They are pretending all this mish mash of the thousands of "pre-Christian" mostly insane fucknutted cults are easily blendable? Druids and Romans hated each other, Germans warred against each other and their ancestra; land Gods, Odinites had their wars against literally every mentioned group, and last time I look the Greeks were buttfucking children...
What the fuck is wrong with these losers?
agree
bump
How to grow a manly beard like that? Is there no hope for us beardlets?
they are controlled oppsition
ITS A GLOWING ORG changed the names many a time THEY WERE AFFILIATED WITH *MICHAEL AQUINO* who loves him some ISRAEL
It's Kristian Vikerness eternal butthurt because he wanted to be an edgy poser metal musician while his family was Christian.
eat solid oats
They didn't war with each other over religion. Can you claim the same to he true with Christianity?
go suck jewsus' circumcised pee pee mutt
bump
This would be a problem for pagans if they felt the same urgent need for doctrinal uniformity that Christians apparently do, but neo-pagans generally aren't the type to care about being "authentic;" if it works take it, if it doesn't leave it. I think it should be clear that any modern person who's interested in paganism isn't interested in carrying on the traditions of the institutions that exist and is definitely looking to go back towards the origins, to simplicity and freedom from mummified doctrine, rather than continue down the rat mazes of the modern spiritualities.
Still less delusional than uniting various Christian denominations in the name of "Western Civilisation".
I actually read McNallen's book. It had some pictures of him somewhere in SE Asia with some "freedom fighters". He was carrying an AK.
He might actually be a CIA nigger.
Just do Orthodoxy.
As a Catholic I have a solution for the Protestant problem which includes the British queen.....a Final Solution.
Not to mention the ones before THEM, such as Basque myth, Barrow culture, early Indo-European, Cro-Magnon, and Neanderthal ( maybe they were pagan).
Heil Odin! Hail Mars!
Different Christian denominations united during the Crusades, but okay.
Redd itors. Beta males. Lost souls
damn, he's got it made if the ever reboot LOTR
>Druids and Romans hated each other,
Caesar used names of roman deities to describe celtic ones. One would think you can fight a war over different things than just religion.
To suggest that their belief systems being different played no part in labeling other tribes/people barbarians and thus making enslavement/subjugation warranted is missing the forest for the trees. Can you honestly say there was never tribal conflict over sacred grounds before Christianity arrived in Europe? Can you claim that vikings did not believe they gained their gods' favor by attacking Christian monks?
First of all pagans had slightly different outlook on action and morality(hence even in Christian Anglo-Saxon England murder was legal), gods were a manifestation of certain aspects they've found as worthwhile within their caste. Attacking Christian monks was just attacking isolated targets, a vent where aggression and domination was being shown. It was it that pleased the gods, not the fact that the targets of these actions happened to believe in other gods. Nietzsche tapped onto it in his philosophy. At the same time, for people outside of warrior caste, such behaviour may have been considered repulsive an easy way to understand it would be a remnant of pagan caste system in Christianity - knights as warrior caste held duels in great regards to judge someone's faults, while the clergy - priest caste - was more supportive of legal processes, that focused on the actions that their caste held dear by the God, or rather gods of their sphere(see the 3 spheres of IE religious life).