Explain why Communism is bad

And you earn stuff, you are not given it.

Communism would work with a strong eugenics program, but then it's not really communism.

Corrupt leaders take over, read the book Animal Farm

Im sure we will get it right after killing 100 million more people

It doesn't work on a macro level. In your household or in certain settings communal and collective living is perfectly fine. But it's not actually possible to voluntarily organize a large group of people on communist lines. Once you get a large number of people involved you immediately have to start making things more formalized and codified by law to actually function.

So i mine for my own iron,crush the ore,smelt it,and hammer it into a blade but it's still isn't my own creation? OP is retarted

you don't do any of that though

Orwell was a communist.

Attached: FDB65316-8BAD-4803-B9EA-F2F60A0401B5.png (840x741, 583K)

If it were good, the USSR would have won the Cold War and we'd all be commies

Because the Sherman is superior to the T-34

youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI&t=1623s everything is wrong with communism

*socialist

Orwell was a socialist.

those are the same thing

t. retard that doesn't know anorexia is a mental illness and not a physical condition
makes sense you don't know how to critique communism with maturity and reasoning

I didn't know where to post it, but I want to say Nicole D Wallace is aesthetically very pleasing.

>I don't want to wait 10 years for a car nor do I want a commie bloc apartment

72 month loan with (((compound interest))) and 25 year mortages for which you have to compete with rich foreigners are so much better!

I think we should give every commie a free one way helicopter ticket but this is simply factually incorrect.

I'm assuming you don't get that the message of 1984 is against totalitarianism which communism is. But it's not surprising since you have that flag

Attached: 1550781552510.jpg (638x1000, 74K)

Just like to draw attention to this and try to see the commie refute it.

>communism is totalitarianism

Attached: 37hhsvd231qrngjjjt5j54.jpg (708x800, 64K)

Socialism is the transitional phase between capitalism and communism. Communism is the stateless phase of anarchy.

>a dictator in a one party state isn't totalitarianism

Attached: 1550785235121.png (856x846, 85K)

because it has never been tried

Too "for the good of everyone" focused, which leads people to not contribute their all siince it won't lead to them getting ahead.

Name one non-totalitarian communist state

Nah man.
Even at it's best the T-34 had a 3-1 kill ratio and was constantly getting wrecked by even the most autistic of German tanks
operationbarbarossa.net/the-t-34-in-wwii-the-legend-vs-the-performance/

Reminder that the people that propose that we should try communism again in non communist societies are useful idiots that the first to get executed when the commies get into power.

Ah, yes we can totally expect a totalitarian regime to nicely abolish itself when it feels it's achieved utopia

Attached: 1550788587728.png (645x729, 69K)

>whataboutism
I see you like to use Soviet propaganda techniques

Attached: 1550788730950.png (442x500, 52K)

>Explain why Communism is bad.
makes govt into super conglomerate that mismanages industries
>Makes wagecucking 100x worse because now your boss is also a politician
>corruption because everything is centralized

>every human individual is born with the natural rights of Life, Liberty and Property
>the concept of communism violates all of them
>once one of these basic rights are denied to a human being, a conflict happens
>communism is nothing but the generation of conflicts against mans >conflicts are bad
>communism is bad

He was a socialist who hated other socialists. Basically he hadn't realized utopianism is inherently bad

>the dictatorship of the proletariat is one leader and exists in a state of permanence and not as a transitional government to reign in a new era of communism

Attached: Where+are+your+brainlet+images+fj_d237bc_6691842.jpg (692x800, 73K)

Do you think theft is wrong?

It will naturally become abolished. If the soviet union had taken over the world they would naturally have moved towards a stateless society.

its weaponized judaism

100 million dead

why are commies so gullible?

explain? Ive heard this comparison before but i dont know much about judaism besides talmudic anti goyim quotes

>>every human individual is born with the natural rights of Life, Liberty and Property
>>the concept of communism violates all of them
no it doesn't
communism gives the poorest people more property than under capitalism
communism makes life better for poorest people
communism is more freedom than wagecucking at below min wage.
nice try but this is the absolute dumbest arguement

also nature rights are social construct and do NOT exist

We only get tankies on Jow Forums so its fair to assume their proposed version will be.

Communism incompatible with human nature. To build communism, you will have to kill a lot of people and establish dictatorship to enslave the rest.

Thank god i dont have room temperature IQ or follow some non theistic religion like this guy

I see your transition worked pretty well. I'm still looking for that utopian stateless society though.

Attached: 1550788372059.jpg (442x500, 8K)

>it has ever, EVER passed that point and gotten to this utopian dreamworld you speak of
good try (((commie)))

Attached: loghead.jpg (415x470, 32K)

It's not about gullibility you retard. As people reach more and more advanced phases of humanity and work is no longer an absolute necessity they rely on the state less and less. Eventually it becomes a non-entity. Capitalism will never achieve that phase as it is predicated on the state being there to facilitate the transaction and it artificially stifles progress in favor of profit.

Attached: 2l0ahe.jpg (415x470, 39K)

If natural rights are made up, why even value anything? You can’t have a purely nihilistic stance and still argue for some sort of goal or order in society.

because not everyone is equal, we are all different individuals with different sets of skills and intelligence.

Its also just their astroturf.

Taking legitimate social problems, weaving an insane yet internally consistent ideology which somehow ends up giving their people absolute power.

>we need to have the strongest state ever so people will abolish it using hammers and scythes
Then why not fighting against the state while it is "weak"? Is this bait?!

