'It serves him right, he trusted DONALD TRUMP!'

'It serves him right, he trusted DONALD TRUMP!'
Old thread.

Attached: neocon orange.png (1095x710, 621K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G-jDp4KjLLY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>we pretend Assange helped Trump and supported Trump when he said Trump and Hillary were both cancer

Trump said 'I love wikileaks' many times. Now he said he doesn't know anything about them.

More lies from Blorph

>Trump said 'I love wikileaks' many times.

What the fuck does that have anything to do with anything? Trump also said this prior.

Attached: Screenshot 2019-04-11 12.00.06.png (1340x584, 311K)

You can see the image I posted in the OP. Trump claims he doesn't know anything, a total lie.

Your image just proves my point further, he's a conman.

>he's a conman.

word

They could have charged Assange with a laundry list of felonies if they wanted to. He could be facing 100 years in prison if they wanted to.

Only charging him with a crime that has a max penalty of 5 years is a signal that there is something else going on here.

bump

>it's always discord trannies bumping their own threads

Attached: 1550605239987.png (1488x1756, 736K)

>How dare you quote Trump's own words!

tossed under the bus like a dog even though he thoroughly helped trump elected.
you folks are bigger rats than kikes.

moderately rare

moderately mcdonalds.

Take what the average goybook boomer "knew" about wikileaks in 2016 and subtract half

That's what Trump knew about wikileaks

I fully expect Trump to say 'Julian who?' in the next few days though too. Happened with Ann Coulter.

Maybe. I just don't think he cared enough to research what Assange actually is at the time.

It was all a joke until he won

Why is it anyone who has assisted him is harmed or defamed?

Trump saying "he doesn't know anything" is shorthand for saying he doesn't know them personally or interact with them.
See his "I don't know the KKK or David Duke" earlier that the media tried to pin him with.
I don't like Trump, but at least be honest in critiques of him; start taking him seriously, not literally like the left does.

Saying 'I don't know anything about wikileaks it's not my thing' isn't him saying 'I don't know Assange'. That isn't what he was being asked about either.

Just like Flynn. When Trump let Mueller torture Flynn's family, I knew something was wrong.

It's him saying he doesn't have anything to say about it.

Which is a cuck move if ever there was one.

Trump isn't an eloquent speaker. He did the same thing with Ann Coulter, saying he "doesn't know her", to basically state that he doesn't talk to her on a personal basis, at least anymore.
Unless he specifies otherwise, I think we can assume he is saying the same thing here as well.
It's also to probably distance himself from the accusations that he "coordinated" with Wikileaks in 2016

Stupid people often confuse bravery with stupidity. Nautrally they consider themselves very brave.

Wikileaks gave the election to Trump

It’s a good thing he was rescued before the deep state killed him. Seth Rich will get justice now.

this is twelfth dimensional texas hold 'em. Trump is bluffing. he knows them. but for some reason he doesn't wanna say anything currently. we can only wait and see what happens

I love Wikileaks != I coordinated with Wikileaks to win the 2016 election

Seth Rich

Wew is that a crime?

Ya they are going to torture him to get his “russian” connections

that’s someone else

If trump changed as a person in 5 years to all the things which you subjectively value as good and right, would that make you a conman?

Oh and btw, only fags don't answer directly.

He's a conman because he quite obviously just said whatever people wanted to hear at the time and then didn't really mean any of it. The same as other politicians.

So it would make him a conman if those opinions were said in order to gain votes yes. If he ran on a platform of being a neocon and then became a Ron Paul type when he got in you could say he conned the people who wanted him to be a neocon for example.

Honestly this should be the breaking point for anybody on here. If he protects our lad Jules he's a good cunt. If he doesn't, he's a shit cunt and you should treat him as such.

Attached: Q-dropcode11.jpg (1202x677, 196K)

Or hes gonna get him to testify against hildawg and obongo

this

Just as a headsup, Trump is throwing him under the bus, bigly. I watched a lot of jewtubers today and comment sections everywhere are filled with screeching MIGA kikes doing hasty damage control

>comment sections everywhere are filled with screeching
Which ones?

Surely even the biggest mouthbreathing Q-boomers will see how fucked this is. He revealed that Iraq was primarily a jewish operation and sold to US citizens and many other nations under false casus belli.

So they're trying to fuck his ass for revealing the rat behind the curtain.

Shills on sucide watch. Trump speaks in codes

You need to learn about subtleties in language.

>Let me translate what Trump said
>Here's what he REALLY meant
>He's only pretending to be retarded

Attached: trump assange wikileaks.png (577x519, 336K)

So are you guys suggesting that if Assange gets JUST'd and locked away for life in the US, Trump has nothing to do with it?

