Norwegian Prof. Johan Galtung predicting the end of U. S. dominance

>In short, I stand by my prediction that by Year (October) 2020 the US empire is gone. In the UK, Labour will put an end to it. In Denmark-Norway, political-public opinion. The English-speaking countries will certainly celebrate their cultural community, imitating U.S. basic English and basic pop culture. Maybe also enriching it.
>Galtung has also accurately predicted the 1978 Iranian revolution; the Tiananmen Square uprising of 1989 in China; the economic crises of 1987, 2008 and 2011; and even the 9/11 attacks—among other events,
Back in 2000, Galtung first set out his prediction that the "US empire" would collapse within 25 years. After the election of President Bush, though, he revised that forecast five years forward because, he argued, Bush's policies of extreme militarism would be an accelerant.
>An “empire” means that you have a client state that does the job for you, and when I predicted the decline and fall of the US empire, I did not predict the decline and fall of US violence. I did not predict the decline and fall of the United States of America. I predicted that we would do the killing for the United States, because the empire would collapse.

Galtung predicted the rise of antisemitism in the U. S. ("trying to find an scapegoat"). Also that the president at the time will be an isolationist.

youtu.be/o8npPSB90ZU

Attached: 220px-Johan_Galtung,_2012_(cropped).jpg (220x311, 28K)

Other urls found in this thread:

haaretz.com/1.5218261
google.com/amp/s/www.haaretz.com/amp/1.5218261
youtu.be/f49w_KDnI7I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Council
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Well it's about time the rest of you niggers pull your weight

Because these quotes are sort of confusing.
>An “empire” means that you have a client state that does the job for you
> I predicted that we would do the killing for the United States, because the empire would collapse.

So which is it?

He meant Noway Denmark and England by "we" as the most loyal countries to the U. S. He meant that other powers will stop fighting the wars of the U. S. and that the last to stop fighting the U. S. ' wars would be those three and with that the empire will collapse

I've expected as much from a long-time communist.

>Noway

Norway*

Well he did predict the fall of the Soviet Umoln accurately as well so....

So what exactly will happen by October 2020?

Attached: suzeta de aur.jpg (598x635, 36K)

In brainlet language
>U. K will ditch the U. S.
>U.S. will ditch Israel
>U. S. boom boom by itself

I don't think anyone at this point will cry over the demise of the American Empire
It's run by Jews for Jews and the biggest losers have been the American people.
My only hope is that the transition is peaceful

>be prof
>predict the obivious
>get attention

Still not getting this from his quotes. It's more like confused rambling.

what am I looking at? A royal toddler?

You can watch the video below

> Galtung predicted the rise of antisemitism in the U. S. ("trying to find an scapegoat")
> Scapegoat

OK.

literally who

>You see, when I say the US empire is going down, I have emphasized, I’m not saying that they’re stopping killing, but they have to do the killing themselves. The first who started doing that, who understood that “I had to do the killing myself,” was Obama. But Obama didn’t talk about it. He killed, and the way he killed was little bit by drones, and the Western media focused on that.

The US ceases to become an empire when it the UK, denmark and norway stop doing violence/killings on the US's behalf? that's retarded.

On the other hand, if Peter Zeihan is right, then the US will soon have, or already has, no global interests, hence it might not be as involved in the affairs of the rest of the world, except perhaps to ensure that nobody comes close to challenging their power. According to this cuck, a USA that sits back and watches the rest of the world burn, intervening only when there's some kind of alliance and semblance of order that could conceivably challenge it and then only to put an end to it, that that's the end of US empire?

Looking forward to those days.

Attached: 1554228982028.png (507x568, 135K)

Thanks for helping a balkabrotha out, it's a bit clearer, but still confusing. Mostly because I never thought of Norway and Denmark as very pro-US.
> U.K. will ditch the U.S.
Meaning? Severe decrease of trade? Expulsion of diplomats? Leaving NATO? Withdrawal of troops from the middle east?
Because the last wouldn't be that much of a deal, considering the situation there poses no problems for the U.S. and Brexit might require cutting down some expenses.
>U.S. will ditch Israel
Stopping all funding? Withdrawing political support? Publicly opposing Israeli politics?
Das rite, he the prince of pimps.

You can see it happening already. Has the USA emerged victorious from a single foreign policy engagement in the past decade? America went from unquestionable in the 90s and early 00s to now where they are routinely getting btfo, from Crimea/Ukraine, Syria, and now looking like Venezuela too. Europe is flat out ignoring American demands and sanctions now. Next step after will be countries starting to abandon the dollar as reserve currency.

