The whole thing reads like they are desperate to save face. Page 13 they finally get to the point.
BOTTOM LINE
Brayden Harris
Ryan Thompson
Le bump. Everyone jumping around using CTRL+F for juicy stuff and no one has posted this that I've seen.
Levi Howard
They were DESPERATE to find collusion too
Thomas Foster
I really like this part. It btfos the libtards nicely
Jonathan Murphy
Calling a hoax investigation a hoax investigation is obstruction of justice.
Jack King
That part is pure gold. Allows them to go on and on.
NPR had Debbie Wasserman-Schulz on to go on about Russian hacking and although on radio, I think they had a straight face.
Jaxon Allen
1st and 10 at the 40 yard line. We're gonna win the game anons!
Austin Brooks
What do we win?
Liam Cox
Public executions. Pizzagate reveal. 911 revelations. End of the Federal Reserve. Unlocking the mysteries of medicine and space. The end of foreign aid to Israel. I'm not sure what the trophy is. All that I know is that it's 1st and 10 at the 40. #17 said so.
Henry Cook
slimy little weasel words
if he had enough evidence to prove he obstructed he would've said so
Liam Perry
>The end of foreign aid to Israel.
5/6 ain't bad though.
Julian Peterson
They never even established that there were russian election interference activities in the first place.
Julian Murphy
CHECKED!
We're not settling for a field goal are we?
Robert Morales
No. The bottom line is: Trump is a coward.
Cameron Williams
bump
Grayson Edwards
KEK!!!
Nolan Russell
Yup, a whole team of democrats led by an establishment republican, with all the powers the govt can give prosecutors, failed.
Henry Morris
He literally says that the investigation is going to take years and that he's not going to get anything done because of it. Trump right again. It's hilarious the way they are playing this up when it's literally Trump calling it exactly as it was going to happen.
Xavier Howard
Implying prosecutors are even supposed to, or are often capable of, exonerating someone
Josiah Gutierrez
>The president returned to the consequences of the appointment and said, "Everyone tells me if you get one of these independent counsels it ruins your presidency. It takes years and years and I won't be able to do anything. This is the worst thing that ever happened to me."
Angel Robinson
how can you exonerate someone if a crime wasn't committed in the first place?
this whole fucken investigation is bogus as it's predicated that a crime occurred (by someone) when there was no evidence of it occurring in the first place.
Kevin Wilson
In all fairness, when you look at how much the deck was stacked against him with Clinton loyalists in the investigation, I'd say the same thing too.
Luckily, there were still some decent journalists and insiders who exposed the bullshit like what Lisa Page and Strzok were doing.
I was pretty sure the FBI was just gonna frame him anyway.
Zachary Wright
Yea, I mean. If you are suicidal or looking to scorch the earth and starts wars, it would be very hard to get anything done.
Gavin James
>how can you exonerate someone if a crime wasn't committed in the first place?
It's no investigator's job to exonerate targets. You find evidence of a crime. You find evidence that the target committed the crime. The bar you have jump over is very low. You need credible, verifiable evidence of both of the above. If you can't do that, you don't indict because you've got jack squat.
It's not an investigator's job to find proof that the crime occurred. That's the prosecutor's job. Normally those two jobs are done by two separate people/agencies. Often, investigators recommend prosecution because they've found some evidence, but the prosecutor declines to prosecute because they think the trial will be a waste of time. That's how low of a bar that Mueller tried and failed for two years to jump over.
Caleb Baker
The whole thing is embarrassing for the US. It reads like a fairy tell using phraseology like "widely reported" as the apparent basis for claims throughout. Imagine reading this as a Chinese or Russian intelligence agency.
Aiden Cox
It took them 3 years and millions of dollars to conclude that Trump either did or didn't do something. Glad we got all that cleared up.
Nathan Cook
It's extremely embarrassing. The entire "scandal" is just a two year long humiliation of America. The worst part is that all these Russia Colluder conspiracy theorists aren't just somehow the cultural mainstream, but they're literally doing Putin's job for him. The goal of the social media/hacking campaign was to provoke and exacerbate political and cultural division in America and now we have a solid half of the country that thinks, for completely bogus literally debunked reasons, the President is not legitimate, our elections are rigged, and the other half of the country are degenerate untermensch. Fucking A.
Aiden Jenkins
Mueller is also not exonerated from colluding with Russia or obstructing justice. No Hillary or Obama. Nor anyone. But leftists are too stupid to understand this wordplay trick.
