Is there any goverment system that doesn't rely on violence and coercion or threat of?

and this is exactly why the founding fathers got it right with the second amendment.

based.

is there a lefty faction that doesnt resprt to violence when trying to compel me to vote for their issue?

Yes, because Anarcho-X systems stipulate that all or most people should react violently to some violation of their ideologies rules. Even if there's no one directly and actively controlling it it's still a threat of violence. Like if you were surrounded by zombies who only ate people in red hats. In most cases you would avoid wearing a red hat due to the consequence of violence.

>is mob mentality really violence?
Mobs usually results to "rules for thee but not for me" mentality.

governments that quash speech and thought are facist, they live under he guise of democracy and push laws through without the admission of the public

No. That's what a state is first and foremost: an entity that holds the monopoly on coercion and violence. AnCaps are people who are smart enough to figure this out, but too stupid to realize is that the only other alternative to a state is civil war and massive intra-polity violence. Anarchy is the power vacuum that exists between the existence of State-entities that hold that monopoly on violence.

Yes, but that's only because they don't understand that Egalitarianism (the core pillar of every so-called "Leftist" ideology) cannot be sustained without totalitarianism and massive wide scale oppression.

/thread

OPs either underage or a normie

wasn't there some freedom project in amerika where a bunch of retards thought that "shaming" would suffice as law enforcement. no police or anything, just yell shame on you, if someone didn't pay their debts. jesus white people can be retarded.

what you gonna do about it? shoot up a mosque and get even more of your rights squashed under their heel? or complain about something obvious on the internet perhaps?

If we throw away purely negative connotation of term "totalitarianism" and assume it as a strong centralized government, then it's true. But assuming government as a dictatorship of proletariat and wide scale oppression towards bourgeoisie