UK OR FRANCE? WHO'S STRONGER?

>bigger pop
only by 1 million. not significant.
>better land mass
UK is an island and has a better navy then France.

It would be a stalemate

More man power do help a bit. But for french, i dont think it means nothing. Little surprise always make them fly white flag.

France by a mile.

Attached: 1554656420989.jpg (972x1023, 146K)

italy

The French Foreign Legion are actually pretty strong, but they're not Paratroopers.

Attached: paras.jpg (634x427, 82K)

The best french men are french canadian
And the best canadian are french canadian aswell

Attached: dcba369eaa8001107c19cef7b1adf5b2996e5faf.jpg_1200x630.jpg (1200x630, 136K)

I mean you won in the end, but before that the English were beating you again and again and again

Tell the french faggot who always has to run an help france every time they get into shit. Just like shouting on yer big bro.

The Norf will smash the souf

Attached: 1543407930910.jpg (523x800, 48K)

You have to factor in traditional tactics of both.
For example the U.K. Has historically used the us to fight battles for them, they've even used the us against France in the past. Therefore you realize that it doesn't matter wether or not you'd win a war because the cheeky fucks will just hide on their island and make the us kick your baguette twirling ass.

I know I should keep my mouth shut when it comes to military power but this post cracked me up good.

Also, I’m pretty sure UK would win a war between them and France (no allies, only “1vs1”).

Attached: 71790CD4-C4FA-46C5-AF8C-4D2DF48C8CFF.gif (360x346, 170K)

Fuck u yank.

>uk

pfttthahaha I'll just leave this here

Attached: 1555256704531.webm (640x360, 2.98M)

I cannot fathom either of them currently having the military capability to invade and occupy the other. Best they could do is nuke a few of their muzzie infested capitals.

Aye ok oor army's shite.

canada would be on our side. i reckon france would win tho. we have zero social cohesion at the mo and stuff like that matters

Fuck london i'm scottish.

thinking about it id probably side with france at the mo

Fuckin turncoat.

yes what we need right now is another brothers wars, specially now, that we are being invaded by shitskins from everywhere

Attached: band_of_brothers-030ab11ba636r-europa00338x8.jpg (960x599, 100K)

PLEASE let this happen somehow.

Both of your countries need a kick in the pants to get your boys masculine again.

Or it'll put enough social strain to destroy your welfare state and force the immigrants to riot and be put down.

Does France have more nukes?

France also had more soldiers and weapons in ww2 then Germany. Weapons don't help if your strategy is to surrender

Niggers

Frances nukes probably don’t work unless they kept matinence in check same with the us

The real winner is Germany since they'll reap the benefits from a ruined Britain and France.

Attached: German tradition.png (1306x714, 313K)

Is immigration really that bad in the UK compared to France?

Attached: military_hat_confused_meme1.jpg (500x409, 45K)

UK with commonwealth > Poland > France > UK > Italy > Spain > Dutch > Germany

britain had loads of immigration before all the fuss about immigration started mid nineties to mid noughties.

But has it gotten worse compare previously in those years back or is it just a normie day for you guys?

Kek!

France has the biggest standing nation in Europe, and has for most of its history, so make what you will of that point, but to have an effective military, you at some point have to use it.
Can anyone name the last time France got involved in any recent conflict who's roll that didn't surpass that of trash collection, sat at the back with the German's and the Canadians!

Defeat the UK, they'd have to arrange with the Union's to allow enough troops to turn up and then only on days that didn't end in 'Y'.

