Can someone explain Hoppeanism to me in short terms
Can someone explain Hoppeanism to me in short terms
One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very purpose of the covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They – the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism – will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order
Read you lazy fuck
when you want people to have complete freedom, as long as they arent a minority
>Democracy is shit
>Libertarianism is shit
>But I have too much vested in libertarianism to throw it out, so I'll attempt to reconcile the unreconcilable.
Goddamn he looks smug. Almost smug enough that I don't want to read his work.
Did he say monarchy was a good system, or did he say libertarianism leads to monarchy?
he only said monarchy is preferable to democracy.
This. Hoppe and Rothbard are basically Lenin for libertarians. To try and prepare the world for the voluntarist utopia, a death-dealing authoritarian state is needed to purge the disloyal elements.
As far as I know he said monarchy is better than democracy
The right of property and the right of contract are absolute. Thus, they permit the formation of private covenant communities with those of similar race and culture to the exclusion of everyone else. The agents of such a covenant community would retain the right to expel undesirables from the private property of the people they represent.
>tl;dr everything Hitler wanted, but on a voluntary basis justified by contract law and the notion of private property
This. He is basicly an ethnonationalist libertarian
>empiricism is gay
>democracy is gay
>main stream economics is gay
"And I can prove it mathematically"
That's basically him
If you are interested in logical explanations of things without relying on stupid statistics and questionable data you will be very happy with him. He never hides his real views even if they go against almost everyone else.
You don't have to subscribe to libertarianism at all to read his books because they are usually analytic and not prescriptive.
His style of libertarianism looks more like feudalism.
I would definitely read other books of him outside his Democracy the god that failed.
I recommend : mises.org/library/aristocracy-monarchy-democracy
not very long but very insightful.
Why the fuck do I have to hit captcha a million times?
Hoppeanism =
Commies get FREE helicopter rides
Short terms?
Bad economics.