This test was designed by the NASA to filter incels. Congratulations, you all failed.
This test was designed by the NASA to filter incels. Congratulations, you all failed
Asher Sullivan
Josiah Taylor
Wrong
Jaxson Parker
I don't get it, she helped create the algorithm. Why is she singled out?
I mean props to her, but she "helped", there was a whole bunch of people doing it.
Josiah Nelson
>Muh women
John Bennett
powerful
Oliver Richardson
jews and kikes
Nathaniel Hill
if your not a friendless incel
GET THE FUCK OFF Jow Forums!
Matthew Morales
Because if you post some young woman's face on everything you not only get more funding but there's strong propaganda value as well
Easton Green
I don't get it. If you are not a female or Obama, does that make you an Incel?
Zachary Barnes
>we were merely pretending to be retarded
Julian Sanders
The greatest man in all human history was an incel.
Julian Martinez
Based, incels absolutely BTFO
Camden Bell
(((helping develop)))
Jackson Garcia
>famous
>incel
Incel is not a synonym for celibate you moron.
Jayden Smith
What the fuck are you talking about, an incel guy made all the work. Respect your superiors roastie.
Jayden Gomez
and he cucked out on this topic immediately
Josiah Rodriguez
> Literally is
What did the Russian mean by this?
Thomas Hall
Woman behind!
Black Hole!
I get jokes
Ian Russell
> Literally is
Pray tell what the 'in' part means.
Gavin Torres
did she use a mirror or something to fine her black hole?
Grayson Reyes
Involuntary. As in Involuntary Celibate.
Carter Bennett
we are already down to designed and helped
Charles Gray
You're a straight shooter... Not a stellar job following the conversation.
Yes that's what it means. And 'Involuntarily celibate' has quite a more specific meaning than 'celibate', not a synonym. And anyone who knows anything about fame knows that it is literally impossible to be famous and not have hundreds of women who will fuck you for bragging rights. Noting involuntary about that.
Matthew Diaz
/pol says she's jewish
any proofs on that?
Caleb Murphy
Nice one with the 'Russian', very original, I am triggered beyond belief.
My hat is off to you good Sir, a real trole master. Very impressive. Bigly.
Jacob Scott
just look at her nose and face. you don't have jewdar
Cooper Robinson
So you openly admit that this is, at best, a major exaggeration of the truth, literally propaganda, but you're saying WE'RE the bad guys here?
Just post an objective, in depth analysis of who on the team did what, and there will be an end to the horror.
Christopher Fisher
>Not a stellar job following the conversation.
Because I’m not the user you were talking with. Check IDs, thought I’d speed up your point to help.
Alexander Russell
>pointing out she didnt really do much is being an incel
Jaxson Hernandez
she has a very nice black hole. i saw the pic
Gavin Cook
It’s Chad Stevens IRL.
Ethan Gray
>didn't realise I was fully aware he's not the person I was replying to
My point stands. Thanks for the good intentions Sparky.
Dylan Hughes
cool algorithm. all that work for something that looks like it was made in GIMP in 5 minutes.
Brandon Morgan
Would that make Newton a Vocel?
Carson Scott
She's a Jew
Sebastian Ortiz
What the fuck is a plaudit? Did someone get a new thesaurus? Is accolade too low brow now? I hate people who pretend to be smart by using big words.
James Phillips
why do they look so ducking gross
Cameron Nelson
I already hated women before this, now I just want nothing to do with them
Jack Cox
Look how Jewish she looks.
Benjamin Williams
Did you ever think that his crippling autism might make it impossible for him to even conceive of "hooking up"? It could still be involuntary but the reason is a personal one.
Jacob Ortiz
Wameng
Nathaniel Howard
how about one of those fancy women that have a feminine penis also well meme'd phoneposter
Nicholas Walker
WHAT THE FUCK! WHY IS THIS BEING SHILLED SO FUCKING HARD?! Like great she figured something out! lets get more women to do this kinda shit but honestly in the large scope of things...(no pun intended) this accomplishment is small in comparrison to other things women have done. SO WHY ARE THERE SO MANY FUCKING THREADS ABOUT THIS?
Jacob Miller
Proof he wrote the code and didn't just data manage and compile?
