Should Old Testament be removed from the Bible? It's all about Jews and their conquest to kill the gentiles

>Supersessionism, also called replacement theology or fulfillment theology, is a Christian doctrine which asserts that the New Covenant through Jesus Christ supersedes the Old Covenant, which was made exclusively with the Jewish people.

>Supersessionism has formed a core tenet of the Christian Churches for the majority of its existence. Christian traditions that have traditionally championed Covenant Theology (including the Roman Catholic, Reformed and Methodist teachings of this doctrine), have taught that the moral law continues to stand.[6]

>Subsequent to and because of the Holocaust, some mainstream Christian theologians and denominations have rejected supersessionism.[7]:2–3

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism

Ah yes, i think OT is a good redpill on Jews

>Should Old Testament be removed from the Bible? It's all about Jews and their conquest to kill the gentiles.
no, its about bronze age non-talmudic hebrew warriors and their attempts to kill moloch worshippers

John 4:22 is what he's referring to.

Should the alphabet be removed from schools? It's all about reading and writing.

Yahweh’s laws are divided into four classes, commandments, judgments, statutes and ordinances. The COMMANDMENTS are the major rules governing man’s duties to his God. The JUDGEMENTS are the rules governing man’s relation to other men. The STATUTES are the general rules for the health, prosperity and peace of the nation. This includes the dietary, agricultural, social and economic laws. Finally, the ORDINANCES are the religious regulations for the various festivals, sacrifices and offerings and the levitical priesthood.

Of these laws, only the ordinances have been set aside by Yahshua in the New Testament.
The other laws of Yahweh are still in force.
Thou shalt not steal, and thou shalt not commit adultery are still as important today as when Moses carried the stone tablets down Mount Sinai. However, we do not expect to gain our personal salvation by keeping the laws, this was never the purpose of the laws. We do expect to gain the peace, prosperity and good order of the community. We have tried to do this by enforcing the laws of our city, state, and our nation. Let no one be misled into thinking Yahweh’s commandments, judgments, and statutes have been set aside by the New Testament, these are permanent laws.

People say Christianity is all spiritual, so we have abolished the law. Not so! In Romans 7:14, Paul tells us the LAW is spiritual. In Romans 3:31 Paul says, “Do we then make void the law through faith? Yahweh forbid: yea, we establish the law.” Just as our perfect God exists forever, so do His perfect laws. Psalm 111:7-8 tells us, “The work of His hands are verity and judgment: all His commandments are sure. They stand fast for ever and ever, and are done in truth and uprightness.” Yahshua affirms in Matthew 5:18 that not the smallest part of the law will pass away, until heaven and earth pass away. Revelation chapter 21 shows us that this is not until after the millennium and Yahshua’s triumphant 1,000 year reign.

rosettedelacroix.com/?p=19544&

>Should the series of books on why God forsook the Jews and turned to the gentiles be removed from the Bible?
That's a negatory, ghost rider.

prots and "cultural" """christians""""" hang first

Oh yeah the ten commandments The really important part of the OT Gods rules of life

No, old testament confirms that Jesus Christ is fulfilling the prophecy of Pslams 22, and is the real messiah the Jews had waited for. The zionists had rejected him out of greed, and convinced the other Jews and non-Jews that he wasn’t the messiah. Though Christianity was suppose to rid the Jews of their vile ways, they’ve continued with their ways and now they’re in the synagogue of Satan as they do sin.

Agreed completely, though you don't have to be gnostic and just need to look back to early church history when the majority of christian groups running around thought that.(the old testament god is different from the new one)

Look up the first ever biblical canon if you poltards don't believe me.

The orthodox beliefs though are far better for controlling the masses which is why they were chosen over the other christians(also they had no qualms about killing which most christians did)

Here is one to flip your lid. It's all logic.
1John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

If you not party to the Covenant, then you are not party to it's laws.
Only Isrealites could transgress the law.
Don't believe me ?

