>High street stores and newsagents will also sell separate age-verification cards to adults after carrying out face-to-face checks, according to the government.
>Dubbed "porn passes" by the media, the idea is that users would type in a code imprinted on the cards into pornographic websites to gain access to their content.
fucking hell. i'm actually going to have to get a loicense to watch porn.
memes becoming reality.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
phys.org
twitter.com
you memed out a long time ago
suicide or terrorism are your choices
ENGLAND YES!
You got a Jow Forums loicense?
Fuck, make it now, I want more salt.
>c..c..can i buy 4 porn licenses please mate
>yes buddy, do you want an onion baji to go with that
Prices for different porn loicenses
>cuckold / blacked = free
>gay / lesbian porn = free depending on gender
>Tranny porn = free
>BDSM = 10 dollars
>Hentai = 15 dollar (free subsidiary for patients mental illness)
>Furry = 15 dollar (free subsidiary for patients with mental illness)
>White on white = 50 dollars
>White on white creampie = 150 dollar annual and mandatory monthly sensitivity training.
Dispite all the hate and anger argentines naturally have for brits, good luck in the dark and Orwellian nightmare future you have ahead of you Brit.
Shit is gonna be pretty bad
It will only affect legitimate paysites. Boomers BTFO, but anyone under the age of 35 who gets their porn from imageboards and streaming sites won't even notice.
or you use a VPN, Proxy or Tor
Reminder that this whole thing is spearheaded by the kikes at mindgeek aka pornhub to relieve you filthy goys of your hard earned sheckels.
Nah, it'll never happen. Politicians can't figure out modern technology even at the best of times. They've been blathering on about this for years and no one has been able to work out a viable way of enforcing it. Just think how many actual porn sites exist on the net, now think of how many 'mixed' sites (like Jow Forums) exist. If it does happen then it will literally only impact the biggest sites on the net, Xvideos, Porn Hub etc, I doubt the system will extend to obscure Hentai sites and places like e621 or R34, Danbooru, Gurochan, etc...
There are details though OP.
>only cites with mostly porn content will be affected
>only commercial sites will be affected
>social media like Twitter, Reddit, etc, will be exempt
>The sites will be able to use any means for checking they see fit, the licence/code stuff is just one of the options available
It's a step in the wrong direction, but it's not what it's being made out to be.
that won't stop muslims from raping children though
I bet Jow Forums is gonna get blocked. Why would Hiro be assed to implement something that actually has to verify the age of someone using a connection to a separate database full of literal wankers? Jow Forums is definitely going to be considered as "pornographic" since it's blocked in basically all public wifi spots that have any sort of porn censor. Maybe you guys can still use 4channel :^)
it's going to affect any profit making sites, i.e sites which host advertising.
such as pornhub.
It actually isn‘t.
They are still at the application period stage so they have not decided yet what platform they will use for Age Verification.
Rules are very strict there.
It can affect any 18+ site.
and they will extend this to other things, not just age verification for porn.
Jow Forums is already blocked on my ISP.
Kind of steep. Whats the price of white on white tranny?
Wouldn't it be a shame if Jow Forums became a porn site and bongs needed a loicense to shitpost?
>obscure Hentai sites and places like e621 or R34, Danbooru, Gurochan, etc...
It's legitimately sad that you know of this many sights. Repent, degenerate.
How can you browse Jow Forums for any length of time and not know about these sites?
You must be new.
The guidance is focused on ensuring the purity of age verification and includes the following important clauses:
>Only the MINIMUM amount of personal data required to verify a user’s age shall be collected. A user’s identity shall not be verified as part of the process.
>Information about the requesting website that the user has visited shall not be collected against the user's activity.
>Age-verification providers shall only share the result of an age-verification check (pass or fail) with the requesting website.
>Personal data relating to the physical location of a user shall not be collected as part of the age-verification process.
>Personal data used for fraud prevention and detection and to verify a user’s age for access to commercial online pornographic material shall not be used for any other purposes, such as marketing or the creation of digital wallets. Age verification providers shall not market other services to these users during or after the age verification process.
>A user shall be given the option to verify their age without being required to set up an account with the age-verification provider.
AV providers should not aim to do anything with a user other than verifying their age. Methods or systems that attempt otherwise will likely not attain accreditation from the BBFC
Why would a porn company want to make it harder for people to watch porn? Even just the extra step of having to go buy a license will put people off. No more "in the moment" urge to watch porn.
