Do you agree?
FAKE NEWS CHART
Fixed
No, they're all crap without exception with absolutely nothing neutral or fact-reporting about them. Make a list of employees with locations next time.
I see that I will exclusively read patribotics from here on out.
OAN almost always just states the facts.
lol at NPR slightly 'skewing left'
virtually all of it should go into 'red rectangle'
no, this is clearly from R*ddit or at least made by a far-left partisan "intellectual"
the simple fact HuffPo and Jacobin aren't mirrors of InfoWars is proof of the lie
>Fox isn't at the very least mirror of CNN or higher since at least its news desk isn't full of lying fags completely
>NBC and PBS where they are
>>>>>NYT
this is utter trash the more I look at it
Bias does not equate to fairness. Media can provide balanced bullshit.
*fakeness, not fairness. Damn autocorrect
Breitbart is half decent and has some authentic red pill articles. Infowars while cucked today at one point was red pilled asf. daily mail shows how cucked Europe is becoming.
Buzzfeed occupy democrats vice huffpost ny times slate vox cnn MSNBC etc all need to be hanged
I believe 100% of all the content infowars has ever produced
>No Zerohedge
Into the trash it goes.
img related is what is true
Fuck no I don’t agree are you from redd*t?
>this fucking chart
It's just terrible, kys for posting this in any seriousness
>npr skews only slightly left
yeah, dropped
No. Every single one of those is Jew controlled. The left bans you if you're not a degenerate, the right bans you if you tell the truth about bankers and their stooges, the Jews.
Nope..... Shift the whole grid 2 squares left.
no, cuck faggot
you can read each side individually as fair but they're both lies together. almost everything on the left needs to drop like 2 tiers each and one to the left, on right take each one in one and up one
exceptions on both sides, but anyone unironically trying to say that fox's news desk is less objective than the NYT or politico, let lone below buzzfeed, is a certifiable retard.
plus in general it's better to go for individual skilled reporters than massive corporations
And CNN itself at least 2 squares left
The average person gets their news off Facebook memes and Tweets.
I listen to NPR every day for 3 hours for my drive. It is hilarious to watch them try so hard to lean center, while busting at the seams being liberal dirtbags.....there content is very far left though so this diagram is fucking wrong
Yeah, for once I take no issue with this
The Hill...does NOT lean right. it is 75% blatantly pro-democratic party, an ideal sh*tposting site.
NPR is partisan left.
That chart is pure opinion and the perfect u-curve is a complete delusion.
Also whoever made it has some very strange ideas about the left-right spectrum: eg the guardian to the right of wapo and politico, what the hell is that?
In fact the more i look at it the more random it all seems.
Anyway, The Hill seems to be the de facto fulcrum between the 2 parties in 2019 if you want a rough idea of where the overton window is.
OPB for sure. They are very focused on climate change, muh migrants, and Russia.
Did you find this chart on Reddit?
This infographic is from before Trump
Trump changed everything
>from before Trump
It's from August of 2018.
The real purpose of graphs like these is to limit debate. None of them are actually independent, ((their))) prints are over all of them.
All this does is try and control the Overton window.
This chart is biased. The left leaning media are too close to the center and the right leaning are far from the center. I would be fox news, OAN, daily wire, blaze, newsmax on the the skews right column. CNN should be on hyper partisan left column and TYT on most extreme left.
i saw you typed out a lot of stuff but didn't bother to read it
kek
dismissed
Agreed. I don't see Breitbart, The Daily Caller and The Daily Wire retracting stories and/or getting it wrong on a daily basis.
from the creator of the chart
>My name is Vanessa Otero and I’m a practicing patent attorney in the Denver, Colorado area, and I have a B.A. in English from UCLA and a J.D. from the University of Denver. I’m not a journalist by training, and I don’t claim to be one. So why should you listen to me about the quality of news sources? You shouldn’t. In fact, you shouldn’t listen to anyone who tells you that you should think or believe a certain thing a certain way.
ITT: kiked burgerfaggots tripping over themselves to prove it vs ONE sane bongbro