Can women be considered right-wing/natsoc if she doesn't get married or gives birth but contributes to the White race some other way? In other words, if she is useful but not in a traditional way?
Can women be considered right-wing/natsoc if she doesn't get married or gives birth but contributes to the White race...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
bitchute.com
twitter.com
No. A woman's sole purpose is to lay on her back and be filled with her husband's cum.
Yes because unlike men women have to pray some decent man comes along to marry them
Loosely, but what makes women special is that they can give birth. Its why so many fascists were gynocentric. Your ideology is useless without a new generation to uphold it.
>Werewolf Women of the SS
AWOO
youtube.com
Is it irony or what?
No it is reality
Most modern men are degenerate whoremongers
Not as much as modern women though
A percentage of women are capable of living as men.
Yes, but those levels of contribution are low and are relegated to grandmothers (due to menopause) teaching kids.
What a stupid fucking question. Kys you nigger!
fpbp
Depends, how good is she with a knife and digging tunnels.
>tfw you'll never be gang raped by Nazi mistresses
>Can women be considered right-wing/natsoc if she doesn't get married or gives birth
>she doesn't get married or gives birth
no
god i wish that were me
Nice try, Coulter.
This was actually the most popular genre of porn in Israel in the 1950s until they banned it. Banned Nazi porn, not all porn I mean. I thing it was called "stalag erotica" or something.
Kek, but I thought the porn was usually the other way around, Hans filling up matzos with his big bratwurst?
Daily Reminder:
WOMEN
ARE INCAPABLE
OF HAVING
POLITICAL CONVICTIONS.
/thread/
4+ kids per female inside of a marriafe. That is the gold standard for white females.
from what I remember they want like this:
>Shlomo gets captured
>femdom shit with Nazi guards
>Shlomo escapes and takes revenge
god i wish that were me
>tfw no nazi dommy mommy
feels really bad man
This is true they listen only to penis
>but contributes to the White race some other way? In other words, if she is useful but not in a traditional way?
Did you not have kids? Too late? I'm sorry.
You may get the opportunity when cloning / artificial wombs become more mature.
Next best thing is as a mentor to relatives kids. I reckon.
If this were true it would be easier for men to get laid
Purely theoretical question
>Pray
Part of the female role is being modest and a well enough judge of character.
If as a woman you give free hail mary blowjobs on the first date, hoping the stranger you just met is not an asswipe, then you deserve to raise your sub-par children by yourself, you have failed as a woman.
The upside for the female gender is that they get to choose from a decently sized pool of dick without having to lift a finger or being particularly attractive, so there's that.
>Part of the female role is being modest and a well enough judge of character
No that is their fathers job
>The upside for the female gender is that they get to choose from a decently sized pool of dick without having to lift a finger or being particularly attractive, so there's that.
That is great if you want to whore around but the pool of men that are willing to marry you is extremely smaller
>No that is their fathers job
I'm inclined to agree, but evolutionary demands shift with the environment, and it this wretched environment we've created the family barely exists as an entity. The pressure falls on the woman. Give us 5 generations of laissez faire no welfare eugenics and the tiny pool of women who are crafty enough to figure men out will replace the thots.
Realistically, this won't happen and the human species will suffer death by a thousand semitic kvetchings.
>That is great if you want to whore around but the pool of men that are willing to marry you is extremely smaller
In modern society. The pool of men willing to marry you is still significantly bigger than what you'd find with the roles reversed. Making it big by comparison.
They have no use outside of reproduction, so no.
Fpbp
>and it this wretched environment we've created the family barely exists as an entity
And how does that excuse their worthless fathers not doing their job?
>In modern society. The pool of men willing to marry you is still significantly bigger than what you'd find with the roles reversed
What are you talking about?
It has never been easier for a man who wants to get married
>And how does that excuse their worthless fathers not doing their job?
You imply I argue about fairness and shoulds. My picture is merely descriptive.
>What are you talking about?
Biology. Women are meant to be picky, Men are meant otherwise. This is not even worth discussing.
>It has never been easier for a man who wants to get married
Compared to men in the past, perhaps, not with women.
Depends on the reason why she doesn't give birth to whote children. If she's biologically unable to do so, then it's ok.
>My picture is merely descriptive.
But the female role has never been to approve of a husband
That has always been her fathers job
>Biology. Women are meant to be picky,
No they are meant to be followers and do what they are told
>Compared to men in the past, perhaps, not with women.
It is much easier for a man to get married then a woman
No.
Does having mental illness count?
women are stupid and easy to manipulate they are nothing more than chameleons, your tradthots do what they do for money
>But the female role has never been to approve of a husband
It is now, like it or not.
>That has always been her fathers job
Yes, I know it's wrong, don't preach to the choir. You wanna play the blame game? Even if the father tried his best and tried to impose his authority, the state, the status quo and society at large are against him. The father as far as his family is concerned is a eunuch. This is a question of what ought to be, what's fair, who's at fault. We all know what ought to be and who's at fault, it doesn't change how things currently are.
>No they are meant to be followers and do what they are told.
Well they are gonna have to develop different traits if this drags on.
>It is much easier for a man to get married then a woman
With a worthless woman who is hitting 38 and has more cats than mileage up her pussy by several orders of magnitude, yes, she may just say yes out of desperation.
Women who don't marry don't marry because they'd rather die alone than go after mr Fedora C. Incel.
Unless you wanna add mail brides into the equation, which is a form of prostitution and invalid I don't know what to tell you.
It is an observable fact of life that nature endows women with effortless suitors throughout her young years.
As a man you are not passively attracting women and having them approach you unless you're way up on the attraction scale.
It's mind boggling to even consider anyone on this green earth would believe otherwise.
He said woman, not fag.