Owen Lopez
>This accomplishment is small in comparison to other things women have done
Such as? It really isn't and that's saying something. The most famous scientific woman I can think of got famous for killing herself with radiation.
Bentley Reyes
Explain the blue underline away if that was just inputting data. The red arrow shows clearly the spikes where data was just c&p'ed.
Jose Turner
I can't, these are just the argument that I am hearing from the "other" side.
Ayden Peterson
go to his github and look nigga, its public
Easton Long
I did. Looks like a lot of graphs. I don't know enough about coding, but I see this argument.
Jack Perry
Just use your fucking brain. I suspect you're trying to trick people with your naivety, or you really have no sense of logic. Pic related is what it would look like if you just plug and played datasets.
Wyatt Hill
Not trying to trick anyone. I just need my ducks in order when it comes to telling people Bouman did a lot less than she is getting credit for.
I don't know enough about coding to get technical with the people I will be debating with, so I need easy and understandable ways to come back at what they will throw at me.
Thomas Hughes
He didn't write 850.000 lines of code. He made changes that affected 850.000 lines. His argument is specious at best, he also does not know if he was manager or not and he is assuming he is. If you look at this commit history its clear he wrote more code than she did. If you look at the older articles by MIT press about the project she is barely mentioned too, most certainly not as a leader.
Not surprised to see white knight faggot on reddit, that site needs to be nuked.
Luis Sanders
Well, he was coding for the projects entire course. Inputting data would lead to large spikes because everything is already done and it goes in at the same time. Small, consistent peaks mean he's writing it.
Owen Phillips
If you don't want or can't get technical just look up the older articles about the project in MIT press releases. They don't mention her until the end, and only as another project member. Not as a lead, not as the creator.
John Gonzalez
incels btfo
Nicholas Young
Poor guy, all that work, and he is cast in shadow, as a lesser colleague takes all the credit.
Joshua Evans
Same. I'm absolutely done.
Noah Ortiz
>Jewish
>Female
Hmmm
Angel Garcia
That's so great
Women are way more useful than men, if you disagree you're an incel
Nolan Stewart
So, what you're telling me is that this is FAKE NEWS?
Colton Thompson
Jose Turner
Not even an incel would screw that giant nosed creature
Adam Gomez
Computer science is completely dominated by men like nothing else. The jews want a larger supply of people who can into computer so they can pay them less. To that end flood the media with these waman koder stories
Gabriel Howard
Tuns out, she did a sub sub sub part of a programm. A sort of 'adaptor' that just reformats certain data into another format, and then feeds it into the ACTUAL programm.
That misrepresentation of what she actually contributed and what she actually did is nauseing. Either nepotism on the part of the institution OR the media.
Sources :
here, what SHE wrote ( HOPSTOOLS ) : github.com
Here the mother program, where that optional part of her is added, where it acts as a sort of interface to import one more datatype by reformatting it.
source : github.com
It's kinda ridiculous, how the media morphs this into something COMPLETEY different.
btw: that's also NOT an algo, but just reformatting data.
────────
You dont understand - she did NOT write and algo at all. sche did NOT write an image tool at all.
What she did code is at max about 4 pages of code - but more importantly - is neither an algo, nor a imaging program but is an ADAPTOR for a source of data, which reformats the data to feed it into the mother program - of which she contributed that adaptor, which makes up ca 0.01% of said mother program at max AND is marked as "optional" part of the program
sources : github.com
────────
Her whole bundle ("hopstools") here was merged into the mother programm and counted as one commit of 'mother' program. hopstools, of which she did at max 25% Her share on contribution on this actual imaging program is about 0.3% max, but OK lets say 1% - So she did less than 1/4 of 1% of the work. max. If we're very generous.
this little part is the share that her contribution does. And again : HOPSTOOLS is just an adaptor for another dataformat that can be read into the 'mother' programm. that's it.