>It's run by Jews for Jews and the biggest losers have been the American people.

I just wonder how they'll fuck the boomers over and not give them SS checks. Should be fun!

>Peter Zeihan
Low IQ retard

With the decline of the US empire, he did not imply a decline of the US republic. The "relief from the burden of Empire control and maintenance...could lead to a blossoming of the US Republic, he says.

He lists «work ethics and dynamic, productivity and creativity, liberty and
pioneering spirit as traits of the US-republic.

Galtung says aggressiveness, arrogance, and violence, hypocrisy and self-righteousness, and ignorance and extreme materialism as traits of US-empire.

If pre-election Trump makes a come-back, Galtung could be proven right.

>However, there are some countries that are still, and still have been fighting wars of the United States, more particularly three countries. United Kingdom, Denmark, and Norway. Denmark and Norway were rewarded by the United States for fighting in Libya by being appointed Secretary General of NATO one after the other. The present one is a former Norwegian Prime Minister.

>Why United Kingdom, Denmark and Norway? Well you see here you have to look into history. I could say immediately, because they’re Evangelical Protestant countries like the United States, but I’m not saying that these are religious wars. I’m just saying that being Evangelical Protestants, the United States, England, with the famous Anglican Church from which very many people came to United States, Norway and Denmark, being that they have something in common, some kind of loyalty, solidarity, and the countries that refuse to fight US wars, the Catholic countries, and Orthodox countries. You see, we are not saying that this is religious. I’m only saying that old ties of solidarity play an enormous role.

About Israel he says that basically the U. S. public will start blaming Israel for its foreign policy failures and failed wars and will and he says that there will come time when the U S. will demand of Israel a serious change

>With the decline of the US empire, he did not imply a decline of the US republic
That will happen too, because USA will no longer be funnelling money from the rest of the world when the dollar is dumped. Also because of the demographic situation obviously.

>Meaning? Severe decrease of trade? Expulsion of diplomats? Leaving NATO? Withdrawal of troops from the middle east?
>Because the last wouldn't be that much of a deal, considering the situation there poses no problems for the U.S. and Brexit might require cutting down some expenses.


No. Simply refusal to align their foreign policy with that of the U. S. And more towards a direction convenient for them

So why didn't the French stay in Vietnam to obey the American Empires orders to keep fighting?
This is very a very confused misinterpretation of American FP, and if only referencing Afghanistan / Iraq NATO force, well that was the first time the article had been triggered. Some NATO nations didn't go in (Turkey). As with any fight, the countries who will go will be those whose interests are aligned.

"Trump's severe autism + narcissism is precisely the source of his psychosis"

It's a potent combo for sure.

>demographic situation obviously.
yea we're going to be in a middle of the biggest civil war this world has ever seen in the last 1000 years. Its going to be a total shit show.

The demoralization checks out

Attached: mhmmmmm.png (192x217, 102K)

Based

america came to vietnam to help french colonialism and try to curb the spread of communism, you dumbass. read up on your history.

The Methodist / Episcopalian Church in the US is small by a huge factor, with only 7.6M members.
Catholics; 68M
Baptist; 16M

This is again, retarded logic, trying to infer serious meaning off propaganda / meme understanding of the US.

What year did the french stop fighting in Vietnam?

haaretz.com/1.5218261

Pioneer of Global Peace Studies Hints at Link Between Norway Massacre and Mossad

In several anti-Semitic remarks, Norwegian sociologist Johan Galtung also defends 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' and says Jewish influence was one of the factors leading to Auschwitz.

He mis-spoke sort of severely there

There are 200 million people in Pakistan -- land mass of 12,000 sq km.

Ok, I get UK, they're a major component of NATO and have naturally played a significant part in the ME adventures.
But Denmark and Norway? Because they're protestants? Did these countries have any remarkable contribution in Irak, Afghanistan, Lybia or any other conflict?
Your professor seems Jow Forums tier deluded.

google.com/amp/s/www.haaretz.com/amp/1.5218261

Johan galtung actually is red pilled on the jews

>Did these countries have any remarkable contribution in Irak, Afghanistan, Lybia or any other conflict?
yes

>scapegoat
I remember when I believed shit like that. It's been a long while, but I member.

youtu.be/f49w_KDnI7I

Johan Galtung on the protocols of Zion

>Galtung predicted the rise of antisemitism in the U. S.

What the fuck is he talking about? People literally WORSHIP Jews in the US.

Attached: Ted Cruz - CUFI.jpg (2122x1243, 258K)

Greater than any other ally except the UK? Because that's what the dude is saying.

