Should access to the minimum required nutrition to sustain life be considered a human right?

Poor user doesn't even benefit from the basic human right to a flag.

The concept of universal human rights is retarded. Some retard party tried to make free internet acces a human right. What kind of shit were they smoking when they thought that was a good idea.
The only argument that could be made for universal rights are negative rights. The right to not be something done onto you. Freedom of speech, freedom of Association, the right to self defence etc. These are the natural rights that they're planning to take from people in the Western world. And try to force these quasi communistic rights onto you.

In theory sure, But what kind of laws are you gonna make from that statement?
Where is the food gonna come from?

There is no such thing as a positive right because it is inherently impossible to universalize them. That's also communism and giving people a "right to food" ends up with Soviet breadlines.

Attached: 1551203602750.png (882x758, 17K)

I agree. The right to not be born should be honored.

human rights are just made up anyway so sure, why not?

This is more about food being denied to people in Yemen or Palestine via blockades, not about redistributing money.
Right to access the food market is an easy policy to draw from it. And the right to access the food market is denied to some people right now, which I advise should be illegal.

Human rights are like some end goal for us to look forward to.
Declaring X a human right is just a statement that we will work towards our policies achieving X eventually.
Its not useless, it mobilizes people to think in a certain way, and bully politicians a bit with shaming and protests towards it.

>human rights are just made up anyway so sure, why not?
Wrong.
We are endowed with inalienable rights by our Creator.

because americans love getting fucked in the ass by big corporations , it's their favorite pastime , if they could even make water and oxygen a corporate product , they would do it.
even their "freedom" , muh guns are owned by corporations , even their foreskins are owned by corporations , truly a nation of slaves.

>even their foreskins are owned by corporations
That surprised me for some reason and gave me a good chuckle.

Attached: Josie, six years old, Bertha, six years old, Sophie, ten years old, heading to work at 4AM in Port R (777x960, 112K)

You can philosophize about it all you want but it means jack shit when someone puts a gun to your head.

Remember feeding niggers low quality fake food taxes resources such that high quality real food is harder to obtain. We live on a finite world, retards.

Enjoy feeding niggers as your body atrophies from lack of nutrition.

>Should access to the minimum required nutrition to sustain life be considered a human right?
Anything that requires someone else to provide something for you is NOT a "right," it is a "want"

>North Korea
>Voted Yes
kek

>Should access to the minimum required nutrition to sustain life be considered a human right?
No.
ALL human rights are negative.

>Enjoy feeding niggers as your body atrophies from lack of nutrition.
We produce more calories and overall nutrition than we consume, as a species.
Its just that it is cheaper in a market economy to throw food away than it is to ship it to where its needed.

Attached: capitalism is the most resource efficient system.jpg (1242x1154, 123K)

Just because someone may attempt to violate our rights does not mean that they don't exist.
Stop worshiping evil.
Good will always prevail over evil.
Things like your speech, your associations, and your self-defense are your birth rights as a human being. They are intrinsic to you existentially as made by our Creator. Any government or social order that attempts to systematically transgress these rights not only should be overthrown but will be overthrown. That is because these rights are inherent to the fabric of creation and their continual transgression cannot be tolerated by natural law.

I'd be onboard if we hadn't expanded the definition of "human" to include every invasive species on two feet.

Attached: portrait-close-up-little-boy-mulatto-smiling-B7KM8G.jpg (1300x956, 113K)

No.

Also this. Positive "human" rights are liberal cancer.

Attached: 1554377077897m.jpg (1024x1024, 317K)

>ship food to area's that can't sustain themselves as is
>population increases
>as population grows their ability to sustain themselves further decereases
>require even more food that we have to ship to them because "muh right"
>population increases even more
Yeah, I love your plan of literally subsidizing unproductive 3rd world population growth because MUH MADE UP RIGHTS.

The only right you have is the right to die.

>We produce more calories and overall nutrition than we consume, as a species.
That is objectively false. If that were true there wouldn't be so many retarded white people. Something is wrong with their brains due to lack of nutrition. It may be something found in meat that can't be replicated in a factory farm. It may be all the food marinated in plastic wrapping while it's shipped halfway across the world. It may be something else or a little of everything. I don't know exactly, but something is definitely wrong.

Given the choice to live miserably on the edge of death, only kept alive by being given the MINIMUM CALORIES NEEDED TO SURVIVE, I doubt you would just continue doing that and have many children.
Nigerians have 10 kids because the Nigerian economy is actually growing stupid fast. They are optimistic. That and lack of women's rights. If women have no rights, they are breeding sows. Do a cross reference on female rights and fertility of a population, it has more correlation than calories and fertility.

