PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - CLEAN EDITION /ptg/

>The bear will leave his cave forever

Attached: 1534308972138.jpg (2400x1754, 3.22M)

Nothing has changed for the other side. So glad 2020 is going to be nothing but anti-white rhetoric and still harping about Russian 'collusion'

>qanon
Nothing will happen to Democrats, they are untouchable, everyone in your bureaucracy is a democrat or in bed with them.

Mellenials and Gen Z are hard left, face it, the GOP is a dying party

hell yes it was, its fucking glorious
>many of the President’s acts directed at witnesses, including discouragement of cooperation with the government and suggestions of possible future pardons, occurred in public view.
>no principle of law excludes public acts from the scope of obstruction statutes. If the likely effect of the acts is to intimidate witnesses or alter their testimony, the justice system’s integrity is equally threatened.
>it is important to view the President’s pattern of conduct as a whole. That pattern sheds light on the nature of the President’s acts and the inferences that can be drawn about his intent.
>Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony
>Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President’s direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only—a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.

Millenials are shitlibs.

Gen Z are leftist socialists. They're based.

But yes, GOP is dying. Thank God.

a waste

Why do you keep changing your IP?

If you unironically believe that Mossad psyop you don't deserve to be taken seriously on anything.

so explain why this is bad.

so far trumps only defence to obstruction has been "but I didnt do the original crime so there was nothing to obstruct", which is great because that means hes accepted the premise that the actions would be illegal and his reasons why they arent are shot down by the report
>Obstruction of justice can be motivated by a desire to protect non-criminal personal interests, to protect against investigations where underlying criminal liability falls into a gray area, or to avoid personal embarrassment. The injury to the integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person committed an underlying wrong.
like he said he's fucked, and this shitshow is going to be the greatest fireworks show since the hindenburg

NOT SO FAST
MR KELLYANNE HAS SPOKEN

Attached: conway.jpg (572x649, 110K)

youtu.be/1efOs0BsE0g

its not lol, its great. 2020 is going to be even better than 2016

>Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance

In other words, "we have nothing but let's try to spin this in a subjective and nonsensical way"

Why do you keep copy and pasting and changing your IP?

The fingolian knows he gets filtered.

That's Mueller's definition not the DOJ definition.

You know Mueller's appointment broke DOJ special counsel regulations, right?

Chief being only the AG can appoint a special counsel and a specific crime has to be named before a special counsel can be appointed.

Also, your precious Mueller Report looks like it fails to protect people who were behind the FISA plot.

Once the FISA report gets declassified, even Mueller and his team will get in trouble, especially if it contradicts the FISA report,

Did they ever release the contents of Mueller's ethics waiver he received when he was appointed?

>witness tampering
>trying to remove the SC
>tying to kill the investigation
>"nothing"
read the thing, nigga. hes saying that because they happened at the same time it makes an already hilarious shithow even more hilarious.

The entire report if full of DNC spin. They fucking cited NYT articles that they leaked information to as evidence. In other words, they told reporters to write a story and then use the information in that story as evidence.
Completely circular construction.

AWOO

MAGA!

Attached: 1547457895145.jpg (1000x1000, 802K)

>if I change the definition of words, then everything lines up!

>>>/finland/

Q predicted Sessions firing and date of Barr activity on the Mueller report.
INB4 larp.

Attached: qproof.png (1081x1671, 363K)

>They fucking cited NYT articles that they leaked information to as evidence. In other words, they told reporters to write a story and then use the information in that story as evidence.

Attached: 1548652469181.jpg (741x568, 92K)

I predict KAC moves out within the week.
He's really going too far.

Mueller didn't absolve Trump of all possible crime and wrongdoing. Impeach!

Attached: 1550094425636.png (1287x1159, 1.29M)

>no Oxford comma
What bird cage liner is this from so I can never read it

>Also, your precious Mueller Report looks like it fails to protect people who were behind the FISA plot.
False. By charging russian shitposters on facebook and filing a case that will never be tried over the havking they have established a predicate for the illegal spying

As the hacker case will exist forever anything that would interfere with that case would also have to stay hidden, such as the 'evidence' of the hack itself

In this particular matter Mueller absolutely accomplished his goal

Attached: 1529143015309.jpg (600x400, 98K)

>using the wikipedia approach to rewriting history
Sad.

