The so-called “Nanking Massacre”

the so-called “Nanking Massacre”.

Historically, this was the massacre of 50,000-300,000 Chinese civilians conducted by the Japanese army. This information was exaggerated for the purpose of propaganda.

This is already common knowledge to historians all over the world.

Every single photograph of the massacre either was fabricated, a photo from the Chinese civil war,
listed here:
www2.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Eremn
ant/nankingm.htm

The war in Nanking between Japan and China did indeed happen.
There was a war at Nanking, where they fought against each other but the story of the massacred 50,000-300,000 civilians, this is an exaggeration.

The IWG, USA’s National Historical Team published a report focused on Japanese war crimes titled “Researching Japanese War Crimes, Introductory Essays”. In the report, the IWG analysed the reason why documents regarding the crimes were scarce.
archives.gov/files/iwg/
japanese-war-crimes/introductory-es
says.pdf

Military involvement is necessary to massacre 50,000–300,000 people in Nanking, but no evidence of military involvement in those incidents has been found.

Since most actual Japanese military records were scarce and nothing was found, even by a survey conducted by the IWG.
Historians have been unable to accurately estimate the death toll of Nanking at all.

In the Chinese civil war, the Chinese were nearly 10 times the amount of their own citizens as died in the Nanking Massacre. Here is all the evidence.
Benjamin Valentino estimates that between 1927 and 1949, the death toll among the Chinese between the civil war is 1.8 million to 3.5 million.

It is more than clear that the Nanking story was made "by the communist party of China " to hide the fact that the civil war took nearly 10 times the amount of lives that the so call massacre did, "and encourages people to hate Japan instead of the Chinese communists."

Attached: F39C1C9E-9CCA-48BF-852E-20247318E322.jpg (600x442, 57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

www2.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Eremn
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_Basic_Relations_between_Japan_and_the_Republic_of_Korea
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis
mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000364.html
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Women's_Fund
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Initially, there were only 250,000 people in Nanking city (the Nanking citizens' refugee population at the time of occupation), 300,000 ~ 500,000 people (as insisted upon by the Chinese side) could not have been killed, and there is no logical evidence backing up the number.
Luis S · Smyce, general secretary of Nanjing International Safety Zone International Committee in the war, conducted a damage survey three months after the fall of Nanking. The population of Nanjing is 250,000 people. The findings of these international organizations are generally available materials. So we can easily conclude that the story of the massacre of 50,000–300,000 civilians is an impossibility, and exaggerated propaganda. Even if the Chinese government conducted a survey on the national scale over that half century or more, the remains of the bone of the 50,000–300,000 dead citizens in Nanking were, surprisingly, never found.

Even if the war crimes committed by Japanese soldiers were in Nanking, since the Chinese army at that time did not surrender, the enemy soldiers on the battlefield must have been shot. Even in self-defence, it is normal that Japanese soldiers will attack Chinese soldiers.

And as Chinese soldiers disguised themselves as civilians, becoming clothing soldiers, they are engaging in terrorist activities aimed at the Japanese army. Under international law, even if we treat them, even if we give some civilian damage, international law will be the responsibility of the Chinese army who implemented the strategy. Also, there is no logical evidence that Japanese soldiers attacked Chinese civilians aimed at.
You can imagine that at the time of Nanking, they were at war like Iraq or Afghanistan are now.

The story of the indiscriminate massacres of the general public by the Japanese army have no supporting evidence at all, even by the survey conducted by the IWG.

Anyway, about Nanking massacre.
Take a look at this website, as it is the most clear. You can read everything about the Nanking massacre in detail.

www2.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Eremn
ant/nankingm.htm

And compare the pictures of the Chinese civil war and the Nanking massacre.
You can see that the so-called “Pictures of the Nanking massacre” are just the pictures of the Chinese civil wars.
In Chinese civil war, the Chinese were killing each other 10 times as much as the amount of casualties in the massacre. Here is all the evidence.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War

none of them were jewish. therefore nothing with real value was lost.

>the remains of the bone of the 50,000–300,000 dead citizens in Nanking were, surprisingly, never found.

bones not found. i remember this pattern.

the Chinese are all soulless insect people so I wouldn't care if the Nanking massacre was 10 times worse desu

Attached: when the beat drops.webm (1056x480, 2.92M)

<
""Because ton of monies are involving in this issue.""