>If that were true there wouldn't be so many retarded white people.
There aren't very many retarded people. They are just more visible, and survive more often, because of medicine and mass media.
Unless you are talking about american "mental illnesses" like attention deficit disorder, which expands in its definition every few years, to include more people to sell more drugs.

Outbred urban retards wouldn't know there's something wrong with the food. Most of them have never ate real ingredients.

how does that help you when there is a bullet in your brain?

Can someone smarter than me construct a snappy ad absurdum argument showing that feeding other invasive hominid subspecies is morally equivalent to raising bubonic rats or subsidizing roach infestations? After all, all life is precious.

Attached: 1552944324578.png (1124x900, 400K)

For whom? You mean human life? The environmental disaster that would ensue if everyone on Earth was entitled to acquiring 3 meals per day would be unprecedented, let alone the unsustainability of such a practice in a decade or so.

Do you have any reason to think any of this is true, other than your feels?

based burgers, everyone who thinks there should be a "right to food" is a sub-100 IQ commie who would be too weak and pathetic to survive on their own

I eat real food.

If that were true, how does you eating alleged real food prove any of what you wrote?

A retarded concept on its face. Just the sheer biomass of unlimited breeding and consumption guarantees ecological disaster. Humans aren't exempt from food chains.

Collectivizing the farms worked out damned well for the kulaks and Ukraine.

Attached: America.jpg (474x355, 29K)

Urbanites are objectively less intelligent and further away from real food. You can not accept that. Watch how the next 20 years unfold. You read it here first.

Arab spring was sparked by wheat prices going up

human rights is imaginary

No

North Korea voted "yes" apparently

Attached: 1552959035604.jpg (768x768, 76K)

>real food
As in traditionally produced? How is traditionally produced food more "real food" than industrially produced food? You haven't proven that.

>urbanites
As in people born and raised in the country, who moved to the city to get an education and job? Because thats what a very large portion of city folks are in most of the world. Urbanization is recent globally.

>you can not accept that
Accept what? You can't make proper statements, never defining anything.
At any rate, I was born in a village, moved to nearby town to study, then moved to the capital to work. I've slaughtered my own chickens and goats, and gutted them, and cooked them. I still bring eggs, tomatoes, and traditionally made preserves from my parents when I travel. You don't know me, so stop trying to profile me.

only if you want me to stop being a productive member of society

>be American
>scream pro life while simultaneously being ok with people starving to death

This country was a mistake.

no i wont pay for food for lazy africans

Literally nobody on pol is pro life, excepting the half a dozen christ cucks who are on 12 hours a day to argue with pagans

fuck you they don't deserve my fucking food when they don't work for it

let alone when their diaspora is killing my fucking country

Traditional recipes were created using ingredients which have all been replaced with onions and processed oils. Enjoy your onions. Farmers sell their onions to the cities and keep the real food for themselves, lol.

I think many people hold that Poland law opinion that abortion should be performed only if the health of the mother is in danger, or if the child is proven to be deformed, or if the child is the result of rape. That is, no recreational abortions.
I am undecided on if healthcare services should cover abortions, as the idea of government subsidized murder is off ethnically, but I do think that private person should be able to buy abortion whenever they want, as long as they have mandatory time to think (like a week between asking for abortion and the actual abortion being performed), and them being informed about the side effects and long term effects of the procedure.

You've again not backed your words by anything and are simply spilling garbage, I won't respond until you say something reasonable instead of just going by your feels.

I don't believe in human rights, i believe in Nordicism and that Jesus may perhaps be legit.

minimum required nutrition in murkan realities is about 10k calories a day and thus indeed a bit excessive to be a right so no wonder they voted no

I don't want more non-Nordics for example.

Nordicism and Jesus are mutually exclusive if you bothered to learn what both are about.

>2% of my current food is traditional
>FU man
>cry

My tongue and mouth feel pretty good masticating real food. You think I'm gonna go against millions of years of evolution?

Amerishits aren't human though

Not really, but it's a complex topic and i don't really feel like getting into it right now.

The government gives food stamps to poor people who have no food or means to get it.
/thread

Anyway, the thing is that what both Nordicism and Jesus are about is up for discussion is what i'm saying.

Most poor people tend to be ugly and stupid and usually non-White if you've noticed, i don't want those types of people to reproduce.

>Give free food to niggers
>they survive
>they reproduce
>10 nigglets to feed
>some may or may not die off
>feed the ones that survive
>they reproduce
>even more nigglets
This isn't sustainable, just look at how much the world population has increased in 100 years.
Especially in 3rd world cuntries that still shit dozen of kids per family, there's more people in india or china than europe and us combined.
Free food and healthcare only if they don't reproduce, which isn't gonna happen unless you sterilize them (based israel did this to niggresses covertly).