The Anglo must be cleansed before the Jew
Slavs can be appeased but not Anglos, they must go

Perhaps Americ's "exceptional" status has been predicated on one thing, the US dollar being the world reserve currency. We have mismanaged this privilege by taking on vast amounts of debt. As time passes a paradox occurs; the conflict between short term domestic desires and long term international objectives. Both objectives can no longer be simultaneously met. This is called Triffin's Dilemma. The global community is already making plans to end American global dollar. When this occurs, perhaps in 2020, the US empire will be gone; economically, militarily, politically, and in all other regards. However, this is not the likely outcome, but war is. Look at our last multiple year defense budgets.

The French left because the US refused to provide bomber support durung the horrendous Battle of Dien Bien Phu. Why did the US refuse? Because France would not get onboard with NATO. Quid Pro Quo. Read "Hell In a Very Small Place" and "Street Without Joy".

No and less than France, Germany and the Netherlands.

Both of us have the most troops there outside of the US.
Theres a reason they keep burning our flag.

You can read this

Attached: Screenshot_20190419-004142.png (720x1280, 98K)

Right, so this sounds like two parties with differing views, not France subservient of the US Empire. I'm refuting the point that the US has all it's fighting done by other NATO members who fall in to line no matter what.

>denmark and norway stop doing violence/killings on the US's behalf? that's retarded.

I've never heard of the guy but I suspect he means how firmly the nordic countries are in the US "progressive" camp or sometimes referred to by continentals and icky Russian commies as the "Atlanticist" camp. This observation is not without merit.

This isn't a bad thing. How many billions do you spend projecting the interests of others around the world? We hardly pay cent for defense because we know that we are in the American sphere and that if anyone where to fuck with us you would obliterate them treaty or no treaty because you value keeping Australia secure.
I am sure there are many other countries like us around the world that will have to pick up the slack and stop free loading.

I don't disagree with you at all. Just wanted to provide a little background. But, yeah, if you are at interested in The French Indochine War, The Malay Crisis, and US involvement in Vietnam; those two books I mentioned are real eye openers from the French perspective. There's another by a different author about France in Algeria worth reading, too ... can't remember the name right now. Just really a fascinating point in history that goes a long way toward making sense of it all.

>scapegoat

Dropped
What a dumbass

What did these predictions actually say? Sounds like a bunch of bullshit, vague comments that happen to every state aren't predictions.
US dominance ended in 2014/2015 because of the brilliant diplomacy and geopolitical decisions by Putin/Russian military. The NATO empire is barely holding together as a formality, and America is now seen as a joke by the rest of the world. And as each allied nation collapses you will see even further abandonment of ties to the US.
Good riddance, the absolute worst nation in history. Dumb as rocks people and strategically incompetent leadership.

I don't see what other option they have, especially the UK

he isn't wrong

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Council

Oy vey

Perhaps the collapse of America will be overseen by an isolationist/socialist president like Bernie Sanders? A Marxist who despises Israel and all forms of traditional Judaism. He would certainly single out of the one percent for blame.

he uses weasel words if the US empire is gone in 2020 it was gone in 2001 already by that standard what a weasel

wow he's so smart
how'd he figure this out

>US moving toward dictatorship?
yes and no, what people don't realize is that the 2020 census citizenship question would essentially make a one party country. for the most part. the radical urban far left will be politically castrated. states that use fed money for gibs for illegals are going to be fucked, mass chimp outs.
the US is going on lock down. this is why Trump will win 2020.

I don't consider this a dictatorship and a return to a republic but liberals are going to chimp out when they realize the full scope of this.

keep dreaming buddy. Texas and Florida will be blue permanently by 2024 at most. America will be a one party country of course. Democrat one party country. And after that happens, they will sell out whatever the chinese dont have to them.

I agree. The US ceased to be after 9/11 and their abortive attempt to "Pearl Harbor" America back into global dominance *and* relevance. We should have given a few licks back in kind, hunkered down, and re-learned what isolationalism taught us just a few generations before. But, no. Instead, we have the longest war in US history and have joined the Soviets and Brits in the "Afghanistan Why Club".

Empires rise and fall. The average lifespan of an empire is 250 years.

Assuming the United States became an "empire" after the American-Mexican War in 1848, the American empire could collapse in approximately in 2098

If the U.S. became an "empire" as soon as it gained independence in 1783, the American Empire could collapse in 2033

If the U.S. became an empire later in 1865 after the Civil War, it might collapse as late as 2115

Marking when the U.S. became an empire based on it's superpower status in 1945, the U.S. could last until 2195

That's a range from 2033 to 2195 which is 162 years.