Attached: france-votes-for-socialism-gets-socialism-france-the-entirety-of-37994327.png (500x542, 100K)

It's slightly worse in Paris, not that it even matters anymore

not really. lots of northern yurp has had a lot since recent middle east troubles which is a bit of a shock to them. uk has always had a steady stream cus of the commonwealth connections. we've had a lot of economic migrants from east europe in last 15 years which doesn't bother me at all but lots of people don't like the polkski skleps springing up in rough parts of town

Look faggot, the royals and the city of london rule the world, they have the best military technology in the world by far through DARPA, yes it is an """american""" company, the real question is would they defend the united kingdom? likely yes but only if it was under their control

>the royals and the city of london rule the world, they have the best military technology in the world by far through DARPA,

>yes it is an """american""" company,
Think about what you just said. Also France and Germany etc burrow tech from the US. That doesn't mean anything.

you think america sells its real tech? hahaha

UK would win, France are fucking faggots that abandon their people in time of need

Attached: 1507488094152.jpg (1728x1388, 561K)

Yes that's true what do Americans sell (but youbfont know that).
Better yet, what do you British sells that more important for the US or what France gives to us that probably more valuable?

Currently fighting for control of Libya using their puppet Haftar.

>implying anyone would fight in that war
Lol this is not the 50's anymore kid, half of the fighting age males in UK would go back to pakistan and the same in France back to Algeria.
Actually you might be one to something, the state of permanent war in Europe was what was stopping all of this immigration

Except for the ones that are litteraly paratroopers

Dude why are you so triggered?

France will unequivocally be the stronger power once the UK is exited from the EU.

France gave citizenship to millions of shitskins during their imperial days, and refused to give up multiple colonies

It is difficult to say which is less white since France has a history of mass immigration from other European countries while the UK doesn't, but "ethnic British people" are at least 76% of the UK population while "French with roots" are estimated to only be around 60% of the population.

In terms of ethnic homogeneity the UK beats France.

>>implying anyone would fight in that war
What if France and UK fought using only their shitskins? That could be interesting.

>France will unequivocally be the stronger power once the UK is exited from the EU.
How bad and depowered will the UK be when they do Brexit? (If they do Brexit that is)

There is no reason for an Englishman to fight a Frenchman while our countries suffer at the hands of invaders and occupied traitors in government. The French I know feel the same way. Sure we love a joke at each others expense but I for one respect my French counterparts and hope that one day we can call on each other as comrades and friends.

Undoubtably they respected the French more and I can't blame them. I love Britain and our people but the French were and are still more cultured and admired by the Germans. France was the true trophy of the reich whereas us Anglos are mongrel Germanics that the reich largely tried to ignore.

This

>Undoubtably they respected the French more and I can't blame them.
That's surprising, I didn't know they respected a nation that surrendered to them but now I know.

britains military power would probably increase unless brexit really tanks the economy. the country would probably shift to the right with a us style army culture. britains always been more militarily aligned with us and former commonwealth than europe anyway.

Thats a naive way of looking at it. I don't mean to be rude but I think Americans don't really understand European traditions of mutual respect. I suspect it has something to do with your scorched earth civil war, a horrendous scar on your nation. Honestly a lot of Brits don't understand it either, too often we engage in bravado and misunderstand an honourable retreat as surrender. It wasn't like that when we fought with France and Spain in centuries gone by, for example Lord Wellington had immense respect for Napoleon. When I say honourable retreat what I mean is that they recognised an overwhelming force and rightly sought self preservation for the greater good. It was a wise and necessary decision that saved a lot of needless bloodshed. Honestly it's a fact that the nazi command had immense respect for the French. Certainly they considered French as equals. The British were pretty much considered second rate Germans. Certainly worthy of a higher respect than the Russians but not as much as the French.

We'd lynch every Angloid subhuman before ever coming anywhere close to siding with you bongniggers

Attached: QNIGHT.png (600x887, 889K)

We'll kill your africans if you kill our pakis

you are mostly angloid you stupid fucker. plus you couldn't lynch a moose.

The only advantage the UK has is its navy, France's military is pretty damn good as far as Western European standards are concerned.

Wessex is stronger than Europe.

Attached: 1555073972359m.jpg (1024x531, 76K)

Our subs are better :')

Attached: vanguard-class-submarine.jpg (650x365, 62K)

Given that UK is owned and governed largely by descendants of the army or William the Conqueror we can assume that it is the same country, just formally cryptodivided for some cryptoreason.

>The only advantage the UK has is its navy
That's a pretty huge advantage for an island in a hypothetical war between said island and a neighbouring landmass.