Rom_4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.
No transgression, No sin.

So when Jesus came to die for the sins of the world. It was for ONLY the world of Isreal. Why ?
Only Isreal could sin.

Mat 15:24 He said in reply, 'I was sent only to the lost sheep of the House of Israel.'

Eph 2:15 having abolished in His flesh the enmity d – the torah of the commands in dogma – so as to create in Himself one renewed man from the two, thus making peace, Footnote: d Also see Col_2:14, Col_2:20, Act_11:1-3.

TLDR/
Only Transgression of the Law is sin. No Law, no sin.
Law is the rules of the covenant which God Only made with Israel.
Jesus came only for Israel.

No. The old testament is like a puzzle that is only truly unlocked after you have read the New Testament. God "chose" the Jews to prepare the way for Jesus, but after that most of them rejected him and the "Jews" today are damned.

Attached: 1555887734200.jpg (1584x1660, 634K)

Yes, the Old Testament is of the Devil. Marcion was right.

No, it wasn't. And no, he wasn't.

Attached: 1555864616140.jpg (1400x2700, 448K)

>Should Old Testament be removed from the Bible?
Are you able to make your own decisions? If you have the Bible and it has a part that you don't like and that part is removable, then remove it. Why ask Jow Forums?

You should re-read that passage because you’re not relaying it accurately.

They don’t kill the women and children and the rapist didn’t come to make restitution but to ask for the woman’s hand in marriage.

This. It's filled with their misinterpretation of God.
Tons of examples of the older sibling losing his birthright (status as chosen people) to the younger.
>Cain and Seth
>Esau and Jacob
and so on. The kikes have been trying to kill the new chosen people ever since.

Sometimes gentile suck. Don't forget, niggers are gentiles. And many of the people killed in the old testament were the moloch and astoreth worshipping people who's descendents are pushing the gay shit these days. The pagan mystery school tranny cults back then were wicked. Sodomy, temple prostitutes, child sacrifice, etc. I would wipe them all out again today. The sodomites, etc.

No.
It is the foundation of the New.
Many of its prophecies are yet to be fulfilled.
Isaiah 17 & Ezekiel 38 are looking good for 2019.

Attached: image.jpg (1583x2048, 394K)

no its context to why they do what they do, how they act, why their covenant was broken with God, and proof they continue to do these things today

Also a prophet of god, Isaiah, predicted the jewish rejection of Christ.

Yes but Christians became the new Israel after Israel became corrupt

No, God said to all peoples (Descendants of Shem and Japeth) that through Ham (the third son of Noah after Shem and Japeth) was cursed for intermixing with the Cain bloodline, thus putting a curse on all Caananites. Cain's bloodline was racemized with non Adamite peoples (blacks), as well as God said to always separate from Caananties. If you let them live among you, you too will be cursed like the Caananites, plagued with ungodliness, degeneracy.
A separate space for every race.

Israel was Jacob. Jacob had many sons. One of them was Judah. Jews are the descendants of Judah. There were many other sons and the abrahamic blessing was passed on to Joseph who in turn passed it on to Ephraim and Mannasseh. Those last two eventually went north via their phoenecian trade-posts. The names carry a certain meaning: fruitfull and forgetful.

Do the math. Jesus was a redhead.

Attached: 67345345346.jpg (640x749, 94K)

Biblical Jews no longer exist, only kikes.

Nope. Isreal never stopped existing. It was in dispersion. Isreal forgot who it was.
The Jews were never Isrealites.

John 8:33 is the wake up pill

"They (The Pharasiees) answered him, "We are Abraham's descendants and have never been slaves of anyone. How can you say that we shall be set free?"

See they are not Judahites (Tribe of Judah) or Isrealites (The Lost 10 Tribes) or Hebrews (the original 12 tribes of Isreal/Judah).
Jesus tricked them into telling the truth.

"We have NEVER been slaves." The Edomites were never slaves. The Hebrews were.
in a little place you may of heard of, Egypt..

where they are depicted as blond...
Israel has always been ONE bloodline.