That being said, 250 is an AVERAGE, so it may be longer, maybe like Byzantium it could last 1000 years - or perhaps it may be even shorter - say for example, 2020

What does he have to say about the Israeli empire? After all, they get the US to fight for them

This is Lagardian tier numerology, Sir Glubb.

WW3 because of fucking Taiwan, China will try to annex it. Us will win but pulls a post ww2 britain. Sub saharan Africa will become the dominant power

not dreaming and if you understood what a massive under count in the census means then you would realize how wrong you are.

Illegals will keep pouring in and voting, all your big cities are santuary cities and will be democrat permanently. Its over. The last nail is in the coffin and the funeral will soon start.

Implying Jow Forums can be fucked to calculate 250 after all those dates

or read books!

That's a good thing, less money to spend on ''refuges.''

a jewish hackjob theorist doesnt deserve disection

This but the global power will be European Union - Russia partnership

the US will reign for a 1000 years

It's about time you niggers stop being the Jews puppet and also get some actual culture into your country, American downfall started when people decided that freedom mean "actively not contributing to society while doing literally whatever the fuck I want because freedom"

Keep in mind every single great philosopher was suspicious of not downright against individual freedom in the sense you think you have. Corruption was invented the day politicians got their first paycheck.

>Galtung predicted the rise of antisemitism in the U. S.
It has started in the democratic party.

Attached: 1551828939004.png (798x578, 524K)

What is your conception of freedom?

If reigning is being a chinese colony by 2050 max, then yes.

Russia has an economy smaller than Texas

How much of the Texan economy is bogus?

It's already a dictatorship unless you think the likes of le drumpf and pelosi are more powerful than the military, intelligence agencies and wall street.

yeah'p

Do you have any reason to suggest the Texan economy is bogus?

This, I think the real blackpill republicucks and boomer conservatives need is Texas turning blue. After that, that's it for America.

at least the jews will finally fuck off to china, hopefully the chinks murder all of them

>Galtung has also accurately predicted the 1978 Iranian revolution; the Tiananmen Square uprising of 1989 in China; the economic crises of 1987, 2008 and 2011; and even the 9/11 attacks—among other events
got any proof, bucko?

WE

Amen.
Rest easy, for no matter when you leave this world of how painful your journey to the end may become, burgers will pay.

Chinka has other things to worry about like, wait for it, sanctions! For you know, it's treatment of their Falun Gong and Uighur "detainees" in their "re-education camps." You all would be proud at the scale of what the Chinks have gotten away with imo. In fact the Nazis, Stalin, Lenin, Ceausescu, Hoxha, and even Chairman Mao himself would even smile given the scale of their brutality.

It's only a matter of time anyways before it was going to be uncovered, great firewall or not.

>He meant that other powers will stop fighting the wars of the U. S

you mean for the jew, which will never happen.

any predictions for a race war?

Attached: 1533606704997.jpg (1200x1200, 273K)

Florida will try to split up into two states if such a scenario ever happens to keep the kikes and wops from the threes counties in the south at their natural habitat.

let me explain. congressional districts are drawn based on census data collected. each rep of the 435 house representatives represents roughly 770k people. if illegals and foreign born don't take the census, then they won't be counted. if they aren't counted states with a lot of illegals and foreigners will lose seats in the House. California, Florida, New York, Illinois, New Jersey and Texas will all lose seats, those seats will go to state with fewer illegals and foreigners, Ohio, Kentucky, you get the picture.

there could be a 60 rep swing from this alone. that only would put the GOP in the majority for a decade. but it gets even better. within the states that have high foreign born populations, when their districts are redrawn the districts they have left will favor rural over urban and there isn't anything democrats can do because they've been so anti gerrymandering.

2020 is the last election the democrat party has because once the GOP gets this set into place they will easily control both houses and the presidency for a decade. it won't matter if they have more votes. the GOP will have an absolute lock on the electoral college. they're going to be a bicoastal boutique party. if you don't believe me just look at the California lawsuit against the Trump administration to block the citizenship question.

why do you think they want to absolish the electoral college?
why do you think they are fighting Trump to the death?

Trump is about to deliver the absolute kill shot to urban progressives. the real rulers don't like it when their golems attack their masters.

>Do you have any reason to SUSPECT the Texan economy is bogus?
Yeah, that tribe of human sacrificing Aztecs just south of you.

USA is finished.

How can it keep going as a super power when it's barely even 50% white?

Attached: Kiked.png (220x229, 10K)

Can you make/link a proper chronological list of what he predicted for 2020 forward?

This guy is fucking retarded. Just another clown in clown-world.