.

>you should discuss with mainstream accepted religious authority.

I could not care less what they have to say.

>You're advocating for the oppression of minorities and the removal of their religious freedom.

No, I'm advocating for male bodily autonomy and personal choice.

>They'd do it anyway illegally, or move.

And? Doesn't stop Indonesian, Malaysian, or Dawoodi Bhora women from performing clitoral hood nicks on their girls.

>Oppression of minorities isn't something you should advocate for.

If protecting male children from being abused and giving them a choice to do what they want with their own bodies when they become adults is oppression, then I'm all for oppression, baby.

Adults can circumcise themselves, if they want.
Parents shouldn't be allowed to circumcise their children.
It is a medical procedure that carries risks, it is completely unnecessary and it is unethical to do it on a child who cannot authorise it when there's no medical reason to do it.

This checks so many bullshit boxes it's actually pretty remarkable. Well played, user.

Again, stop goysplaining Judaism. You are a goy, you don't know how it works.

The truth is parents KNOW what is best. Children do not have a say in what happens to their bodies, parents are the legal guardians until 18 and until that age they decide what is best for them, whether you like it or not. You are being very offputting by fixating on this topic like a child.

This argument is stupid because the same authority and the same arrogance of those who would ban abortion are on display for those who think they should regulate circumcision. I don't want to spend the next century debating who does and doesn't have the right to circumcise, because once it is on the table, it's only a matter of time before it's lost. What seems silly or obvious to us will not always be the public sentiment or perspective.

If you feel worthless then off yourself. One less burden on the environment.

Nobody can change your mind and you don't want to change it. And nobody can undo the procedure. So there's nothing of value here, no advice, just your fucking bitching.

Go on, finish the job.

lol

>parents are the legal guardians until 18 and until that age they decide what is best for them, whether you like it or no
Being the legal guardian doesn't mean that you get to do whatever you want to your child because "you know what is best for them".

Just imagine your religion said that you had to amputate the hands of every baby girl. Would you say it's okay to do so, because "it's their religion" and "parents know best"? Or would you agree that doing an unnecessary and potentially dangerous procedure on a child is absolutely immoral and should be illegal?

No one is arguing you should ban circumcision all together, when you're an adult you can still get circumcision. You shouldn't do it to a child.

>Again, stop goysplaining Judaism. You are a goy, you don't know how it works.

A cigar is a cigar. Taking sharp objects to an infant's genitals is abuse. You can spew some verbose rambling crap about the symbolism and how it brings you closer to G-d or whatever the fuck, but at the end of the day you're just taking a sharp object to an infant's genitals.

>The truth is parents KNOW what is best. Children do not have a say in what happens to their bodies, parents are the legal guardians until 18 and until that age they decide what is best for them, whether you like it or not.

Tell me, what other healthy body parts can parents give permission to be amputated from their children?

>This argument is stupid because the same authority and the same arrogance of those who would ban abortion are on display for those who think they should regulate circumcision.

Actually, no. It's more like his body, his choice.

Yes, men having a problem with being sexually mutilated is funny. Thank you for your brilliant contribution, user. This will surely be remembered throughout history as a post that definitely contributed something.

Compensating much?
I can understand and you are 100% right to feel this way. Wether you not a very sensitivity part of your penis is removed sold be your decision and I can understand why you feel violated. However, you need to go on and make sure to let other people know how you feel, if asked. Maybe you can start a therapy, your view of your body sounds a little dangerous.
Good luck

Attached: 1557204223869.jpg (612x666, 53K)

Hey, another compassionate person. You have my sincere thanks.

>However, you need to go on and make sure to let other people know how you feel,

The only problem is that when I do, I typically get responses like most of the ones in this thread.

You don't need a foreskin, it doesn't do anything except make it easier to masturbate without lube. It's literally a non-issue which is why it's funny you're so butthurt about it. Also protip when someone is laughing at you, they're not trying to "contribute", they're just laughing at you.

>Have a child, nice baby girl
>Legal guardian until 18
>16 years later, low on cash
>Whaitaminute.jpg
>Let some old gross fuckers rape her in a truck stop toilet
>perfectly okay, because as her legal guardian I can decide over her body until she is 18.
>Repeat for 2 years
>Profit, pic related

You are going places user. Not university, but other places like jail.

Attached: 1557481228286.jpg (472x461, 30K)

You're a retard who has zero idea what he's talking about. Laugh away, you sub-human.

Conflating circumcision with rape? I would never have suggested that intacters are this morally void, but there you go.

It's not rape, it's consensual.
Her legal guardian gave consent, and they know what's best for them. That's how it works, right?

Circumcision literally leaves you with a physical scar and it's not consensual
t. an israeli jew

You know that there are many nerves in the foreskin and that sex/bjs are much better with it?
You are not wrong, it's not really necessary. That's correct and nobody should hate their body because of not having one.
but it's nice to have a foreskin. Keeps your dick sensitive and fucking feels better for you. I also liked the feeling when you slide it in and you can feel her hole push your foreskin back. It's nice too have one, 9/10 would miss it.

