How can You Justify Research Proposed Education and EPA Budget Cuts? You Can't!

Also, hiring a totally incompetent and unqualified "owe the family a favor" for Education Secretary, Devos is a fucking retard.

Attached: Undercover.png (736x866, 641K)

Other urls found in this thread:

targetedevidence.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I can't think of a single public school district at any level of education I know of that didn't have inflated salaries for superintendents and principals and other "administrative" staff like vice-superintendents. These people barely do anything and make more than teachers. There's no movement to address this either. Throwing them more money won't solve it.

anyone?

but what about the teachers, and saying fuck them too isn't really an answer

I* can easily justified it. The more credibility and legitimacy America loses (the institution not individual whites) ..the sooner people accept National Socialism. political fuck ups serve my interests

>but what about the teachers
Entitled babies.

you're doing it wrong sir ..you're supposed to empathize then suggest your idea. ;)

and you're sure that with accelerationism that the American public is more likely to switch to National Socialism over Democratic Socialism...

If the federal education budget is a penny over $0.00, it's too high.

The aim is to liberate Americans from the oppression of compulsory public education and the taxation that supports this marxist indoctrination force

that's a great opinion you have there but I'd like to stay on topic

No, I'll just call it shit and watch it burn. Debating on Jow Forums doesn't fix anything. It's just venting.

what if the public education system taught national socialism? would you support it then?

You're right, I can't justify EPA budget cuts. Arguing for budget cuts means I agree the EPA should exist. I don't and it shouldn't.

Abolish the alphabet agencies. Start with the BATFE, FBI, EPA, DEA.

is that just the libertarian thing to say or do you care to explain...

are you opposed to protecting the environment or just big government and everything that comes with it...

National socialism will only work in an Ethnically homogenous nation you know that Don't hold your breath

they (whites) are more likely to be *forced into NS because the other sides are majority non white who will exact revenge/aggression at every opportunity (in personal interactions and at policy level). I'm not waiting around for non whites to do the work for me in converting people.. I have an obligation to help my people regardless of we currently are politically. my lunch break is almost over so I might not be able to respond immediately.

>protecting the environment
Nonsense feel good agitprop
>opposed to big government and everything that goes with it
Any power, office, or ability not expressly enumerated to the federal government is reserved to the states, and the people.

what about the North Western Front

I'm not debating (on pol or anywhere else). I'm also not going to watch it burn down or my people suffer. I'm leading the path forward through my lifestyle and plans which began years ago (business and work related) which will culminate in a political run later in Europe.

so what's the problem.. That's a feature not a design flaw

water and air flows from state to state... its a shared environment so it seems like a federal issue because it is all connected

it's not a viable long term solution. Maybe if you already had a family and wanted to keep them safe momentarily then sure. This needs to happen on a National and continental scale (for Europe). Frances problems will become Germany's and Germany's will become England's. We need to understand this then help other whites also understand that running away was never an option nor is waiting around until you become homicidal. We need individual steps between individual whites towards a center point (idea) then we move as a cohesive unit in one direction (future)

Betsy DeVoss is not implementing the extermination or removal of all non whites unfortunately and I don't see that happening anywhere else frankly ever So your point is moot since even if it's a good system in the right circumstances those circumstances will never exist here

Undraining the swamp is the most republican sport ever.

It's not commerce. Nor is every waterway, tidal straight, or other geographic feature on federalized land.

Zero authority. Pass an amendment giving the feds authority over "nature." otherwise fuck off and abolish the epa.

like a solution that's final...

Lets get rid of both departments, they aren't necessary.

so fuck the environment and fuck children's education... there have been no tactical answers today just fuck it answers. thanks, anons

He literally told you what to do, you just dont like having to obey laws you dont like.

He missed my point talking about federal land as I was talking about water and air being shared between states. The Supreme Court has given a broad interpretation of the commerce clause... so what law are you talking about?

What about gangstalk funding?

targetedevidence.com/