Leo Myers
Andrew Chael wrote 850k out of the 900k lines of code He was also the leader of the project Michael D. Johnson wrote 12k lines of code Chanchikwan wrote 5k lines of code
The woman? Only wrote 2.4k lines of code
Interestingly enough, the code she wrote was importing something called HOPStools
Interestingly enough if we go look at HOPStools and all its contributors we get:
weilgusm wrote 2.9k lines of code
chanchikwan wrote 676 lines of code
Andrew Chael wrote 1.2k lines of code
jpbarrett wrote 71 lines of code
Katie Bouman wrote 2 lines of code
Hell, even on the hopstools thing there is this in the summary:
"=============================
For Katie:
cd /Users/klbouman/Research/vlbi_imaging/software/hops/build source hops.bash
run this file from: /Users/klbouman/Research/vlbi_imaging/software/hops/eat"
She also fixed absolutely none of the bugs on the EHT
And the algorithm they talk about? It was plagiarized off of a japanese guy named Mareki Honma who made the thing back in 2012, and uploaded/updated it to github in 2016
Andrew Chael asked to use it, Honma helped him adapt it, and was part of 60 japanese people working on the project
Katie Bouman, also isn't following any one at all on Github and has basically only utilized it for these two projects (Hopstools and EHT)
────────
The second co-leader of the EHT imaging group is Kazunori Akiyama with the first being, Andrew Chael.
bhi.fas.harvard.edu
news.mit.edu
Looks like MIT's social media twitter account didn't collaborate with MIT's own news office since in reality, Katie Bouman did not lead any team at all or was a leader at all.
Josiah Peterson
The actual leaders were Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael.
Notice how before this social media shilling on twitter, the MIT article only mentioned Katie Bouman once at the very end of the article.
news.mit.edu
The Haystack EHT team includes John Barrett, Roger Cappallo, Joseph Crowley, Mark Derome, Kevin Dudevoir, Michael Hecht, Lynn Matthews, Kotaro Moriyama, Michael Poirier, Alan Rogers, Chester Ruszczyk, Jason SooHoo, Don Sousa, Michael Titus, and Alan Whitney. Additional contributors were MIT alumni Daniel Palumbo, Katie Bouman, Lindy Blackburn, Sera Markoff, and Bill Freeman, a professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
How long before this MIT article written by MIT themselves gets taken down and rewritten to give Katie Bouman a whole paragraph to herself?
When will the mainstream media take responsibility for inaccurate reporting? Why is there such a glaring difference between one of MIT's twitter accounts versus their own press release?
Why were the 2 leaders: Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael completely ignored by everybody else?
4 teams around the world.
American team was ked by Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael.
Nowhere it is mentioned that Katie Bouman led the American team, just only these 2 males who were co leaders.
Where did this Katie Bouman was leader originate from? Even MIT's own news article doesn't mention this.
Josiah Parker
The second co-leader of the EHT imaging group is Kazunori Akiyama with the first being, Andrew Chael.
bhi.fas.harvard.edu
news.mit.edu
Looks like MIT's social media twitter account didn't collaborate with MIT's own news office since in reality, Katie Bouman did not lead any team at all or was a leader at all.
The actual leaders were Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael.
Notice how before this social media shilling on twitter, the MIT article only mentioned Katie Bouman once at the very end of the article.
news.mit.edu
>The Haystack EHT team includes John Barrett, Roger Cappallo, Joseph Crowley, Mark Derome, Kevin Dudevoir, Michael Hecht, Lynn Matthews, Kotaro Moriyama, Michael Poirier, Alan Rogers, Chester Ruszczyk, Jason SooHoo, Don Sousa, Michael Titus, and Alan Whitney. Additional contributors were MIT alumni Daniel Palumbo, Katie Bouman, Lindy Blackburn, Sera Markoff, and Bill Freeman, a professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
How long before this MIT article written by MIT themselves gets taken down and rewritten to give Katie Bouman a whole paragraph to herself?
When will the mainstream media take responsibility for inaccurate reporting? Why is there such a glaring difference between one of MIT's twitter accounts versus their own press release?
Why were the 2 leaders: Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael completely ignored by everybody else?
4 teams around the world.
American team was ked by Kazunori Akiyama and Andrew Chael.
Nowhere it is mentioned that Katie Bouman led the American team, just only these 2 males who were co leaders.
Where did this Katie Bouman was leader originate from? Even MIT's own news article doesn't mention this.