Chomsky: We Must Confront the “Ultranationalist, Reactionary” Movements

Mfw when each first world nation engenders its own Hitler and the Juden can't stop it

Attached: ue56j7d57.jpg (703x685, 151K)

The colossal fuckups resulting from the global social experiments these kikes have been pushing over the past several decades are the reason there is demand for such movements in the first place. He and everyone else in the (((journalism))), (((humanities))), (((NGOs))), (((progressivism))), (((one world govt))), (((deconstruct whiteness))) etc sphere should be subjected to Nuremberg trials 2.0 and hunted across the globe like was done to Nazi higher ups following the end of the war. Muslims and niggers I'm more than happy make peace with, but these kikes are a cancer that must be removed.

Attached: philip-m-cohen_4.jpg (640x517, 99K)

just because youre not educated enough to understand terminology and theory deeper than surface level features doesnt make it hurr durr sooodo intellegual XD

You're just an idiot with blatant non sequitor whataboutist "reasoning"

>waah waah we must resist nationalism because white people shouldn't have their own countries and white people need to be wiped from the face of earth, white people shouldn't exist and they need to be sacrificed to serve the rest of the world, WAAH nationalism is bad because muh boomer hippie brainfarts

and just because you think something smart is being said doesn't mean something smart is actually being said
see:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonscience
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dictionary_of_Fashionable_Nonsense

>These fucking boomers just want to maintain the status quo because their aging porridge brains can't handle any sort of change. Chomsky doesn't give a fuck if future generations will be enslaved, he won't be around.
>That or he's just a Commie jew who hates whites.
?Por que no los dos?

Thankfully National Socialism is a revolutionary, transformative movement. Definitely no reactionary.

Support the National Socialist Canadian Labour Revival Party.

This

>BLM flag

Nice bait. But besides that, you made it too obvious by proving my point, instead of trying to counter it. Anybody with a dictionary and a memory can gish gallop through whatever they'd like, true or not. Anybody with confidence can (and generally will) describe it in layman's terms.

>Uneducated
There is nothing of substance. It's not science. There is no "Theory" in the technical sense of the term. There is nothing more than baseless conjecture and pseudo religious moralism, and narcissistic faggots who only care about an "intellectual" image rather than actual pursuit of truth or creation of value always latch on to shit like this because it grants them a niche where they wont be challenged by actual intellectuals, who see these non-rigorous fields as a waste of their time and potential.

>Whataboutism
This is a perfect example of the kind of buzzwords these Dunning-Kruger leftists like to throw around. Would you, for example, be able to explain to me how proof by counterexample:
>There are no even numbers greater than 2
>What about 4?
differs from "whataboutism"? There is a difference when the terms are used as was originally intended, but modern leftists are so dependent upon argument by redefinition that I don't think they even know when and where they're bullshitting any more.

Attached: knifehead.jpg (600x480, 50K)

What does this kike mean by "confront" us?

Weimar Republic -> Hitler
Worldwide Weimar Republic -> ?

Attached: 82487v26v2.jpg (471x354, 92K)

He's not narcissistic or any of the shit you're accusing him of. He's a highly trained, highly intelligent subversive agent for the New World Order's psychological operations warfare. Get real.

nationalism is good
ultranationalism is bad
ultranationalists distort historical facts to make their state seem infallible
ultranationalism is idolatry of the state

>Saudi Arabia
how? theres not even democracy there

These

Why not both?

gnome is a dying old man, sounds tired, sounds defeated, he will not last another 10

isn't this the same dumb kike that said 2 years ago that confronting these movements was a death sentence because they have the monopoly on force?

>We Must Confront the “Ultranationalist, Reactionary” Movements
Considering Chomsky is opposed to the Rothschild-Israeli plot to install Kosher Nationalist puppet states in the West who funds Chomsky?

Attached: Noam Chomsky Ace Ventura.jpg (2000x3000, 597K)

You clearly don't understand basic tenets of discourse. Nobody besides undergrad philosophy majors spend time defining a well-studied item of literature during an expository text. Anudda high school diploma cuck

That was a lot of wasted text to say nothing. If you listen to what he says and do a simple literature search on any of the topics and have some resemblance of executive function and deep comprehension, you'll understand the arguments.

I can't even touch on how retarded that whataboutism analogy was, sorry.

he isn’t wrong if we fight them many will die if that is what he meant

He'll be dead soon. Who cares?

