Jewish slave owners

It's fake in the sense that there is no proof for those numbers, find them right now, and DON'T just say "check the US census", post the stat right here from the govt website you found it on

Attached: 1454379680205.jpg (230x173, 11K)

No, you didn't. You lying faggot. Take a photo of page 385 right now.

Attached: slaves.png (527x344, 59K)

I've searched in it, and there is literally nothing listing slave owners being majority jewish, go do it yourself and disprove me

Attached: 1548286810643.jpg (2149x3035, 969K)

This is the best video to spread this truth to normies: youtube.com/watch?v=iRsrNMKMPuc&list=LLT0dgFhq5uP1Y9PmwNOAoAQ&index=5&t=38s

Post a picture of page 385 or kill yourself. No one believes your VPN, kike.

Love the immediate Israeli trollage on this forum. Disugsting. The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews tells all

It mischaracterizes the Southern Aristocracy as Jewish.

>At the height of American Slavery
>A bunch of jews not in America, on the other side of the ocean owned most of the slaves.

Attached: Jews slave trade.jpg (1469x1600, 447K)

oy vey

Attached: 8GAqa.jpg (1275x1650, 224K)

Post a photo of page 385 or fuck off

Burden of proof lies on you, larping kike

Attached: 20180628_010232.jpg (620x575, 243K)

No one cares faggot go back to /tv/ where you already lost this debate

I'm using the citations that were just fucking posted.

Show me that 78% of "American" slave owners were Jewish.

A bunch of Jews on the other side of the Atlantic isn't relevant to "American Slavery"

What are you even talking about

t. heeb

Where is the 78% figure then, shill?

>"it's fake"
>"i've searched it and it's not true"
Those are assertions. Prove them. And Kill yourself.

Why this "greek" is the loudest in the "must defend the jews" story?

I've looked at the census and it's nowhere, it's YOUR job to look through the rodriguez book and find the page, since you mentioned it first
Because we're being deceived you fucking idiots, these stats are made to make Jow Forums look retarded because they have NO backing, unlike everything else we've been saying so far

You're calling me a shill while you're the one defending jews? kek

It's in the original picture you collossal faggot. You admit yourself you didn't check the sources in the original pic, yet simultaneously lie and tell people you debunked it. You are a slimy rat and I can't wait for the real Holocaust.

78% figure or bust, prove it or you're a disinfo shill
I'm defending integrity and honesty by demanding evidence, which you don't have apparently

This has nothing to do with slave owners in America specifically and even if the excerpt was relevant you will notice the conclusions are based on "this could have been how it was" versus "this is what the source says"

>"I debubked the image. It's disinfo. Did I check the 1st source? No, of course not."

Fucking die, reprobate.

>Does anyone have sources on this?

Why? Who gives a fuck? What is reading another book or watching another shitty larp-video on youtube going to accomplish? White men have been filling their heads with far right knowledge for 150+ years and haven't accomplished jack fucking shit. It's because white men are disorganized, lazy, cowards. It's that simple. Finding out some facts about Jews to share with your echo chamber isn't going to do a thing. Since the end of the American Civil War the only thing white men HAVE accomplished is to push more (((Christianity))), hand every industry and institution over to their (((enemies))), and LARP endlessly; oh and they managed to put (((Trump))) in office. Nice job.

Attached: 170522092440-02-trump-western-wall-0522-exlarge-169.jpg (780x438, 78K)

I checked the census, and it's not there you liar. You're supposed to prove your claim regarding the book

I never said it did. It merely supplements the topic by showcasing their historic role in it. Now fuck off.

I didnt throw out any numbers. First google result throws up an article from the mid 90s that talks about how per capita jews had more slave owners than whites as sourced from a government census:
>"Using the research of Jewish historians, the book suggests that based on the 1830 census, Jews actually had a higher per capita slave ownership than for the white population as a whole."

The cope states that this is because of unseen variables but doesnt actually refute the number.
Now go fuck yourself faggot, its your responsibility to prove thats wrong.

>"There are 3 sources, and I checked on of them and all of the information wasn't there. Checkmate."

Insufferable kike.

Attached: 1555590476955.jpg (640x450, 102K)

You make an assertion, then you have to prove it shill, take a screencap from your source and prove the 78% figure
N O N U M B E R S

show flag pls

You wouldn't need to supplement anything iv you could just post the information regarding the census involved in the op's picture. Fucking mong.

True and checked

>You make an assertion, then you have to prove it

Interesting, because your assertion was that it's fake and you debunked it. All before I even entered this thread. You exposed yourself, bumped this thread, and I'm sure some anons saved the others images I posted. Topic was a success. Kys.
Negative. Can hide behind 320 million people in America. Not so everywhere.

The OP's picture deliberately cropped the source image which included citations. Kill yourself.

