rollingstone.com
archive.fo
THE PRECEDENT IS SET. JOURNALISTS WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
Other urls found in this thread:
factcheck.org
twitter.com
If you encourage your source to commit a crime, you should be held accountable. Fuck journos and fuck Pussange
ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE
(((reporters))) will be fine.
Nothing changes for everyone else because they already know what they're up against.
All this means is that seeking refuge in embassies (or churches decades ago) isn't viable anymore.
You shills will be indicted too, you know this right?
bump
bump
Make a list of every value the americans LARP about.
They actually do the opposite
Hahahaha you Israelis are gonna die.
But not the mass murdering traitors they took the info from who are running our planet into the ground they don't have to be accountable ;^)
Hahahahah Muslims will wipe out Israel before may 9
perfect example.
in reality they love israel.
One day Jow Forums would have defended him
Just for the lulz of seeing the Amerimutt government in full despair
Nobody loves Israel. You believe your own propaganda. Enjoy watching your world collapse.
Pretty sure I don't have a jew proxy on
sure thing kike
>Nobody loves Israel.
more than americans
Why think when the government will tell us what we need to know?
Really? Rolling Stone? Pfft.
No one is ever held accountable. Fake news.
"these are not the droids you're looking for"
>No one is ever held accountable.
Sadly it will be only be journalists who don't have gov connections.
Pardon Assange
ARREST ALL TREASONOUS LYING FAKE NEWS """"REPORTERS""""
What scares me the most about this is the so-called "progressives" are celebrating the arrest of a man who merely shared the truth about government and corporate activities. Their proving the point that they're a bunch of authoritarians.
>If you encourage your source to reveal a company or government has been committing a crime against its people, you should be held accountable.
FIFY, lickspittle
And fuck you, fat-arse
>What scares me the most about this is the so-called "progressives"
Jimmy Dore?
Michael Tracey?
Glenn Greenwald?
Mark Ames?
>Nobody loves Israel
Your country is the birthplace of Christian Zionism.
Christ dude seriously take your meds
As it was in the beginning, so shall it always be about the lulz. Never forget, user who read these words.
That's GB actually for the record
great bait, ho ass bix nood muhfugga
They don't have to worry.
They are not actual reporters like Assange.
They are (((reporters))) spreading misinformation and BS.
Yes but the world order is turning around now. It has to. In order to assure the survival of chosen place. It's a twisted game but they are in our their heads.
Kike detected, please commit bleach ammonia
Catch my knife in your belly any time you fucking faggot. Any fucking time, bring that cringe into meatspace and I’ll tickle your kidneys.
Reporters are happy with the Assange's arrest because he worked against democrats in the 2016 election.
No. Reporters are shitting bricks.
I like your enthusiasm bro. Stay ready.
buy a gun, faggot.
Hey mossad faggot. Consider suicide because this ride is gonna lead to the end of zionism anyways.
Kek.
real damascus didn't look like that new age faggy damascus wannabe
so now you know
Israelis like you are worthless subhumans and that's why you'll be dead soon.
It could be even more fun than that. Have them endorse Assange to safe their asses would be a hilarious move.
I know it ain’t real Damascus, I mostly liked the grip.
>1b8658d2241271100c797a85b(...).jpg
It's a lie:
factcheck.org
No fucking way. There is no way liberals are actually happy about his arrest since Wikileaks essentially brought down the Bush's foreign policy legacy
I just watched the collateral murder for the first time and read some background on it.
Why exactly were two journalists conversing with armed insurgents who were about to attack a US convoy? I can agree that the second open firing onto the van just trying to pick up wounded was unjustified, but the first shooting seemed like everything was done correctly. A journalist standing shoulder to shoulder with someone about to attack U.S. forces while an apache is above should have known the risks. What am I missing?
he didnt redact stuff that wasnt relevant to his points