Antichrist.

>That was a lot of wasted text to say nothing

Attached: ironic.png (880x832, 669K)

>ultranationalism
hmmm still not scary enough how about "extremist ultranationalism" yup that better

Attached: 1551942651158.jpg (664x720, 192K)

How about you start your revolution commie? This uneducated proletariat is dying for you bourgeois faggots to make the move. Stop talking about it. Be about it.

there is actually a difference between nationalism and ultranationalism tho

>be linguist
>everyone should listen to my political opinions

Fuck Chomsky

>ANTIFA beats up trash cans, threatens people, clash with police, start fist fights with conservatives
>this is fine

>alt-right says hateful things on the internet
>SHUT IT DOWN

Attached: assholecleavingincoming.gif (260x146, 708K)

SUPER DUPER GIGA-NATIONALISM

U MAD BL*CK BOI???

Attached: buff hitler shitpost.jpg (1024x768, 74K)

I'm not even a leftist, but it's fucking amazing watching you bootlicking faggots lose your shit to anyone giving the slightest critiques of examples of your stupidity

>We must confront them by giving them power and seeing what they truly look like in their final form

I think chomper acknowledges that, notice he says reactionary

Meanwhile we are just supposed to lay down and accept ultra globalist movements.

Chomsky is a retard propped up by media.

>bitches about pseudointellectuals
>goes on a pseudointellectual tirade
lmao castrate yourself faggot

He's weaponized pilpul as a socio-political tool

making your non-sequitur verbose doesn't stop it from being one retard

Attached: SmuggiesPunchANazi.png (2512x1052, 243K)

>nah look this post made up a definition
look it up in different dictionaries, every definition for ultranationalism is just "super serious nationalism" its just a way to label nationalism to make it sound scarier.

>a jew
>stop supporting your own country

water is wet

Chomsky wrote the literal book on generative semantics.
He's a world class bull shitter.

Once the boomers die off the world will be ours Frens

>Chomsky: We Must Confront the “Ultranationalist, Reactionary” Movements
Like Zionism and Israel.

Attached: Zionists - Jerusalem.jpg (800x509, 80K)

this
fucking posers
never had to do jack shit but pontificate

Nationalism is good
Ultranationalism is ultragood.

Do these dinks really think these movements are ultra nationalist? Are they even aware of people lke pol pot, mussolini, and hitler? Or are they super mega ultra nationalists?

What about the Ultraleftist radical movements?

Attached: trotsky merchant.png (308x412, 135K)

>Analogy
I wasn't making an analogy, I was stating that it is redefined when convenient in such a manner as to be incompatible with basic logic. Leftists do this habitually. They will flip between "minority" in the numerical sense, and "minority" in the sociological sense when convenient. Or how they switch between "racism" as in recognizing statistical differences and "racism" as in racial supremacism and "racism" as in power + prejudice and "racism" as in inequality under the law and "racism" as in inequality of outcome when convenient.

What does he mean by confront us?
Every shift towards the left since the end of the war has been with the consent of whites. Women did not fight wars. Blacks did not fight wars. Gays did not fight wars. Some people raised concerns about slippery slopes and the potential for powerful interests to hijack the movements to subvert society but this was all dismissed as "conspiracy theories" and "insecurities". Every time, whites consented and gave them what they asked for, under the condition that all concerns were unfounded. Now that the cat is out of the bag, and literally every "civil rights" group is openly anti white in every single western nation on earth, this implicit social contract has been broken, not by whites, but by the left and their "minorities". Whites no longer have /any/ moral obligations to fulfil. They have done what they promised not to do, and for that they anticipate a reaction, and they fear it, and they project this onto the people who they know they have betrayed. They know they've been caught red handed, and they'd rather try their luck shooting the cops and running than paying the fine.

Yeah trump is based, i agree fellow magapedes

Proof that they are controlling those movements and not others.

It’s almost like a white supremacist killed 49 people

If you ever get a jolt of intelligence, you might find context matters and it's likely you can't keep up or switch your angry little mind off the one-way track you think on. You're also probably conflating literal definitions with referential acknowledgements of semantic overlap, which is understandable.

Your mental health would be best served by taking a break off of here, based on what I've read.