The Normans weren't the Franks. They were closer to the Danes.

Neither of your subs were any good.

Attached: s733876465344419401_p383_i4_w1010.jpg (1010x615, 44K)

>A Foreign Frenchman at my US College said France can decimate the UK in a war if it wants to due to having a higher population and better land mass. Is this true? I always thought UK had a better military.
topkek

the fucking dad power stance, lmao general staff is shit

The British Astute-class of nuclear subs is just as good as the US' Seawolf class.

we have more nukes, and overall more military power.
but those faggots are on an island, which makes an invasion pretty hard.

First off , digits. Second , you dont ever have to use your subs , so how can you even check?

UK, it’s not even up for debate. UK wins 10/10

the USA never won a war.
except the civil war, which was against itself.

>nukes
>france
Your nukes are NATO's.
You just happened to shell out the shekels to acquire them.
Don't get it twisted.

>Pic related

Laughed

kill yourself and pay debt, France had a nuclear program since the 50.
we have 300 of them, while the UK have like 80

as a scot who serves in '1 scots', the french have less of an edge with its infantry and overall cohesion

also the uk has always been a victor for most of history, which despite not having an empire anymore, its still likely that we'd come out on top according to ratios

the channel also gives an advantage, as we can easily be defended since we have very short shores, whilst france has massive shores perfect for amphibious assault

irregardless, it would be too much of a strain to take france on land, as there is too much land to cover - also they have much more forestry than in britain, which would allow a lot of forces to be hidden unlike on britain

overall its a stalemate, britain would be able to take on france by land but with no real success, its a pretty fucking dumb idea anyways who wants to invade france?? what worth is france to the british or vise versa??

Attached: alma.jpg (1578x956, 514K)

Population is almost exactly the same, so that frog doesn't know wtf he's talking about. Also militarily we're about the same too.

Kike divide and conquer thread . Sage

nukes don't make a difference, 10 nukes on french soil would be enough to wipe out a majority of the population - its a pointless argument

The real question is: is the white population similar? Because you know damn well only whites would fight in this scenario

This basically

Discussing France V Britain is retarded. In a "1v1" scenario it would be near on completely equal.

That said the French are faggots and we would win

Attached: anglo.png (229x220, 12K)

idk mate the anglo is already radiated pretty badly, we'd need triple dose.

Attached: 1551893387324.jpg (474x651, 54K)

France is less white, not by a lot though

Israel

>we have more nukes
Having 215 or 300 nuclear warheads is totally irrelevant for two countries that can see each others coastlines with the naked eye on a clear day at some points of the channel. Not to mention we don't know the yield of those bombs. If you've got 1000 Little Boy's from Hiroshima, you've still got less than the country with 500 Tsar Bombas.

Both countries have ICBMs with a minimum of 3000 mile range, and most importantly both France and the UK can launch nuclear warheads from the ocean, so even if one of our countries totally annihilated the other, those submarines still have the ability to strike thus there's no advantage to striking first, and no advantage in having 85 more warheads when the scenario in which they become relevant is mutually assured destruction anyway.

The UK would win due to geography and naval power, like they always did. They were never really the strongest military power in Europe, but they managed to compensate by strategically expoliting their naval advantage and choosing good allies to ensure the status quo for centuries. And in one case, during the invasion of the Spanish Armada in 1588, the weather really helped them, because most likely the Spanish would have royally buttfucked them if they would have managed to land.

Why are you so angry lad? We don't want a war with France. Only the jews could win from that potential bloodshed. And bullying Greece is just mean, they didnt do anything wrong.

UK needs to go in over Belgium and France is taken within a day.

who cares about nigger countries

there is a beautiful moment where the french reach our shores and the norf and souf, who don't even need to look at each other, suddenly shift focus onto the soggy baguette

>Suez crisis

Immigration is worse in the UK, especially in London which is a non-white city.

Both coutries are pretty fucked but come on be real.

Yet Canada is still part of the common wealth...really makes you think

Noice

Attached: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1555002191394s.jpg (250x250, 7K)

Say from the country whose economy is based on making easier tax frauds and money laundering