Whiter than you ahme-

Are Tajiks based and redpilled?

Imagine being a Ukrainian conscript in the Soviet army.
Afghans capture you, treat you well, teach you their local customs, give you a 15 year old qt wife.
It's the fucking 80's and there is still communism in your home and Russian occupation. Of course you would stay!

youtu.be/QkFjIGA1SII?t=277

alexander's army fucked their way through Afghanistan 2000 years ago.. they are white

Bactria was white.

afghanistan has never been fully invaded

Dagestan?

Those are Afghans, not Arabs. Plenty of Indo-Aryans live there just like India and Iran and there isn't just one tribe/race but a lot of different ethnic groups in one country in those places. I mean Turkey isn't all Turks, there are plenty of White Greeks from the time of Anatolia living there, same with Syria and Chechnya and even North Africa too. Indo-Aryans didn't just congregate in Europe and no where else. Granted these tribes of Indo-Aryan left overs are nearly all Islamic excluding the ones in India who are Hindu but still Indo-Aryan nevertheless.

Attached: 1553396579658.jpg (719x1024, 206K)

Quit fapping and increase your T levels unless you have a genetic defect like Asians do and you can just cheat like them and use hairloss cream that boomers use on your face in order to get your body to start growing a lot of facial hair in the places it should.

It's been fully invaded a fuckload of times.
You probably mean that it's never been fully conquered, but that's very debatable.

They did. The fact is, only a few genes select for depigmentation and eye color. Also, if you zoom out of a PCA plot, then West Asians (Middle Easterners) are honestly not that far from Europeans. They are adjacent to Europeans but don't overlap.

Attached: geneticrace.jpg (572x532, 58K)

seethis guy didn't conquer afganistan ,but now hes genes are apart of it.

They've been invaded by everyone, it's just that no one outside of the mongols and I believe Alexander the Great were able to hold it for long periods of time. Everyone else from the British, Soviets to even now with the US pretty much take over but fail to hold the land.

Attached: 1555138234558.jpg (240x255, 30K)

The blue eyed / blonde Afghans cluster with the other Central Asian Afghans* and not with Europeans, you faggot.

>Arabs
What? Arabs don't populate Afghanistan. As I said, it's like India, a shit load of different Ethnic groups living in 1 country.

I know. I made a typo because I am tired.
>As I said, it's like India, a shit load of different Ethnic groups living in 1 country.
The point is the ethnic groups cluster with each other on autosomal DNA plots. Get a White looking Iranian and compare his genetic distance to a more brown looking Iranian, and they relate far more closely than to any European. Race is not skin-deep, and I don't give a fuck what people look like.

oh well still my point stands there are a shitload of different ethnic groups in Afghanistan, including Indo-Aryans.

this is a russian rapebaby
more in Syria soon

Attached: загружено.png (280x276, 109K)

I'm not saying they're 100% pure, I'm just pointing out that they're Indo-Aryans, just like in India and Iran. Makes sense considering that's on the path the Aryans took anyways out of Northern India that there are leftovers around.

nah Brown Afghan + Russian =/= that. There are plenty of Russians living in Afghanistan from the Soviet Afghan War with Brown Afghan wives, their kids look just as brown as their mothers. I think RT did a special on it idk.

Indo-Iranians, called Sintashta, mixed out by 1700-1400 BCE. That's about 1000 years before the Achaemenid empire, roughly. Ancient Persians were never White.

Attached: Persian_v_04.jpg (8199x6167, 3.34M)

whiter than you

Attached: rotherham 1500 child rapes by paki.jpg (1809x1874, 697K)

he is totally a Russian mutt
if you actually lived in Russia or any easten european slav country and saw the people you would know

They aren't white, they just have shared PIE ancestry with Europeans.
People need to separate being white and being Caucasian; all whites are Caucasians but not all Caucasians are white.

> "I mean Turkey isn't all Turks"
Furthermore what people call Turks aren't actual Turks, as in the Central Asian Turkic people.

Maybe just abandon the word White and opt for Europid instead? Otherwise, I agree with you. My issue is more of one with nomenclature.

Literally no amerimutt is even half as white as OP pic.

Based

Most Iranians and Caucasians (specifically people who live in and around the Caucus region) I've met are pretty based and I get the impression they are in their countries. They have strong racial identity and are wary of a certain tribe.

