ll criticism I've hear on this board about Chairman Yang have been from misinformed stances.
I honestly think this election cycle is gonna play out like this:
>Yang builds support this time similar to Bernie for 2016
>Beto or Bernie gets DNC nomination
>Easy reelection for Trump
>2024 Kanye all over the election headlines
>A bunch of establishment cucks to compete against
>Yang has become mainstream and Trump passes the torch
Why did Democrats and normies and leftists all work in unison to obstruct the central parts of President Trump's agenda? Why did corporate America, deep state, 3 letter agencies, hollywood and the donor class all work to obstruct his agenda?
There were so many common sense key things. I'm not keen on voting for anyone other than Trump now after all of this. Sorry. You've stoked a pretty much unconditional loyalty for the man in me and it's 100% the fault of people like you, and I am someone who started out only vaguely-sorta supporting him, but the behavior of all of the powerful ruling contingents of our society and their attempts to destroy him seem to prove to me that he must be 100% legit in some way or another even if I don't see eye to eye with him on 100% of his policies.
lmao the yang gang is back didn't you ppl get busted for conspiring to post an overflow of support on Jow Forums and shit
This fag understands the ideal timeline.
standing 100% with anyone for these reasons seems like NPC behavior. granted, you have a point with him being legit in that the establishment treats him like a glitch in the system. you can also see that hes a flawed leader and a shitty representation of our degenerate culture. he's an exploitative slob that the unwashed masses supported because hillary was worse.
Our current plurality voting system, where everyone selects a single preference and then the person with the most votes wins, is viewed negatively by election scientists, for several reasons:
>It’s vulnerable to a spoiler effect, where a third-party candidate can take just enough votes away from a candidate to cause them to lose, even if that candidate would be preferred to the eventual winner.
>It can cause strategic voting, where voters don’t vote for their favorite but rather the person they like who is most likely to win.
>Especially with a party-based primary system, it leads to partisanship, as centrist candidates, despite having wider support, lose out to candidates who appeal to the fringes of each party.
There are many alternative voting systems that are superior to plurality voting. We should move to a ranked-choice/instant runoff voting system, a system that has recently been implemented in Maine and is being explored by many other localities.
Education in America starts too late. There have been massive benefits shown to offering pre-kindergarten options to children throughout their lives, especially for those from low-income families. It also increases sociability, and it relieves the financial burden of finding daycare for families who struggle to afford it.
>Pre-k and early childhood education have been proven to get kids off to a better start, and it also relieves families from having to find and pay for daycare for their children when they are 3 and 4. Other countries are investing in it, including China, and we need to as well for the good of our children and families and our long-term competitiveness as a country.
>you should like yang because hes going to win
jesus what an argument in his favor
>standing 100% with anyone for these reasons seems like NPC behavior
Yeah no it's not tho NPCs literally do the opposite and go with the flow. I'm sorry. Try to twist it and spin it all you want. Fact is that he had an absolutely objectively necessary agenda that Democrats about 2/3rds of the country actively tried to obstruct at the behest of the donor class. It's not "NPC behavior" to try to resist the donor class and their agenda. "NPC behavior" is the opposite of that, it's blindly submitting to the donor classes plans.
You need to learn about the hegelian dialectic and the real plan that is being enacted, because you obviously don't know what it really is. It's not even a secret, it's been openly stated from day one. Pic related.
Your picture depicts wonderfully what's wrong with this country. You voted for Bush, you got betrayed. You voted for Obama, you got betrayed. You voted for Trump, you got betrayed. You vote for Yang?
That whole 1000$ is just another bait shit similar to Trump's "Hillary is going to jail". It won't last long or never will happen if Yang ever becomes POTUS.
I recommend Yangfags to start to educate themselves in Basic Economics and you will (hopefully) quickly realize why UBI is never going to work.
pls explain why UBI in this scenario wont work. im open to
im not arguing the hegelian dialectic or the fact that trump is dismantling some sick shit
im saying that trump as a person and a leader is by no means ideal and 100% backing all his decisions is the equivalent of disowning your own intellectual autonomy.
what do you think of the massive foreign aid we've given to isreal in relation to the satanic nwo globalist thing?
Somewhere between 2.1 and 2.5 billion humans currently own a smartphone. While early models were released as early as 1992, the first iPhone (a good line-in-the-sand for widespread adoption of the technology) was released in 2007. In a little over a decade, these machines have become ubiquitous throughout the world. In the USA, around 70% of adults have smartphones.
What about children? Research suggests 22% of young children, 60% of tweens, and 84% of teenagers currently use a smartphone.
While these devices provide unparalleled access to information, their impact on the mind is barely understood. Researchers are just beginning to look at the impact focusing on a screen all day has on human development, and the conclusions are devastating.
There has been an unprecedented surge in depression, anxiety, and suicide, and a marked decrease in sociability. Teenagers are spending more time worrying about whether their online acquaintances like their recent post than they are in person with their friends hanging out and developing social skills. The average teenager spends Friday nights at home, interacting with a machine, instead of out with friends at a game or event.