My assertion is that it's fake because you can't prove it, thus if you can't prove it, it's not real. If you can post a cap and prove it i'll concede, but you can't be here acting like a mystic about it.
Here, have one of your kinds of sources
Necronomicon page 274
"memeflags are fags"
"You want evidence for that quote? Well, go find the book on your own and post it for us"

Silly Pajeet, toilets are for the poo, not storing books

kek cope more faggot its a common knowledge fact that has been accepted for decades before identity politics fried your brain

So you admit that you have no proof...

lmao get fucked op

>give proof
>oh but its not my explicitly loaded question proof so you lose
lolk faggot

LMAO the story keeps changing
>there's not links
>oh ok but I can't find any source within the link
>oh ok but I'm too lazy to actually look at the exact specific data myself so I will choose to pretend its fake

Yeah, the census has no evidence so it's not a source, and you possess the other book so you could take a cap of it

100% of slave auction houses were Jew owned

This, it's on page 385 of the same book

So the vast majority of the southern plantation owners were Jews?

Really?

The civil war was actually the north versus the Jews?

Really? And they all died in the civil war I suppose, which explains why there are so few Jews in the south...

Exactly. What else did you think I put in there?

per capita there were more slave owners.

AFAIK I don't see you in that toilet pooskin

based

Goal Post moved
How do they get across the ocean then faggot?

Let me put this through your brain in an easy manner
You have shown me some sources
I check the one that I can which is the Census, the evidence is not there
The book I don't possess in my belongings, so I ask that you provide a screencap to prove your point. You don't, so I'm calling you out for deceiving the thread

Goal post keep moving

Fallacy fallacy being commited at alarming heights

Why dont you faggots just post the evidence so the rest of us knows who's right? Because right now you look pretty fucking stupid refusing to prove yourself.

yeah implying ill waste time to educate you.
Jacob Rader Marcus, a historian and Reform rabbi, wrote in his four-volume history of Americans Jews that over 75 percent of Jewish families in Charleston, South Carolina; Richmond, Virginia; and Savannah, Georgia, owned slaves, and nearly 40 percent of Jewish households across the country did.

This. I don't even like the fucking kikes, I just want to know if I can use this as serious evidence or not

top search on google before i head to work.
www(.)myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/

>sources? haha xd
Oh thanks a lot for that, enlightened user

Attached: tw.png (877x653, 809K)

"100% of Jews are Firefighters!"
In my town there is only one jew and he is a firefighter...

If one were to inquire more neutrally into what role Jews played in the Atlantic slave trade, one would find that it was a considerable one during the formative years of the trade, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and a very small one when the trade reached much greater volume, in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1995/09/slavery-and-the-jews/376462/

By sources i assume you mean a link? because your to loud a cunt for your local Library.

I don't think Grecia is in the Americas lad

>literally such a brainlet he can't use google
books.google.com/books?id=ATq5_6h2AT0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can hardly manage to use google to find a free pdf download of a book? Leads me to believe you should read a book nigger.

I've posted a shitty google library copy for you. Never used it but it might work. Or you could literally just download a pdf after looking for less than 5 minutes.

Conflicting Evidence 100 years later, Oh Gosh i wonder what side ill defend lol

(((user))) are you sure you read it?

>and a very small one when the trade reached much greater volume
Yikes
And still no numbers

That's a pretty dumb claim. A large percent of jews owning slaves would make sense, but a large percent of slave owners being jews, let alone a strong majority of them being jews, is super-easily disproven just by comparing the number of slaves in the US at the time (which is a very large number) to the number of jews at the time (which is a very small number).
>Mr. Farrakhan also claimed that "75 percent of the slaves owned in the South were owned by Jewish slaveholders." In 1860, there were about 15,000 Southern Jews and 4 million slaves. If 3 million (75 percent) were so owned, this would mean 200 slaves for every Jewish man, woman and child, or 1,000 slaves for every Jewish head of household. Jews owned only a fraction of 1 percent -- thousands, not millions -- of the enslaved population.
nytimes.com/1994/02/14/opinion/l-jews-had-negligible-role-in-slave-trade-183202.html

Wew. seems like these pages are barred.
Your move pal

Attached: yew.png (791x503, 115K)

Yeah I forgot the guy that moves the slaves to the slavers isn't a owner himself. Obviously he is morally clean lol

How do you explain to someone that reading a article on buzzfeed about how scientists all agree on these 10 facts isn't a good source?

>per capita
So even if that's true, OP's image is still bullshit. So I guess the Greek was right.

I wouldn't know, I'm using user's source, check what I'm replying to

This is b8 right?

WEW seems like you are being purposefully disingenuous

You're proof is literally an appeal to authority.

Then why don't you give me a link for page 385? I can't reach it in the form you gave me, maybe you're just wrong?

My proof is your source, you fucked up and listed an article that debunked the very thing you wanted to prove

Why don't you use the fucking search function you retarded monkey

Moving the goal posts again? what a sad sycophant you are

>debunked
Firstly I didn't post it. Secondly it didn't unless you are a retard who believes in appeals to authority. This is something every greek should understand, no?

Your body wash and toothpaste you nasty brown fuck.

Thats not what moving the goalposts is. In fact I i'm more focused on the goal than you are. Use the search function you stupid ape.

I don't appeal to that site's authority, he does. He listed it as his proof, but it talks against the very thing he wanted to prove

I've already searched the book, and it is not available for me. The burden is on you for making the claim, the one that you STILL can't provide evidence for

Why would it be b8? It's a really straightforward point. There's a big difference between:
1) Group A was overrpresented for their size in Trade B vs.
2) Most of Trade B was Group A
A large portion of a small number can't be the majority of a much larger number, which is why #2 above is clearly not the case.

>implying there is anyone of importance on Jow Forums