>Live in an area known to have multi year droughts every decade
>deforest everything for firewood
>overgraze
>don't invest in water infrastructure or resilient agriculture
>shit out 6-12 kids
>act surprised when next drought comes

I’d take offense, but you’re in a Muslim country so nah.

Nigger, you're retarded. We've been having constant famines in Africa and despite that the population is growing. Pic very much related, the population of Somalia tripled in 50 years despite the famines.

They've been breeding forever the way they are now, the difference was that nature took care of the surplus population that was not sustainable via disease, famine and war but now we have this great plan of simply throwing endless amounts of aid into the black hole that is Africa so nature isn't correcting the issue anymore.

It's why you're not supposed to feed wild animals in forests and why we have to shoot excess wildlife, because we destroyed the ecological balance.

Attached: file.png (1335x711, 151K)

no

It's all the liberals fault.

>1977 - 13% population growth
>2017 - 2% population growth

Its settling. Look at history, Russia and Germany also experienced population booms when medicine and fertilizer were introduced, and they settled down.

Apply cost-benefit analysis to the question and get back to us.

Begin with whether there should be human rights to begin with, because as far as I can see it's usually just brown people who harp on about them and why they should entitle them to a place in my country.

No cause than people will reproduce and inflate the already inflated world population if you want an expample look at Ethiopia after WWII

Cost: the sovereignty of failed states is violated, and fewer people can enjoy the benefit of private jets.
Benefit: I live in a world where man is man to man, and not wolf.

Yeah but niggers are r selected, Whites and Germanics/Nordics in particular are more K selected. You may have 2-3 kids, Mbumbo with his 79 IQ will prolly have 6, his cousin will too and so will his brother.

I saw a stat the other day that said that by 2050 niggers will be like 50% of the world's population, that's all the fault of White liberals giving them aid. Actually, it's prolly Jews AND White liberals now that i think about it.

That's global population, whites are contracting while niggers are breeding out of control, giving "only" 2% increase globally

This would only guarantee everyone gets no more than the minimum nutrition required to sustain human life - until even that is unsustainable at which point nobody does.

Nigger, you must know the ultra rich don't pay tax, they leech taxes. All this aid comes out of the hides of the white middle class. You're basically taking bread out of the mouth of a white child and giving it to a nigglet

Having 6 offspring isn't r selected lmao, things like trees or viruses are r selected. Humans have few children, long pregnancies, long infancy periods where the child needs care, and at least one parent tends to stay with the child literally decades helping it. Even somalians are some of the absolute most K selected species on the planet to ever exist.

No. Fuck niggers and fuck jannys.

It's more due to christcucks than anything, actually

Christcucks are giving them AIDS meds while telling them they'll go to hell for using condoms

>That's global population
Thats Somalia's population growth, not global.

The rich not paying tax isn't a law of physics, you know. You are treating it like a cosmic constant.

Comparing WITHIN species, the only comparison that is relevant in this situation, Somali niggers are far more r selected than whites, but you already knew that

>I live in a world where man is man to man, and not wolf.

Yeah no bro, you need some serious eugenics to eliminate predatory non-Nordic/White phrenology if you want such an utopia to happen. Remember that Europe before 1492 was a battlefield, and not all of it was figthing Asiatics and Moors.

Niggers mature earlier than Whites and Asians and the "men" usually don't care for their offspring, you just can't handle the idea that maybe nigger genocide (to a certain extent) is a valid position.

This will just breed resistance to AIDS meds while infecting degenerates. They are doing the Lord's work.

Now you're just fucking lying. They still have 6 kids a woman, not mathematically possible to have only 2% population growth

>Should access to the minimum required nutrition to sustain life be considered a human right?

Should enslavement be legal? Because that's what you're asking for fool

It is a constant as long as we have cucked values, like nigger breeding programs

It's White liberals dude, only White people do this sorta shit. Many Christians, such as myself, believe in actually helping niggers the only way it's realistic to do so: by killing the shittier ones (i.e most of them).

>I saw a stat the other day that said that by 2050 niggers will be like 50% of the world's population

This is a retarded "if the trend continues" stat.
You know, like "i took a shit and lost 500 grams of weight, if the trend continues I will cease to exist by the end of the week" or "it rained for 5 hours straight, if the trend continues the whole planet will be under water by the end of the year". Take and extreme, project that it will continue without change and without being addressed for half a century, and "if the trend continues....". The trend doesn't tend to continue. Population growth settles. We've seen it many times in history. In Europe, in China, and even in Africa already. All these population explosions are settling.

Somalia settled from 13% growth when medicine and fertilizers were introduced, to 2% today.

Not a human right but a right for all loyal party members