Those who have worked within the industry describe the work they’ve done in stark terms. Often relating apps to slot machines, they say that the smartest minds of a generation are spending their time getting teenagers to click on ads and obsess over social media posts to see how many acquaintances respond or react to their posts.
In short, many experts are worrying that the widespread adoption of a poorly understood technology have destroyed the psyches of a generation.
We need to diminish the influence that (((mega-wealthy individuals))) and companies have in our elections. While we must push for a Constitutional amendment to allow our campaign finance laws to properly limit the power that the (((top 1%))) have, we must act much faster to save our democratic processes. To do so, we must make it possible for all Americans to contribute to candidates they feel strongly about, in order to drown out the voices of the (((few))) who can spend millions of dollars to influence our politicians.
In a world without automatisation the concept of UBI just can't work out. It might be a different case if we would have automatized nearly 100% of the industry, which didn't happen yet (and probably won't for at least the next 50 to 75 years. Also considering the fact that the greatest economic bubble (debt; look ratings) in world history is still growing, I don't know if we ever can make it. It's probably gonna take a lot longer until we reach that point). As long as this non-automization exists, the more the Price/wage spiral will go insane if we do UBI aka it would become worth nothing in short to mid-term. And that's just one of the major weaknesses.
The economy is not suited for UBI. It never was. All the so-called "social experiments" with UBI are bs, because they are just focused on one person or a small group of the country. It's a whole different matter though if you would initiate UBI to a whole country.
>im saying that trump as a person and a leader is by no means ideal and 100% backing all his decisions is the equivalent of disowning your own intellectual autonomy.
How can you say this to me when I specifically said in earlier posts to you that I don't support everything he does from a policy point of view, it's just a massive strawman on your part.
>what do you think of the massive foreign aid we've given to isreal in relation to the satanic nwo globalist thing?
Giving aid to Israel isn't that weird despite what Jow Forums says. Without Israel it would be a Muslim caliphate there. IDK. Everyone can throw up their hands and say "OMG U ZIONIST!" it's not like that at all, it's just the objective reality that the entire region gets a lot more hairy and destabilized and hostile to us if there is a Muslims caliphate rather than Israel there. IDK.
I mean there are massive problems here in the US with lobbying interests like AIPAC and proposed laws that would make it illegal to boycott Israel (insane and obviously unconstitutional) but I don't even believe that Trump as president would have any unilateral power to do anything about that stuff, so IDK. Plus it's pretty objectively unfair to judge someone who has picked 100 huge fights for not picking 101 of them. Or a 110 of them. Or a 120 of them. Or whatever. I mean it's politics, not a dictatorship, there are elections and political alliances and donors to worry about and this is true of anyone who gets in, and it's just deliberately insane or dishonest to try to disregard that context, as is frequently done on Jow Forums.
I just don't see you as having any real argument here bud. It just seems dishonest to me. "Hurrrrr yeah guys, I totally love the right-wing agenda and so much of Trump's agenda, but lets actually totally ABANDON it and put in someone who stands FOR THE EXACT POLAR OPPOSITE INSTEAD! THAT WILL REALLY SHOW THEM MWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Like yeah, just no. It's dishonest, I'm sorry.
This
And I'm not even trying to be mean to you or pick a fight but that's what it is, dishonest.
chicom spy and useful idiots both get vanned
You're just a butthurt fag begging for niggergibs.
Fuck off back to plebbit.
not gonna lie i misread part of your original post. chalk it up to brain fog or something
not sure if it was clear in my OP but im not staunchly anti-trump.
securing the border, promoting western ideologies/culture/people, and attempting to prevent what seems to be inevitable degeneracy through drugs, sexuality, and low IQ are not limited to one political party or approach.
id never say we should totally abandon trump and go full steam ahead in any opposing direction. thats precisely why yang seems palatable. everyone ive talked to who has a strong conviction against yang isnt getting info from the source.
It's OK user
>attempting to prevent what seems to be inevitable degeneracy through drugs, sexuality, and low IQ are not limited to one political party or approach.
Honestly I'm a libertarian, and not a partisan at all, and I'm not even that much against degeneracy or any of the things you said, and I believe drugs including heroin should be legal, but I fail to see any reasonable, realistic way that you could think the Democrat party isn't the party solely responsible for pushing those things and the Republican party, and in particular the Trump wing of that party, isn't solely responsible for struggling against them right now.
And I mean shit, just to reiterate, I'm a libertarian and this is the shit I hate about the Republican party, lol. But your conclusion to me just seems objectively the polar opposite of reality.
Imagine how fucking stupid you would have to be to shill a chink on a white nationalist board.
the dems are CLEARLY pushing for this. they don't try to hide it and all their party leaders are proud to show it.
yang himself has said that he is only a democrat because of the spoiler effect when it comes to third party candidates in a first-past-the-post voting configuration. he clearly isnt involving himself in identity politics and hes not pandering to the emotional left.
Jow Forums is a board of peace and free thought, where better than here?
good, then im free and clear
this board is literal shut-ins thinking they're defining US policy with fanfics and hyperbole about every facet of existence