This is fucking bullshit. Science is dead. This is not an "image of a black hole"...

This is fucking bullshit. Science is dead. This is not an "image of a black hole". Its some unverifiable psuedoscientic illustration from "noisy, random data".

Attached: D3y0LIfX4AAxgpP.jpg (2048x1193, 66K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Black hole sun, won't you come and wash away the rain? Black hole sun, black hole sun, won't you come, won't you come?

Attached: 2311.jpg (545x551, 19K)

>Burger makes thread to show off his scientific illiteracy
Every time

basically a million lines of code required to manipulate the data

pixels and voxels on suicide watch

based

>burger makes fun of burger for being a dumb burger
the absolute state of america

When it comes to scientific matters this board is absolutely fucking retarded. You have to possess a sub 75 IQ to unironically take OP's position.

Yeah I don't even think it's a black hole. It just looks like they took a random picture with a telescope and just saw something on the image that looked like a black hole and decided to release it and tell the goyim that this is it.

If it's noise how did it form a circle OP?

"Why doesn't the image of an object multiple million light years exactly like in Interstellar?

Attached: 1526059970506.jpg (235x215, 6K)

>Expecting an image of something over 50 million light years away whilst also being barely more than 1 AU across in diameter to come out as anything more than a fuzzy blob.
You're not being tricked here user, you just have the mental capacity of a baboon.

Attached: Black Hole ENHANCED.jpg (784x768, 20K)

this
Just looking at the catalog yesterday killed off half my brain cells

Attached: 1553302782099.jpg (766x690, 106K)

Because they fed it circles to learn what to look for, it can't find black holes on its own lol

or at the very least why doesn't it look like my animes and maymays

Attached: 1554676306298.gif (750x750, 16K)

No, they were literally measuring 1.3mm radio-waves, and then developed a computer algorithm to generate the image. There is no "photograph" properly speaking. It's literally CGI, it's just that it's more "real" CGI than the CGI we had prior which were just artist renditions.

Exactly. Measuring radio waves is basically sight with more steps. No idea why pol thinks it's faked by jews or something.

whats so special about black hoole

It's not even a pixel on a radiotelescope, but it's about what you'd see if you were there, before you die.

It's not a photograph of visible light per se, but radio waves and visible light are all light waves, so it's a composite photograph taken of radio waves. Many space images are taken in radio waves, x-rays, etc. It doesn't mean they aren't real. When you view infrared military footage, do you consider that fake just because it's not filmed in visible light?

ppl died for this foto.. all the hunger in the world for this one foto GG

Lol that's a solar eclipse someone took last year.

It’s real. I’ve seen similar black holes with my $600 telescope on a clear night.

I highly doubt you'd see anything like this if you were there in person.

It actually does look like interstellar. That's a red flag if anything

It is an image of the black hole, its just not an image in the sense you are used to. They are picking up little bits and pieces of information and then pasting it all together with a computer. Its not really a “picture” of the black hole, its more like an image representing the black hole that is generated using large quantities of incomplete data gleaned from looking towards the black hole.

KEK

What else was it supposed to look like?

Attached: 1494713616938.jpg (682x600, 225K)

Attached: EuOcdMc_1.gif (480x368, 1.08M)

>This is not an "image of a black hole". Its some unverifiable psuedoscientic illustration from "noisy, random data".
They had to put out something to justify their efforts and funding. Until a separate group can reproduce similar results from their own separately gathered data then this is just their interpretation of "noisy, random data".

2 0 1 7
0
1
7

Attached: Screenshot_20190410-192416.png (1200x1920, 415K)

Based NASA fucking over the retards and providing (((reasons))) for more money.

Yes, well done user, you managed to post scientific models of what we would have potentially seen based on the theory of general relativity. As it turned out when the final picture was released yesterday, those models from several years ago were highly accurate. This in turn once again allowed us to reaffirm our understanding of the theory of general relativity. If i confused you, I'll try to explain it again, this time not using words longer than 5 letters so that you might be able to understand.

Attached: ecde5f10-5455-4acf-9efd-21bdf4c0010e.jpg (655x616, 104K)

Will post this screenshot on r/iamverysmart for extra upboats

It isn't a black hole because black holes don't exist. If you go through their methodology they deliberately filtered out signals until they found some of the shape they expect of a black hole. That picture could be anything from a nebula to a weirdly shaped galaxy or some shit. The fact that you faggots and others accept this blindly is proof that even Jow Forums is starting to fall for the reddit cult of science worship.

Black Holes

youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q

How did the radio waves escape the black hole?

They didn’t “escape”, they never made it past the event horizon so they were flung back around.

Attached: 1515645275068.png (478x523, 80K)

>and then developed a computer algorithm to generate the image.

>develop.

this its nothing new, it exist since a long time. a lot of exageration goin on with this ...

Attached: jupiter-visradio[1].jpg (498x345, 33K)

It isn't the radio wave part that is the problem. Its the distance and resolution. You simple can't get that sort of resolution over those distances

Nah, OP is right for being skeptical. This isn't an actual image, it's a reconstruction produced by a Bayesian statistical engine trained with data from real, observed celestial bodies and their known interferometer data.

In other words, you're looking at a probability space in image form, not an actual image of a black hole.