- published cognitive scientist

The problem is that these people have conflated
>Right wing
>Nationalist
>Capitalist
>Nazi
>Ultranationalist
>Conservative
>Christian
>Localist
>Libertarian
>Corporatist (in the classical sense)
>Alt right
>Liberal
>Fascist
>Separatist
>White supremacist
>White nationalist
>Individualist
etc so consistently that nobody knows or cares what they fuck they mean any more. They can't complain about people ignoring them when they have done nothing but cry wolf at at anyone who challenges their world view.

>Published Physicist
Suck balls faggot

Attached: B4CE1EB0-EA38-4A46-BE51-200CF6518BCA.jpg (1242x1256, 161K)

Meant for this pseud, but meh

At some point you realize that all Leftism is a Jewish invention.

I mean really think about it.

Attached: political compass stonetoss.png (1200x1306, 385K)

Attached: Antifa7.png (1000x1432, 543K)

yeah, not with that egregious lack of reading and writing comprehension. Explains the existential dread leading you to adopt such hatred and conspiratorial views, tho, lol

Jews are the enemy.

Attached: 8071169899825.jpg (792x576, 64K)

>be smartest guy one the planet
>get called retard by dumb-dumbs

wtf is ultranationlalist supposed to mean anyways?

Bands like NOFX used to quote him a lot, shits hilarious

>be smartest guy one the planet
>advocate for anarcho-communism (a paradox)

Attached: commie brainlet.png (1063x603, 314K)

>old kike who's singlular claim to fame is being a reknowned master of pilpul
Fuck you and fuck Chomsky, get gassed.
btw at 2:37 he says
>the remarkable popular anarchist revolution of 1936-38
Which tells you all you need to know about this snake kike. He is a communist faggot. For anybody to refer to the demonic communist revolt in Spain as "remarkable" just proves how much of a depraved piece of shit they really are.
Both you are Chomsky are double-think pilpul niggerlicious brianlets.

so that's your true brainlet self lmfao i knew that whole pseudo-intellectual bullshit was a facade.

It's not just that but he says that the federal reserve is da best goy, murica would collapse if not for the fed & a privately owned central bank is awesome.
He also said that murica should stay bombing Syria when Trump said he was gonna pull out.
Really makes you think.

> ageing Jew attempts to stay relevant in a society that is collectively starting to see his globalist philosophy as a dated relic of the past

fuck this kike pseud

yeah, I'm not impressed to say the least.
imagine if their "smartest guy" also happens to be evil. turns out to be a common theme with them.

Based

>we must confront the people trying to unfuck the shit house we created.

Hey remember when an antifa member killed 77 people in Norway. Oh wait no that was a white supremacist.

This, nationalism is rising in every country and (((they))) can't stop it

>mutts thinking israeli politics is any of their business
fuck off chomsky

>nigger loving kike loving "published cognitive scientist" (aka psych major, lmfao) loves the ancom faggot Chomsky
How embarrassing. Take off your meme flag you dumb faggot.

Yeah'p, remember that when you screech about punching Nazis.

It's becoming nationalist and opposing leftism in the West by allying with far right European parties.
Maybe European far right will get money to oppose Soros and globalists.

The boomers are really scared

how long will it take people tomrealise leftists are attacking the people. As in you, me, him, her, left, right doesn't matter. They are attacking the general population.
The general population is the "reactionary" movement they are talking about.

>reactionary
people who use this word are almost never prepared to explain what the evil opposition is reacting to. My white pill is that left-wing arguments can actually be torn down before even getting to the facts, that is, based on ideological consistency alone. This is by far the best way to argue with leftists, since they hate discussing facts. The problem with facts is that facts can be racist. No evolution doesn't care about "equality" because equality is just a social construct.

Brevik did nothing wrong.
He wants your country to dominate the world though so you should support him.

No, why don't you confront the international financial system?

Attached: ixSdAMb.gif (501x504, 11K)

>I'm not even a leftist
>bootlicking
You fags always say you aren’t but show your color with your word salads and buzzwords. Just look at all your posts, man. You can’t help yourself. Idc what flavor of subversion you are, you’re still a traitor and deserve the rope before any outside enemy.

Its classic commie rhetoric. The reactionaries are anyone reacting to their assault on society.
It can be anyone.
Even other lefties.

does this mean we can stop sending you money and military equipment now? sounds great to me!

>The general population is the "reactionary" movement they are talking about
This is likely why they started using the term "reactionary" in the first place, as the older "populist" made this connection obvious from etymology.

nationalism will win leftie.