>only cites with mostly porn content will be affected
Lel and what cities are those? I bet London isn't in the list, considering porn is haram.
Still free.
im getting anxiety just thinking about the prospect of having to go into a shop to buy a 'porn pass'
Jow Forums was right again
>LOICENSE
Its not coming from a porn company.
>various Government bodies including DCMS (Dept for Culture, Media & Sport), NCC Group plc (expert security and audit firm), GCHQ (UK Intelligence & Security Agency) ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office) and of course the BBFC (the regulator).
I think we can all safely assume the user misspelled the word "Sites"
by that they mean they are going to do all of those things
Do you get discounts on other licenses if you watch female-POV?
The wink gets lost in translation from author to text.
You'd have to ask the board of censorship that question mate. Exceptions can be made based on individual cases.
No and thats the reason why this age verification system is not up yet.
Because a crucial part of this system is still not operational.
We've all seen this scene before.
They promise to only use the minimum data and only for good.
then in 4 years there'll be a huge scandal where actually everyone's porn habits have been logged and released by a hack.
Anyone who trusts companies with their data at this point is clinically retarded.
What are lobbies?
Its seems they try to avoid this scenario.
Like I said, something very important is still missing thats why its getting delayed.
If that thing isn‘t working then your scenario will happen, if it works then it won‘t.
At first I thought this was about anti-porn morality or "protecting" young people, but when it became apparent that Twitter and non-commercial porn sites are exempt, it's obviously just a porn tax.
I think the privacy aspect is their least concern, they just want to make money from porn themselves.
>porn industry wants harder access to their content
You are not the brightest right?
This is bigger than just >muh porn or >muh age verification and goes way beyond than what that porn company is.
Of course it SEEMS like they're trying to avoid that scenario, but they aren't. The real reason for this pass system is clearly data collection, but the backlash from admitting that is too large, they're hoping to do it and then beg forgiveness later.
I unironically support this. Out of all the shit the UK government pulls, this is the least Jewish.
>white teens retain testosterone through puberty.
>nofap becomes commonplace due to people not wanting to pay.
>Jewish porn directors make less money
>white on white lesbian porn for cis white incels
10k
Its not just about the money, this thing here is some kind of testrun and if it works, which it will then they will expand and extend this system all over the world for all kinds of things.
The internet will make a big transformation in the next couple months/years.
LOL yeah.. common sense.
Anyone with an understanding of networking/security will tell you that this system is fundamentally impossible without compromising anonymity. At best, they're using sync RSA like keys which provide "unique" secure verification. The problem of course with this is that the central authority administering this has a unique avenue to track the shit out of a user. This looks less like age verification and more like an first step in testing out an experimental tracking/monitoring system that restricts every user's activities on the web. Given the EU's bullshit privacy policies and in-house data rules, it is clear they are progressively moving to a centralized internet authority that tracks/monitors/taxes online activity. Essentially, in the future, you'd need this key bouncing off of every website you visit and your personal data/cookies/etc would be kept in a file locker controlled by the govt. They're just slowly trickling this shit out under the guise of : Think of the kids. As they always do.
They likely and already have a similar system in place but now they're formalizing its functionality.
See :
This is a pre-cursor to locking down and taxing all internet activity by a centralized authority/tokenizer system.
So, essentially, you took the bait and don't see the (((broader picture))) move. You literally think this is to shelter kids from porn. If brainlets that frequent this site believe that I can only imagine what the brainlet public thinks.
Nah I just fuck my wife so i don't give a shit about porn and shitpost bro.
>Why would a company that provides a product for free want to extract money from it's consumers in perpetuity?
I don't know, you tell me einstein
>Implying Jow Forums won't require a porn pass
Why do you think they split the site?
It's always this kind of thing and a friendly reminder to enjoy things thoroughly in their wild wild west phase because assuredly it will eventually be locked down and taxed. You can guarantee that. Cyber-punk predictions are becoming more and more real with moves like these. It's going to be hilarious watching this culture come about again.
There's authoritarian retards in every community, at least here they're actively mocked.
Does a non autistic kraut exist, it's rhetorical, don't answer.
What's wrong with less porn? Explain the broader picture. It seems like a good thing to me.
>Getting your porn from Jow Forums
4chan will be untouched in any regard. It'll just be the main Porn sites on the net that do this system (if it ever even happens)
Who do you come on the internet to tell lies?
imagine needing a wanking license. the absolute state.
I know right, i'm going to cry into my foreskin.