<
>>At 2018 again the Korean government decided to force Japan to pay $24 billion with the money coming from the 245 Japanese companies operating in Korea. Korea tries to force this as compensation for WW2
<
"220,000"of korean people is asking at least "$89,051.50 = ¥10000000".
South Korea already forcefully seize the property of some of Japanese companies already.(crazy but this is the reality.)

<
The only reason? Money.
Korea have never stopped asking for compensation, even until now.
<
>in the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty , japan paid The total amount of 800 million dollars [currently converted 4,500 billion yen] to south korea.The total amount of 800 million dollars is 2.3 times the Korean national budget at the time.

<
>And Japan's private assets in Korea amount to 5.3 billion dollars (1.98 trillion yen, about 15 trillion yen now converted) was given for free.
<
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_Basic_Relations_between_Japan_and_the_Republic_of_Korea

<

<
<
and 1994
The Asian Women's Fund
a total of ¥4.8 billion ($40 million) was provided by the Government of Japan.
<
And 2015 ,
the Japan-korea agreements made over comfort women.
"Japan paid 1 billion yen again in 2015."
<
<
>Also, how often we apologize for war criminals…
>We can see Japanese government apologists so often, and the government of Japan itself never denied the existence of Japanese war criminals of the past.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis
t_of_war_apology_statements_issued_
by_Japan
>That’s not a very good look for South Korea, who only seem to be thinking of the money.

Attached: 0FE82068-D04E-42E3-8E7F-DA781B10D669.jpg (256x184, 13K)

>in the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty, the following words are written. "Confirm that post-war processing will be complete and ultimately resolved" (Article 2, Article 1 of the Agreement)>>
<
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_Basic_Relations_between_Japan_and_the_Republic_of_Korea

>However, after the conclusion of the treaty, South Korea utilized the money from Japan for national development without paying individuals for compensation. And never informed about it to the own korean people.
There is no doubt that the economic growth of Korea, which was said to be "the Han River's miracle", was made with the liquidation paid for this and North and South Korea as the driving force.>>

>And the Korean government surprisingly, has not informed the people about even this treaty itself. Is it to conceal what was diverted to national development without paying to individuals? Or maybe it is to aim for an increase in Japanese hate within the Korean people? Or perhaps both?

Newest agreements about comfort woman was 2015.
Announcement by Foreign Ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea at the Joint Press Occasion
You can see everything here
mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000364.html

the Japanese paid repeatedly during 2015, with the Korea-Japan agreements made over comfort women.

"Japan paid 1 billion yen again in 2015."

Almost all the old comfort woman took the money and accepted the agreements at the time of president park, but the Korean media hid it.

Korean government did this:

1. Paid 10 million yen to surviving comfort women based on the Korea-Japan Agreement and paid 2 million yen to the families of dead comfort women.

2. Three-quarters of surviving comfort women, 36 out of 47 people, accepted. Of these, 34 had already received aid.

3. Of the family members of 199 dead comfort women, they also accepted the bereaved families of 68 people.

Comfort women and their families accepted and reconciled the money as a problem with the Korea-Japan Agreement, but only President Moon has provoked and instigated trouble, as if the agreement had problems.

<
<
Also The Asian Women's Fund also abbreviated to アジア女性基金 in Japanese, was a fund set up by the Japanese government in 1994 to distribute monetary compensation to comfort women in South Korea,

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Women's_Fund

Comfort woman was nothing but a paid prostituter.

not Japanese denial of war crimes.

>>
>"Licensed prostitution was legal in prewar Japan, and Allied officials viewed the small part of the overseas system they uncovered as an extension of homeland practices. Prosecuting Japanese soldiers for rape, a notorious crime everywhere the army set foot, took precedence over investigating the circumstances of “comfort women,” who were seen as professional prostitutes, not as unwilling victims coerced into brothels by employees of the Japanese military."

>This analysis is in line with the "Japanese Prisoner of War Interrogation Report 49" written in 1944, which describes "A 'comfort girl' to be nothing more than a prostitute or 'professional camp follower' attached to the Japanese Army for the benefit of the soldiers."

>The report further stated that this practice was not charged with criminal acts.
>"In part to reduce local resentment against Japan and in part to prevent the spread of venereal disease among its ranks, the Japanese military contracted private vendors to set up “comfort stations” for the troops as early as 1932. Again, this practice was known to the Allies but no criminal can harges were filed at the trials."

the IWG expressed disappointment at the preface of the report because the IWG uncovered and released very few Asian theatre records.
thus, the IWG apologized to the Global Alliance for Preserving the History of WWII in Asia,which was involved in the commencement of this project.