Anthony Allen
what spin
Isaac Martinez
this isn't even an investigation into Donald Trump and he still managed to show up and clearly bre guilty of obstruction. Imagine if they actually investigated him.
Nathan Hall
Why was everyone lying to investigators?
I believe what we will eventually learn is that Trump feared the investigation, not because of election meddling, but because he is a money launderer for Russian oligarchs.
This was not within the mandate of Muellers probe, but if he did find such evidence, he has turned it over to SDNY
Hunter Fisher
Hey, maybe it's the prosecution's job to state that a person DID NOT commit a crime, and attempt to show given the evidence that a crime DID NOT occur!
What kind of proving a negative shit is this. The prosecution either believes they have evidence a crime was committed or they DON'T. In the U.S. justice system, the prosecution cannot possibly attempt to show beyond a reasonable doubt that someone DID NOT commit a crime.
Our entire jurisprudence is based around this idea, because it's absurd to think you can produce reliable evidence to show that something DIDN'T HAPPEN.
This is absolutely subversive, foul-tongued bullshit that appears to normies as though the Special Counsel is actually in the business of proving *innocence*. We don't have a mechanism to prove innocence in this country, we can only demonstrate evidence for guilt.
Liam Nguyen
My mother watching ABC Nightly News coverage of this is like watching a child watch a cartoon and not understand why it isn't real. Everything they presented is BTFO by the next sentence that they don't present. Normies are all ignorant because they all refuse to take 15 minutes and look up any primary source. It's all just loosely fitted talking points. Nothing has context and none of them can tell you where to confirm any of their fever dream assertions. I had to print out and highlight the paragraphs they are talking about which completely contradict the newscast. It's boomer brain damage. I just came by to cut the lawn for fuck's sake.
Wyatt Green
They're out there meme'ing the "I'm fucked" part when he was clearly right. He said it because "everybody tells me a special counsel ruins a presidency".
Hilarious that this is their big win from the report - - him being correct yet again.
Ethan Cox
No one will ever know the next part because it will never be reported and they never read primary sources.
Hudson Hill
>This is absolutely subversive, foul-tongued bullshit that appears to normies as though the Special Counsel is actually in the business of proving *innocence*.
Some of them know that you can't prove a negative and are going to use this to draw out all of this "collusion" nonsense to a point that would make Franz Kafka blush.
Carson Diaz
CNN literally said it was the #1 headline before going on to 7 straight hours of garbage inside the report.
Levi Sanders
dont you know, theyve completely pivoted onto obstruction of justice? this was never about collusion.
Colton Hall
the report goes from that paragraph, and then contradicts itself by detailing all the times trumps team coordinated with russia
Hunter Adams
We knew this would happen, so does Trump. Trust the plan. "They" are fucked.
Adam Sanchez
The ticker at CNN's bottom has said two things all day:
>Mueller says the only reason Trump was not guilty of obstruction is b/c aides would not comply
>"I'm F****ed"
Or some variation thereof. They just switched from 1 to 2 right now as I am writing this.
Joshua Hughes
>I just came by to cut the lawn for fuck's sake.
topkek
Tyler Foster
Is Mueller no longer /ourguy/? Have we dropped that bit from this schizophrenic episode yet?
Parker Jones
the "i'm fucked" is particularly stupid because anyone would say this when a politically motivated investigation was launched against them with the full backing of the media
John Rogers
I already know it's fucking nothing so hard I'm afraid reading this report might constitute confirmation bias.
Tyler Jenkins
No. only a bitch.
Dylan Wright
I don't think you know what coordination means if you think that. As all investigations have found--Mueller, House, Senate, Private--there was never coordination or collusion. Except with Hillary who paid the Russians.
Hudson Hernandez
What would you do in the hot seat?
Michael Edwards
>did not colluded with Russian government
Hmmm. Which government did he collude with I wonder.
Gabriel Morales
>Trust the plan
go to bed jared
Brandon Perez
>555
and so shall the truth come to light....
Tyler Robinson
>We conclude the president didn't commit a crime
>But we don't say he didn't commit a crime
Carson Williams
>they are desperate
Charles Flores
>they are desperate
David Lopez
i have total confidence user. it's so clear their only tool is manipulating public perspective
David Taylor
Lucas Barnes
He was an idiot to appoint Sessions in the first place. Everyone knows sessions is a slimeball. Trump fucked himself by appointing neocons all over the place. I suppose he did it as a compromise with the GOP, but still. It didn't work.