>Voting to deport illegal immigrants is political violence
>They can now justifiably murder you in self-defense
What is the argument against this?
Voting to deport illegal immigrants is political violence
>upholding the law is political violence
HONK HONK
>Voting to deport illegal immigrants is political violence
This is false.
The argument is that they are commiting political violence by entering the country illegally and using public services.
So the deportation is self defense.
This feels like the best argument, but he would just say the degree of violence isn't the same, because the illegals are only committing negligible violence on you and/or you had already committed violence against them by fueling the drug or funding the CIA to destabilize them countries or whatever.
How would you respond to that?
is that the debate guy who came out a pedophile?
Actually voting for immigration reform doesn't qualify as violence so the entire argument is invalid. Violence requires physical harm to a person exercising your democratic freedom to vote definitely doesn't fall into this category
Call him a conspiracy theorist because the fbi behind the drug epidemic is a conspiracy. And then say its the fault of the governments in south america for not policing their citizens enough to crack down on the cartels shiping drugs to the US.
1) It's not political violencw. It's literally encoded into US immigration law to deport people who come in illegally. There literally should be no reason to vote for it in the first place since lawmakers and the executive branch have a sworn oath to defend and uphold the law per the Constitution, and this law is very much constitutional since the executive branch is given the power to do this through the Constitution. It's not violence in the least, let alone violence that justifies self-defense.
2) Tell that dumb spic manlet to go back to playing his bing bing wahoos and let the men in the room talk about things that require more than two braincells to process and not create facetious and retarded non-arguments.
When illegal immigrants come in they commit a crime.
Whites should deport them out of self defense.
kill them on sight if they want to make idle threats like that, gonna kill me in 'self defense' when youre the one invading the country? have the gaul to even suggest it
>pop pop pop
just shoot them at the border now
>taxation is violence
>I can now justify violence against tax collectors
>gaul
gall*
deformed midget can only be more than a deformed midget in clown world.
He is an agent of clown world and he will defend it with his life.
Force is the gold standard. If you don't understand this you don't understand politics. This retard is merely arguing for using force in a different direction, against whites. See: militia people getting arrested for detaining illegals (I know it was technically for other things, but come on don't be fucking stupid). That's using force against the previously accepted order.
there. it's always the ones defending themselves in our civilization that are labeled evil.
daca recipients are there illegally?
I like his argument for mass migration because how open borders makes the ultra rich and mega corporations even richer and then you can tax the rich and the corporations in order to give gibs such as job training and welfare to all the natives that have been displaced by the mass migration.
Very solid neo-liberal thinking. Based and /gdpgrowthpilled/
I would honk
>What are tax havens?
>Also, implying that politicians aren't paid off to not fix the tax code by said corporations in order to protect their bottom line in addition to gaining some political clout
It's such a retarded argument because it assumes that humans are good and they aren't able to be corrupted by money and this fact won't influence that at all. Again, Destiney is a fucking idiot along with most people involved with IBS like the Guntlord, Adam Cokeski and all these other faggots. The only ones that I think are intelligent is the autistic Irishman Patrick O'Shaunessy (maybe because he can easily read people and can actually put forth coherent and somewhat valid arguments when he is debating) and Zidan (mostly because he left IBS after realizing it's full of literal mouthbreathers and it didn't pay the bills like his promoted position at his company did).
Never argue legality with this midget. He'll always just use the morality argument and make you look like an idiot.
You mean make himself look like an idiot?
Are you actually this bobble head retard? Because you base your argument on something that is completely false
>Voting to deport illegal immigrants is political violence
daca was unconstitutional so yes. President can not, by himself, make illegals legal.
>What is the argument against this?
there is no need for an argument as the first statement is false.
>political violence
voting to take away guns or to forcefully demographically shift the country in a one sided partisan way is political 'violence'
Therefore we have the right to find where Steven lives and kill him.
Use the appropriate picture please.
>debating
Who gives a fuck. The time for words is over. It's time for ethnic cleansing.
>desTINY LITERALLY loses every debate.
I think the more interesting issue is how Destiny remains on the platform when smaller commies get suspended for talking about genociding Israel?
reddit.com
>upholding the law is political violence
it is and there is nothing wrong with that as long as the laws are just and designed to benefit those who are of benefit to society.
>>Voting to deport illegal immigrants is political violence
But voting to take people's hard earned money by force isn't?
>smaller commies
Literally no such thing. He is as small as humanly possible.
Bernie Sanders or some leftist candidate wanting to tax carbon emissions would be contributing to the downfall of certain industries and people would lose their jobs. Sanders is "literally" committing violence against those people. Do they now have the right to preemptively attack Sanders voters?
Leftists want to continue flooding white countries with low IQ brown immigrants who are a burden to the economy because they pay less in taxes than what they receive in benefits. Leftists are literally enacting violence against net tax payers like whites. Can we now preemptively enact violence against leftists?
>Now I'm not saying they ARE justified - I just wish leftists considered that their political preferences have a real impact on real people.
Destiny's argument is retarded.
I just want to gloat about the fact that not a single dumb fuck on his subreddit can refute what I said in principle. Feels good.
BTW u guys mad that Destiny got BTFO so hard by AltHype that he never wants to talk to him again?
youtube.com
bitchute.com