Even after he pardoned Chaim Shekelgrubbler sholom rubashkin as his first pardon?

I'm sorry dudes but you'll really start tying your assholes up with this one.

Attached: 635992478552349502-m0127rubashkin01-.jpg (3200x1680, 315K)

>Surely even the biggest mouthbreathing Q-boomers will see how fucked this is

I wouldn't bet on it see,

Attached: Assad 5.png (720x1280, 1.02M)

Also, keep in mind one of the Q people's theories now is that Assange is SECRETLY BEING SET FREE BY TRUMP.

If he builds walls I don't care what he does.
t.nationalist

Everyone knew Assange was going to leave the embassy at some time or another. I'm interested to see where this development leads because he wasn't doing anything while locked up in there. Finally we can get some plot advancement. Those quotes from Trump aren't inconsistent either. His "knowing nothing about Wikileaks" is him denying that the arrest of Assange is his will. It's to appeal to his voter base the same as his 2016 remarks.

Trinidad and Guyana are two of the fucking worst types of people on this planet. Low IQ, low awareness, dirty shitskin alcoholics

Example of these fools.

Attached: 1555003991384.jpg (750x918, 138K)

Well that's why I want them to answer this one.
If they aren't actually beholden to Trump in some measurable, real life manner - at what point of his betrayal of Assange will they start considering that Trump is complicit?

Attached: american-founders-white-country.jpg (1100x1659, 458K)

>Implying that's the only charge he will face.
The government never adds more charges, am I right? You're a fucking retard.

Well I'm glad you're storing those nigger-bytes because this is one of the best sink-or-swim moments of Trump's presidency. If he allows Assange to get fucked we know exactly the kind of man Trump is.

>It's to appeal to his voter base the same as his 2016 remarks.
Such complete crap. You're literally putting words into his mouth to make it seem better than what he really said.
Trump said 'I love Wikileaks' in 2016, now he's saying 'I know nothing about Wikileaks it's not my thing'.

If Trump wanted to echo his 2016 words he'd say it was terrible that he was arrested.
But he won't do that because he never meant it, which is why that traitor neocon Pompeo got appointed too, the man who wanted the death penalty for Assange.

There is no way you can spin this into something it isn't.

That isn't me in that picture. I'm posting it as an example of the retarded theories these guys are coming up with.

Being in official custody by the government is actually the safer outcome for Assange. The alternative is being found in dispersed around town in trash bags.

I love Wikileaks, but I don't know anything about them on a personal level. Trump is denying that he is the one persecuting him as a political maneuver, the same way he highlighted Wikileaks during his campaign. Why don't you go ahead and provide full context to the quote?

So if he gets a life imprisonment in the US, would you expect Trump to pardon him like he did with Shlomo Goldbergstein?

Wow Trump is a piece of shit who uses and dumps people when they're no good to him. What a shock!

why not just say the kikes real name

Who knows. A lot of what happens to him hinges on what testimony he can give and how the political winds shift. I doubt he'll get life imprisonment either way, but Assange being extradited to the US is probably the best outcome for him. The alternative is living out the rest of his days in the embassy, which would never happen, or being set free to commit suicide with a couple shots to the back of the head.

It's more effective to treat them all with the same caricature in my humble opinion.

yeah but you could also be telling people who dont know who it was who was pardoned

Well, you're definitely right that we need to wait and see. You are avoiding my question though. If he gets imprisoned for life, would this harm your opinion of Trump?

Wait, are you telling me the #TrustThePlan hashtag is unironic?

Holy shit.

Attached: 1552739033026.gif (550x510, 350K)

Here's the full context

youtube.com/watch?v=G-jDp4KjLLY

Good point

Yes.
I guess the 'crossfire hurricane' hashtag is how they're talking about 'LE STORM' these days.

Attached: 510e2b1b16f33cabde33b2a6a8c80f7c.jpg (381x545, 57K)

just gotta keep dropping red pills man, dont use such insular memeing
but i get the humor aspect of it

>Trinidad and Guyana are two of the fucking worst types of people on this planet. Low IQ, low awareness, dirty shitskin alcoholics
Yet your the one getting ass-blasted. Seriously, slap the last 5 generations of your family, for being filthy interbreeding retards.

Not really. I would like to see him pardoned or set free. Better yet would be he delivers testimony that further destroys the Russia hoax. Trump will do what is politically expedient, it's just the way the game is played. I'm optimistic about this, though, I don't think there's enough genuine vitriol against Assange. If Obama could get away with commuting Manning's sentence I think it's highly likely Trump could do the same for Assange. So far that event is what's spawned the prosecution against Assange.

Look at the smug fuck. Bill Mitchell probably used to kick back with Roger Stone over a G&T while laughing at how dumb the working class goyim were to fall for the Q maymay. They're all a bunch of snakes.