Attached: 1515719152835.jpg (506x422, 53K)

>this is a photo of radiowaves that were converted into visible light by a computer program
>this image was saved on a computer and displayed using binary code to produce the picture for others to view across the internet
>the visible light in the image on the computer screen struck your rods and cones in your eyes and your brain inverted the picture into what you currently see
>you're looking at an interpretation of an interpretation of an interpretation

is reality a meme?

Attached: wew.jpg (251x201, 8K)

Love how reddit faggots pick up everything space related, just to shove it up deep in their ass.

they had to develop a program because they could only get little radio fragments full of noise at any one time

You have to be a scientismist to not even consider whether OP is right.

checked

Attached: 1549216244182.jpg (243x207, 7K)

What pisses me off even more is this picture of a pipe!

Attached: this is not a pipe.jpg (900x627, 53K)

I'm in this research community and yes, you're right. Finding any kind of little shit gives you a pat on the back and congratulations, even when your findings are baseless shit. This is akin to cartel like mentality so we get more money and grants to fucking abuse. There's always political shit involved as well such as someone wanting to do their doctorate, even if it is baseless shit, it doesn't matter because by the time it gets debunked and proven wrong, it will be 10-15 years from now. And you can always claim it was just theoretical.

Nigger what do you think that big black spot in the middle is?

Attached: 1527782625323.gif (504x686, 268K)

again, nothing new, every image before this had to deal with noise even our own noise can affect the lecture (TV signals , radio, satellite etc etc) theres no need to exagerate.

Attached: noise_est[1].png (489x397, 151K)

Attached: 1554911182061.jpg (700x700, 209K)

(OP)

Please don't breed.

Attached: 1553675248347s.jpg (125x121, 2K)

Attached: blk.png (392x436, 41K)

the color is added to the image also, these telescopes don't use visible light.

It's legitimately disturbing how stupid you are.

Sorry the truth hurts your feelings.

>science worship
insane how the American educational system failed its population.

Im sure you can comprehend that there is SOME WAY to move around the black hole - while still being affected by its gravity?

>inb4 gravity doesnt exist - everything is filtered by density

So, the "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE! LE STOP GLOBUL WARMING XDD" faggots are the one's the system didn't fail? Fuck off.

lol IFLS is a fucking result of your shitty educational system
but the real problem is social media inherently giving merit to retarded peoples voices

all media does that, dumb nigger.

Someone please tell me what this is and why it matters?

no one knows exactly what a back hole looks like. NASA could pull rabbit out of it's ass and sell it as a black hole 'algorithm' and everyone on twitter would be all
>ahhah interesting. I loves science and facts

You are mostly correct.
But Im sure you agree that social media reaches farther and faster than "old" media.

Don't you understand? This is the result of the Universe growing tired of mankind's degeneracy.

It's a black hole, see

Coincidentally it matches the theorem of Einsteins prediction. Which is pretty cool

>non-whites struggling to comprehend science
>"OOGA-BOOGA"
Unsurprising

Reality is completely based on the observer

kys you low level lifeform

>whats so special about black hoole
It's where all the money sent to NASA went.

you're retarded as well

Change your tampon.

>It’s real. I’ve seen similar black holes with my $600 telescope on a clear night.
ACIIIIDDD

Attached: acidtrip.jpg (1280x720, 192K)

>It is an image of the black hole, its just not an image

Brilliant. Sciencecuck logic.

NASA is a bullshit waste of money.

Are you sure?

Attached: 8000e83d8efce51a7d93d729efa2442dcde42af24dc5a6b819613a9a15b216cf.png (760x740, 333K)

>In other words, you're looking at a probability space in image form, not an actual image of a black hole.

In other words, it's fake and gay.

>it's not a photograph
>it's a CG composite image
Then why do they keep calling it a photograph?

fukken saved

for the longest time NASA didn't even have a complete picture of the earth from space. it was just a bunch of photos stitched together.

>NASA didn't even have a complete picture of the earth from space

Attached: view-of-earth-from-moon-apollo-11-july-20-1969.jpg (1024x1047, 306K)

You're no better than a fucking nigger fighting for Boko Haram. Kys you barbaric waste of life.

That's the only part of what he wrote that I liked, honestly.

The fuck is wrong with your basic education?
That's it i quit , this board is a joke.
Fuck white nationalism a bunch of pseudo-intellects with low iq.

>50 brazillion Gigabytes of data
>to show us something we've known for over 30 years.
okay

a full complete photo. all the old ones were composites. they literally said it themselves

>The fuck is wrong with your basic education?

Basic education == believing a fuzzy picture of a circle of light made by a (((female coder))) is a black hole.

I presume , you had failed in highschool. Low iq nigger

Attached: moon doggo.gif (640x639, 279K)

So you mean the photos from the moon are fake?

I wish I could wring your ungrateful little neck and throw you into that thing so you can experience it first hand.

Space is the future of humanity. Space is important, cum fucker.

>The earth seen from the moon is the same size as the moon seen from earth

Really makes you think

Fucking kill yourself im so fucking angry , no wonder this nation is doomed fucking subhumans from both side.
Let the asians rule the world , fuck white world

Made me kek.