Why are almost all guerrilla movements either Communist or Islamic? Why are there no revolutionary far-right movements?

was meant for

historically there were plenty of right wing paramilitary organizations that delighted in butchering civilians (usually of a particular "race", skin color or religion)

you're simply uneducated

Because the far-right are useful idiots who defend the status quo

>The Buddhists Shoahing the Rohyngias can be seen as "far right People" defending themselves from the Religion of peace
Targeted expulsion doesn't mean far-right politics though. If so Stalin would be considered far-right.

>historically there were plenty of right wing paramilitary organizations

Very little.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_guerrilla_movements

yeah, but if you know about the shit that happened there, you know that it was right wing buddhists got them out.
My Point is, that right wing shit outside of Europe and the US will never get labeled as right wing by the MSM for political reasons

Because most of us choose to shitpost on Jow Forums all day rather than organize with other fascists.

I suggest you get out there and do that.

Isn't ISIS far right?

Because there are no far-right states to fund such guerilla movements

>the far-right defends the status quo of globalism, open borders, miscegenation and transgenderism
Kill yourself you autistic faggot

Thats why the government freaks the fuck out over the far right than the left yeah? Ok.

Because middle class people support far right when shtf. No need for guerilla movements.

They're an Islamic Theocracy. They don't really have an internal economic system since there is no infrastructure.

What do you mean by the far right for starters. There are plenty of religious movements across the globe killing leftists and there were a ton of military dictators last century.

Far right militias have existed. Look at Yugoslavia. Difference is they are the only ones that call out ZOG so the powers that be go into overdrive to Shut Them Down

They did had an economic system...

They believed in private property, they would tax the civilians and would distribute money to the poor. Maybe they were closer to socialism?

Because left-wing revolutionary groups are usually fighting against right-wing dictatorships.
The right is usually in power especially in central amercia

>get out there and start sieg heiling in the forest with guns, take pics

Yeah see how that works out for you. There is no solution except accelerationism and collapse. Put grease on the slope. Organizing far-right militias is just a quick ticket to the grave. Nothing will come of it.

there was some in ukraine if i'm not wrong but weirdly they get funded by eu and supported by jews.
i mean thats the difference : islamist are funded about guerillas far leftist in south america i don't really know how they do (maybe by usa for destabilize governments and still having weak states focus on them instead of focusin on drugs cartel ? idk)

Because that is the very point if a revolution: establish communism or Sharia. No one in his sane mind would follow this bullshit unless it's been shoved down his throat. Also because revolutions aim to overthrow natural order, and communism doesn't like nature, it depends its time finding new reasons to make equal a bunch of stuff that is clear as day different.

If it was this good, it wouldn't need armed groups to defend it.

>hurr durr governments are leftist!
>ignoring the fact that these governments protect private property and perpetuate capitalism

Attached: 1553196240652.png (754x1024, 409K)

ISIS:

> Private property
> Militarization
> One man leadership
> Anti-Democracy
> Anti-Communism
> Anti-Secularism
> Theocracy
> Totalitarian
> Propaganda for the state
> Recruiting kids into the army
> Believes in expansion
> Believes in traditionalism
> No women rights
> State arranged marriages possible
> High birthrates
> Glorifying war and martyrdom
> Believing to die for a higher order
> Very idealistic
> Actively fights communists (PKK)
> Actively fights modern secularists (Assad, Iraqi regime)
> Actively fights leftists (Philippines, Congo, Western Africa)

How do we classify ISIS? Are they closer to the left or to the right?

No funding. Islamic terrorists are funded by the US and Saudi Arabia. Commie rebels were funded by the Soviets and China.

>what is neoliberalism

Gee it's almost as if the world is more nuanced than your "leftism good right wing bad" autistic viewpoint

Take your meds and try not to jerk off too much today

Economically Third-position
Socially Conservative
Politically Theocracy.

I'd say neither left or right.

Either way, they aren't our friends

Fuck sand niggers

Pinochet

Pinochet wasn't far-right. He was an anti-Communist reactionary Minarchist military dictator.

neoliberalism is capitalism, rightist ideology are capitalism

Typically because rebels come from the 'losers' of society. The most dysfunctional with the least to lose. The right wing is by definition conservative and loyal to the current establishment and therefore the most functional. If your state has right-wing rebels you're likely in a two-state i.e. civil war scenario.

Because the CIA won't fund right wing groups. Well, except in Ukraine.

Yeah I guess that's why antifa runs around with impunity. While the current far right is under a microscope.

Attached: 1551395745310.png (289x289, 41K)

Because you don't need to be a terrorist if your opinions are supported by facts and logic

You literal fucking brainlet. It's like I am arguing with a down syndrome kid

Neoliberalism includes support for open borders, multiculturalism and LGBT bullshit. That is the current status quo of almost every western country. The far right is against all of this, and the far-right is also third position meaning they do not support capitalism.