>That's Mueller's definition not the DOJ definition.
the DOJ dont get to say what laws mean, thats the courts job. guess what immediately precedes that definition you're whining about? Mueller citing the case which set the precedent that "proof of such a crime is not an element of an obstruction offense". United States v. Greer, 872.

wanna guess why barr didnt cite a case when he said Trump didnt obstruct justice? because he knew he was talking out his ass the whole time

and in what way will it be great?
please explain.

why do you think I changed my IP lol

Yep, it's how they get warrants to investigate without any real evidence. They would go to judges and cite the articles as a reason to investigate. Of course, never documenting that the FBI agents wanting to investigate were the source of the articles.
The same trick they used for watergate. It didn't work this time.

AP style doesn't require an Oxford comma. Or it may even prohibit it -- I forget which.

>The entire report if full of DNC spin.
Cool, nothing has changed - they are going to continue believing what they want to believe. But since Trump has done fuck all and thus /ptg/ has nothing to talk about of substance I guess this will be the topic until November of next year.

Skellyanne ran the most successful campaign possibly ever, deposing the Democrat stooge entrenched with monoloithic media, university and deep state support, winning by most likely a landslide in the face of blatant, video-recorded machine vote flipping in favor of Hilldogg.

They believe they desperately need to alienate her from Trump's 2020 run.

Attached: 1550439271684.png (900x900, 331K)

>Hasn't realized Kellyanne is leaking
The absolute state of the fake base.

I’m talking about Obama’s words and his desperation. Not qanon.
They are not untouchable and they are not all powerful.
GAME OVER.

Attached: D7EFEC44-8FB9-43B1-B2C7-EC59F56ED7AA.gif (500x375, 188K)

Attached: 1555209769756.jpg (500x486, 23K)

trumps and friends are going to stand up on the national stage and make the most blatant and stupid lies in that classic way of his that is just so fucking funny, and as the evaporative cooling effect makes his supporters ever more insane and republican infighting grows, its going to be like 2016 turned up to 11 but with trump on the back foot instead of whoever the democrat is.

If Muller was confident that Trump committed obstruction, he would have said so in the report. But no, he said well this might be obstruction but we don’t know his motives so I’ll not reach a conclusion. The attorney general is in charge of determining charges, which he said no charges were warranted.

>They are not untouchable and they are not all powerful.
You don't get this without believing in Q nonsense so just stop.

>a three year long coup attempt has failed
>it's nothing of substance
You shills are pathetic.

Are you illiterate? capable does not mean it did.

A coup that Trump is going to do nothing about but take to Twitter and bitch like a woman, like he has about every other single thing instead of you know DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT

>Trump went up against the entire machine multiple times, and dominated them each time
>Y-you have to believe in Q in order to believe that Trump can win
You haven’t been paying attention.

Attached: 3584AFD4-826E-4B81-94E2-E419A3F2B804.jpg (429x914, 546K)

and you believe thats whats going to happen?
hmmm ok.

I hate you stupid demoralization kikes that clock in at this time of day. How shitty is it to live in Israel?

Trump is the machine you fucking moron.

There is current ongoing litigation between Concord versus Mueller you know.

I wouldn't know Moshe, I don't live in Tel Aviv like you do. Demoralization is now pointing out Trump's all talk and no action behavior, amazing.

Trump is the anti-establishment candidate. Nice try though.

Attached: 25D21E41-F1F8-46E2-94C5-831AEFB3935F.png (628x676, 115K)

Same old scripted response. It's pretty obvious that every day, at 9 AM in Israel, this board gets flooded with demoralization shills.

Attached: stone1.png (290x102, 4K)

Oops, I broke the shill.

>Clocks in from Tel Aviv
>Accuses others of being literal JIDF
Moshe please, your being too obvious.
>I did a thing
No retard, it's called CAPTCHA fucking up.

seems you did.....again please.

>They are not untouchable and they are not all powerful.
Eric Voegelin gave a name to it, it's called "metastatic faith", people that have this belief that even if they do nothing, reality itself will change and everything will be better, a paradise on earth.
The world is bad and ugly, and those bad people are the ones winning.

Easier to "trust the plan" than admit you got conned.

I thought Jews were nocturnal. And why would the Israelis be against Trump?

trump is good, why the media is a bunch of faggots like always.

OOPS
They always pull that same line too
>Let me call this guy rabbi in order to legitimize my presence here!

Attached: 7D6C4494-FB14-4D1E-BD21-727368BEADD7.gif (320x384, 1.31M)

>210479211
I love when /ptg/ places 1 posts like these to give the sense there are actual posters left here

Because they're losing viewers and they have literally committed murder in the past to protect their profits.

A Circuit ruling is non-binding outside their circuits.