Porn is irrelevant to this, they could be requiring passes for pictures of cute cats and it would be equally troubling government overreach. The reason it's for porn is because idiots like you will support anything that's "think of the children"
When will the UK be renamed to KEK?
C*CK, or the Celibate United Caliphate-Kingdom
> no fap
> no porn
Are psy-ops you brainlet. So is all the christ-cuck bullshit. It's meant to prey on vulernable/confused/hormone laden youth who question every little thing they do.
> What's wrong with less porn?
They're flooding the EU/UK w/ 3rd world immigrants because they need people birthing slaves in class to prop up the economy. STD rates have soared. Your average roastie has slept with the whole village and is a risk vector. Having casual sex is pretty destructive in this day and age. This bill has nothing to do w/ porn and everything to do w/ locking down and controlling every activity an individual conducts on the internet. There is no porn issue. It's a convenient excuse and :
> en.wikipedia.org
"Think of the children" (also "What about the children?") is a cliché that evolved into a rhetorical tactic.[1][2][3] Literally it refers to children's rights (as in discussions of child labor).[4][5][6] In debate, however, it is a plea for pity that is used as an appeal to emotion, and therefore it becomes a logical fallacy.[1][2][3]
> Explain the broader picture
I already did in detail here :
>hiding in the shadows of a dark alley wearing a trench coat.
Psst, hey buddy, you looking for a porn pass?
>Anyone with an understanding of networking/security will tell you that this system is fundamentally impossible without compromising anonymity.
that was the case a couple years ago but technology moves forward friend.
Ever heard of Zero Knowledge Proofs?
Thats part of the tech that they will use and this solves the problem.
>This looks less like age verification and more like an first step in testing out an experimental tracking/monitoring system
That one comes later for sure, for now its only about tokenization of things that couldn't be tokenized before.
The tracking/monitoring/control system builds then on top of this.
>tracks/monitors/taxes online activity.
thats called smart contracts and thanks to the PSD2 regulation this will become a reality soon.
oh boy its gonna be a wild ride, Internet 3.0 and the next Industrial Revolution will take us places.
personally I'm all in.
Hilarious how brainlets can't even see the big picture even when spelled out to them... The world is continuing in a vector of increased idiocy and idiots.
dumbfuckistan-another meme becomes reality...
Oi, kick it out you filthy porch monkey, we'll have no racism in footy, got it?
i'm uncut, believe it or not.
Sorry, didn't realise i was talking to a spic.
>or you use a VPN, Proxy or Tor
Have you talked to people lately? They are retarded NPCs. They will comply and the next Jow Forums hacking attack on Pornhub will leak the porn preferences and porn time logins of 30 million Brits... including their names, addresses, age and pictures.
nope. white and dutch. 1488.
UK government getting its foot in the door for more and more Orwellian crackdowns. That's how it works, you take an inch at a time until you've taken a mile, so that each change is small enough that people don't revolt.
Great, I'm already getting bombarded with "threatening" letters about my TV license, now I'll also be receiving ones about my porn license.
>**knock knock**
>im from mindgeek, have you set up a direct debit for your wank sir because it prison if you dont
mate, masturbating doesn't make you lose testosterone.
are americans actually this stupid or are they memeing?
>that was the case a couple years ago but technology moves forward friend.
>Ever heard of Zero Knowledge Proofs?
>Thats part of the tech that they will use and this solves the problem.
And yet the fundamentals of Information theory proof otherwise. Data always has to traverse a pipe. He who controls the pipe thwarts even the most sophisticated securitization protocol. The only caveat is when you get into quantum networking whose properties cause physical intrution or line eaves-dropping to compromise the data and flag intrusion. Even then, this will eventually be cracked as well :
> phys.org
The server has knowledge and is the weakest link. Point to point connections occur through IP addresses. In that is knowledge. Hackers attack the weakest link not some "Genius" level academic wonder that failed to account for the real world environment it will be put in.
> Thats part of the tech that they will use and this solves the problem.
And there 100s of other parts attached to such a system that can be compromised... and will be as they always are for all of history. There is no such thing as security+anonymity. It has been fun watching the new bullshit modern spin on it though.
> That one comes later for sure, for now its only about tokenization of things that couldn't be tokenized before.
Aka bullshit anyone with a sound understanding can piece apart.
> The tracking/monitoring/control system builds then on top of this.
It's already back in server side at the authent. authority with all of the knowledge and control of the pipes
> thats called smart contracts and thanks to the PSD2 regulation this will become a reality soon.