>Capitalism will never achieve that phase as it is predicated on the state being there to facilitate the transaction and it artificially stifles progress in favor of profit.
Oh fuck you're right

It’s not bad if you don’t like food

>kill hundreds of millions in imperialism and commit global classicide
>look comrades we created a global classless utopia
>now all we need to do is abolish this totalitarian one world government
you're insufferably stupid

Attached: 1550785624478.jpg (474x729, 38K)

Communism could only maybe work if everyone is dumb as rocks with no culture, no identity, obedient sheep

>looks at world today
>predicts future
>ohh shit

> when all the world is run by a single authoritarian socialist state, naturally "the state will dissolve..."
> apparatchiks will become bored with dachas on the black sea, mansions full of servants and snorting cocaine off the asses of teenage prostitutes.
> they will heed the calling of their hearts and move to the countryside and shovel pig shit on a collective farm, or get a room in a commiebloc and work in a shoe factory...
> communist logic
marx was a fool, and his bullshit makes no sense.

Worse bait my lord

Attached: thre truth.png (736x736, 433K)

What does judaism teach?

1. Communism advocates for the end of private propriety. Ethically speaking, it means that an individual no longer owns the propriety of his choices and the consequences of his actions, effectively dehumanizing him, who now MUST work "for the good of all society".

2. Philosophycally speaking, it's a badly formulated theory. Marx's explanation of the conflict of classes flies in the face of logic, his idea of historical materialism is unsustainable and his notion of historical dialect fails to hold up to scrutiny. Marx's greatest mistake in this regard was to take Smith's and Ricardo's flawed understanding of capitalism and provide a solution for it. However, as their theories weren't representatives of reality, so too are socialism and communism disconnected from it.

3. Economically speaking, it's shit. In short, the notion that the value of products hails from the amount of work employed in their creation fails to hold up to scrutiny. Additionally, not only does State control of the economy eliminate most incentives to innovate and enhance products, but it also destroys the method of assigning prices to all products by removing their means of production from the market. The result is famine, poverty and the plain tyranny.

Jew invention to eradicate Europeans

So kys faggot

Communism doesn't work because people like owning stuff

The SU collapsed because the giga kikes pulled the plug and took all the stolen wealth to their masters in London.

>communism makes life better for poorest
Sure! That's why there are so many happy poor people in North Korea. They have no choice -- if they show even a smallest unhappiness, they will end up in a labor camp...or worse.

>If natural rights are made up, why even value anything? You can’t have a purely nihilistic stance and still argue for some sort of goal or order in society.
human nature aka biology is where we derive "rights"
why is murder illegal? because it means the tribe cannot function
why is theft illegal? same reason

natural rights are retarded because people can make up new (((Natural rights))) all the time, like immigration is a human right according to EU.
Immigration is not a right because all animals have a right to territory.

Jews are the center of the universe.

bitchute.com/video/QtLvxZ9d0yEY/

its a ten part series, but part one covers the basics pretty well

Show your flag faggot, israeli or burger confirmed

>I see you like to use Soviet propaganda techniques
"w-whataboutism"
More like "unpleasant truth".

If you touch my stuff, I'll have to kill you.
And that's bad.

>It will naturally become abolished

Attached: 1C46CB7B-A3D2-455D-8025-8363798C72A6.png (241x209, 8K)

>go to vegas
>lose money
>go to atlantic city
>lose money
>go to indian casino
>lose money
>go to local card table
>lose money
>play dice in alley
>lose money
>play lottery
>lose money
"EXPLAIN WHY GAMBLING IS A BAD IDEA! DON'T MENTION ALL THE TIMES I ALREADY GAMBLED, THEY DON'T COUNT!"

>because a leader would totally give up his portion of wealth and total power!

my flag is literally in this post you blind retard

I forgot to turn it on keke

>europathelastbattle.wordpress.com/watch/

Among other things it's completely immoral.

...

>
>Socialism is the transitional phase between capitalism and communism. Communism is the stateless phase of anarchy.

>Communism is the stateless phase of anarchy.

>STATELESS

OK, time to get back on the short bus comrade.

> communism gives people property...
since when? do you even know what communism is?
> communism makes life better for the poorest people...
no, it makes everyone equally wretched and poor (except the apparatchiks of course...)
> communism is more freedom...
just stop.
> below minimum wage...
theres a reason its called "minimum" and if youre getting less than that, you must be absolutely useless, or a wetback, or possibly both.
you deserve NOTHING and should go back to el salvador where you can have all the "freedom" that socialist regime gives you.

For real, whataboutisms are garbage and actually damage ability of discourse, try not to use them.

>all animals have a right to territory
Not according to communism. At the very least thought, you need to accept that some abstract concepts are “true” to even comprehend the world at all, nothing makes any sense otherwise. The most basic abstract concept is autonomy, and next to that, freedom. I would say both capitalism and communism violate both because they value materialism over anything else. These flawed systems will probably drugdge on until we find a way to create infinite resources.

take your all powerful state and die to death on it.

there's a difference between personal and private property

>because distributing all the food could never go wrong!
>soviets collectivized the food and most of it rotted in warehouses while everybody starved
cOmMUnIsM hAs NeVER bEEn TrIeD!!!!!1111oneone

Attached: AA52484B-8F39-4B77-ABAA-FE2837E79DD7.jpg (705x705, 121K)

The argument: communism = north korea is worthless.

All "communist countires" functioned differently. Hungary wasn't like Soviet Union. Soviet Union wasn't like China, China wasn't like Cuba and so on. This is like cherrypicking some horror story from an latin american shithole and saying that it goes for all democraties countries because "muh capitalism"

You can always spot an establishment follower by their use of whataboutisms.

youtu.be/K4kHiUAjTvQ

Under communism, the rich oppress the poor....and you can be shot for shitposting.

Democracy in the West really is no better than a latin american shithole.