For example, 9th circuit rulings hold no jurisdiction outside the 9th circuit and can be ignored by the state of texas since they fall under a different circuit.

Quoting a district judge much less a circuit judge is much more weaker than quoting a supreme court judge.

You don't seem to understand the concept of jurisdiction or circuit splits.

The final word is always left up to the supreme court.

no lol. the obstruction investigation was never going to say he obstructed justice no matter what he did.
>a traditional prosecution or declination decision entails a binary determination to initiate or decline a prosecution, but we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment
>we determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgment that the President committed crimes
However it would have said he didnt do it, if thats what they thought, but they didnt
>f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment

That’s a great way to describe a situation that you clearly know nothing about.

The Democrat House can't even pass any legislation and everything they do, gets vetoed.

My understanding is Mueller got the protection in the discovery process he wanted

Lurk more. Mueller broke DOJ rules when it comes to special counsel regulations.

Mueller ignored Congress's legislation that was part of the special counsel law that demands Muller make a decision.

Why don't you look up the special counsel regulations, you shill.

Attached: D4eqjsXWsAAItb3.png large.png (1387x249, 50K)

>hyphotetic "justice" in the future
Sure, so far, reality proves me Democrats are untouchable, they can do anything they want, if they are their donors they can kill some nigger on his apartment on a regular basis, if they're some senator they can pay minors for sex and keep being so, even murder someone and nothing will happen.
While the guy that commited the crime of winning an election against one of them gets investigated for nothing, they don't get investigated at all.

hypothetic*

(c) Closing documentation. At the conclusion of the Special Counsel's work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.

The Special Counsel regulations do not allow or even tolerate what Mueller and his team did with their half assed refusal to not make a decision.

You are aware that if a prosecutor doesn't even bother to follow guidelines, it actually damages his case, right?

Cool, what does that have to do with anything I said?

>>it is important to view the President’s pattern of conduct as a whole. That pattern sheds light on the nature of the President’s acts and the inferences that can be drawn about his intent.
That's called hearsay and conjecture. It has no legal standing in a court of law.

2020 landslide

youtu.be/1b0xnAq65mE

Attached: d23.png (986x1356, 295K)

Trump declared an emergency and the military is complying with Trump's order regardless of Congress.

You are going to deny it happened?

And how is Trump doing nothing. He's appealing every decision made by activist judges and this month, the Supreme Court is already handling the 2020 Census Question.

>You are aware that if a prosecutor doesn't even bother to follow guidelines, it actually damages his case, right?
Not in the court of Schiff but that also doesnt matter

There will not be an impeachment so the real questions remaining are as follows
>1. Will the democrats help themselves or will this drag on like Bengazi and piss normal people off
>2. Will Barr pursue any further action against the DOJ / FBI officials who created this mess

Attached: AllThingsConsidered.jpg (428x344, 20K)

Reminder that we stand with Israel because they have decades of experience against mudslime menace.

>Trump declared an emergency and the military is complying with Trump's order regardless of Congress.
Border is being overrun but we wouldn't want reality to get in the way of our bullshit, now would we?
>And how is Trump doing nothing
You're joking, right?

>undue influence
I'm sure glad we have Mueller's wooly asshole to dispense nuggets like these because there is no statute that defines what undue influence is for the president, who is ultimately in charge of all investigations.

Trump has it in the bag, but if Kushner is running his campaign he might fuck it up somehow.

They are the menace.

>if Kushner is running his campaign
Take a look around /ptg/, seem like it's working? This is what your donations are paying for.

J predicted this.

Attached: 1490451217409.jpg (527x588, 133K)

jew. never surrendering even after you have lost is talmudic. this is jidf right here. They always have to have the last word too.

first, this wont be challenged in the supreme court, this will go to congress who will decide whether or not he obstructed justice and whether or not they should impeach him.
second, no sane interpretation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1501–1517 is going to conclude what you want it to lol. If it did then you could bribe a judge to find you not guilty of a crime and then be immune to obstruction charges because that judge found you not guilty.
>section 1503 contains the Omnibus Clause, which states that a person who "corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice" is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice. This clause offers broad protection to the "due administration of justice." Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process.
find me ONE case where a defendant was found not-guilty of obstruction of justice because they were innocent of the initial claims or charge.

>we determined not to make a ---traditional--- prosecutorial judgment
THAT's what you're going with? Really? On top of the fact that he did make a prosecutorial judgement, just not a traditional one, do you actually think Barr or Trump wanted him to make a traditional prosecutorial judgement?

nigger

Attached: 1555453993091.jpg (768x768, 51K)

What does this mean