Attached: Greek general meeting with a Isrealite leader - Temple of Hukkok.png (900x492, 929K)

Supersessionism is correct, dispensationalism is not

The Bible and all its content is not there to serve your racial or ideological/political goals.
Its goal is to reveal God's plan and will for all of us, not only the white race.

>don’t kill the women and children

Yes I must have confused that with a different Canaan tribe the jews committed genocide against probably Heshbon. In Shechem they only massacred the males.

>On a later sojourn, two sons of Jacob, Simeon (Hebrew Bible) and Levi, avenged their sister Dinah's rape by "Shechem the son of Hamor the Hivite, the prince of the land" of Shechem. Shimon and Levi said to the Shechemites that, if "every male among you is circumcised, then we will give our daughters to you and take your daughters to ourselves."[7] Once the Shechemites agree to the mass circumcision, however, Jacob's sons repay them by killing all of the city's male inhabitants.[8]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shechem#In_the_Hebrew_Bible/Old_Testament

However in other cities like Jericho and Heshbon the Jews do in fact genocide all the inhabitants including women and children.

>come to make restitution

He circumcised the entire male population and offered to "convert" to Judaism. In response the jews killed all those "converts" of whom only one actually committed any crime.

>Ham (the third son of Noah after Shem and Japeth) was cursed for intermixing with the Cain bloodline,

That's not in the Torah

The changing of the covenant (from Jews to Christians) also has precedent in the OT, with the Samaritans, the Northern Kingdom, splitting off from the Judean Israelites after the reign of Solomon, and losing rights to God's covenant

>32 When Sihon and all his army came out to meet us in battle at Jahaz, 33 the Lord our God delivered him over to us and we struck him down, together with his sons and his whole army. 34 At that time we took all his towns and completely destroyed[a] them—men, women and children. We left no survivors. 35 But the livestock and the plunder from the towns we had captured we carried off for ourselves.

Deuteronomy 2:32-35

biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy 2:32-35&version=NIV

No, instead all the non cannonical texts should be placed along with the Bible including early gnostic works to create a super Bible similar to the Tal-mud. We could embed some pro white pro European text as well that lets us get away with loads of stuff and then refer to it every time anybody gives white christians flack for anything ever.

Prove god exists.

Define God first.

>>Ham (the third son of Noah after Shem and Japeth) was cursed for intermixing with the Cain bloodline,
>
>That's not in the Torah
That's correct. Ham's sin was uncovering his father's nakedness. (translation: Sleeping with his mother) the offspring was Caanan.
Ham's sin was incest. Caanan was not black but his descendant's race mixed.

How about start with the first book of the OT user? You really do not know of which you speak
>Genesis 4:9–12, "Then the LORD said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” And he said, “I do not know. Am I my brother’s keeper?” 10 He said, “What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to Me from the ground. 11 “Now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. 12 “When you cultivate the ground, it will no longer yield its strength to you; you will be a vagrant and a wanderer on the earth.”"
Cain's bloodline was cursed, and such anyone who mixed with it is cursed as well.

this video may be hard to watch for some, but it's the truth

skip to 30:00
youtube.com/watch?v=36g3auOm9HA

Genesis 48
Genesis 49
Jeremiah 31:9
>for I am a Father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn.

In Genesis 48 Jacob adopts Ephraim and bequeaths the name Israel to Ephraim.
Genesis 49 Jacob blesses Ephraim above all the other tribes of Israel.

Ephraim by biblical definition is a Gentile. His mother was Egyptian. The Old Covenant is necessary because it identifies who Jesus came to save with His New Covenant. The House of Israel.