>someone said juju cum?

Attached: 1552609151593.jpg (933x728, 39K)

Yeah, he's pushing off the political consequences on the Attorney General because he knows praising Assanges extradition is poison to his voter base. Welcome to politics. He'll downplay Assanges arrest and praise Wikileaks because it's useful for him.

This has more to do with Ecuador getting fed up with Assange in the embassy. Ecuador booted him out. He's been wanted for various crimes long before Trump was even a candidate.

He is saying that he has no direct involvement with the arrest. It's the DOJ's rodeo.

He isn't getting charged with anything that results in life you hyperbolic fuck. He gets 5 years max, more likely 2-3 years in white collar prison.

Fuck off MIGAkike

1. Trump says 'Wikileaks isn't his thing" and that the DOJ will be taking care of it.
2. They could have thrown the book at Assange, instead they charge him with a crime that has a max penalty of 5 years.

3. Both Hannity and Tucker spend the night basically defending Assange (with some caveats). We all know that those shows are used by Trump to disseminate information.

something else is going on here

Cope harder, human slime

Trinidad has one of the highest standard of living. I guarantee you that we are very happy here.

There's a chance he might pardon him.
He'd only be able to get away with it if "he had a sudden change of heart after Assange's testimony."
Don't really see what he would have against Assange. We don't really know a lot about the guy.

>look mom I posted it again!

Attached: 1510159973175.jpg (297x289, 32K)

why are you so mad?

Don't waste your time on these incels. We're getting the next election and their tears in 2020 will be delicious. No one likes Trump not even Jow Forumstards lol. Yang or Harris will be president and the reign of the rich white bigots can finally come to a deserved close.

*squeek*

Attached: 1553085659977.png (396x420, 323K)

I heard what he said. Much much different to 2016 Trump.
If you think 2016 Trump would have said as cucked a response as that then you must be from another planet.

And Barr is a neocon who oversaw the murders at of American citizens at Ruby Ridge by federal agents.He is a traitor and Trump is a traitor for appointing him.
How people try to justify these traitors getting their hands on power again and again I will never understand.

Ok I'm glad you're making falsifiable statements now. We're getting somewhere.
So you're implying that if Assange does get a huge sentence under the auspices of sedition/terror etc., that would leave you shocked at Trump's decision?
I need some conscious participation from you on this so that in 3 months when we find out his fate you can actually reflect on what you were saying here.

What is your mental gymnastics routine like? Must be pretty intense to be this delusional.

Attached: 1554413365281.gif (195x229, 1.29M)

>you pretend Wikileaks didn’t hand zognald the election on a silver platter

Attached: 541ED6AA-69EB-43C9-8B3F-03A833D3EE0F.jpg (329x294, 21K)

>i have no idea what i am talking about
Thanks for clearing that up, tranny.

.

>fake news narratives
trumps said he doesn't know anything about wikileaks (most people don't) but he's been inform of whats happening to assange and he'll leave it up to barr. whats so controversial about that?

>if Assange does get a huge sentence under the auspices of sedition/terror etc
That's not what they want him extradited for. I don't even know how they could charge an Australian for sedition in this case, and terror is hilariously flimsy. The other guy is right, of the charges brought so far Assange is looking at 5.5 years maximum.

This I’m not holding my breath though

On behalf of America, let me apologize for that orange buffoon we have in office right now. I know when we get a democrat in the oval office, other countries can finally take us seriously again. Europe especially finds our liberal presidents to be more stately and egalitarian. No one ones to do business with some twitter shitposter. 2020 will be different we promise. It's good to see that we have allies even here

Before you failed to even address the primary concern of this discussion - where Trump lies on individuals who clearly have the best interests of anti-NWO figures at heart.
Your comment I replied to was at least falsifiable. You said he's not going to get any kind of real sentence. That's a falsifiable statement because if he does get a long sentence you can at least reflect on your current perspective and admit you're wrong. It's brave on your part, so I commend you for putting your convictions in words.

SO my friend I'll ask you again. IF he gets a fucked sentence, will this influence how you view Trump in relation to globalism, influence, interventionism or any combination thereof?

>Calls a direct quote 'fake news'
>Being this obtuse unironically

>19 posts by this ID
very anally damaged undercover memeflag, try harder shill
do they pay you per post or something now

Attached: accusemerchant.jpg (464x286, 36K)

What is falsifiable are the real charges Assange has been accused of. You fairy tales of sedition/terror are falsifiable because they don't exist outside of a bizarre hypothetical.

Attached: 1511260597440.png (495x498, 327K)

>crossfire hurricane
Those are Rolling Stones lyrics arnt they? That’s some peak boomer right there