Aka block-chain bullshit which was always about tracking the shit out of everyone. Hilariously, there are several unpublished FUNDAMENTAL flaws in that technology which are going to make its eventually roll-out and integration into edge networks/IOT a fucking field day clown show
Exactly. The sad reality of this is that utter brainlets will be behind these legislations and technological roll-outs that will be so tightly wound into every device that it will leave whichever country is dumb enough to do so vulnerable to a slew of debilitating attacks (foreign powers especially). This will be the eventual price paid for thinking you can control everyone without understanding that such a vector can be utilized by outsiders to control (YOU). But whatever, godspeed...
>get to your cell
>cellmate: what you in prison for then m8
>you: wanking without a license
honestly i'm not that bothered
i've been wanking a lot recently just using my imagination.
you can come up with some really filthy stuff in your head that you'd never find on video.
A lot of brainlets on Jow Forums have been completely kiked by nofap/christcuck bullshit that well-minded individuals used to collapse their confidence and cause them to second guess their sexuality, sexual desires, pee-pee, and think they'll go to hell or become losers if they even think about it. Hilariously, such mental cucking has caused them to become brainlet incels (as intended) who are unable to confidently pursue anything.
>>White on white creampie = 150 dollar annual and mandatory monthly sensitivity training.
Based.
FFS did he get to wank or not???
>Hilariously, there are several unpublished FUNDAMENTAL flaws
yeah that is pretty fucking hilarious considering the massive amount of money that anyone in possession of such flaws is leaving on the table
I personally don't believe in nofap, but I can see some usefulness in it. Like trying to encourage people who excessively use porn to cut back.
So less Brits will be expending their sexual energy on porn and instead will have to use it to work towards thing like finding a mate, having white baby's and overthrowing their dystopian government . These tards sighed their one death warrants and dont even know it.
Or they'll just pay for the license...
You never really know.
Not everything is about money...
This is sort of why the world is so fucked up right now and why so many things eventually fail... Like an attempt to control a whole populous under draconian bullshit mandates.
The cycles continue because man continues to be set on the same failed goals of a time's past.
>Like trying to encourage people who excessively use porn to cut back.
Everything in moderation. Indeed, anything you do in life should be able to be halted/moderated for a sensible time period for you to assess/reflect on it. However, not beating your dick isn't going to change your life. Maybe give you more motivation to do so but you should already have most of your energy set on pursuing goals/dreams. Beating your meat to wind down should be the least of your analysis because it should already be moderated or you should already be successful enough in other areas including women to not give a shit about how often you touch your pee-pee
I agree with your assessment.
>tfw we live in a timeline where bongs need a wanker loicence
>Aka block-chain bullshit which was always about tracking the shit out of everyone.
and thats exactly where we are going with this, aka the Mark of the Beast.
>Data always has to traverse a pipe.
Zero Knowledge proofs literally solve this.
>In cryptography, a zero-knowledge proof or zero-knowledge protocol is a method by which one party (the prover) can prove to another party (the verifier) that they know a value x, without conveying any information apart from the fact that they know the value x.
>It's already back in server side
there is no server, its all decentralized. ZKPs and Trusted Execution Environments solve all the problems.
This is actually a real thing?!
Probably the most intelligent post I've seen all day.
yes
>In April 2017, the Digital Economy Act (DEA) received Royal Assent to address key issues regarding online communications services relating to the UK’s digital economy. The concept behind the legislation was to implement tougher provisions on copyright offenders, improved transparency of broadband speeds as part of a push towards true net neutrality, the sharing of citizens’ data and the online age-verification of adult content.
>All UK-based users accessing commercial pornography websites will have to verify their age on the front page before accessing the remainder of the site.
>These websites will be free to select the age verification methods they wish to use, but they must be compliant with the DEA 2017. Users will also be given the option of choosing how they wish to be age-verified, depending on the level of information they wish to provide third-parties.
>>Furry = 15 dollar (free subsidiary for patients with mental illness)
Does a 60% PTSD rating count? Asking for a friend.
[Desire to boogaloo intensifies]
They are going to just put in place the same system we already have to 4g connections. I know young people that don't have credit cards that can't even play the lottery on their phone.
"Er Myrtle, this filthy bugger wants a porn loisense?
"A what?"
"A PORN LOINSENSE!!!"
"Oh -- a porn loinsense. 'Er you go. That'll be 4 and 6, luv."