The Leviticus faggotry laws are rendered null by the New Covenant though.
This is one of the big problems with Sola Scriptura, it lends to the acceptance of things such as faggotry, while the authority of pretty much all Catholic and Orthodox rites agree homosexuality is wrong due to reasons revolving around the Natural Law, which I've seen American Liberal Protestants argue doesn't exist (which is why they accept things like premarital sex, divorce, and fags)

Not really possible, but I can give you the next best thing:

A1a: we live in a causal universe
A1b: every effect has a cause
A2a: if we follow that chain back far enough we reach “the beginning of our universe”
A2b: If an in-universe cause preceded this, it is not “the beginning of our universe”
Therefore our universe began with an external cause;

B1: premise A1 is foundational to discerning truth through science
B2: premise A2 is a tautology.
Therefore arguing against A requires you to argue against the validity of the foundation of using science to discern knowledge.

>not understanding the old testament
>wanting to remove it
OT has nothing to do with the Jews as we know them today, and NT would be completely meaningless without the OT and wouldn't make any sense.
Also pic related.

Attached: 1555890575734.jpg (851x391, 157K)

The (((Jews))) of today would be stoned if they were in a Levitical town.

Christianity was spread from as far as Spain to all the way to India by 70 AD.

OT is the example given of how civil government is supposed to work - the NT is how individuals get saved. It's different subject matter. But they come back together again in a Christian-nation. Our government should have 'sharia' type principles but our individual lives should be based on grace and forgiveness. When Christ returns there will be a 'genocide' that makes the conquest of canaan look like a girl scout party.

No Ephraim was Jacob's son.

Genesis 48:1-6 NJB Some time later, Joseph was informed, 'Your father has been taken ill.' So he took with him his two sons Manasseh and Ephraim. (2) When Jacob was told, 'Look, your son Joseph has come to you,' Israel, summoning his strength, sat up in bed. (3) 'El Shaddai appeared to me at Luz in Canaan,' Jacob told Joseph, 'and he blessed me, (4) saying to me, "I shall make you fruitful and numerous, and shall make you into an assembly of peoples and give this country to your descendants after you, to own in perpetuity." (5) Now your two sons, born to you in Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, shall be mine; Ephraim and Manasseh shall be as much mine as Reuben and Simeon. (6) But with regard to the children you have had since them, they shall be yours, and they shall be known by their brothers' names for the purpose of their inheritance.

Born to you in Egypt. They were his biological sons.
and gentile does not mean what you think it means. It's a Latin word. the word used in the OT is goy and Goyim.

What an absolute joker. Seriously... he's saying that "all the first-born are mine" refers to human sacrifice. If that joker would have read the bible, he would have known it was refering to a state of holyness. The next sentence of it literally reads: "I set apart as holy every firstborn in Israel, whether human or animal. They will be mine. I am the LORD."

The way he quotes God (with some demonic sounding voice) just goes to show the evil intent of that satanic little fucker. Ridiculous.

The jews didn’t kill the men of Shechem. Simeon and Levi killed them all. They weren’t Jews, because their brother Judah was the father of the tribe of Judah.

>I set apart as holy every firstborn in Israel, whether human or animal, they will be mine

remember that God demanded animal sacrifices? he also wanted human sacrifices
there are many verses in the bible which touch on this. it becomes even more clear when you read the Tanakh (jewish bible, untouched by the words of Christian revision). The ancient jews would sacrifice their firstborn to their volcano demon god

youtube.com/watch?v=8u3z69YpLx0

Fuck off and die, heretic

They were NOT his biological sons. They were Jospeh’s sons you liar. Jacob adopted them. And gentile appears first in Genesis 10:4, and is translated from GOY. I know what it means you sower or discord.

Take off the meme flag, schlomo. Without the OT, you have "progressive" Christianity. With just the OT, you have kikes and evangelic right wing Christians. Together and in proper context, you have a based religion that teaches traditional values whilst also valuing charity and helping each other of your own freewill. Together, you have a religion that kikes fear.

He came to save the world. He came to generally minister to the sheep of the house of israel for the short time on earth, but ultimately died to save the world.
John 12
47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.