Fucking kill yourself dude. You are low IQ, low energy human trash

The right has conserved absolutely nothing except securing the 1% place at the top you absolute moron.

Attached: 1503665554058.jpg (1920x1080, 1.09M)

Yeah this kid is fucking retarded. Neckbearded faggot

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts

Literally every armed conflict in the WORLD has either Islamists, Communists, or African tribe shit

LITERALLY ALL OF THEM

Economically left, socially right wing as fuck

Because the Right is the one that builds and rebuilds. Leftists are only good at self destruction

>guerrilla movement

They tend to happen in piss poor states, piss poor people like free shit, the left & communists are all about free shit (in theory)

Attached: 78767867867.jpg (298x409, 22K)

Nice picture, remember when all those militant American Nazis saved the west? Actually I think they just larped and faded out as the cringey faggots they were.

Because right wingers organize at national level.

But muh evil violent white man!

Attached: 1553519672813.png (757x615, 184K)

>t. kike faggot

Probably because antifa aren't as autist enough to shoot up churches

All those policies benefit capitalism
>muh turd position
It's still capitalism you retard.

Attached: 8e17a249d643043caf036009fdc25c39ac9cef05.jpg (3256x2808, 2.86M)

Right wing revolutions usually are military coups

Attached: 1480513451004.jpg (1588x1932, 639K)

>Actually I think they just larped and faded out as the cringey faggots they were
I don't think you know what larping means. Rockwell had hundreds of followers and gave dozens of speeches at major universities. If that's "larping" to you then you're retarded.

Because whites are larpers.

This time we try inside job

*thumbs up*

Attached: 1547047226589.jpg (736x673, 112K)

>Why are guerilla movements always X
Because these things can't actually maintain a society. All movements start as guerilla movements, even the Nazis and early US had guerilla elements before coming to power but that's the difference. They actually come to power upon victory, at which point they become the new establishment. This doesn't happen with leftism, since once they win, their poorly thought out ideology results in their victory being hijacked by people who actually know what the fuck they're doing, hence
>Not real socialism
All movements have guerilla elements, what's unique about leftists and Islamists is that they're perpetual guerillas, on account of their ideologies being insufficient to maintain a society upon victory.

we are ideologues of peace

Attached: bicycle.png (393x516, 268K)

Ironically most guerrillas in the 19th century were right wing, like the Chouans, the original Guerrillos, etc.

George Washington was far off from being far-right and independence movements rarely have a united ideology.

I'm not glaring over your autistic infographics.

Third position rejects unfettered capitalism but also rejects the abolishment of private property. Hitler's economic model took Germany from buying loaves of bread with wheelbarrows of cash to an economic superpower in less than 10 years.

Now do us all a favor and shoot yourself in the fucking head faggot. No one will miss you.

This is big brain stuff

Try to understand autists. I know it's hard

far right movements are always reactionary

yeah the GOP has done such a great job of conserving. At least neetsoc have principles.

Actually... Didn't they have a congressional baseball practice shooter and that fat kid that shot up a church. Not Antioch, but anotner one. The thing is that the media will cover for antifa.

Attached: sigh.jpg (960x1033, 230K)

Islam in general has elements of proto-socialism but it also defends certain property rights. Wealth distribution and state control of resources are something that has historically been promoted as a part of an Islamic state, with Muslim caliphate having one of earliest formal welfare states and Islam has always been a movement from among the lower classes. There is also a notion of "classless society", with a poor pious man being seen as higher standing than a rich hedonist. The theology is pretty conservative though in social areas.
Islamism is kinda like Catholic distributism in my opinion (in general terms), its a communitarian ideology that promotes conservative culture in framework of some kind of economic egalitarianism. I'd say its Third Positionist. In modern times, Islamist movements have had some influence from socialism. Khomeini allegedly was partially inspired by Marx in some ideas, Hizb-u-Tahrir is also known for its influence from how communist parties operate and some of their ideological rhetoric.
Btw idealism and child soldiers aren't a left-right thing. Many right-wing movements have been idealistic and both leftists and rightists are known to use child soldiers.

Because white nationalists have no power/control.

Their own women are sleeping with negros, Indians, chinks and other ape-races.

Pageantry and a lot of pretending that what you're doing is significant. The definition of a larp.
>The GOP are a bunch of feckless losers who accomplish nothing
>le based Nazis they accomplished nothing sure but at least they accomplished nothing

fucking not even worth laughing at, that's pathetic and they have the nutsack to call themselves radical and reactionary

The GOP are great.... Everything is fine....this is fine. I hope your home is invaded by a pack of niggers this weekend.

Attached: Untitled(1).jpg (646x581, 100K)

Philippines is not leftist m8

Islamic societies (even more secular ones) tend to be the only which lean to the left/ third position economically, and to the right socially. Hell, look at Kemalism. In its purest form, you’re basically looking at a highly nationalistic social democracy with major central planning.