1) I already explained that it's bogus. Kids don't make their own decisions about their bodies. Parents do. It's part of being a responsible parent.

2) exaggerations used for shock value: male GENITAL MUTILATION! Ear piercings are now audio mutilation. Mole removal is now skin ablation. Or skin cutting. Or skin mutilation.

3) Neonatal circumcision has proven medical benefits for men and their sexual partners. And no, neonatal circumcision does not impact sexual function or feeling. The science on this is uncontested. It's not up for debate. The results are in, the meta data analyses have been done. That's it.

Do you still want to take away people's medical and religious freedom anyway? Then provide a reason that doesn't involve those 3 points.

How do people who get adult circumcisions even function? I'm uncut and the bits behind the skin are so sensitive I have trouble washing it because it almost hurts. Shit would be absolute torture to live with without the foreskin.

>Ear piercings are now audio mutilation
You don't hear worse because of ear piercings and this shit has started to become an outdated practice already. Skin cutting and skin mutilation is okay?? What?? Mole removal is beneficial and is usually done with the childs consent.

I overplayed it cause it made me angry. The way the poster put it made it seem like he can treat his kids however he wants until 18 years. You shouldn't be allowed to decide sexual things for somebody else ever and since there is a chance that circumsiced people are not able to have sex or enjoy it, I got carried away.

Their head is just not as sensitive and is used to underwear friction I guess. Regarding sex sensitivity though - my boyfriend is cut and he cums more easily from sex because he barely masturbates. My ex was uncut and he had a hard time cumming very often because he was addicted to porn and prolly jerked with a death grip.

>it's not really necessary.

Well, a lot of our body isn't necessary to live, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't seriously affect our quality of life for the worse if we didn't have those parts, and not having a foreskin absolutely affects your capacity for sexual experience.

>Kids don't make their own decisions about their bodies. Parents do. It's part of being a responsible parent.

You didn't answer my question from before. What other healthy body parts do parents have the right to amputate from their children?

>exaggerations used for shock value: male GENITAL MUTILATION!

Oh boy, here we go...

>Ear piercings are now audio mutilation. Mole removal is now skin ablation.

I don't agree with piercing a child's ears either, but you can't really compare an ear piercing to removing a substantial amount of functional tissue from somebody's genitals. Ditto on removing moles.

>Neonatal circumcision has proven medical benefits for men and their sexual partners.

Bullshit.

>And no, neonatal circumcision does not impact sexual function or feeling. The science on this is uncontested. It's not up for debate. The results are in, the meta data analyses have been done. That's it.

Also bullshit. Biased literature reviews from known circumcision fetishists like Brian Morris are meaningless. Objective comparisons of the normal and circumcised penises have shown that the foreskin is home to the five most sensitive regions of the human penis. THIS, is not up for debate.

>Kids don't make their own decisions about their bodies. Parents do.
Parents are asked to make decisions about their children bodies when there's a medical need to. Not randomly so.
I can't show up at a hospital and ask for my kid's appendix to be removed because I'm against appendixes.

>exaggerations used for shock value: male GENITAL MUTILATION!
Words have meanings. Circumcision is, factually, genital mutilation. You mutilate the genitals.
Removing a mole is skin ablation. Audio mutilation isn't exact when you talk about piercings.

> The results are in, the meta data analyses have been done
Subjecting a person to an invasive medical procedure when there's no need for it and they haven't asked for it is immoral.

>Do you still want to take away people's medical and religious freedom anyway?
No. Adults can circumcise themselves whenever they wish.

ad 3)
I think the only way it can be beneficial is, if you have extremely poor bodily hygiene and are not able to wash your penis daily. (Like say regular living standards 500 years ago)
I don't have fast knowledge of the subject but I thought I'd common knowledge that there are no health benefits.
Ad 2) I think that's also a bad comparison. The dicks purpose is to feel. Feeling is reduced by removing sensitivity. So it's not quite fitting. Same with moles, it's not quite the same, I would say. They don't serve a function and might be a cancer risk, which is not how I wold describe foreskin.

This isn't advice topic
Stop spamming

Mods take this foreskinless freak back to pol and r9k

I did want some advice in the form of different perspectives that may help me deal with this, you can thank the idiots in this thread who saw this thread as an attack on their egos and decided to take the opportunity to shit on me.

A fuckboi I know has had sex with 100+ women and he is circumcised. He never got a STD or HIV in his life. Either he is very lucky or this circumcision leading to less sex related diseases is true.

There's scientific research saying it isn't true.

What a lucky fucker then. Literally

I am muslim and my dick is circumcised.

Never understood the big deal around it. Until recently never really cared about it either, but then I heard of people literally getting to court over this in Germany. I actually feel like my dick looks better without my foreskin. Also, according to my father, who is an urologist, circumcision has a lot of health benefits.

Why do you dislike being circumcised? How come you are circumcised in the first place?