Go on then what does goy mean ? What does gentile mean ?
You can't even seem to grasp, " Now your two sons, born to you in Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, shall be mine; Ephraim and Manasseh shall be as much mine as Reuben and Simeon." without calling them gentiles.

Firstly what do you mean no Christian reads OT, maybe you're referring to "Christians", because I always started reading the Bible from the begging. And everyone that is even slightly knowledgeable about the Christian faith is familiar with the OT. Secondly you seem to have completely missed the actual point of the OT. It's not about cruel God and barbarian Israelites, it's about the fulfillment of Gods promise in Gen 3:15.

Technically they would be Israelites since they are sons of Jacob (Israel) with whom God made the third covenant after Jacob beat an angel(or an angel representing God?) in a 1vs1 wrestling match.

“I will make nations of thee"
"I will make GOY of they"
Genesis 17:6

H1471 - גֹּי גּוֹי Goy

In the Old Testament, which was written in Hebrew, whenever you see the word Gentile in your English Bible, the Hebrew used the word goy if it was in the singular, or the plural form of it, goyim. This word means precisely nation and nothing else.

Remember Yahweh told Abraham in Genesis 17:6 “I will make nations of thee.”

In the Hebrew Yahweh said, “I will make goyim of thee.” It would have been utterly too silly to
translate this, I will make Gentiles of your descendants. The translators translated it correctly
here as nations. You remember when the twins, Jacob and Esau were still in the womb of Rebekah
their mother, they struggled together and she prayed to Yahweh to tell her why this was so and
Yahweh answered her, “Two nations are in thy womb.”
In the Hebrew original this says, “Two goyim are in thy womb.” Certainly Yahweh never told
her that two Gentiles are in thy womb. Here the translators had to translate it correctly as
nations. But, this is exactly the same word which they translate as Gentiles in most other places.

Definitions matter

So let's go with the whole neither Judean or Gentile canard. What does Gentile mean ?
"The words Gens and Gentiles have a special meaning in the system of the Roman law and in the Roman constitution. This is the official Roman definition of gentile by Festus:— "That is called Gens Aelia which is composed (conficitur) of many familiae. Gentilis is both one who is of the same stock (genus), and one who is called by the same name (simili nomine),
1 as Cincius says, those are my gentiles who are called by my name."

SAME family. SAME race.
SAME family. SAME race
SAME family. SAME race
That's what Gentile means. It doesn't mean non-jew, or another race or another family.
The Greek word used in the NT is ethnos which means “race"
in fact in my 1966 Catholic bible it says race and not Gentile..
see the thread ?

Yes I have no idea how the fuck white romans even agreed to this jewish filth being in Christianity.

This is not even KJV, so what is the point. Yours is a soi version. Post KJV at least.

the bible should be removed from the world

Remove the meme fag Schlomo.

Yes, Egyptian =\= Israelite, and Ephraim by blood was Egyptian, that means Ephraim was a Gentile, and had to adopted into the Hebrew nation because by blood he was a foreigner. Thank you.

Mines from the Greek Septiugent translated by ISREALITES for the Pharaoh Philidelphius.
Yours is from 10th century Masoretic Jews who did everything they could to show the Jews as Israelites.
Why do American Prods just lap up the Jewishness ?
Sorry I'll take the 250BC Isrealite version over your 1000AD Jewish one.

Give me the KJV of John 3:36 ... saved by beliebing.

i don't use as a meme it's the flag adjusts the most to my identity

Half Egyptian. Getting an Egyptian Priests daughter would be like marrying Ivanka Trump.

You have no clue as to what you are talking about. Nothing. Zero.

First of all, within the bible the word "El" can refer to a multitude of beings or objects of great power. Then there is the entire cultural and Enochian context of such things. Then there is the anthropological side of it all.