I think it just needs to be reiterated that white people are specifically Western and Central Europeans with the typical white phenotypes of fair skin and fair hair.
Europid is even more vague than white and I expect you'd find the same problems we have now but even worse. Greeks would be Europids but I wouldn't consider them the same as British/German/French/etc people. That's not a judgement on my part either, I have nothing against them but I just regard them as adequately distant from us to be a different group altogether.

>Western and Central Europeans with the typical white phenotypes of fair skin and fair hair.
Not all Western Europeans have fair skin and fair hair though. Just say Europid. Why do you deserve the label of "White"? There are Caucasus people like Circassians with fair features, but they don't cluster with Europids.

There is some distance between Southern and Northern Europids, true, but you are close enough to be considered one cluster.

This does not represent not even 5% of the arab population. You are nitpicking... Even in some SOuth American countries you can find whites and even aryans. Most look brown.

Attached: 1486608f3426c66c0971bd72817395397a870261fe647482927fee0a14ae81d0.png (573x529, 618K)

Untrue. They are mixed, but the European features originate from the indo-European Andronovo nomadic group. Survive the Jive cites Robert Reich in a video on youtube if you are interested.

Attached: 1533326964821.jpg (1024x606, 73K)

>This does not represent not even 5% of the arab population
its almost like Afghans are not Arabs or something

Attached: 1535398844354.png (797x728, 183K)

> "Not all Western Europeans have fair skin and fair hair though"
There are exceptions like the Basque, some Welsh, the Black Irish, etc but these themselves are minorities within the greater Western Euro genepool. Then there are those within Western Euros that have admixture that bled from West Asia or Africa. Doesn't change the fact that it is more helpful to have your starting point for delineating what qualifies a people as white is the presence of fair features and Western Euro descent.

> "Why do you deserve the label of "White""
Because the term was invented by and historically used to describe Western Europeans.
> "There are Caucasus people like Circassians with fair features, but they don't cluster with Europids"
I already specified that being ethnically Western European was a qualification.

> "you are close enough to be considered one cluster."
If Greeks are considered as close enough to Western Europeans then so would Iranians. In reality you can distinguish them as separate clusters to Western Europeans. On top of that their mannerisms and culture are very alien to Germanic and Celtic peoples. A kind of Pan-Europeanism that "Europid" implies and that would want to place all ethnicities in the European continent close together is just not very helpful or realistic.

Afghanistanis aren't Arabs.

Attached: file.png (450x668, 97K)

>Untrue
Nope, I am right. Even the blue eyes and light haired Afghans and Iranians cluster with darker versions of their racial members.

Also, not even NW Europeans are pure Yamnaya or PIE though. It's true that NW Europeans tend to have more Yamnaya admixture whereas Southern ones have significantly less. However, even in the case of NW Europeans it's around 50%.

>sandniggers are white
>southern europeans aren't

done with this board

i didn't say that, but your still a nigger

>Doesn't change the fact that it is more helpful to have your starting point for delineating what qualifies a people as white is the presence of fair features and Western Euro descent.
All that matters is Western Euro descent and whether people of their respective nations cluster with each other. Stop complicating stuff.
>Because the term was invented by and historically used to describe Western Europeans.
I have issues with this term because fairness is not attribute exclusive to Europeans. It introduces too much confusion too focus more on light features rather than West Euro descent. Also, those exceptions you listed still cluster with you.
>I already specified that being ethnically Western European was a qualification.
It should be the only qualification for being of Europid race.
>If Greeks are considered as close enough to Western Europeans then so would Iranians.
Iranians are not really close to Greeks. This diagram is from a Nature study and shows autosomal DNA on a PCA plot with good clusters.

Attached: 1518445282391.png (1024x997, 620K)

t. shitskin

Attached: dna test.jpg (863x484, 41K)

is not an attribute*
to focus*
Ignore typos*

Most Tajiks live in Afghanistan, "Tajikistan" is only the portion of the larger Tajikistan the Russians managed to conquer.

you seem to have me confused with someone else mister basketball american

Attached: 1535550392402.jpg (805x853, 228K)

On second thought, I think it's best to acknowledge North and South European as referring to a race. No need to introduce the word Europid, but it's best to just make it more widespread knowledge how North and South Europeans form their own clusters and constitute a race.

No need to bring the word "White" into it.

STOP MAKING US LOOK BETA!