Do women get too much credit Jow Forums?

Do women get too much credit Jow Forums?

Attached: 1555019828579.jpg (1199x531, 105K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/achael/eht-imaging/graphs/contributors
cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2016/papers/Bouman_Computational_Imaging_for_CVPR_2016_paper.pdf
news.mit.edu/2019/mit-haystack-first-image-black-hole-0410
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

is it me or did some shop glasses onto his face?

proofs pls

Attached: 1555019900631.jpg (913x852, 69K)

I never noticed that until you pointed it out. Now I can't unsee it!

bump

How the fuck does someone write 850K lines of code? Even if it was just bitch work directed to him by others that's a ton

actually I could see it if most was copy pasted and fitted into a program

thanks for that.


github.com/achael/eht-imaging/graphs/contributors

jewish women certainly do, and suffer no consequences or hardships whatsoever

Attached: jew-woman-scientist-stem.jpg (1285x1062, 976K)

Most of the code is procedurally generated, data, or file includes. I think when they took that all out, he wrote about 40,000 lines of code.

But the number of lines doesn't matter. Her research provided algorithms for imaging the black hole. All that's left is for someone to translate that into whatever language.

The woman came up with the algorithm so she did all the high IQ work. The guy on the right just wrote a ton of code like a cuck.

>left picture: happy merchant - takes credit
>right picture: happy goyim - does work

All I have to say is if he and the crew really wanted the credit they wouldn't be so beta and not do anything about it. But this whole thing will fade away by next week.

she didn't do shit. she was responsible for changing fonts, font colours and copying work of maciek wielgus into the rest of the code. she just took credit like full blooded jew

How many proxies do you use dude?

:)

Attached: 1555019960784.jpg (1200x613, 124K)

HIS NAME WAS ANDREW CHAEL

moar

>Hi IQ
>Women

Choose one.

>B-but he wrote more code! More code = more work!
Holy shit is Jow Forums literally the most computer retarded board on here?

Incels are intimidated by this powerful and intelligent woman.

Attached: 1476840313778.jpg (405x864, 142K)

Nope. Algorithm already existed.

Attached: women.jpg (500x356, 29K)

Attached: 1554972863164.png (238x256, 61K)

Attached: CW.png (1528x3874, 1.8M)

I'm surprised I haven't seen this pic related already

based and redholed

lol

based

the post on the right got removed too. youre not even allowed to give credit to anyone on the team other than the jew lady

It’s an inverse FFT, it’s nothing new. Probably invented in the 60s or possibly long before.

The majority of the problem is likely dealing with the sheer amount of data.

This is the paper:

cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_cvpr_2016/papers/Bouman_Computational_Imaging_for_CVPR_2016_paper.pdf

I think you guys are jumping the gun on this one. It seems entirely possible to me that she wrote the paper and developed the method and thus isn't receiving undue credit. It's also possible that someone else did most of the work on the paper, but it's probably not Andrew Chael because he's not an author on the paper.

They are real. You can look through the lens on the right side of the picture(his left eye) and see the distortion in the line of his face from the magnification of the lens. Inside the lens it's narrower than outside the lens.

From here news.mit.edu/2019/mit-haystack-first-image-black-hole-0410

>The Haystack EHT team includes John Barrett, Roger Cappallo, Joseph Crowley, Mark Derome, Kevin Dudevoir, Michael Hecht, Lynn Matthews, Kotaro Moriyama, Michael Poirier, Alan Rogers, Chester Ruszczyk, Jason SooHoo, Don Sousa, Michael Titus, and Alan Whitney. Additional contributors were MIT alumni Daniel Palumbo, Katie Bouman, Lindy Blackburn, Sera Markoff, and Bill Freeman, a professor in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

>Additional contributors were MIT alumni Daniel Palumbo, Katie Bouman,

How can she have done so much being just an additional contributor. I mean they have a full team of people, on the actual team.