Watch this, from 53:00 to 60:00.

youtube.com/watch?v=0PsY8Q38oyQ

Attached: 1540215873046.jpg (1750x1724, 1.1M)

I think there are some new testament passages against homosexuality

>no Christian reads OT,

I don't know of anyone that reads it, most of my Church cared about giving everyone feel good messages that can be applied to modern life (for example: just be yourself and God will love you). No one much cared about the exploits of an ancient tribe in the Levant and their quest for total domination over their neighbors.

God bless you, brother. I’m exhausted from the Spirit today. So many good tidings. I gotta get some rest. Happy Easter.

God bless you too, brother.

Underage b&

>This level of cope kek.
Without the Old Testament, the New Testament is unironically worthless, which is why christcucks are bound to be the eternal shabbos goys of kikes in spite of how much they bleat about that one Bible verse about "da synagogue of satan!!1!!".

Attached: jesus-christs-genealogy.gif (469x382, 16K)

You need to find a better church that actually teaches scripture

They’re already on it.

Attached: D35AB90E-AD76-4B8C-9F99-704B93CE14D1.jpg (750x964, 354K)

Also, in relation to this video you posted... why do you think Abraham was mad when he saw his people worshipping the golden calf? What do you think that signifies? Why do you think he was mad? It's only logical for there to be similarities between the OT and earlier pagan practises because the OT ALSO is a historical account. The tribe of Judah always dabbled with babylonion mystycism and what not... why do you think Jesus himself was rejected by them ffs? It's one of the main themes for crying out loud. Yet people like you NEVER stop to consider it all. Nope... just random snippets taken out of context to serve their own satanic agenda. And you are the user who's falling for it all.

Attached: 1543969861059.jpg (800x772, 249K)

Mits'rayim is Hebrew for Egypt, Mits'rayim was a son of Cham (Ham), and was not cursed like K'naan (Canaan), thus was of adamic seedline.
There were MANY Shemetic Egyptians.

To kill the PAGANS. Big difference.
Also you need to keep the law bud, Jesus said so.

this

Fuck it all. It's a semitic religion and jesus was a jew. It has nothing to do with whites. Europe was destroyed by this religion and many genocides have occured over history as a result.

Christianity has nothing to do with it, only European Paganism LARPing as Christianity AKA Catholicism

Old testament is a story book. The new testament is the truth. If you believe in Jesus you should disregard the old testament as jesus' promise of eternal life BTFO the commandments and other "lessons" God gave in The old testament is an exciting story book with lots of fucked up shit, but if you love my boy Jesus you shouldn't believe in the old testament. Make your choice guys.

Attached: 1539300117444m.jpg (913x1024, 222K)

If the Jews are really so crafty as to pretend to oppose Jesus and have him killed, and then plant the seeds for a religion which will place them as leaders, but only 2,000 years later... well... not sure we have much of a chance.

THIS

Also, Matthew 5:17
>Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

Paganism is nothing what christianity says and doesn't have nearly as much blood behind it. And it really has nothing to do with the perverse catholic church either. Pagans respect life. They were wiped out because they wouldn't submit to christ. Sound familiar?

Martin Luther is a hero.
>”Here I stand, I can do no other.”
Literally Nathan Hale.

All jews are hebrew, but not all hebrew are jews. Judah was but one son of jacob (Isreal). There were many others. Some of them (Eprhaim and Mannasseh) traveled into europe through their phoenecian trade-posts. A large portion of european peoples are of hebrew descent. For example, all readheads are.

Europe florished the moment Ephraim turned north in a time it was still a pagan backwater while the middle east was florishing with art, culture and science.

Then europe became fruitful and forgetful indeed.

Attached: 13243245436547.jpg (484x580, 101K)

>They were wiped out because they wouldn't submit to christ
Good, get rid of the prostitutors and degenerates that mask themselves as our forebears

Imagine being so fucking stupid you actually think Jacob existed. He is an origin myth for the jewish tribe dumbass.

>lets remove all the prophecies which Christ fulfilled
Fkn tard

There is much truth in this.
Rome is what made Christianity universal to play to the masses.
before that it was very insular and only for the lost tribes of Isreal.